Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Grace Heritage Center Georgetown, Texas Existing Exterior Envelope Assessment October 28, 2015 ARCHITEXAS - ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING, AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION, INC. Grace Heritage Center Georgetown, Texas Existing Exterior Envelope Assessment October 28, 2015 PROJECT TEAM ARCHITEXAS Architecture, Planning and Historic Preservation, Inc. 2900 South Congress Ave., Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78704 (P) 512.444.4220 (F) 512.444.4221 SPARKS ENGINEERING, INC. 933 North Flores Street San Antonio, Texas 78212 (P) 210.229.0669 October 28, 2015 '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Page 1 - Introduction a. Project Statement b. Executive Summary II. Page 4 - History a. Summary of Historic Research Findings b. Chronology of Significant Historic Events c. Annotated Elevations - Existing Conditions III. Page 9 - Existing Facilities Survey & Recommendations a. Methodology for Analysis b. Existing Conditions Analysis & Recommendations c. Annotated Elevations - Recommendations d. Structural Analysis e. Summary of Preservation Recommendations by Priority f. Building Maintenance & Inspection Program Recommendations IV. Page 41 - Budget Estimate a. Estimate of Probable Cost b. Phasing Strategy V. Page 47 - Funding Recommendations a. Potential Grants, Tax Credits & Other Available Funding Sources VI. Page 49 - Appendix a. Relevant Historic Documents b. ADA Assessment c. Cresting Patterns d. Additional Funding Sources e. Glossary of Terms '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 I INTRODUCTION Project Statement Executive Summary '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 1 Project Statement The Grace Heritage Center, formerly The Grace Church was constructed in 1881 in the Carpenter Gothic style. It is the earliest surviving wood framed Church in Georgetown. The original structure is symmetrical in plan comprised of a rectangular Nave with a square Narthex to the west and rectangular Chancel to the east. The main volume is one story with a steeply pitched gabled roof. The main entry consists of a three story Bell Tower topped with ornamental wood finials and crenellations. The exterior walls are punctuated with pointed arched windows and doors with simple hood moldings above. The original structure was moved twice and is currently one block north from its original location. In 1992, a front entry porch and an accessible ramp with connecting rear porch were added. Over the years and due to the moves, much of the historic materials have been replaced. However, the configuration and most of the original structure remains. ARCHITEXAS, Architecture, Planning & Historic Preservation, Inc. (AT) was hired by the City of Georgetown to provide architectural services to prepare a Structural Assessment and Rehabilitation Plan for The Grace Heritage Center located at 9th and Main Streets in Georgetown, Texas. The limits of the work for this study include the structure and exterior envelope of the church building and the immediate site around the building. The study will generally include the following items: t t t t t t Research history and chronology of the structure to gain an understanding of the original architecture, materials, and modifications to the building over time and document significant historic events. Exterior conditions analysis including general structural assessment. Analysis will provide a brief description of the assembly, note its condition, and provide recommendations for its repair. Additionally, conditions will be categorized by priority. Photos and or drawings indicating damaged and deteriorated materials. Identify potential grant sources, tax credits, and other available funding sources. Cost estimate for proposed scope of work with possible phasing to account for budgetary constraints. Cyclical maintenance plan. Items not part of this study include: t t t t t Assessment of structures on site other than original “Church” structure. ADA review as a prior assessment report has been provided by the City of Georgetown, dated July 2014. Environmental assessments, i.e. lead, asbestos, etc… Geotechnical investigations. Paint analysis to determine historic paint scheme. The recommendations of this report are based on the Secretary of the Interiors Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstruction of Historic Buildings. The Grace Heritage Center Exterior Envelope Study was prepared by ARCHITEXAS under the direction of Stanley O. Graves, FAIA, Principal, with the assistance of Susan Frocheur, Principal, and Izabella Dennis of ARCHITEXAS. '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Executive Summary The goal of this study was to determine the project scope of work needed to repair, restore, and rehabilitate the exterior envelope of the Grace Heritage Center. ARCHITEXAS conducted a general assessment of material conditions on the Grace Heritage Center exterior. The assessment was limited to areas that were physically accessibly by ladder or bucket truck. Sparks Engineering, Inc. provided a general structural assessment report focusing on the condition of the foundation, roof and bell tower. ARCHITEXAS analyzed the historic structure to determine existing conditions and prepared preservation, restoration and rehabilitation recommendations and associated costs for these recommendations. In the analysis of existing conditions, each element was classified as being in Good, Fair, or Poor Condition, and then categorized according to priority as Level 1-Critical, Level 2-Serious, or Level 3-Minor. This type of categorization will assist the City of Georgetown in determining scopes of work to be undertaken if the project is phased, based on priority. Currently, the building houses the Georgetown Heritage Society and serves as a community space. While the building appears to generally retain the physical appearance of the earliest historic photographs, the structure was altered during its moves in 1955 and 1991, and substantially restored after its move to 9th and Main Street in 1991. The 1992 restoration drawings (see “Appendix: Relevant Historic Photographs & Plans”) specify updates to the roof and electrical systems, plans for new staircases on the west and north sides of the building, reconstruction of the bell tower, new foundation underpinnings, new drainage (gutters and downspouts) and construction of a detached restroom addition. ARCHITEXAS developed measured elevations from field measurements to document the existing exterior structure and identify elements not specified or implemented from the prior restoration drawings. Overall the building’s structural integrity is good but deterioration to the bell tower foundation has compromised the structure and caused the belfry to noticeably lean. The foundation has varied surface deterioration due to moisture intrusion. The condition of the existing materials on the Grace Heritage Center ranges from good to poor. The majority of the wood elements (siding and trim) are severely weathered and deteriorated due to lack of maintenance, poor detailing and inappropriate wood species. A durable wood appropriate for exposure to the elements, such as cypress, redwood or Spanish cedar, should be used as a replacement, and regular maintenance and repainting should be implemented. The windows and doors are in good to fair condition; their restoration is recommended for long-term preservation. The top section of the bell tower was fully constructed in 1992 and is now severely deteriorated, requiring a full reconstruction. Bird infestations through the slatted louvers on the bell tower, as well as inadequate roof drainage, have caused considerable damage to the bell tower siding and trim. A west front porch and north ramp/porch were added during the 1992 restoration. They are in fair condition but, according to our inspections and the 2012 ADA Survey by Altura Solutions, L.P. (see “Appendix: American with Disabilities Act (ADA) & Building Code Compliance Review”), the handrails and ramp are not ADA or building code compliant and will need to be modified accordingly. ARCHITEXAS will work with the City of Georgetown on developing a phasing strategy if there are funding limitations and the entire project cannot be completed in a single phase. Potential grant sources, tax credits and other available funding sources have been included in this report. '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 II HISTORY Summary of Significant Historic Research Findings Chronology of Significant Historic Events Annotated Elevations - Existing Conditions '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 4 Summary of Significant Historic Research Findings Figure 1. Old Grace Church Photograph assumed to be taken c. 1900 - 1925 on original building site, (Source: www.graceepis.org) Grace Episcopal Church was organized on Easter “Monday” of 1881 with a congregation of 29 members and the cornerstone of the building was laid on November 16 of the same year. Early records of the church indicate that occasional services began as early as 1868 in churches and homes across town. According to historic photographs (see Figure 1), the west-east aligned church had white horizontal clapboard siding and a shingled gable roof, most likely made of wood. The simple interior scissor trusses are made of cypress wood brought by wagon from San Marcos, Texas, according to former vicar Romilly Timmins. In the chancel, the original wood altar is still in place, and north and south rows of lancet windows historically cranked open at the base to ventilate the structure. To the west, the narthex is located below a two-story bell tower housing a 22” wide stairwell leading to an organ loft. The loft was active until 1887 when the organ was moved into the nave. A bronze bell was later installed into the space in 1958 and is still operable. The bell tower maintains three original arched top louver windows surrounding the loft and three diamond windows that appear, from historic photos, to have been originally made of colored glass. The building is decorated with motifs of St. Andrews and saltire crosses, trefoils, botonee and fleurde-lis. By 1955, economic growth in Georgetown spurred commercial development along Main Street and the congregation decided to move Grace Church to 1314 E. University Avenue, across from Southwestern University. The belfry was transported separately for its safety and was shortened before it was reattached to the building. The decorative woodwork and finials from the top of the bell tower were removed at that time. From historic photos, it appears that the foundation as well as the trim around the windows and doors were painted a darker color during this period. Figure 2. 1984 Old Grace Church Photograph Taken after 1st move, note shortened tower (Source: Texas Historical Commission) After 110 years of continuous use, the congregation of Grace Church outgrew the structure and the Episcopal Diocese of Texas donated it to the City of Georgetown. Serving as the focal point of Founders Memorial Park, the Georgetown Heritage Center fits into the fabric of the historic Main Street, and it currently operates as home to the Georgetown Heritage Society offices and a public-use facility for the City of Georgetown. 1 Christie Shroeter, “On the Move”, 1991.“Georgetown Heritage Society,” Georgetown Heritage Society. http://georgetownheritagesociety.org/. Accessed July 1, 2015.Shroeter, Christie. “On the Move,” Austin-American Statesman. May 23, 1991. Figure 3. 1900 Sanborn Map of Georgetown, TX Indicating original location of the building at the corner of Orange St and Main St Texas Historical Commission and D. Moore. “Grace Episcopal Church: Site No. 224”, Texas Historic Sites Inventory Form - Texas Historical Commission (rev.8-82), July 1984. '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Chronology of Significant Historic Events 1881 Grace Episcopal Church was constructed for a cost of $2,186 and located on the southwest corner of 10th and Main Streets in downtown Georgetown (Refer to Figures 1 & 3). 1910 Electric lights added. 1928 Ceiling fans added and the building changed from coal to gas heating. 1955 Due to economic growth and downtown development, the original structure was moved to 1314 E. University Avenue across from Southwestern University. During the move the tower was separated from the main structure and the top portion shortened removing the spires and decorative wood crenellation (Refer to Figure 2). 1991 The congregation of Grace Church outgrows the structure and the Episcopal Diocese of Texas donates the building to the City of Georgetown. 1991 Though a partnership between the City of Georgetown and the Georgetown Heritage Society, the original structure was moved a second time to the northeast corner of 9th and Main Streets, two blocks from its original location. Foundation for the structure was provided in conjunction with the move and consisted of a continuous concrete footing at the perimeter of the building and isolated footings on the interior with CMU piers supporting the structure. 1992 Paving and Drainage documents prepared by Dan Shannahan, P.E., dated May 28, 1992 (Rev. Sept. 15, 1992), indicate the existing relocated church on the southeast corner of the property with surface parking to the north and east, a new structure containing restrooms directly to the east of the church, and Founders Park at the south east corner of the property. 1992 Public restroom documents prepared by Voelter Associates, Inc., dated October 13, 1992 (Rev. 1.18.93) indicate construction of new restroom facilities directly east of church structure. 1992 Renovation documents prepared by Voelter Associates Inc., dated November 23, 1992 indicate the following scope of work: Reconstruction of the upper portion of the tower including the spires, decorative crenellation, and the arched topped louvers; new roofing assembly above the existing roof decking including insulation with a nail able roof substrate, furring strips, wood shingle roofing, and decorative sheet metal ridge cap; new sheet metal gutters and downspouts; Reconstructed decorative wood crosses at the east ridges of the Sanctuary and Apse; Selective replacement of the corner boards and siding (Installation of batt insulation at exterior walls assumed); Installation of concrete footing and stone wall between CMU (concrete masonry units) piers including application of a cement plaster finish on the face of the piers and installation of rigid insulation on interior wall of the crawl space; Construction of new front entry porch and steps; Construction of a new accessible ramp along the north elevation and rear porch and; Providing an accessible exterior door on the east wall of the sanctuary. On the interior of the building, the following alterations were indicated: Strengthening the main trusses and adding free standing partitions at the west end of the sanctuary to create office space. 