Download The Moorish Divine and National Movement

The Moorish Divine and National Movement
About nine decades have passed [1913 A.D. +] since Noble Drew Ali [Sheik Sharif Abdul Ali]
officially established and organized a functional and modern social and political forum, conceived and
visualized for awakening and activating the ‘enslaved’, nationally - dormant and unconscious descendants
of the Ancient Moabites / Moors of North America. This Organization and Forum was structured to
address and span the broad and general areas of social needs and spiritual concepts corrections. Economic
and political development, with instructional rules for harmony and stability was addressed and deemed
of paramount concern. Concentric efforts were allotted to ‘true’ spiritual reeducation needs and
necessities to remove the presiding polarized mental state existing amongst the natural people. Other
multifaceted efforts were geared toward Moorish Culture and ‘Proper-Person’ reintroduction - made to
uplift the Moorish Nation of North America.
Noble Drew Ali’s works, efforts and Instructions included knowledge-based directives for enhanced and
advanced ‘functional knowledge’ of Ancient Moabite / Moorish Philology and High Culture Disciplines.
Prudent and proven Government and Civilization Principles were devoted to ‘personal growth’ and
advancement and to family progress, for general corrective improvements. Moors were given knowledge
of ‘true’ Government Order and structure; with a call to ‘enforce’ the Constitution of The United States of
America. Conscious Moors are to take an intelligent, active stand and position on National and World
Issues. Particular emphasis was put upon Moors to be ‘active’ and not passive, and to take our places
among the affairs of men! Thus, in these days, we see the exercising and grooming of those ‘active’
natural persons [Moors] who understand and recognize the ‘formerly - veiled’ truths about their
Unalienable Rights and Birthrights.
Durative of the Medieval Era, and prior to the openly ‘forced slavery’ and the ‘bound freeman’ period
in modern North, Central and South American History, the proper noun, Moor / Maure / More / Mauros
was factually used and recognized universally [according to dialect and language]. That was common
when people of Asiatic / African origin identified themselves or related to themselves. Moor was / is the
‘Identity’ declared when communicating to others. Moors were Ancient Inhabitants of Asia, Africa,
Europe, and throughout the Americas, and Americana.
The ancient and proper name, Moor, Muur, Moroccan, Mauritanian, Moabite, was not only applied
in reference to the natural inhabitants of the Moroccan Empire of Northwest Africa / America (The
Extreme Western Hemisphere) nor just to the natural and political inhabitants of the Provincial Kingdom
of Morocco, Khemet, etc., (The Eastern Hemisphere). The proper ‘pedigree’ natal name, Moor, was
traditionally and customarily used synonymously with the word, African. The contemporary
misapplication of the brand-word, ‘negro’ has a connotative function. The ancient origin of Negro refers
to the ‘Troglodyte Niger’, which is a ‘black chimpanzee monkey’. Negro is a chattel brand name, which
was, with disorienting intent, contemporarily applied to Moors for ‘straw-man’ - corporate adhesion—
contracting, and deceptive ‘nom de guerre’ uses for the benefit of European-Colonial slaveholders, the
‘Corporate State’; for mental—twisting, and for social / political dehumanization advantages.
The Medieval Era (also referred to as the “Middle Age”) deals with the intermediate period between the
‘Ancient’ and ‘Modern’ time periods. The ‘Medieval Period’ generally refers to that time period which
spans from 500 A.D. to 1500 A.D. Most Historians, Scholars and writers use the year 1492 A.D. as the
designated - axis - year for dividing Ancient History from Modern History. Note that 1492 A.D. is the
year when the Moors were defeated in Europe; signaling the colonizing of, and the venturing into, The
Moroccan Empire of the Northwest Amexem (significantly, North America).
