Download Complete Contribution

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Internet protocol suite wikipedia , lookup

Computer network wikipedia , lookup

Piggybacking (Internet access) wikipedia , lookup

Cracking of wireless networks wikipedia , lookup

Airborne Networking wikipedia , lookup

Network tap wikipedia , lookup

Peering wikipedia , lookup

Recursive InterNetwork Architecture (RINA) wikipedia , lookup

List of wireless community networks by region wikipedia , lookup

Passive optical network wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Contribution Number: OIF2001.112
Working Group:
Title:
Architecture, Signaling and Carriers Working Groups
Presentation given on OIF2001.067 Proposal to form a Project on Architectures
and Signaling for Configurable All-Optical Networks
Date:
January 22, 2001
Source:
Adel A. M. Saleh (Speaker) Yassi Moghaddam
Jane M. Simmons
Avici Systems
Lotfi Benmohamed
Corvis
Jonathan Lang
Calient Networks
Angela Chiu
Robert W. Tkach
Celion Networks
Raj Jain
Nayna Networks
Rauf Izmailov
Yoshiharu Maeno
Yoshihiko Suemura
NEC
Subra Ambati
Joe Parker
Opthos
Brian Brown
Bala Rajagopalan
Richard Lauder
Tellium
Malin Premaratne
Redfern Broadband Networks
ABSTRACT: This is a copy of the presentation made at the OIF meeting in Tampa,
Florida on 1/31/2001 related to Contribution OIF2001.067 on “Proposal to form a Project
on Architectures and Signaling for Configurable All-Optical Networks.” At the meeting,
no formal motion was made to form a project. This is currently planned for the next OIF
meeting after some fine-tuning. Meanwhile, contributions in this area are solicited.
Notice: This contribution has been created to assist the Optical Internetworking Forum (OIF).
This document is offered to the OIF solely as a basis for discussion and is not a binding proposal
on the companies listed as resources above. Each company in the source list, and the OIF,
reserves the rights to at any time to add, amend, or withdraw statements contained herein.
This Working Text represents work in progress by the OIF, and must not be construed as an
official OIF Technical Report. Nothing in this document is in any way binding on the OIF or any
of its members. The document is offered as a basis for discussion and communication, both
within and without the OIF.
For additional information contact:
The Optical Internetworking Forum, 39355 California Street,
Suite 307, Fremont, CA 94538
510-608-5990 phone ! [email protected]
© 1998 Optical Internetworking Forum
OIF Contribution 2001.067, January 31, 2001
Proposal to form a “Project” on
Architectures and Signaling for
Configurable All-Optical Networks
Adel A. M. Saleh, (Editor) Corvis
with other contributors from
Avici, Calient, Celion, Corvis, Nayna,
NEC, Opthos, Redfern, Tellium
Contributors to OIF2001.067 Proposal
Adel A. M. Saleh (Editor)
Jane M. Simmons
Lotfi Benmohamed
Corvis
Angela Chiu
Robert W. Tkach
Yassi Moghaddam
Jonathan Lang
Avici Systems
Calient Networks
Raj Jain
Rauf Izmailov
Yoshiharu Maeno
Nayna Networks
Celion Networks
Yoshihiko Suemura
NEC
Subra Ambati
Joe Parker
Opthos
Brian Brown
Richard Lauder
Malin Premaratne
Bala Rajagopalan
Tellium
Redfern Broadband
Networks
Saleh, et al
OIF2001.067 Proposal to form an All-Optical Project
January 31, 2001
Abstract / Motivation
Long-reach optics and configurable all-optical networks provide
economic benefits for carriers in terms of both capital and operating
expenses by significantly reducing the amount of equipment required in
the network. Such networks are currently entering the marketplace, and
there is a desire in the OIF and other standards organizations to
generalize their respective architectural models to include all-optical
networks. This contribution is a proposal for initiating a new project in