2004 Replacement of wood shingle roofing with asphalt shingle roofing. '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Bibliography: “Georgetown Heritage Society,” Georgetown Heritage Society. http:// georgetownheritagesociety.org/. Accessed July 1, 2015. Shroeter, Christie. “On the Move,” Austin-American Statesman. May 23, 1991. Texas Historical Commission and D. Moore. “Grace Episcopal Church: Site No. 224,” Texas Historic Sites Inventory Form – Texas Historical Commission (rev.8-82), July 1984. '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Annotated Elevations Existing Conditions '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 III EXISTING FACILITIES SURVEY & RECOMMENDATIONS Methodology for Analysis Existing Conditions Analysis & Recommendations Annotated Elevations - Recommendations Existing Structural Assessment Summary of Preservation Recommendations by Priority Building Maintenance & Inspection Program Recommendations '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 9 Methodology for Analysis The ARCHITEXAS team conducted an in-depth investigation and evaluation of the existing exterior conditions of the Grace Heritage Center in Georgetown, Texas. The inspection was done to note deficiencies, assess the condition of deterioration to damaged exterior envelope building elements and to provide preservation recommendations and a budget estimate to assist the City of Georgetown to initiate and complete a restoration of the historic structure. The conditions of the building envelope were assessed from the exterior by visually reviewing the exterior envelope, windows, roof, stairs and bell tower. The exterior materials were visually assessed from the ground, with the use of binoculars where necessary for the upper portions of the building. The inspection, evaluation and recommendations were conducted based on a format that was established by the National Park Service and has been utilized as a standard system of inspecting and evaluating the condition of National Historic Landmark Buildings. Definitions The findings of the investigation are organized into three general categories, Description/Construction, Existing Condition, and Recommendations. The following definitions were used to classify each building condition according to one of three categories. Good: The element is structurally sound and performing its intended purpose, and there are few cosmetic imperfections. Repair is not needed or only minor routine maintenance is required. Fair: The element shows early signs of wear, failure or deterioration but remains generally structurally sound and is performing its intended purpose. A failure of a sub-component may have occurred. Replacement of up to 25 percent of the element or replacement of a subcomponent may be required. Poor: The element is no longer performing its intended purpose, is missing, or has deterioration or damage affecting more than 25 percent of the element. The element may show signs of imminent failure. Major repair or replacement is required. Additionally, each element is classified as to priority according to one of three levels (lower priority items may be ranked as a higher priority or be included in an earlier phase due to functional considerations or because restoration of a related/adjoining item requires the item be addressed sooner): Key to Deterioration Priorities Level 1 - Critical: Advanced deterioration is involved and immediate repair or replacement is needed to prevent the failure of the element within the next 2 years. There may be a threat to health or life safety. Level I priority should be accomplished immediately. Level 2 - Serious: Deterioration may result in the failure of the element within 2 to 5 years if not corrected, and a threat to health or safety may result if not corrected. Deterioration of adjacent or related elements may occur as a result of this deterioration. Level 2 should be repaired or restored within this period or included in a comprehensive restoration of the building. Level 3 - Minor: Deficiency or deterioration exists which requires minor or routine repair or preventative maintenance, and the life expectancy of the element may be reduced if not corrected. This condition will affect the element in the long term, beyond 5 years. Level 3 priority should be included in a comprehensive restoration of the building. '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Existing Conditions Analysis & Recommendations '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Existing Conditions Analysis and Recommendations ELEMENT TYPE PRIORITY Description/Construction: I. SUBSTRUCTURE 1. Foundation ANALYSIS 2 Figure 4. Pier at NW Corner of Bell Tower. Failing parge coat at pier. Figure 5. NW Corner of Entry Porch, Note: Cracked/failing mortar joints. The foundation of the building consists of a continuous concrete footing at the perimeter of the structure and isolated footings on the interior. CMU piers at approximately 10-foot on center bear on the footings and support the wood framed structure above. The CMU piers are finished with a cement plaster parge coat on metal lath. The space between the piers is infilled with 8-inch thick, randomly coursed limestone masonry. Metal ventilation grilles exist within the stone infill to ventilate the crawlspace. Rigid insulation exists on the interior side of the crawlspace walls. Asphalt paving exists beneath the structure. The 1992 Restoration Drawings note that “Existing paving is to remain under the building”. Access to the crawlspace is through wood access doors located on the southeast corner of the building installed during the 1992 Restoration. Existing Condition: The CMU piers and stone masonry foundation walls generally appear to be in good condition and functioning properly as no significant cracks or settling was noted. The following conditions were noted: (1) Deteriorated cement parging and exposed metal lath at the north and south corners of the tower and at the northwest corner of the building; (2) Cracked and deteriorated stone mortar joints at the infill masonry between piers and at the sidewalls of the steps, porches, and ramp; (3) Biological growth at the base of the building was noted particularly adjacent to downspouts and at side walls to steps, porches, and ramp due to open and failing mortar joints at the top surfaces; (4) Bent and damaged foundation vents and; (5) Paint splatter on the stone infill wall at the south east corner of the chancel. Recommendations: 1. 2. Figure 6. West End of North Ramp Note: Biological growth on stone masonry 3. 4. 5. Remove deteriorated and damaged cement parging at piers and replace to match existing texture, finish, and color. The parging is unfinished and it may be difficult to match the color. Parging from pier to pier may need to be replace or all parging may need to be painted with an appropriate paint coating. Selectively repoint failing and deteriorated mortar joints at stone masonry walls. As the masonry was constructed in 1992, it is likely that a type “N” mortar was used as it is generally appropriate for limestone. We recommend that mortar be of weaker strength than the limestone and that it match the texture and color of the existing mortar. Clean biological growth by either power washing with the appropriate equipment or with application of an appropriate chemical cleaner designed for use on the type of materials and soiling present. Repair bent and damage foundation vents. Check that foundation vents are clear and allow for movement of air in crawlspace. Remove paint splatter from stone surfaces with an appropriate paint stripper designed to remove the type of paint present. Figure 7. East End of North Porch. Note: Bent foundation vent Figure 8. Foundation Wall at SE Corner Note: Paint splatter on stone masonry footing '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Existing Conditions Analysis and Recommendations ELEMENT TYPE PRIORITY II. SHELL 1. Roof Construction a. Nave & Chancel ANALYSIS Description/Construction: 3 Figure 9. Scissor Trusses, Looking east Figure 10. Existing Roof Covering on Nave, View Towards Northeast The roof structures over the Nave and Chancel are exposed to the interior. They are steeply pitched with an approximately 8 on 12 slope. The Nave is comprised of four main wood timber scissor trusses with roof rafters between spaced at approximately 30-inches on center. Decorative wood collar ties exist at each roof rafter. The scissor trusses have been modified several times with the addition of tie rods above and below the plate line. Pat Sparks, the structural engineer, noted that the upper tie rods appear to be the earliest and may have been installed shortly after the Church was constructed. It is not known when the lower tie rods were added. The 1992 Renovation Drawings indicate that the scissor trusses were strengthened with ¾-inch thick wood boards on three sides of the main members. The exposed wide plank tongue and groove wood decking appears original. The roof structure over the Chancel is comprised of five roof rafters spaced at approximately 28-inches on center. Decorative wood collar ties exist at every other rafter. The exposed wide plank tongue and groove wood decking does not appear original as the plank width is about 1-2 inches wider than that of the Nave. Additionally, knots are visible indicating fewer paint layers. The 1992 Renovation Drawings indicate that the following materials were applied over the “existing wood decking” (The exposed wide plank ceiling): wood shingles on 1x4 horizontal nailing boards on 1x4 vertical slats on vapor barrier on 15# felt on nailable surface on 2-inch roof insulation. All these materials are visible on the east wall of the Belfry with the exception of the wood shingles, nailing boards, and vertical slats. These were probably removed when the current asphalt shingle roofing was installed. The Owner believes that the asphalt roofing is approximately 10-11 years old. An early photograph of the building indicates that the original roofing was possibly wood shingle with a decorative cresting at the ridge of the Nave roof (Refer to Figure 12). The roof of the Chancel is not visible in this photograph but it is likely that it too had the cresting. Existing Condition: Refer to Initial Structural Evaluation prepared by Sparks Engineering, Inc. for description of existing condition for the roof structure. The asphalt roofing appears to be in good condition, no visible signs of water damage or water infiltration was noted in the Nave and Chancel. Figure 11. View of Chancel Roof Covering Recommendations: 1. 2. Figure 12. Ridge Mold on Historic Photograph, View Towards Northeast Note: Decorative cresting at ridge The lifespan of Asphalt shingle roofing in Texas weather is typically 12-15 years. As the existing roofing is approximately 10-11 years old, inspect the roofing yearly to evaluate condition and check interior spaces for water infiltration. If it is desired to provide a period appropriate cresting at the ridge of the Nave and Chancel roofs, standard sheet metal ridge caps/cresting in a number of different patterns are available (Refer to period cresting patterns included in the appendix of this report). '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Existing Conditions Analysis and Recommendations ELEMENT TYPE PRIORITY ANALYSIS Description/Construction: b. Bell Tower 1 The exterior of the bell tower was accessed via a boom lift. Access to the roof of the tower was not available. The 1992 Restoration Drawings indicate that the roof pitches to each side of the tower and sheds water through the spaces between the decorative wood crenellations. The drawings indicate that the roof assembly consists of a flat seam metal roofing, fully soldered, on a ¾ inch thick plywood deck. Existing Condition: Water staining was visible on the interior walls and ceiling of the belfry indicating that the roof is leaking. Deteriorated and rotted wood was visible at the decorative finials and crenellations above the roof line. Figure 13. Interior of Belfry Note: Water staining at perimeter of roof Recommendations: 1. 2. 3. 4. Depending on its condition, repair or replace the flat seam metal roofing and integral metal flashing at the finials, crenellations, and wash surfaces. Repair and or replace deteriorated wood elements to match existing profiles. Replacement wood should be a highly decay resistant species such as Mahogany, Redwood, Cypress, or Spanish cedar. Additionally, it should be clear or vertical grain to promote dimensional stability in order to resist cupping and warping. Back prime wood elements including cuts and splices to reduce water absorption and increase longevity. Prime and paint exterior architectural woodwork with an appropriate paint system. Provide an access hatch at roof of tower for future inspection and maintenance. Figure 14. Bell Tower, View of SW Corner Note: Deteriorated wood at finials and crenellations Figure 15. Bell Tower, View of Southeast Finial Note: Deteriorated wood at finials and crenellations '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Existing Conditions Analysis and Recommendations ELEMENT TYPE PRIORITY 2. Exterior Wall Assembly ANALYSIS Description/Construction: 1 The exterior walls of the structure are comprised of 2x4 wood studs with approximately 4-inch exposure wood clapboard (thicker along the lower edge than on the upper edge) siding. The corners of the building are clad with 5-inch by 1 1/8-inch thick wood corner boards. The corner boards are likely not original as they extend past the water table at the base of the building. The top course of siding is capped with a 9-inch high by 1 1/8-inch thick wood trim board along the side walls and a 6-inch high trim board at the gable ends. The 1992 Restoration Drawings indicate batt insulation between the studs. The water table, which creates the visual base for the building, is comprised of a wood drip cap and a 9 ½ inch high by ¾ inch thick skirt board. The wood drip cap is sloped to wash water. The water table is likely not original as it is typically continuous at the base of the building and end grain type trim is generally not used for this location. Figure 16. South Side of Bell Tower, Top Section Note: Rotting of wood siding and peeling paint The bell tower is divided into thirds by a horizontal band course. The band course is comprised of a wood drip cap and a flat trim piece. The 1992 Restoration Drawings indicate that the top third of the tower was reconstructed including the decorative wood finials and the crenellations. Existing Condition: Refer to Initial Structural Evaluation prepared by Sparks Engineering, Inc. for description of existing condition for the wall structure at the Bell Tower. Figure 17. Southeast Corner of Chancel Note: Rotting wood and deterioration of paint adjacent to downspout Figure 18. Southwest Corner of Nave Note: Short length of wood installed as replacement In general the exterior architectural woodwork was found to be in poor to fair condition. The following conditions were noted: (1) Deteriorated wood elements due to a lack of maintenance such as failing paint coatings throughout exposing wood substrate, open and failing sealant joints, etc.; (2) Deteriorated wood elements adjacent to downspouts and yard sprinkler heads indicating that downspouts are leaking; (3) Poor repairs using short lengths of wood installed with butt joints, which are susceptible to water infiltration; (3) Poor architectural detailing at the water table, corner boards, and trim boards at the top of the wall. The water table is not continuous at the inside and outside corners. The inside and outside corner boards extend to the bottom of the water table leaving the end grain susceptible to water infiltration and subsequent deterioration. The type of wood and profile used for the drip cap of the water table is not appropriate for this application as end grain is exposed on three sides. This is also typical of the drip cap found at the horizontal banding and roof trim at the Bell Tower. The corner boards do not extend to the rake board, exposing end grain. The corner boards in several locations are proud of the trim board at the top of the wall, exposing end grain and allowing water behind the corner boards and; (4) Lack of sheet metal flashing where elements interrupt the exterior wall. Due to the age of the building and the poor detailing, it is likely that most of the exterior architectural woodwork is not original. Recommendations: 1. 