Chattel
Chattel is a Law term, which has been, and is, politically applied to human beings who have been
‘dehumanized’ by the U.S. Demos’ artificial - person -constructs, and acts of forced enslavement. Chattel
means ‘an article of goods or a thing’; and is specifically applied, in law, to goods movable and or
immovable; except such as have the nature of ‘freehold’ status. Chattel is also spelled, catel and is the
same word as ‘cattle’. The subtlety of its political use, within society, is to make the apparent ‘distinction’
between a ‘socially and politically-neutered’ or ‘civilly-dead’ human being and that of a ‘common beast
of the field’. (Refer to the William Lynch Papers). Negro is, thusly, a favored ‘sobriquet’ coined by
modern-day European slave-holders occupying North America, in order to regulate and distinguish
‘chattel property’ from ‘free Moors’, other free peoples, or from free nationals, designated as sovereigns
from other free African or Asian National or Political States. The ‘brand’, negro, is Latin and defines as
‘black’, meaning ‘loss of consciousness’ and of ‘social, moral and civil death’. Thus, much emphasis was
put upon that mental and social state of ‘civil death’ and ‘spiritual-death’ and recognized as a person
suffering of a ‘broken’ spirit.
The occupying Europeans’ artificial creation of the ‘corporate - negro - status’ laid the illusory
groundwork needed for the ‘colorable’ erection and construction of ‘false jurisdictions’ and ‘straw-man’
constructs - used to fund and support their fictive claims of authority, legality and law. These ‘colorable’
social / political fictions and jurisdictions were invented for veiling ‘bureaucratized, forced servitude’ and
to carry out ‘birthrights –theft’ against the Aboriginal and Indigenous Moors. Thus, false corporate
jurisdictions are the institutionalized origins for functionally applying ‘color-codes’, ‘color-of-law’ and
the fictionally justified term, “colored people”. The ‘negro status’, in its social nature and profitsgenerating effects, involves activation of the firmly held and undignified ‘Black Code Systems’ - deemed
toward political separation of such ‘neuterclassified’ beings from the illustrious and High Culture
Knowledge of Civilization, and absent from affecting the authority-operative governing affairs of ‘self’ or
that of the Human Family. Lacking an authentic knowledge of the sortilege use the ‘negro-legal fiction’,
denies one a clear understanding of true Law; of true World History; and of High Culture, which gives
stability and supports to Human progress, in general, and to Western social and political developments.
Editorials of Statements Made by Noble Drew Ali
Noble Drew Ali brought the names and the nationality back to the Moors of North America.
The
Forefathers of the Moors had a name and a nationality, but in order to separate the Moors from the
achievements of their fathers, a name was given them which had no connection whatever with the
founders of civilization.
Conscious Moors have a proof now that they are not negro, black, colored or Ethiopian, because these
names were given to slaves by slaveholders in 1779 and lasted until 1865 during the time of slavery.
In the deliberations of nations no consideration is given to a people who are not of a nation. The
Europeans took the birthright away from the people [Moors] whom they forced under bondage. They
were not slaves; they were bound free men.
The subsequent generation, who followed them in bondage, were slaves because their minds had been
subjugated to a European psychology. They were separated from the illustrious history of their
forefathers, who were the founders of civilization.
Question: Who are the Moorish Americans?
Answer: The Moorish Americans are the direct descendants of the Ancient Moabites / Moors, who are the
Aboriginal and ‘true’ natural dwellers of Ancient Northwest and Southwest Amexem. The Northwest and
Southwest Continents (Amexem) are modernly known as Northwest and Southwest Africa. Northwest
and Southwest Africa are contemporarily known as North America, Central, and South America.
Question: Are the Moors Indians?
Answer: No. The misnomers, Indian and Native American, etc., were, and are, the fictitious social and
political creations of European Sociologists and the many deceptive historian descendants of the Colonial
Inquisitionists and Crusaders. The words, Indian, negro, black, colored, Ethiopian, etc., were, and are
‘brands’ and ‘tags’ which were coined by way of calculated ‘sordid mental sorcery’. Psychic Attacks
were conceived and propagated to steal the ‘Birthrights’ of the Aboriginal Moors of Al Maurikanos
[America].