the OIF to address the specific features of all-optical networks as they
relate to signaling for automatic provisioning and restoration of optical
paths. Since an all-optical network naturally forms a domain, another
important aspect of this project relates to the more general problem of
establishing connections across multi-domain networks.
Saleh, et al
OIF2001.067 Proposal to form an All-Optical Project
January 31, 2001
High-Level Reference Model for the Current UNI
IP Router *
Optical UNI (O-UNI)
O-UNI
WDM Pointto-Point Link
Core O-E-O
X-Connect with
Full- or Sub-λ
Granularity
O-E-O WDM
Tx/Rx Interfaces
O-UNI
* Can also be ATM switch, SONET/SDH multiplexer, etc.
Saleh, et al
OIF2001.067 Proposal to form an All-Optical Project
January 31, 2001
All-Optical Network Reference Model 1*
IP Router with Built-in
Edge X-Connect Function
Standard
IP Router
O-UNI
O-E-O Edge
X-Connect
AO-UNI
AO-UNI
WDM Mux/DeMuxes &
Tx/Rx Interfaces to the
All-Optical Network
Standard
IP Router
Configurable
All-Optical
Network
“Cloud”
O-UNI
AO-UNI
AO-UNI
WDM Link
All-Optical X-Connects or OADMs
* Saleh, et al, OIF2000.278
Saleh, et al
OIF2001.067 Proposal to form an All-Optical Project
January 31, 2001
All-Optical Network Reference Model 2*
IP Router
NNI
O-UNI
OLI
Proprietary WDM
Signaling & Control
OLI
O-UNI
Tx/Rx Interfaces to the
All-Optical Network
WDM Link
Configurable
All-Optical
Network
“Cloud”
O-UNI
O-UNI
WDM Mux/DeMuxes
(no Tx/Rx Interfaces)
WDM Links
All-Optical X-Connects
* Drake, et al, OIF2000.254 and Chiu, et al, OIF2000.251
Saleh, et al
OIF2001.067 Proposal to form an All-Optical Project
January 31, 2001
Optical Bypass, Optical Reach and Regeneration
An end-to-end optical
path with regeneration
& λ-conversion outside
the O-E-O XC Layer
(Intermediate “cost”)
An end-to-end
optical path with
no regeneration
or λ-conversion
(Lowest “cost”)
An end-to-end optical
path with regeneration
& λ-conversion within
the O-E-O XC Layer
(Higher “cost”)
Another
end-to-end
optical path with
regeneration and
λ-conversion within
the O-E-O XC Layer
(Highest “cost”)
Long-Reach Optics and
Optical Bypass significantly reduce the
needed number of WDM Tx/Rx Interfaces
Saleh, et al
OIF2001.067 Proposal to form an All-Optical Project
January 31, 2001
Some Benefits of a Configurable All-Optical Layer
• In addition to saving WDM Tx/Rx Interfaces because
of optical bypass, as indicated in the previous slide,
...
• A configurable All-Optical Layer, in effect, allows the
sharing of cross-connect ports at the O-E-O layer,
thus requiring smaller cross-connects, which
enhances the scalability of the network
• An All-Optical Layer can more naturally provide
useful optical services like optical Multicasting and
Waveband X-Connection
Saleh, et al
OIF2001.067 Proposal to form an All-Optical Project
January 31, 2001
Forming an All-Optical “Project” within the OIF ?
• Agree on one or more suitable reference models for a
configurable all-optical network layer, including:
– Point-to-point links or rings with long-reach optics and configurable OADMs
– All-optical mesh networks
• Develop all-optical extensions to UNI 1.0 (e.g., AO-UNI, UNI 2.0 ?)
–
–
–
–
–
Formalizing signaling to/from an all-optical layer for connection setup, etc.
Considering regeneration needs for paths longer than the optical reach
Including non-SONET/SDH services, e.g., GbE, 10G-E, OCh, etc.
Adding optical multicasting and waveband cross-connection applications
Assuring that the all-optical aspects are not lost among other UNI 2.0 tasks
• Consider hierarchical, two-tier networks, e.g., with the all-optical
layer acting as an “express-highway” layer
• Treat the all-optical cloud as a domain in a multi-domain network
– Assuring that the all-optical multi-domain aspects are not lost
Saleh, et al
OIF2001.067 Proposal to form an All-Optical Project
January 31, 2001