2. 3. Figure 19. Northeast Corner of Nave Note: Poor architectural detailing of trim boards at top of wall Replace exterior architectural woodwork 100%. Repair and or replace deteriorated framing members following removal of wood siding (Refer to Initial Structural Evaluation report). Modify architectural woodwork details to decrease susceptibility to water infiltration and deterioration as follows: Use full height/length wood trim pieces to minimize the number of joints. Where not possible use beveled joints at vertical members and scarf joints at horizontal members. Use '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Existing Conditions Analysis and Recommendations ELEMENT TYPE PRIORITY ANALYSIS 4. appropriate profiles and correct grain direction to promote longevity. Replacement wood should be a highly decay resistant species such as Mahogany, Redwood, Cypress, or Spanish cedar. Additionally, wood should be clear or vertical grain to promote dimensional stability in order to resist cupping and warping. Back prime wood elements including cuts and splices to reduce water absorption and increase longevity. Prime and paint exterior architectural woodwork with an appropriate paint system. Figure 20. Northwest Corner, Intersection of Tower and Main Building Note: Rotting wood and peeling paint at drip cap; Drip cap is not continuous at corners Figure 21. Southwest Corner of Bell Tower Note: Rotting wood and peeling paint at band due to inappropriate drip cap '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Existing Conditions Analysis and Recommendations ELEMENT TYPE PRIORITY III. ROOF DRAINAGE SYSTEM 1. Gutters & Downspouts 1 ANALYSIS Description/Construction: The roof drainage system consists of half round sheet metal gutters along the north and south sides of the Nave and Chancel roofs connected to 4-inch diameter sheet metal downspouts. The downspouts on the south elevation extend to concrete splash blocks at grade. The downspouts on the north elevation extend below grade to subsurface piping that drains to the parking lot. The gutters and downspouts are painted. The 1992 Restoration Drawings indicate that the gutters and downspouts were installed at that time. Existing Condition: The gutters and downspouts are in good to fair condition. The following conditions were noted: (1) Water damage to wood cladding was noted adjacent to downspouts; (2) Splash blocks were not properly placed to drain water away from the building and; (3) Slight rusting was noted within the gutter. Recommendations: 1. 2. 3. Flood gutter and downspouts to ensure that there is no blockage and that they are properly functioning. At the same time check downspout joints for leaks and repair as necessary. Move splash blocks so that they are below downspouts and directing water away from the building. Check condition of paint coating within gutter. If rusting, prep metal to remove rust, spot prime bare metal with rust inhibitive primer, and apply appropriate paint system. Figure 22. Downspout and Splash block at Southeast Corner Note: Water damage to wood cladding adjacent to downspouts and splash blocks not properly placed to drain water away from building Figure 23. Southwest Corner Note: Rusting within gutter '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Existing Conditions Analysis and Recommendations ELEMENT TYPE PRIORITY IV. PORCH STEPS & RAMP ANALYSIS Description/Construction: 1 1. Front Entry Porch and Steps The front entry porch and steps were added during the 1992 Renovation. The 1992 Renovation Drawings indicate that the front porch is constructed on 2x6 wood framing on stone masonry walls on a continuous concrete footing. The 1992 Renovation Drawings indicate that the decking is 3 ½” x 1 1/8” thick solid tongue and groove wood decking. The current decking appears to be grooved 2x6’s spaced to allow water to drain. The lower brick platform and steps are constructed on a concrete structure. A wood guardrail exists at the perimeter of the porch and extends on both sides of the steps. The guardrail is constructed of 4x4 wood posts fastened to the structure with a top, intermediate, and bottom rail with wood balusters between posts. Existing Condition: Figure 24. Front Entry Porch and Steps Figure 25. Southeast Corner of West Porch Note: Water draining through deck boards and causing damage to plywood shims at foundation piers The front entry porch and steps appear to be in fair condition. The following items were noted: (1) Non-compliant Building Code issues: At the entry door, the finish floor elevation of the building to the finish porch decking exceeds ½-inch. It is currently approximately 2 ½-3-inches. There are no handrails on either side of the steps. Handrails are required on both sides, extending 1-foot past top and bottom tread. Guardrails are required where dimension from top of finish porch or treads exceeds 30-inches. Guardrails are required to be designed so that a 4-inch diameter sphere cannot pass through. The spacing between the balusters exceeds 4-inches. The difference in height between risers exceeds 3/8-inch. (2) It appears that water draining through the deck boards is making its way toward the base of the tower causing damage to plywood shims at the foundation piers and lower wood framing elements (Refer to Initial Structural Evaluation Report). (3) The grooved profile of the decking allows dirt and debris to collect and water to sit on the boards accelerating deterioration. (4) The decking is weathered and slight cupping was noted. (5) Loose and cupped trim elements at the perimeter of the porch and treads. (6) Failing and deteriorated stone mortar joints, particularly at exposed horizontal surfaces or where water is allowed to drain onto a horizontal surface. Recommendations: 1. Due to the extent of non-compliant Building Code issues, water infiltration issues, and required repairs, we recommend that a new Building Code compliant and historically compatible porch and steps be provided with required guardrails and/or railings at both sides of steps. The limestone, brick pavers, and concrete footings/structure could potentially be salvaged for reuse. Figure 26. Northwest Corner of Front Entry Porch Note: Loose and cupping trim elements; Failing and deteriorated mortar joints '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Existing Conditions Analysis and Recommendations ELEMENT TYPE PRIORITY 2. North Ramp and Rear Porch and Steps 1 ANALYSIS Description/Construction: The north ramp and connecting rear porch and steps were added during the 1992 Renovation to provide an accessible route into the building. The 1992 Renovation Drawings indicate that the lower portion of the ramp, paved with brick pavers, is constructed on a concrete structure while the upper portion of the ramp, with the wood decking is constructed on 2x6 wood framing on a stone masonry wall on a continuous concrete footing. The 1992 Renovation Drawings indicate that the decking is 3 ½”x 1 1/8” thick solid tongue and groove wood decking. The current decking appears to be grooved 2x6’s spaced to allow water to drain. A wood guardrail with integral handrail exists on the outside of the ramp continuing around the rear porch. The guardrail is constructed of 4x4 wood posts fastened to the structure with a top, intermediate, and bottom rail with wood balusters between posts. Existing Condition: Figure 27. North Ramp Figure 28. North Stairs, Looking West Note: Weathered and cupping of decking; Loose trim at perimeter of treads; Failing and deteriorated stone mortar joints The north ramp and rear porch and steps appear to be in fair condition. The following items were noted: (1) Non-compliant Building Code issues: The handrail at the bottom of the steps does not extend minimum 1-foot beyond the nosing of the bottom tread; Handrails have not been provided on both sides of the steps; The spacing between the balusters exceeds 4-inch diameter and; The difference in height between risers exceeds 3/8-inch. (2) The grooved profile of the decking allows dirt and debris to collect and water to sit on the boards accelerating deterioration. (3) The decking is weathered and slight cupping was noted. (4) Loose trim at the perimeter of the porch and treads. (5) Failing and deteriorated stone mortar joints, particularly at exposed horizontal surfaces or where water is allowed to drain onto a horizontal surface. (6) Failed sealant joint between building and ramp. The 2014 ADA Assessment indicates that the ramp does not comply with TAS (Assessment is included in the appendix of this report). In summary, the following items were identified: (1) Provide handrail on both sides of ramp; (2) Width of ramp is too narrow; (3) Slope of ramp is greater than 8.3% maximum and; (4) An intermediate landing has not been provided. Recommendations: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Figure 29. Wood Ramp at North Ramp Note: Failed sealant joint between building and ramp Correct non-compliant Building Code issues. Extend existing railing minimum 1-foot beyond bottom tread; Provide a handrail on both side of steps; Modify or replace railing/guardrail so that spacing between balusters does not exceed 4-inches; Re-build steps to provide equal riser height. Currently the wood decking was found to be in fair condition, with cyclical maintenance, the decking could last another 5-7 years. Stain/seal wood decking and trim. This should be done every two years. Reattach missing and misaligned trim at perimeter of porch. Repoint failing and deteriorated stone mortar joint. Due to the extent of non-complying ADA and Building Code issues, we recommend that a new ADA compliant ramp be provided with required guardrails, railings, and/or handrails on both sides of ramp. The limestone and concrete footings/structure could potentially be salvaged for reuse. Note: New 2x wood framing members not exposed to view should be pressure treated. New wood for exterior architectural woodwork should be a highly decay resistant species such as Mahogany, Redwood, Cypress, or Spanish cedar. Additionally, wood should be clear or vertical grain to promote dimensional stability in order to resist cupping and warping. Back prime wood elements including cuts and splices to reduce water absorption and increase longevity. Wood for decking should also be a highly decay resistant species such as Ipe or Accoya. It should be hard and dimensionally stable to resist cupping and wear. '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Existing Conditions Analysis and Recommendations ELEMENT TYPE PRIORITY V. EXTERIOR WINDOWS AND LOUVERS ANALYSIS Description/Construction: 2 1. Window Assemblies Figure 30. Window on South Elevation Note: Weathered sill Figure 31. Interior Stool of Window on South Elevation Note: Water staining on interior from failing and deteriorated glazing compound There are three types of wood windows that exist on the building as follows: (1) Out-swinging, operable, arched head casement windows, approximately 1’-8” wide by 6’-6” tall along the north and south elevations of the Nave with similar smaller windows at the south elevation of the Chancel. The windows are divided into three sections by thin wood muntins. The windows are glazed from the exterior with 1/8-inch thick clear plate glass held in place with glazing compound. The glass has been decorated with paint in a diamond pattern with a stenciled cross at the center pane. The paint appears to have been applied using a sponging technique. The hardware typically consists of two hinges, a push out casement stay, and a latch and eye hook. The latch and eye hook are likely not original. (2) Fixed arched head casement windows with stained glass at the west elevation of the Nave and the east elevation of the Chancel. Each sash contains one stained glass panel; The sash is not divided with muntins. Horizontal flat metal reinforcing bars attached to the interior face of the window provides intermittent structural support for the window. There appears to be several types of glass, opalescent glass, colored glass, and painted glass. Clear plastic protective glazing exists on the exterior of these units, fastened to the window frames with quarter-round wood molding. The stained glass windows in the Chancel were donated to the Grace Episcopal Church in 1932 by an English couple who had been early members of the congregation. The two stained glass windows in the Nave were donated to the Grace Episcopal Church in the 1980’s by the Logan family in memory of their parents. (3) Pivot, diamond shaped casement windows, approximately 2’-3” wide by 3’10” wide at the north, west, and south elevations of the Bell Tower. The sash is divided into four panes by thin wood muntins creating a diamond pattern. The sash pivots horizontally about the center of the window. The windows are glazed from the exterior with 1/8-inch thick clear plate glass held in place with glazing compound. Paint has been applied to the glass using a sponging technique. The hardware typically consists of sash pivots and a latch and eye hook. Existing Condition: Figure 32. Diamond Window on West Side of Bell Tower Note: Overpaint on glass Figure 33. South Window on West Face Note: Thin horizontal crack on stained glass Figure 34. North Window on West Face Note: Buckling of glass panels The windows were found to be in fair condition. The following conditions were noted: (1) The condition of the windows could not be fully assessed as the operable units have been painted and sealed shut; (2) Weathered and damaged sills; (3) Replacement sills of varying thickness; (4) Water staining on interior stools resulting from failing and deteriorated glazing compound on exterior and back-bedding on interior; (5) Painted hardware and; (6) Overpaint on glass. For stained glass panels, the following conditions were noted: (7) Cracked glass, typically in a horizontal pattern; (8) Bowed glass at horizontal lead line at bottom of Chancel windows; (9) Protective glazing with no ventilation and; (10) Discoloration of protective glazing, particularly at the west elevation. Recommendations: Fixed and operable wood casement windows: Provide a comprehensive window survey of each window indicating general scope of work and work specific to each unit as required to make operable windows fully functioning and all windows weather tight. Survey should be performed by a Preservation Architect or window restoration firm who has experience restoring these types of windows. Stained glass: Provide a comprehensive survey of each leaded glass panel indicating options for their repair and recommendations for a ventilated protective glazing system appropriate for this project. Survey should be performed by a stained glass conservator who has experience restoring these types of window. '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Existing Conditions Analysis and Recommendations ELEMENT TYPE PRIORITY ANALYSIS 2. Louver Assembly 1 Description/Construction: There are three arched topped wood louvers on the north, west, and south elevations of the Bell Tower at the Belfry level. The louvers on the exterior are divided into two pointed arches with applied trim flush with the perimeter trim. The 1992 Renovation Drawings note to “Reconstruct tower by rebuilding louvers in storage and supplementing materials as needed”. Portions of the existing louvers may be original. Existing Condition: The louvers were found to be in poor condition. The following items were noted: (1) Severe weathering, water infiltration, rotting, split, and cupped elements, and loose and misaligned louvers; (2) Ripped and missing screen on the interior of louvers to prevent bird and rodent entry and; (3) Bird nests, guano and animal droppings on the interior of the Belfry. Recommendations: Figure 35. Arched Louver on South Side Note: Severe weathering and misaligned louvers 1. 