Question: What authority or law binds the Aboriginal and Indigenous natural peoples [Moors] of America
that commands ‘obligatory taxation’, ‘licensing’ or ‘revenue - payments’ to the alien and occupational
Europeans, who have been ‘falsely’ claiming to be Americans?
Answer: There is no valid law, nor rightful authority, by which invading Europeans, occupying the West,
have a ‘lawful’ taxing authority. Taxation without representation was, and is, a fraud, part of Crusades’
Policy, and of forced servitude. European Supremacy Dictums, made against the Aboriginal Moors of
America, is based on destroyed history, altered books, records and by ‘force of arms’. Thus, we trace the
origin of the existing low mental state and unchallenged fraud taxation is manifested from a lack of
knowledge of ‘self’ and Law. Moors have lacked a knowledge of Geography; of Nationality; of
Birthrights; and of the ‘artificial’ function of ‘Color-of-Law’. Color-of-Law is the ‘extortion-based
authority’ used by Europeans for ‘tithe / tax’ operations - forced against the Natural Peoples in the
Americas. In layman’s terms, that condition is known as mental and economic slavery.
Question: Why did Europeans, (who colonized North America) begin to call themselves ‘White People’
and ‘Free White People’? When did the term, ‘White People’ come into popular usage by the Europeans
occupying North America?
Answer: White means ‘purity’; purity means God; and God means ‘the ruler of the land’; thus, the term,
Landlord! Landlord means landowner; landholder; freeholder and ‘mine host’. On this ‘colored’ basis
Europeans falsely claim to be the Sovereigns of the Americas. The phrase, ‘White People’ is of a ‘social
power caste system’, having nothing to do with skin complexion. The ‘White People’ social rank phrase
was usurpingly adopted by the ‘Whiggamore Party’ in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and fervently
propagated for acceptance during the years, 1854 to 1863 A. D.
Question: What does the phrase, ‘Free White People’ mean in Law?
Answer: ‘Free White People’ is an Ancient Caste status term, which applies to ‘status’ and not to
complexion of skin, being a universal Law phrase. Refer to a good ‘Law Dictionary’, which defines
Ancient and Modern Terms of Jurisprudence. The following is an excerpt from Henry Campbell Black’s
Law Dictionary – Fourth Edition- West Publishing Company.
Free White Persons: “Free White Persons” referred to in Naturalization Act, as amended by Act July
14, 1870, has meaning naturally given to it when first used in 1 Stat. 103, c 3, meaning all persons
belonging to the European races then commonly counted as white, and their descendants, including
such descendants in other countries to which they have emigrated. Free White Persons includes all
European Jews, more or less intermixed with peoples of Celtic, Scandinavian, Teutonic, Iberian, Latin,
Greek, and Slavic descent. It includes Magyars, Lapps, and Finns, and the Basques and Albanians. It
includes the mixed Latin, Celtic-Iberian, and Moorish inhabitants of Spain and Portugal, the mixed
Greek, Latin, Phoenician, and North African inhabitants of Sicily, and the mixed Slav and Tarter
inhabitants of South Russia. Free White People does not mean Caucasian race, Aryan race, or IndoEuropean races, nor the mixed Indo-European, Dravidian, Semitic and Mongolian peoples who
inhabit Persia. A Syrian of Asiatic birth and descent will not be entitled to become a naturalized citizen
of the United States as being a free white person. Ex parte Shahid, D.C.Or., 6 F.2d 919, 921; Ex parte
Dow, D.C.S.C., 211 F. 486, 487; In re En Sk Song, D.C.Cal., 271 F. 23. Nor a native-born Filipino. U.
S. v. Javier, 22 F.2nd 879, 880, 57 App.D.C. 303. Nor a native of India who belonged to Hindu race.
Kharaiti Ram Samras v. United States, C.C.A.Cal., 125 F.2nd 879, 881.