Download The Bionic Ear

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Speech perception wikipedia , lookup

Auditory processing disorder wikipedia , lookup

Dysprosody wikipedia , lookup

Telecommunications relay service wikipedia , lookup

Sound wikipedia , lookup

Lip reading wikipedia , lookup

Hearing loss wikipedia , lookup

Earplug wikipedia , lookup

Sound localization wikipedia , lookup

Olivocochlear system wikipedia , lookup

Noise-induced hearing loss wikipedia , lookup

Evolution of mammalian auditory ossicles wikipedia , lookup

Audiology and hearing health professionals in developed and developing countries wikipedia , lookup

Sensorineural hearing loss wikipedia , lookup

Auditory system wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
The Bionic Ear
Iona Ross, Biomedical Engineering, University of Rhode Island
BME 281 First Presentation, October 18, 2011 <[email protected]>
H
impairment is a worldwide problem.
According to Hearing International, more than 600
million people in the world are considered “hard of
hearing” and about 250 million people worldwide have
moderate to severe deafness. The way that we hear is by use
of the three parts of the ear. The most external part, known as
the pinna, “collects” and “directs” sound through the ear canal
to the ear drum membrane. The ear drum detects these
sounds, and sends vibrations to the ossicles which amplify the
sounds and send them to the inner ear. The inner ear, or
cochlea, then transmits these vibrations along the auditory
nerve with help of electrical stimulation from the brain. In
people that have a problem hearing, there is a malfunction in
this process. For some people, sound cannot even reach the
inner ear. These people suffer from conductive deafness.
Those that suffer from sensori-neural deafness experience
problems with the transmission of signals to the brain from the
cochlea. This is more common and is abetted by the bionic
ear.
EARING
Experimentation with hearing began in the 19th century with
two scientists, Count Volta and Frenchman, Duchenne of
Boulogna. Both stimulated hearing using electricity. In 1957,
two scientists, Djorno and Eyries, implanted a single electrode
attached to an induction coil into the head of a patient in order
to stimulate hearing. The result was a brief perception of
sound. Throughout the 1960s and into the1970s, continued
research on stimulated hearing was conducted and the findings
indicated that a multiple electrode output would best stimulate
the auditory nerve of a person, and best enable the person to
hear again. Using this information, Australian professor, Dr,
Graeme Clark, was able to produce the first template for
today’s “bionic ear.” In 1978, his product was inserted into
Rod Saunders and Saunders was able to hear sound.
Professor Clark’s original bionic ear, made with help from
researchers at the University of Melbourne, the federal
government, and a “medical equipment exporter” called
“Nucleus” was dubbed the Nucleus® 22 Cochlear Implant
System. The latest cochlear implant on the market is the
Nucleus® 24 Cochlear Implant System. Just like the previous
system, the Nucleus® 24 has two internal components: an
array of electrodes and the receiver-stimulator, and three
external components that are worn by the person: the
microphone, the speech processor, and the transmitting coil.
How the cochlear implant works is that it essentially “replaces
the function of the ear”, via stimulation of a person’s
“remaining hearing nerves.” In short, sound is detected by the
microphone, “sent” to the speech processor where it is
transformed into electrical code and sent via a cable to the
transmitting coil. From the radio waves of the transmitting
coil, the electrical code travels through the skin to the implant.
“The implant package
decodes the signal” and
the required amount of
current is sent to the
different
electrodes
within the cochlea. Once
these nerve endings have
been stimulated, “the
message is sent to the
brain along the auditory
nerve” and sound is heard
by the person. The other
fascinating part of the
Nucleus® 24 is the NRT
tool technology, or neural
response telemetry, it
contains. This tool is able to record neural responses and can
non-invasively and quickly inform an audiologist if the
cochlear implant is appropriately stimulating the hearing
fibers of the inner ear.
Research on cochlear implants is still very much young in
the world of science. As of right now, even the Nucleus® 24
Cochlear Implant System cannot improve everyone’s hearing.
The system has been able to help the majority of those that
lose their hearing as a result of age, however it has a difficult
time helping young children who are hearing impaired at birth.
A main goal of the future for scientists is to expand the
population in which they can help with a cochlear implant. It
is also to improve upon the clarity of the signals sent to the
brain so that patients have an easier time recognizing what
they hear. Scientists also want to make the cochlear implant
more convenient for people by making the entire device
internal. Research is being done as of right now to implant the
microphone. Work is also being done to improve the cost of a
cochlear implant for people. As of right now, the implant
costs thousands of dollars, not including the appointments
needed to be made with audiologists before and after the
procedure. The hope of scientists is to make the device more
affordable in the future.
REFERENCES
[1] Australian Academy of Science. “Cochlear Implants – wiring for sound”.
2009.<http://www.science.org.au/nova/029/029box03.htm>.
[2]Traynor, Bob. “The Incidence of Hearing Loss Around the World” 6
April2011.<http://hearinghealthmatters.org/hearinginternational/2011/incidence-ofhearing-loss-around-the-world/>
[3]ThePowerhouseMuseum\<.http://www.powerhousemuseum.com/hsc/cochlear/the_coc
hlear.htm>.I USED SEVERAL ARTICLES FROM THIS SITE.
[4] “Cochlear Implantation and Quality of Life in Deafness”. Damen, G. W. J.
A.,Mylanus E.A.M, Snik A.F.M. Handbook of Disease Burdens and Quality of Life
Measures.< http://www.springerlink.com/content/h1q077560x44v93l/>.