2. 3. Reconstruct new louvers using existing louvers as a model. Provide heavy duty wire cloth on the interior of the louvers to prevent bird and rodent entry. Clean evidence of bird and rodent infestation on the interior of the Belfry. Figure 36. Arched Louver on South Side Note: Rotting and split wood Figure 37. Interior View of Arched Louver on South Side Note: Ripped screen on interior of louver '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Existing Conditions Analysis and Recommendations ELEMENT TYPE VI. EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES PRIORITY ANALYSIS Description/Construction: 2 Figure 38. Paired Entry Door Note: Left leaf has shaved head and is missing part of perimeter trim There are three existing entries into the building. The main entry at the west elevation, the accessible entry at the east elevation, and a fixed door at the north wall of the Chancel. The paired doors at the west entry are approximately 4’-0” wide by 6’-6” tall to the top of the pointed arch and 2 ¼-inch thick. The doors are comprised of three ¾-inch thick layers, bead board laid diagonally on the outside face and bead board laid vertically on the inside face with a hardwood edge at the perimeter. Hardware consists of two pair of hinges, ornate plate and pull with matching key hole, a deadbolt with thumb turn to the interior, a simple pull on the interior and a foot bolt. The single pointed arched door serving as the accessible entry is approximately 2’-10” wide by 6’-6” tall and 1 ¾” thick. It is also comprised of three paneled layers, bead board laid vertically on the exterior and bead board laid diagonally in a book match pattern on the interior. Hardware consists of a pull on each side, a deadbolt with a thumb turn to the interior, a kick down/hold open, and threshold. The side door to the Chancel has been fixed shut. Given their condition and detailing, the main entry doors and the accessible door are likely not original. The door to the Chancel appears original. The 1992 Restoration Drawings indicate that the door to the accessible opening be rebuilt to provide a 32-inch clear opening. It also notes to close an existing opening on the opposite side of the Nave. It appears that the original church would have had four doors, one at the tower, two at the east wall of the Nave, and a fourth at the north wall of the Chancel. Existing Conditions: Figure 39. Single Accessible Door Note: Rubbing at Sill (1) Paired entry door: Fair condition, the following items were noted: (a) The door edge has been modified several times to accommodate the tower movement, the hardwood edge trim is no longer consistent in width; (b) The doors no longer fit the opening, particularly at the perimeter of the pointed arch. (2) Single accessible door: Good condition, the following items were noted: (a) Rubbing at sill (3) Single fixed door: Poor condition, the following items were noted: (a) The condition of the door could not be fully assessed as it has been fixed shut; (b) It appears that a drawer face as been applied to the bottom rail of the door potentially to repair damage behind and; (c) Water damage was noted to bead board above bottom rail. Recommendations: 1. 2. 3. Following repairs to the Tower, new entry doors may need to be constructed to fit the opening. Salvage historic hardware and supplement with period hardware to comply with Owner’s function and use. Adjust accessible door for smooth/proper operation. The door to the Chancel could not be fully assessed as it has been fixed shut. Fully document and survey door assembly as it appears to be the only remaining historic door. Prep and paint exterior until full restoration can be undertaken. Figure 40. Single Fixed Door Note: Water damage to bead board above bottom rail '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Existing Conditions Analysis and Recommendations ELEMENT TYPE VII. BUILDING SITEWORK PRIORITY ANALYSIS Description/Construction: 1 1. Grading & Drainage Figure 41. Southeast Corner Note: Water ponding near building The church structure is located on the southwest corner of the site fronting Main and 9th Streets with an access ramp and connecting rear porch along the east elevation. A restroom structure constructed during the 1992 Renovation is located directly to the rear of the Church. There are asphalt parking lots to the north and east of the Church with a drive through connecting Main and 9th Streets. A crushed stone wall separates the buildings from the parking lots. There is a brick paved sidewalk along Main Street and a concrete sidewalk along 9th Street. There are mulch planting beds with a variety of low-lying plantings and hedges along the south and east elevations. The grade gently slopes diagonally across the site approximately 3’-6” from the northwest corner to the southeast corner. Water is directed off site though curb cuts in the parking lots to a grassy area to the north and a water quality pond to the east. Existing Condition: Grading generally slopes away from the building with the exception of the southeast corner of the building where slight ponding was noted. A condensing unit is located in this area with insulated piping extending through the south wall of the building. The line is leaking and pooling water was noted adjacent to the line within the crawl space. Water infiltration is also an issue at the main entry where water filters through the west porch causing deterioration of wood elements at the base of the tower wall. Plantings in general were well maintained and noted to be a good distance from the building. Figure 42. Southeast Corner Note: Insulated pipe is leaking Recommendations: 1. 2. 3. 4. Modify grade at the southeast corner of the building to properly slope away from the building. Repair leaking condenser line. Provide solid surface decking at west entry porch sloped to drain to prevent water infiltration at base of tower. Continue landscape maintenance keeping edge of perimeter plantings approximately 1 foot from face of building. Figure 43. South Elevation of Tower and Front Entry Porch Note: Deterioration of base of tower wall Figure 44. Northwest Corner Note: Proximity to building '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Existing Conditions Analysis and Recommendations ELEMENT TYPE PRIORITY 2. Irrigation ANALYSIS Description/Construction: 1 A yard sprinkler system exist for the planting beds. Existing Condition: Sprinkler system was not turned on or tested during this assessment. Recommendation: Test sprinkler system to confirm that it is properly working. Inspect each head, move and or adjust heads as needed to avoid wetting the building. Figure 45. North of West Porch Note: prinkler head directly next to building '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Existing Conditions Analysis and Recommendations ELEMENT TYPE PRIORITY VIII. OTHER EXTERIOR ELEMENTS ANALYSIS Description/Construction: 3 1. Fence There is a 3 foot high wood picket fence and gate adjacent to the mulch planting bed along the south elevation of the building. The fence is comprised of 4x4 wood post with 2x4 horizontal top and bottom rails and pickets nailed to the face of the rails. The gate is a full size wood door with a pointed arched opening. The fence and gate are painted. Existing Condition: The fence and gate are in good to fair condition. The following conditions were noted: Failing and deteriorated paint coatings exposing wood substrate. Figure 46. Fence on South Side Note: Deteriorating and failing paint coating Recommendations: Prep wood elements, prime exposed wood, and re-paint. Figure 47. Gate Door on South Side Note: Deteriorating paint coating on door 2. Bronze Plaques Description/Construction: 3 There are three commemorative bronze plaques fastened to a boulder at the southwest corner of the building. Existing Condition: The finish on the plaques are in poor condition with visible discoloring and minimal corrosion to the metal surface. Recommendations: Figure 48. Bronze Plaque Note: Visible discoloring and minimal corrosion The plaques should be restored by a conservator or preservation specialist. Restoration will include cleaning, application of a protective coating and waxing. Regular maintenance is required for any exposed outdoor metal elements. '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Annotated Elevations Recommendations '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Annotated Elevations - Recommendations - West Elevation Replace sheet metal roofing at top of bell tower Repair/restore finials and crenellations Repair/restore louvers; Provide hard cloth mesh to prevent animal access; Clean bell tower to remove animal droppings/guano Restore windows; replace/repair deteriorated elements; Remove and reinstall glass, replace glazing compound and perimeter sealant, typ. Clean light fixture, typ. Following structural repairs to tower, restore/reset main door for proper operation; Clean and re-oil hardware Restore stained glass; Monitor for cracks; Restore wood framing around windows Remove and replace wood siding and trim 100%, repair or replace deteriorated wood framing Replace deteriorated wall framing and wood shims at base of bell tower Replace entry porch and steps to comply with Building Code and TAS Prune bushes and trees so they are not in contact with the structure and to allow room for maintenance Clean biological growth from masonry and repoint NOTE: Following repairs, prep and repaint architectural woodwork 100% including doors and windows. '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Annotated Elevations - Recommendations - South Elevation Replace sheet metal roofing at top of bell tower Repair/ restore finials and crenellations Repair/restore louvers; Provide hard cloth mesh to prevent animal access; Clean bell tower to remove animal droppings/guano Replace entry porch and steps to comply with Building Code and TAS Replace deteriorated wall framing and wood shims at base of bell tower Restore windows; replace/repair deteriorated elements; Remove and reinstall glass, replace glazing compound and perimeter sealant, typ. Provide decorative ridge cap if interpreted as historically appropriate NOTE: Following repairs, prep and repaint architectural woodwork 100% including doors and windows. Restore bronze plaques Remove and replace wood siding and trim 100%, repair or replace deteriorated wood framing Prune bushes and trees so they are not in contact with the structure and to allow room for maintenance '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Re-grade at southeast corner of building to prevent pooling water Annotated Elevations - Recommendations - East Elevation Remove and replace wood siding and trim 100%, repair or replace deteriorated wood framing Clean light fixture, typ. Restore/reset sanctuary door for proper operation; Clean and re-oil hardware Restore windows; Replace/repair deteriorated elements; Remove and reinstall glass, replace glazing compound and perimeter sealant, typ. Restore stained glass; Monitor for cracks; Restore wood framing around windows Replace northeast porch and ramp to comply with Building Code and TAS Visible water damage to wood from leaking downspout Inspect downspouts and gutters for leaks. Reset concrete splash blocks. Replace water table 100% with durable wood species Clean biological growth from masonry and repoint Clean foundation vents and repair/ replace, typ. NOTE: Following repairs, prep and repaint architectural woodwork 100% including doors and windows. Prune bushes and tress so they are not in contact with the structure and to allow room for maintenance '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Annotated Elevations - Recommendations - North Elevation Restore windows; replace/repair deteriorated elements; Remove and reinstall glass, replace glazing compound and perimeter sealant, typ. Provide decorative ridge cap if interpreted as historically appropriate Clean light fixture, typ. Replace deteriorated wall framing and wood shims at base of bell tower Replace sheet metal roofing at top of bell tower Repair/ restore finials and crenellations Repair/restore louvers; Provide hard cloth mesh to prevent animal access; Clean bell tower to remove animal droppings/guano NOTE: Following repairs, prep and repaint architectural woodwork 100% including doors and windows. Replace entry porch and steps to comply with Building Code and TAS Remove and replace wood siding and trim 100%, repair or replace deteriorated wood framing '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Prune bushes and trees so they are not in contact with the structure and to allow room for maintenance Structural Analysis '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Grace Heritage Center Georgetown, Texas Initial Structural Evaluation S. Patrick Sparks, PE Sparks Engineering, Inc. Prepared for Stanley O. Graves Architexas Austin Written July 31, 2015 '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Grace Heritage Center Initial Structural Evaluation 07/31/2015 Grace Heritage Center Initial Structural Evaluation Sparks Engineering, Inc. (SEI) has completed an initial structural evaluation of the Grace Heritage Center in Georgetown, Texas. The purpose of our consulting services was to provide general recommendations regarding structural condition and stability of the building. This report presents our observations, findings, and recommendations. Summary SEI’s Patrick Sparks, P.E. visited the site on June 23th, 2015 to assess the condition of the Grace Heritage Center, a late-nineteenth century wood-framed church building. The primary structural problem with the building is the settlement and outward leaning of the bell tower, which we determined to be a result of localized deterioration in the lower wall framing and the foundation shims. The other observable distress is the visible deformation of the roof trusses. However, the 1992 retrofit appears to have halted further movement. We recommend removal of the exterior siding on the bell tower in order to make repairs to the wood framing. The deteriorated plywood shims can be replaced as needed from the crawlspace. Available documents The following documents were provided for our review: 1. Renovation of the Old Grace Church, by Voelter Associates, dated 11/23/1992, Sheets A1-A8 Site, Soil and Foundations The Williamson County Soil Survey 1 indicates that the site soil is the Denton Silty Clay. The soil has a moderate potential to shrink and swell with changes in moisture content (plasticity index of 30%). However, these soils are typically shallow with lithic bedrock at three to seven feet below ground level, so the expected soil movement should be minor. 