Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Hearing loss wikipedia , lookup
Audiology and hearing health professionals in developed and developing countries wikipedia , lookup
Sensorineural hearing loss wikipedia , lookup
Soundscape ecology wikipedia , lookup
Noise-induced hearing loss wikipedia , lookup
White noise wikipedia , lookup
#27: Validating the Effective Attenuation of Passive Hearing Protectors: A TTS Study Melissa A. Theis1, Hilary L. Gallagher2, & Richard L. McKinley2 [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 1Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Technology, 2Air Force Research Laboratory Supported in part by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) METHODS Measuring noise attenuation of hearing protectors in a laboratory environment has consistently yielded higher attenuation values than what is achieved in the field. There has been widespread acceptance in the scientific community that the “gold standard” of measuring hearing protection attenuation, ANSI S12.6 Methods for Measuring the Real-Ear Attenuation of Hearing Protectors (REAT), overestimates the level of attenuation of the protector based on the difference between laboratory and real-world results. The human temporary threshold shift (TTS) was measured in this study to account for the total (air, tissue, and bone conduction pathways) effect of noise exposure on the auditory system. The purpose of this study was to measure the effective attenuation of passive hearing protectors in terms of TTS for individual human subjects with and without hearing protection and compare this response to ANSI S12.68 estimated attenuation results. Results demonstrated that S12.68 attenuation values, when compared to the measured effective attenuation values using TTS, underestimated the level of noise attenuation for passive hearing protectors. Hypothesis: An open ear noise exposure and an equivalent occluded ear noise exposure (under a hearing protector) will produce similar TTS2 i.e. effective noise attenuation of a hearing protector will match the predicted ANSI S12.68 attenuation using the octave-band method. RESULTS & DISCUSSION Individual subject data analysis Independent variables: • Passive hearing protector, noise exposure (duration) y = ‐2.33x + 15.49x ‐ 13.16 2nd2 order polynomial y= -2.33x2 + 15.49x – 13.16 15 12 Open 9 Earplug 6 132 dB Ambient 3 Dependent variable: • TTS2 0 0 2% 12.5 25 50 75 100 Noise Dose (%) Experimental Procedures: 13 volunteer subjects (5 male, 8 female) • Normal audiometric thresholds Open and occluded ear noise exposures (12.5% - 100% daily allowable dose) • 94 dBA noise level • 7.5 – 60 minute duration • 2nd order polynomials were calculated from 94 dBA Open and 4 kHz Occluded TTS2 forMax TTS Response Earplugs 18 TTS (dB) ABSTRACT the open ear responses to determine the effective noise dose for occluded ear exposures. Using quadratic formula: y = -2.33x2 + 15.49x - 13.16 y (TTS2 , occluded ear) = 1.5 dB x = 2% effective noise dose ANSI S12.68 Predicted: Effective Dose based on TTS: 100% 2% Noise dose comparisons per subject for each device Comparing the Predicted to the Measured Noise Dose using TTS ‐ 2 Circumaural Noise Dose (%) 120 S12.68 Predicted Dose Measured Effective Dose 100 80 60 40 • Graphs illustrate the differences found between the ANSI S12.68 predicted noise dose using the octave band method and the measured effective noise dose for all 3 devices 20 0 PreDPOAE (DoD Instruction 6055.12) 85 dBA – 8 hours – 3 dB per doubling exchange rate •ANSI S12.68 describes the octave band method, the “gold standard” for estimating effective A-weighted sound pressure levels under hearing protectors •The human temporary threshold shift two minutes post noise exposure (TTS2 ) was used to accurately assess the true effect of noise on the auditory system because it is the only method that can account for all of the potential sound transmission pathways. Noise Exposure Post-Exposure TTS2 Measurement (4000 Hz) PostDPOAE 120 Ambient Noise Level Computation (Occluded) Frequency (Hz) Noise Spectrum and Level, under HPD A‐weighted Correction Measured Attenuation Noise Spectrum and Level, ambient 125 85.5 ‐16 22.5 124 250 85.5 ‐8.6 28.5 123 500 85.5 ‐3.2 31.8 121 1000 85.5 0 41.5 127 2000 85.5 1.2 34.2 119 4000 85.5 1 40.7 125 8000 85.5 94.0 ‐1.1 45.0 132 134.6 Average ambient noise levels: Circumaural: 127 dB, Headset: 105 dB, Earplug: 130 dB S12.68 Predicted Dose Measured Effective Dose 100 80 •For all subjects, across devices, the octave band method overestimated the effective noise dose i.e., underestimated the effective noise attenuation 60 40 •To convert difference of effective noise dose to a difference in decibels: 20 0 Subject ID Comparing the Predicted to the Measured Noise Dose using TTS ‐ 2 Earplug 120 S12.68 Predicted Dose Measured Effective Dose 100 80 60 40 20 0 dB = 10*log10 (predicted dose/effective dose) Average difference in dB for all subjects Circumaural = 9 dB Headset = 10 dB Earplugs = 11 dB Subject ID •The objective of this experiment was to measure the TTS to determine the effective noise attenuation of three passive hearing protective devices: a circumaural earmuff, an acoustically transparent headset, and earplugs. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Subject tracking hearing threshold level according to ANSI S12.6 Circumaural: David Clark H10-13XL Headset: Sennheiser HD 457 Earplugs: Adaptive Technologies, Inc. Subject ID Comparing the Predicted to the Measured Noise Dose using TTS ‐ 2 Headset Noise Dose (%) •Military personnel working in high noise environments can be exposed to noise levels up to 150 dB. • DoD Hearing Conservation Programs set safe noise exposure limits to reduce risk of noise induced hearing loss (NIHL). Attenuation Measurement Noise Dose (%) INTRODUCTION Pre-Exposure Threshold Measurement (4000 Hz) Subject wearing circumaural earmuff during noise exposure •On average, the ANSI S12.68 Octave Band Method underestimated the effective noise attenuation the subjects received (therefore significantly overestimating the effective dose as estimated using TTS2) •Additional subjects and HPDs should be examined to further substantiate these findings •Potential explanations for the unexpected human response to occluded noise presentations: • Changes in acoustic impedance seen by tympanic membrane • Changes in the sound transmission via bone and tissue conduction • Psychological / perceived protection level