1 U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov, accessed on 07/28/15. 1 '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Grace Heritage Center Initial Structural Evaluation 07/31/2015 The foundation appears to consist of continuous reinforced concrete footings along the perimeter and isolated footings on the interior. The foundation system seems to be appropriate for the site. We observed the levelness of the building using a laser level and found no significant movement, except at the bell tower. Bell Tower The bell tower is wood-framed with bevel clapboard siding on the exterior, and solid lumber sheathing on the interior of the lower levels. The upper level has been reinforced with plywood panels in the corners. Figure 1. Signs of movement in the Bell Tower: Left, the red laser plummet shows that the tower leans noticeably to the west (yellow line). At right, interior lumber sheathing boards on the lower south wall of the tower are cupped and buckled, indicating excessive moisture in the wall and the possibility of crushing of the framing due to decay. 2 '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Grace Heritage Center Initial Structural Evaluation 07/31/2015 Figure 2. The Bell Tower is visibly leaning away from the sanctuary, as indicated by the yellow line and arrow, where the red line is vertical (ref. also to Figure 1). Arrows point in direction of movement. Yellow zones highlight areas of decay: plywood shims at the foundation piers, and likely decay in the sill-plate or studs at the bottom of the tower. 3 '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Grace Heritage Center Initial Structural Evaluation 07/31/2015 Nave The wood-framed nave is rectangular in plan and has a steeply-sloped roof supported by widely spaced scissor trusses, with tied rafters in between. First tie-rod intervention Second tie-rod intervention Figure 3. The nave walls are deflected outward by about 4-inches on each side, as indicated by the orange lines and arrows, but this past movement appears to have been arrested by the most recent (second) tie-rod intervention (blue line). The walls of the nave are leaning outward about 3- or 4-inches at the top. Such outward leaning of the walls is typical of this type of construction, due to the lateral thrust of the roof and associated deflection of the roof trusses. There were two prior interventions to address the problem of outward wall leaning and roof deflection. The first one introduced a tie-rod in each truss about 18-inches above the top of wall. In a later renovation, another rod was added lower down, just at the top of the wall, and the truss members themselves were strengthened (1992). During our site investigation, we found that the lower tie rods are properly anchored to the trusses and to the wood columns. Based on our observations and preliminary structural analysis, we found that the latest intervention appears to be effective and no further outward movement should occur. 4 '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Grace Heritage Center Initial Structural Evaluation 07/31/2015 We also analyzed the floor capacity and found that it was suitable for assembly space with fixed seating. Recommendations With the exception of the bell tower, the church building appears to be structurally sound. The following repairs are recommended: 1. Remove the exterior siding on the bell tower and repair all deteriorated wood framing using conventional methods. 2. Replace the deteriorated foundation shims with preservative-treated lumber. 3. Provide vertical straps (e.g. Simpson ST18) to tie the tower studs together across each floor level. 4. Double face-nail both the interior lumber sheathing and the bevel siding using stainless steel 8d sinkers into the studs. Limitations This initial structural evaluation was based on visual field observations of readily accessible areas and limited structural calculations using available information. The recommendations are based on the observed conditions at the subject property at the time of our on-site survey. Other conditions may exist, or develop over time, which were not found during the assessment. Our recommendations are for planning purposes only and do not represent an engineering design or specification. Additional investigation may be required as part of a comprehensive program or design. END OF REPORT 5 '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Summary of Preservation Recommendations According to Priority Level 1 - Critical: Advanced deterioration is involved and immediate repair or replacement is needed to prevent the failure of the element within the next 2 years. There may be a threat to health or safety. Level I priority should be accomplished immediately. Level 2 - Serious: Deterioration may result in the failure of the element within 2 to 5 years if not corrected, and a threat to health or safety may result if not corrected. Deterioration of adjacent or related elements may occur as a result of this deterioration. Level 2 should be repaired or restored within this period or included in a comprehensive restoration of the building. Level 3 - Minor: Deficiency or deterioration exists which requires minor or routine repair or preventative maintenance, and the life expectancy of the element may be reduced if not corrected. This condition will affect the element in the long term, beyond 5 years. Level 3 priority should be included in a comprehensive restoration of the building. Summary of Preservation Recommendations According to Priority Level 1 1. Repair/replace flat seam metal roofing and integral flashing elements at Bell Tower Roof 2. Repair and or replace deteriorated wood elements at Bell Tower roof including finials and crenellations 3. Paint exterior architectural woodwork 100% following indicated repairs/ replacement 4. Provide access hatch at Bell Tower roof for future inspection and maintenance 5. Replace exterior architectural woodwork 100% at exterior walls 6. Repair/replace deteriorated framing members following removal of wood siding 7. Flood gutters, downspouts, and subsurface drainage pipes to ensure that they are properly functioning 8. Move splash block to properly direct water away from the building 9. Repaint gutters and downspouts 10. Provide new Building Code compliant entry porch and steps (Includes railings) 11. Provide new ADA and Building Code compliant ramp, rear porch, and steps (Includes railings) 12. Reconstruct wood louvers at Bell Tower including wire cloth for pest control 13. Clean evidence of bird and rodent infestation on interior of Belfry 14. Modify grade at southeast corner of building to properly slope away from building 15. Repair leaking condenser line 16. Test sprinkler system and adjust heads as needed Level 2 1. Remove deteriorated and damaged cement parging at piers and replace to match existing 2. Selectively repoint failing and deteriorated mortar joints at stone masonry walls 3. Clean biological growth on masonry walls 4. Repair bent and damaged foundation vents, verify that they are properly working 5. Restore existing fixed and operable wood casement window 6. Survey and provide options for repairing stained glass windows and replacing protective glazing 7. Reconstruct paired wood doors at west entry 8. Adjust accessible door for smooth/proper operation 9. Document and survey historic door at north wall of Chancel, fully restore Level 3 1. Replace asphalt roofing with wood shingle roofing (Assume 2-5 years) 2. Provide period appropriate cresting at ridge of Nave and Chancel roofs 3. Prep and paint perimeter fence and gate 4. Restore bronze plaques '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Building Maintenance and Inspection Program Recommendations One of the most important aspects which must be implemented in developing a preservation plan on historic buildings is a comprehensive maintenance program. This program must be developed and rigorously maintained to ensure long term preservation of a landmark building. No matter how comprehensive the preservation plan is, or how successful the restoration efforts are, the building components will continue to suffer irreparable damage if not maintained properly. Neglect of proper maintenance will result in eventual deterioration of original building elements and structural integrity which may ultimately endanger the building and its inhabitants. The following maintenance issues should be addressed as applicable: Semi-Annually 1. Gutters and Downspouts Inspect gutters, downspouts and subsurface lines for clogs, missing leaf strainers, leaking joints, rusting, or other deterioration. Re-secure loose gutter and downspouts connections. 2. Grading Inspect grading around perimeter of buildings for ponding water. 3. Landscaping Inspect trees and shrubs around perimeter of buildings; trim back to prevent their rubbing on exterior surfaces, with allowances for wind deflection. 4. General Maintenance Survey Georgetown Heritage Society staff and other community members who have frequent access to the building for indications of building maintenance problems such as water infiltration, inadequate services, or infrastructure problems. Rooms which are not occupied or that are not used irregularly should be inspected for deterioration. Yearly 1. Roof Have a qualified roofing consultant inspect all roofs for existing and potential problems and furnish a written report of findings. Have a qualified, reputable contractor make repairs recommended by the roofing consultant. 2. Sealants Inspect exterior sealants, for damage and deterioration, particularly loss of resiliency, splitting, and de-bonding from sides of joints. 3. Wood Surfaces Inspect painted wood surfaces for deterioration, loose or peeling paint, open joints, and other damage. Repair as necessary. 4. Metal Surfaces Inspect metal surfaces for movement or damage at joints, rust, or failing paint coating, which may allow water infiltration. Repair as necessary. 5. Windows Inspect windows for loose, missing and deteriorated glazing putty and broken glass; weatherstripping, and hardware repair as necessary. Inspect stained glass for new cracks. 6. Wood Destroying Insects Have wood elements inspected for termites and other wood destroying insects by a certified exterminator. 7. Birds and Other Vermin Inspect bell tower, roof, roof trim, and foundation for signs for bird or vermin nests or infestation. Eliminate, as necessary. '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Yearly (cont’d) 8. Stone Inspect stone for signs of severe weathering, delamination, or cracking which will result in water infiltration and potential failure of the stone. 9. Mortar Joints Inspect mortar joints for signs of severe weathering, cracking, and loss of mortar in the joints. These deficiencies will result in water infiltration and will exponentially cause more damage if not corrected in a timely manner. Damage to the mortar joints may be the result of an underlying structural problem and should be monitored closely. Have a qualified design professional review the damage and provide recommendations. 10. Doors Inspect for proper operation of doors, hardware, and weatherstripping. 11. Bell Tower Inspect interior of Bell Tower for any visible water damage. 12. Interior Truss Structure Monitor any cracks or visible strains on the interior trusses. This could be an indication that the structure or foundation is shifting. '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 IV BUDGET ESTIMATE Estimate of Probable Cost Phasing Strategy '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 41 Estimate of Probable Cost '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Estimate of Probable Cost The Grace Heritage Center, Georgetown, Texas No. Item Quantity 01000 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (Assume 17% total construction cost) A) Project Management B) Field Personnel/ Supervision C) Construction Documents / Printing D) Quality Control E) Temporary Utilites F) Construction Facilities G) Bond & Insurance H) Temporary Construction 1) Scaffolding 2) Project sign 3) Sidewalk bridge, barrier fencing (Staging area, protection, etc…) I) Materials Testing 01000 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ABATEMENT Clean Belfry 02000 SITE WORK A) Modify grade at southeast corner of building to properly drain & move splash blocks 04000 05000 06000 CONCRETE A) Modify concrete structure for entry porch B) Modify exist. Concrete structure for ramp & rear porch MASONRY A) Selectively repoint stone masonry joints B) Clean biological growth/soiling on stone masonry walls C) Stone masonry at entry porch D) Stone masonry at ramp and east porch METALS A) Ornamental metal guardrail/railings 1. Front entry porch & steps 2. Ramp, rear porch, & steps CARPENTRY A) Rough carpentry 1. Front entry porch 2. Rear porch & steps 3. Repair/replace deteriorated framing members following removal of siding B) Replace exterior architectural woodwork 100% 1. Siding 2. Flat trim 3. Ornamental finials & crenellations at Bell Tower 4. New decking & wood trim at main entry porch 5. New decking & wood trim at ramp and rear porch 07000 THERMAL & MOISTURE PROTECTION A) Replace flat seam metal roofing system at Bell Tower, includes demo, waterproofing memb., integral flashing, B) Ornamental sheet metal cresting at ridge of Nave & Chancel roof C) Replace asphalt roofing with wood shingle roofing at Nave & Chancel Roofs D) Flood gutters, downspouts, & subsurface drainage pipes Unit Cost Subtotal $ 35,414 $ 1,500 Cost/Sect 35,414 1,500 1 L.S. 1,500.00 1,450 1 1 B) Test sprinkler system and adjust heads as needed 03000 Unit L.S. L.S. 800.00 650.00 $ $ 800 650 L.S. L.S. 2,500.00 3,500.00 $ $ 2,500 3,500 L.S. L.S. L.S. L.S. 1,920.00 1,200.00 2,500.00 3,500.00 $ $ $ $ 1,920 1,200 2,500 3,500 6,000 Allow Allow 9,120 1 1 Allow Allow 19,650 28 103 L.F. L.F. 150.00 150.00 $ $ 4,200 15,450 62,475 1 1 Allow 2500 300 1 83 232 L.S. L.S. 2,400.00 2,400.00 $ $ 2,400 2,400 L.S. 10,000.00 $ 10,000 S.F. S.F. L.S. S.F. S.F. 11.50 18.50 5,500.00 25.00 25.00 $ $ $ $ $ 28,750 5,550 5,500 2,075 5,800 37,710 100 52 S.F. L.F. 65.00 80.00 $ $ 6,500 4,160 2200 1 SQ L.S. 12.00 650.00 $ $ 26,400 650 '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Estimate of Probable Cost The Grace Heritage Center, Georgetown, Texas No. 08000 Item DOOR & WINDOWS A) Doors 1. Reconstruct main entry doors 2. Adjust accessible door for smooth/proper operation 3. Door at north wall of Chancel a. Survey door b. Restore door B) Windows 1. Restore fixed and operable wood casement windows 2. Survey & provide options for repairing stained glass windows & replacing protective glazing 10000 Unit Unit Cost 40,100 EA EA 2,200.00 500.00 $ $ 4,400 500 1 1 LS. L.S. 500.00 1,800.00 $ $ 500 1,800 10 EA 2,200.00 $ 22,000 1 3 L.S. EA L.S. 2,500.00 2,200.00 1,800.00 $ $ $ 2,500 6,600 1,800 2800 3 15 3 1 1 315 1 S.F. EA EA EA LS LS S.F. EA 3.75 400.00 400.00 500.00 1,920.00 1,440.00 3.75 1,200.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 10,500 1,200 6,000 1,500 1,920 1,440 1,181 1,200 I) Replace deteriorated/damaged cement parging at foundation piers 1 L.S. 1,920.00 $ 1,920 SPECIALITIES A) Access hatch at Bell Tower Roof B) Repair bent/damaged foundation grilles 1 1 Ea. L.S. 1,200.00 500.00 $ $ 1,200 500 Allow FINISHES A) Paint exterior architectural woodwork 100% B) Paint door assemblies C) Paint window assemblies D) Paint louver assemblies E) Paint perimeter fence & gate F) Paint gutters & downspouts G) Seal porch & ramp decking H) Restore bronze plaques 26,861 1,700 11000 EQUIPMENT Not Used 12000 FURNISHINGS Not Used 13000 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION None 14000 CONVEYING SYSTEMS Not Used 15000 MECHANICAL A. Repair leaking condenser line 1 L.S. 500.00 $ 500 ELECTRICAL A) Replace exterior light fixtures 5 EA 250.00 $ 1,250 $ 243,730 16000 Cost/Sect Subtotal 2 1 C) Reconstruct wood louvers D) Restore/suppliment door hardware 09000 Quantity 500 1,250 SUBTOTAL 10% GC OVERHEAD & PROFIT TOTAL CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDES O & P) 10% CHANGE ORDER CONTINGENCY ESTIMATED FINAL CONSTRUCTION COST Page 2 '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 $ $ $ 243,730 24,373 268,103 $ $ 26,810 294,914 9/9/2015 Phasing Strategy Recommended Phases Initial Work 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Clean Belfry and wire mesh at interior of louvers Flood gutters, downspouts, and subsurface drainage pipes, report findings Move splash blocks to properly direct water away from building Modify grade at southeast corner of building to properly slope Repair leaking condenser line Test yard sprinkler system and adjust heads as needed Survey and provide options for repairing stained glass windows and replacing protective glazing. Scope will be determined following receipt of report and included in one of the following Phases. (Note: Report should include a budget estimate for the various options) BUDGET ESTIMATE: $9,344 Phase 1: Immediate Restoration Required for Stabilization 1. Restore Bell Tower a. Remove siding and trim 100% to expose framing b. Repair/replace deteriorated framing/shims & provide vertical straps at each floor level c. Replace siding and trim 100% d. Reconstruct wood louver assemblies (3) e. Restore wood windows assemblies (3) f. Reconstruct paired entry door assembly g. Replace flat seam metal roofing h. Provide access hatch i. Restore finials and crenellations j. Clean Belfry and pest proof k. Paint exterior architectural woodwork 100% including louvers and windows Subtotal: $83,168 2. Provide New Entry Porch a. Modify existing foundation for new porch b. Provide wood frame deck level with finished floor c. Provide code compliant steps, guardrails, and handrails. Subtotal: $19,404 3. Provide New Ramp & Rear Porch a. Modify existing foundation for new porch b. Provide wood frame deck level with finished floor c. Provide code compliant steps, guardrails, and handrails. Subtotal: $44,625 BUDGET ESTIMATE: $147,197 '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 45 Phasing Strategy, cont’d Phase 2: Restoration Recommended to Prevent Further Deterioration 1. Restore Nave and Chancel a. Replace siding and trim 100% b. Repair/replace deteriorated framing c. Restore wood window assemblies (14), does not include work to stained glass panels d. Restore wood door assemblies e. Paint exterior architectural woodwork 100% f. Paint perimeter fence and gate g. Paint gutters and downspouts h. Restore cement parging at foundation piers i. Selectively re-point stone masonry wall at crawlspace j. Clean stone masonry foundation wall k. Repair bent and damaged crawlspace vents BUDGET ESTIMATE: $94,502 Phase 3 1. 2. 3. Replace existing roofing over Nave and Chancel with wood shingle roofing Provide period appropriate cresting at ridge Restore bronze plaques BUDGET ESTIMATE: $43,871 TOTAL ALL PHASES: $294,914 '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 46 V FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Potential Grants, Tax Credits & Other Available Funding Sources '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 47 Potential Grants, Tax Credits & Other Available Funding Sources For eligible historic structures and heritage education projects, there are a variety of funding sources available. It is recommended to explore grants, tax credits and fundraising as potential opportunities. On a state level, the Texas Preservation Trust Fund (TPTF) grant program is awarded through the Texas Historical Commission (THC) annually. These one-to-one match grants are paid as a reimbursement of eligible expenses incurred during the project. On a federal level, the National Trust for Historic Preservation reviews grant applications three times per year for smaller grants ranging from $2,500 to $5,000 through the National Trust Preservation Funds (NTPF). Over 196 projects were awarded NTPF grants in 2014. The Texas Historic Preservation Tax Credit Program is available for buildings listed on the National Register of Historic Places and the Federal Historic Preservation Tax Incentive Program is available for the rehabilitation of historic buildings. Grace Heritage Center current has no designations; should it be listed as part of the Georgetown Historic District, it could be eligible for the tax credit programs. Local preservation groups and historical societies, such as the Georgetown Heritage Society, can be excellent resources for gaining visible and aiding in fundraising efforts for projects. Resources Texas Historical Commission http://www.thc.state.tx.us Tax Credit Program http://www.thc.state.tx.us/ preserve/projects-and-programs/ preservation-tax-incentives/ texas-historic-preservation-taxcredit Texas Preservation Trust Fund http://www.thc.state.tx.us/ preserve/projects-and-programs/ texas-preservation-trust-fund National Trust Preservation Funds http://www.preservationnation. org/resources/find-funding/ preservation-funds-guidelineseligibility.html Fundsnet Directory http://www.fundsnetservices. com/ Texas Grants http://texas.grantwatch.com/ Partners for Sacred Places Texas Office 6040 Camp Bowie Blvd., Suite 62 Fort Worth, TX 76116 866/315-4840 http://www.sacredplaces.org t1BSUOFSTGPS4BDSFE1MBDFTJTUIFPOMZOBUJPOBMBEWPDBUFGPSUIFTPVOETUFXBSETIJQBOE active community use of America’s older religious properties. t5IFPSHBOJ[BUJPOXBTGPVOEFEJOCZBOBUJPOBMUBTLGPSDFPGSFMJHJPVTIJTUPSJD preservation, and philanthropic leaders. Since then, Partners has served several thousand congregations and other local organizations and represents the needs and concerns of over 100,000 older, community-serving sacred places across America. t0GGFSTNBUDIJOHHSBOUTGPSUFDIOJDBMBTTJTUBODFBOETFFEHSBOUTGPSSFQBJSTBOEDBQJUBM projects. '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 48 VI APPENDIX Relevant Historic Documents ADA Assessment Cresting Patterns Additional Funding Resources Glossary of Terms '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 49 Relevant Historic Documents '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 ADA Assessment The Grace Heritage Center is required to comply with the Texas Accessibility Standards (TAS), which is based upon the Americans with the Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG), and with the 2009 International Building Code. In 2014, a Sidewalk Master Plan and Public Facility Access Audit was completed by Altura Solutions, L. P. for the City of Georgetown. This study, as accessed from the City of Georgetown website, follows for reference. Future Renovation, Modifications, or Alterations: Under TAS, if alterations are made to an existing facility, any alterations or new construction must fully comply. Projects with construction costs less than $50,000 are not required to be reviewed by TDLR, however, compliance with TAS is still required. TAS 4.1.6(1)(a) No alteration shall be undertaken which decreases or has the effect of decreasing accessibility or usability of a building or facility below the requirements for new construction at the time of alteration. Historic Significance TAS makes provisions for historic preservation projects in Section 4.1.7: (1) Applicability: (a) General Rule. Alterations to a qualified historic building or facility shall comply with 4.1.6 Accessible Buildings: Alterations, the applicable technical specifications of 4.2 through 4.35 and the applicable special application sections 5 through 10 unless it is determined in accordance with the procedures in 4.1.7(2) that compliance with the requirements for accessible routes (exterior and interior), ramps, entrances, or toilets would threaten or destroy the historic significance of the building or facility in which case the minimum requirements in 4.1.7(3) may be used for the feature. (b) Definition. A qualified historic building or facility is a building or facility that is: (i) Listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places; or (ii) Designated as a Recorded Texas Historic Landmark or State Archeological Landmark. As indicated in the TAS requirements, there is some latitude afforded to compliance with these standards due to the age and historic significance of this structure. Alterations to historic properties must comply to these standards to the maximum extent feasible. Under those provisions, alterations should be done in full compliance with alteration standards for other types of buildings. However, if following the usual standards would threaten or destroy the historic significance of a feature of the building, alternative standards may be utilized which meets the intent of the code. The decision to use alternative standards must be made in consultation with the appropriate advisory board designated in ADAAG. While accessibility components are grouped according to priority, ADA compliance in general should be considered a top priority. An Application for Variance documenting historical significance would be the procedure to provide a request for use of the minimum requirements as called out in TAS 4.1.7(3). '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior Exterior Interior Interior Interior 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 LOCATION 1 ITEM No. ROOM Men's & Women's Restroom Men's & Women's Restroom Men's & Women's Restroom Restroom Corridor Restroom Corridor Accessible Parking Accessible Parking Accessible Parking Accessible Parking Accessible Parking Accessible Route 811 S. Main Street Georgetown, TX 78626 GRACE HERITAGE CENTER Shelf* Signage* Door* Drinking Fountain Drinking Fountain Van Accessible Parking Accessible Parking Sign Curb Ramp* Curb Ramp* Trees Handrail* BARRIER The sign is mounted too low at 56", where the minimum height is 60". Ramp is missing one handrail. Ramp clear width is 35", where 36" is the minimum. Ramp running slope is 9.7%, where 8.3% is the maximum. Ramp rise exceeds the maximum 30" without a landing. Trees protrude into accessible parking access aisle, where 80" is the minimum clearance. Curb ramp is located in access aisle which violates the 2% slope requirement for aisles. Curb ramp running slope is 10.5% where the maximum is 8.3%. VIOLATION Raise sign to be minimum 60" high. Relocate curb ramp out of access aisle and provide access to the sidewalk. 307 Protruding Objects 703.4 Installation Height and Location 404.2.4 Maneuvering Clearances 602.2 Clear Floor Space 211.2 Minimum Number Relocate the drinking fountain or move adjacent walls to accommodate compliant clear floor space. Install a drinking fountain meeting requirements for standing persons. 2 2 $400 $300 2 3 3 $300 $3,200 $500 1 1 1 1 1 1 PRIORITY LEVEL City of Georgetown | 2014 Sidewalk Master Plan and Public Facility Access Audit |ADA Self-Assessment Surveys | October 29, 2014 Remove the closer which removes the clearance requirement. Door has 10.5" maneuvering clearance on the push side. Minimum clearance should be 12" due to the closer. Signage mounted on the door, needs Relocate signage to a compliant location. to be on adjacent wall on latch side of door. Shelf protrudes into circulation path. Relocate out of circulation path, or add cane detection. Only one 'lo' drinking fountain is provided. There needs to be an additional 'hi' drinking fountain. Drinking fountain only has 29" wide clear space. Needs to be 36" wide since it is located in an alcove. $250 $100 see cost above. $1,400 $500 Trim trees to compliant height. Relocate curb ramp out of access aisle and provide access to the sidewalk. $4,000 ESTIMATED COST 7/14 Reconstruct the ramp to be compliant. RECOMMENDED ACTION Inspection Date: 208.2.4 Van Parking Spaces There is not a van accessible parking Convert the accessible space to a van accessible space. space. At least one must be provided. 502.6 Identification 405.2 Slope 502.4 Floor or Ground Surfaces 307 Protruding Objects 405 Ramps Accessible Design) (2010 Standards for CODE HEADING * references a photograph identified by item number in the appendix Public Facility ADA Self-Assessment Surveys City of Georgetown, Texas 2014 Sidewalk Master Plan and Public Facility Access Audit '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Interior Interior Interior Interior 13 14 15 LOCATION 12 ITEM No. ROOM Chapel Chapel Men's Restroom Men's & Women's Restroom 811 S. Main Street Georgetown, TX 78626 GRACE HERITAGE CENTER Alter* Arch Doors* Accessible Stall* Lavatory BARRIER 206.2.4 Spaces & Elements 404.2.3 Clear Width $16,800 $5,040 $1,747 $3,276 $26,863 2 2 2 2 PRIORITY LEVEL City of Georgetown | 2014 Sidewalk Master Plan and Public Facility Access Audit |ADA Self-Assessment Surveys | October 29, 2014 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST CONTINGENCY - 30% DESIGN FEE - 8% CONTRACTOR FEE - 15% TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $1,000 $1,000 Arch in the door frame protrudes into Seek a variance. circulation path. There are steps up to the alter, no Seek a variance. accessible route provided. The gate yields a 24" opening, where 32" is the minimum. 307 Protruding Objects $3,500 Accessible stall width is 39", where Reconfigure accessible stall to be compliant. 60" is minimum. Flush control is not on open side of stall. No rear grab bar provided. Water closet centerline is 20.5", where as 19" is maximum. $350 ESTIMATED COST 604.2 Location 604.3.1 Size 604.5 Grab Bars 604.6 Flush Controls Add side panel to lavatory to lower to compliant height. RECOMMENDED ACTION 7/14 Lavatory protrudes into circulation path. The bottom of lavatory is 29" where the maximum is 27". VIOLATION Inspection Date: 307 Protruding Objects Accessible Design) (2010 Standards for CODE HEADING * references a photograph identified by item number in the appendix Public Facility ADA Self-Assessment Surveys City of Georgetown, Texas 2014 Sidewalk Master Plan and Public Facility Access Audit '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Item: 3 Item: 11 Item: 1 Item: 9 & 10 811 S. Main Street Georgetown, TX 78626 GRACE HERITAGE CENTER Public Facility ADA Self-Assessment Surveys City of Georgetown, Texas 2014 Sidewalk Master Plan and Public Facility Access Audit 7/14 City of Georgetown | 2014 Sidewalk Master Plan and Public Facility Access Audit |ADA Self-Assessment Surveys | October 29, 2014 Item: 13 Item: 4 Inspection Date: '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Item: 14 811 S. Main Street Georgetown, TX 78626 GRACE HERITAGE CENTER Item: 15 Public Facility ADA Self-Assessment Surveys City of Georgetown, Texas 2014 Sidewalk Master Plan and Public Facility Access Audit 7/14 City of Georgetown | 2014 Sidewalk Master Plan and Public Facility Access Audit |ADA Self-Assessment Surveys | October 29, 2014 Inspection Date: '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 Additional Funding Resources '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 FUNDING AND ASSISTANCE FOR PRESERVATION PROJECTS This list of potential funding and assistance sources for historic preservation projects is compiled and maintained by the Texas Historical Commission Division of Architecture and was last updated in January 2015. Please contact us at [email protected] or 512/463-6094 to obtain an updated list or with feedback. This list provides only brief summaries of potential funding sources, and information including eligibility requirements and application deadlines is subject to change without notice. Please contact possible grantors directly for more information on their programs. Preservation Funding for Homeowners 1 Preservation Funding for Businesses 3 Preservation Funding for Government Agencies 5 Preservation Funding for Nonprofit Organizations 14 Preservation Funding for Religious Organizations 18 Preservation Funding for Rural Communities 18 Regional Preservation Funding 19 Preservation Funding for Homeowners United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development State Office 101 S. Main Street Temple, TX 76501 254/742-9700 offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?state=us&agency=rd Direct Housing Loans www.rurdev.usda.gov/had-direct_housing_loans.html x Section 502 loans are primarily used to help low-income individuals or households purchase homes in rural areas. Funds can be used to build, repair, renovate or relocate a home, or to purchase and prepare sites, including providing water and sewage facilities. x Applicants for direct loans from Housing and Community Facilities Programs must have very low or low incomes. Families must be without adequate housing, but be able to afford the mortgage payments. Applicants must be unable to obtain credit elsewhere, yet have reasonable credit histories. x Loans are for up to 33 years, or 38 years for those with incomes below 60% of area median income and who cannot afford 33-year terms. Farm Labor Housing Loans and Grants www.rurdev.usda.gov/had-farm_labor_grants.html x The Farm Labor Housing Loan and Grant program provides capital financing for the development of housing for domestic farm laborers. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects x x x 2 Loans and grants are provided to buy, build, improve, or repair housing for farm laborers, including persons whose income in earned in aquaculture (fish and oyster farms) and those engaged in on-farm processing. Funds can be used to purchase a site or a leasehold interest in a site; to construct housing, day care facilities, or community rooms; to pay fees to purchase durable household furnishings; and to pay construction loan interest. Loans are made to farmers, associations of farmers, family farm corporations, Native American tribes, nonprofit organizations, public agencies, and associations of farmworkers. Grants are made to farmworker associations, nonprofit organizations, Native American tribes, and public agencies. Loans are for 33 years at 1% interest. Grants may cover up to 90% of development costs. The balance may be a Farm Labor Housing Program loan. Housing Preservation Grants www.rurdev.usda.gov/had-hpg_grants.html x The Housing Preservation Grant program provides grants to sponsoring organizations for the repair or rehabilitation of low- and very low-income housing in towns up to 20,000 in population. x Those assisted must own very low- or low-income housing, either as homeowners, landlords, or members of a cooperative. Eligible sponsors include state agencies, units of local government, Native American tribes, and nonprofit organizations. Funds received by the sponsors are combined with other programs or funds and used as loans, grants, or subsidies for recipient households. x Funds must be used within a two-year period. Rural Repair and Rehabilitation Loans and Grants www.rurdev.usda.gov/had-rr_loans_grants.html x The Very Low-Income Housing Repair program provides loans and grants to very low-income homeowners to repair, improve, or modernize their dwellings or to remove health and safety hazards. x To obtain a loan, homeowner-occupants must be unable to obtain affordable credit elsewhere and must have very low incomes. They must need to make repairs and improvements to make the dwelling more safe and sanitary or to remove health and safety hazards. Grants are only available to homeowners who are 62 years old or older and cannot repay a loan. x Loans of up to $20,000 and grants of up to $7,500 are available. Loans are for up to 20 years at 1% interest. Loans and grants can be combined for up to $27,500 in assistance. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Fort Worth Regional Office 801 Cherry Street, Unit #45, Suite 2500 Fort Worth, TX 76102 817/978-5965 portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD 203(k) Program portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/housing/sfh/203k x Section 203(k) program is HUD’s primary program for the rehabilitation and repair of single family properties, and is a tool for community and neighborhood revitalization and for expanding homeownership opportunities. x Flexible loan program helps developers, investors and families at all income levels buy and restore properties in urban and rural historic districts. The program operates through FHA approved lending institutions, and the loans are insured by FHA. The 203(k) Rehabilitation Mortgage Insurance Program helps preservationists deal with problems such as appraisal barriers, the high cost of second mortgages, and prohibitive down payment and closing costs. x Unlike most mortgage programs, the 203(k) is available to potential homeowners before work to the home is complete. To provide funds for the rehabilitation, the mortgage amount is based on the projected value of the property with the work completed, taking into account the cost of the work. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects 3 Community Development Block Grants portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/comm_planning/communitydevelopment/programs portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/states/texas x The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program is a flexible program that provides communities with resources to address a wide range of unique community development needs. Funds are primarily used to develop viable communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and opportunities to expand economic opportunities, principally for low- and moderateincome persons. x Program areas include grants to entitlement communities, which include cities with populations of at least 50,000 and urban counties with populations of at least 200,000; disaster recovery assistance; the Neighborhood Stabilization Program, which offers grants to communities hardest hit by foreclosures and delinquencies to purchase, rehabilitate, or redevelop homes and stabilize neighborhoods; improving living conditions for colonias residents; and Brownfields Economic Development Initiative. Non-entitlement communities may apply through the Texas Department of Agriculture (see Preservation Funding for Government Agencies below). x The CDBG program provides annual grants on a formula basis to 1,209 general units of local government and States. x Homeowners, businesses, and nonprofits seeking CDBG funds should contact their local government. Preservation Funding for Businesses National Park Service Technical Preservation Services 1849 C Street, NW (org 2255) Washington, DC 20240 202/513-7270 www.nps.gov Historic Preservation Tax Incentives: 10% Tax Credit www.nps.gov/tps/tax-incentives.htm x 10% federal income tax credit available for non-residential, income-producing buildings that are NOT listed in the National Register of Historic Places and not National Historic Landmarks. x Buildings must have been constructed prior to 1936. Historic Preservation Tax Incentives: 20% Tax Credit www.nps.gov/tps/tax-incentives.htm www.thc.state.tx.us/preserve/projects-and-programs/preservation-tax-incentives x 20% federal income tax credit available for income-producing buildings listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or National Historic Landmarks, buildings that contribute to NRHP districts and certain local historic districts, or buildings that are eligible for listing in the NRHP. x Rehabilitation expenditures must exceed the value of the building itself (not including the land) prior to the beginning of the project. Most rehabilitation costs are eligible for the credit, such as structural work, building repairs, electrical, plumbing, heating and air conditioning, roof work and painting. Some costs are NOT eligible for the credit, such as acquisition, new additions, furniture and landscaping. x The project work must meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. x The Texas Historical Commission (THC) administers the federal tax credit program, in conjunction with the National Park Service and IRS. The THC encourages early consultation. Contact the Division of Architecture at 512/463-6094. x Applications can be submitted at any time. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects 4 Texas Historical Commission P.O. Box 12276 Austin, TX 78711-2276 512/463-6100 www.thc.state.tx.us Texas Historic Preservation Tax Credit Program www.thc.state.tx.us/preserve/projects-and-programs/preservation-tax-incentives x 25% state franchise tax credit available for income-producing buildings listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or National Historic Landmarks, buildings that contribute to NRHP districts and certain local historic districts, or buildings designated as Recorded Texas Historic Landmarks or State Antiquities Landmarks. x Rehabilitation expenditures must exceed $5,000. Most rehabilitation costs are eligible for the credit, such as structural work, building repairs, electrical, plumbing, heating and air conditioning, roof work and painting. Some costs are NOT eligible for the credit, such as acquisition, new additions, furniture and landscaping. x The project work must meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. x The Texas Historical Commission (THC) administers the state tax credit program, in conjunction with the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. The THC encourages early consultation. Contact the Division of Architecture at 512/463-6094. x Applications can be submitted at any time beginning in January 2015. United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development State Office 101 S. Main Street Temple, TX 76501 254/742-9700 offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?state=us&agency=rd Rural Business Enterprise Grants (RBEG) www.rurdev.usda.gov/bcp_rbeg.html x The RBEG program provides grants for rural projects that finance and facilitate development of small and emerging rural businesses help fund distance learning networks, and help fund employment related adult education programs. x Eligible fund use includes acquisition or development of land, easements, or rights of way; construction, conversion, renovation, of buildings, plants, machinery, equipment, access streets and roads, parking areas, utilities; pollution control and abatement; capitalization of revolving loan funds; training and technical assistance; distance adult learning for job training and advancement; rural transportation improvement; and project planning. x Grants are available to rural public entities (towns, communities, State agencies, and authorities), Native American tribes, and rural nonprofit corporations. x Grants range from $10,000 up to $500,000. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grants (See Preservation Funding for Homeowners above) Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects 5 Preservation Funding for Government Agencies Meadows Foundation 3003 Swiss Avenue Dallas, TX 75204 214/826-9431 800/826-9431 www.mfi.org x The Meadows Foundation distributes grant funds in the areas of arts and culture, civic/public affairs, education, health, and human services. x Grants are available for construction (except for the construction of churches and seminaries), and applicants for are encouraged to research the Foundation’s Green Building Guidelines. x Grants are available to qualified public entities or nonprofit charities serving the people of Texas. Grants are not made to individuals. x Applications can be submitted at any time. National Endowment for the Humanities 400 7th Street, SW Washington, DC 20506 1-800-NEH-1121 www.neh.gov Museums, Libraries, and Cultural Organizations: Planning and Implementation Grants www.neh.gov/grants/public/museums-libraries-and-cultural-organizations-planning-grants www.neh.gov/grants/public/museums-libraries-and-cultural-organizations-implementation-grants x Museums, Libraries, and Cultural Organizations: Planning Grants and Implementation Grants provide support for museums, libraries, historic places, and other organizations that produce public programs in the humanities. Projects must be analytical and deeply grounded in humanities scholarship, and must demonstrate the potential to attract a broad, general audience. x Eligible project formats include but are not limited to museum and library exhibitions; interpretive websites, mobile applications, and other digital projects; interpretations of historic places, sites, or regions; book/film discussion groups; and related programs. x Grants are available to nonprofit organizations, public agencies, and tribal governments. x Applications are due in January and August. x Contact the Division of Public Programs at 202/606-8269 or [email protected]. Challenge Grants www.neh.gov/grants/challenge/challenge-grants x Challenge Grants help institutions and organizations secure long-term support for their humanities programs and resources. x Grants may be used to establish or enhance endowments or spend-down funds that generate expendable earnings to support and enhance ongoing program activities. Challenge grants may also provide capital directly supporting the procurement of long-lasting objects, such as acquisitions for archives and collections, the purchase of equipment, and the construction or renovation of facilities needed for humanities activities. x Grants are available to nonprofit organizations and public agencies. x Applications are due in May. x Contact the Office of Challenge Grants at 202/606-8309 or [email protected]. Collaborative Research Grants www.neh.gov/grants/research/collaborative-research-grants x Collaborative Research Grants support interpretive research undertaken by a team of two or more scholars, for full-time or part-time activities for a period of one to three years. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects x x x 6 Grants are available to nonprofit organizations, state and local governments, federally recognized Native American tribal governments, and project directors. Applications are due in December. Contact the Division of Research Programs at 202/606-8200 or [email protected]. Preservation Assistance Grants for Smaller Institutions www.neh.gov/grants/preservation/preservation-assistance-grants-smaller-institutions x Preservation Assistance Grants for Smaller Institutions help organizations improve their ability to preserve and care for their significant humanities collections. These may include special collections of books and journals, archives and manuscripts, prints and photographs, moving images, sound recordings, architectural and cartographic records, decorative and fine art objects, textiles, archaeological and ethnographic artifacts, furniture, historical objects, and digital materials. x Grants may be used for general preservation assessments, consultations with professionals to address a specific issue, purchase of storage furniture, preservation supplies, or environmental monitoring equipment, and education and training. x Grants are available to small and mid-sized nonprofit and government institutions, such as libraries, museums, historical societies, archival repositories, cultural organizations, local records offices, and colleges and universities, and to Native American tribes with significant humanities collections. x Applications are due in May. x Contact the Division of Preservation and Access at [email protected]. National Park Service Heritage Preservation Services 1201 Eye Street, NW-2255 Washington, DC 20005 202/354-2037 www.nps.gov American Battlefield Protection Program: Battlefield Planning Grants www.nps.gov/abpp/grants/planninggrants.htm x Battlefield Planning Grants aid in the protection of battlefield land and sites associated with battlefields. x Project types include site identification and documentation, planning and consensus-building, and interpretation and education. Grants do not fund acquisition or capital improvements. x The program funds projects conducted by federal, state, local, and tribal governments, nonprofit organizations, and educational institutions. x Applications are due in January. x Contact the American Battlefield Protection Program at 202/371-1916. Land and Water Conservation Fund: Civil War Battlefield Land Acquisition Grants www.nps.gov/abpp/grants/CWBLAGgrants.htm x Civil War Battlefield Acquisition Grants help states and local communities acquire and preserve threatened Civil War battlefield land. In Texas, only Galveston, Palmeto Ranch, and Sabine Pass battles are eligible. x Grants are available to state and local governments; a nonprofit organization may apply in partnership with a state or local government agency. x Grants require a 1:1 non-Federal match. x Applications can be submitted at any time. x Contact the American Battlefield Protection Program at 202/371-1916. Tribal Preservation Program Grants www.nps.gov/thpo/tribal-heritage/index.html x Tribal Preservation Program Grants include formula grants to Tribal Historic Preservation Offices and competitive Tribal Heritage Grants. These grants assist American Indians, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiian Organizations protect and promote their unique cultural heritage and traditions. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects x x x 7 Grant categories for Tribal Heritage Grants include locating and identifying cultural resources, preserving a property listed in the National Register of Historic Places, comprehensive preservation planning, oral history and documenting cultural traditions, and education and training for building a historic preservation program. Grants are available to Federally recognized tribes, including Indian Tribes, Alaskan Natives, and Native Hawaiian Organizations. Applications are due in March. National Park Service Intermountain Regional Office 12795 Alameda Parkway Denver, CO 80225 303/969-2500 www.nps.gov Japanese American Confinement Sites www.nps.gov/jacs x Japanese American Confinement Sites Grants are awarded to preserve and interpret U.S. confinement sites where Japanese Americans were detained during World War II. x Grants are awarded to organizations and entities working to preserve historic Japanese American confinement sites and their history, including nonprofit organizations, educational institutions, and state, local, and tribal governments, and other public entities. x Grants require a 2:1 Federal to non-Federal match ($2 Federal to $1 non-Federal match). x Applications are due in November. National Park Service National Center for Preservation Technology and Training 645 University Parkway Natchitoches, LA 71457 318/356-7444 ncptt.nps.gov Preservation Technology and Training Grants ncptt.nps.gov/grants x The Preservation Technology and Training Grants program provides funding for innovative research that develops new technologies or adapts existing technologies to preserve cultural resources. Grant recipients undertake innovative research and produce technical reports which respond to national needs in the field of historic preservation. x NCPTT requests innovative proposals that advance the application of science and technology to historic preservation in the following areas: planning for and responding to climate change and the impacts of natural and man-made disasters on cultural resources; 3D documentation and visualization techniques for historic sites, landscapes, buildings and objects; mobile application development for cultural resource detection, documentation, and management; and development and testing of protective coatings for cultural materials. NCPTT does NOT fund bricks and mortar projects. x Grants are available to universities and colleges, nonprofit organizations, and governmental agencies. x Maximum grant awards are $40,000. x Applications are due in November. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects 8 National Park Service National Trails System Office – Santa Fe P.O. Box 728 Santa Fe, NM 87504-0728 505/988-6701 Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program www.cr.nps.gov/rt66/grnts/index.htm x Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program Grants support the preservation of the most significant and representative historic Route 66 buildings, structures, road segments, and cultural landscapes in the eight states through which the route passes. x Assistance also supports research, planning, oral history, and education outreach projects related to the preservation of Route 66. x Eligible applicants include private individuals and business owners, nonprofit organizations, educational institutions, and local, state, and tribal governments. x Grants require a 1:1 non-Federal match or in-kind contributions. x Applications are due in March or April. National Trust for Historic Preservation 2600 Virginia Avenue, NW, Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20037 800/944-6847 www.preservationnation.org Battlefield Preservation Fund www.preservationnation.org/resources/find-funding/special-funds/#Battlefield x Battlefield Preservation Fund grants serve as a catalyst to stimulate efforts to preserve battlefields, viewsheds, and related historic structures. Priority is given to battlefields that have limited access to other specialized battlefield funding programs. x Funds may be used for legal and research fees to mitigate development threats, fund-raising and media plans, feasibility studies for endangered buildings and sites, archeological studies, landscape research and planning, viewshed protection, easement planning, and interpretation and heritage education activities. x Grants are available to nonprofit organizations and public agencies. Only members of the National Trust at the Forum or Main Street levels are eligible to apply. x Grants range from $2,500 to $5,000. Cash match is required. x Applications are due in February, June, and October. Emergency/Intervention Funding www.preservationnation.org/resources/find-funding/special-funds/#Emergency x Intervention funding is awarded in emergency situations when immediate and unanticipated work is needed to save a historic structure. x Grants are available to nonprofit organizations and public agencies. Only members of the National Trust at the Forum or Main Street levels are eligible to apply. x Grants typically range from $1,000 to $5,000. Cash match is NOT required. x Applications can be submitted at any time. Johanna Favrot Fund for Historic Preservation www.preservationnation.org/resources/find-funding/special-funds/johanna-favrot-fund.html x Johanna Favrot Fund for Historic Preservation provides grants for projects that foster appreciation of our nation’s diverse cultural heritage and preserve the livability of the nation’s historic communities. x Funds may be used for professional services and advice, conferences, workshops, and education. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects x x x 9 Grants are available to nonprofit organizations and public agencies. Individuals and for-profit businesses may apply only if the project for which funding is requested involves a National Historic Landmark. Only members of the National Trust at the Forum or Main Street levels are eligible to apply. Grants range from $2,500 to $10,000. Cash match is required. Applications are due in May. Hart Family Fund for Small Towns www.preservationnation.org/resources/find-funding/special-funds/hart-fund.html x Hart Family Fund for Small Towns assists preservation and revitalization initiatives in small towns with populations of 5,000 or less by providing grants for preservation planning and education efforts. x Funds may be used to obtain professional expertise in areas such as architecture, archeology, engineering, preservation planning, land-use planning, fund raising, organizational development and law as well as preservation education activities to educate the public. x Grants are available to nonprofit organizations and public agencies. Only members of the National Trust at the Forum or Main Street levels are eligible to apply. x Grants range from $2,500 to $5,000. Cash match is required. x Applications are due in May. Cynthia Woods Mitchell Fund for Historic Interiors www.preservationnation.org/resources/find-funding/special-funds/cynthia-woods-mitchell.html x Cynthia Woods Mitchell Fund for Historic Interiors provides grants to assist in the preservation, restoration and interpretation of historic interiors. x Funds may be used for professional services and advice for projects such as developing an interior restoration plan, conservation plan for textiles, or a historic furnishings plan; or to sponsor a workshop on the preservation of historic interiors, for instance. x Grants are available to nonprofit organizations and public agencies. Individuals and for-profit businesses may apply only if the project for which funding is requested involves a National Historic Landmark. Only members of the National Trust at the Forum or Main Street levels are eligible to apply. x Grants range from $2,500 to $10,000. Cash match is required. x Applications are due in May. National Trust Preservation Funds www.preservationnation.org/resources/find-funding/preservation-funds-guidelines-eligibility.html x National Trust Preservation Funds provides grants for preservation planning and education efforts. Priorities for funding include building sustainable communities, reimagining historic sites, promoting diversity and place, and protecting historic places on public lands. x Funds may be used to obtain professional expertise in areas such as architecture, archeology, engineering, preservation planning, land-use planning, fund raising, organizational development and law as well as preservation education activities to educate the public. x Grants are available to nonprofit organizations and public agencies. Only members of the National Trust at the Forum or Main Street levels are eligible to apply. x Grants range from $2,500 to $5,000. Cash match is required. x Applications are due in February, June, and October. Rosenwald Schools: Rosenwald School Centennial Fund, Alice Rosenwald Flexible Fund, and Richard E. Deutsch Memorial Fund for Rosenwald Schools www.preservationnation.org/resources/find-funding/rosenwald-grants x The National Trust, through its Rosenwald Schools Initiative, has a goal of saving Rosenwald Schools as vital hubs of community activity and revitalization. x Three grant funds exist, but funding is not currently available from the Rosenwald School Centennial Fund, which provided for the restoration and rehabilitation of Rosenwald School buildings. The Alice Rosenwald Flexible Fund provides grants for preservation planning, rehabilitation, and education Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects x x x 10 projects. The Richard E. Deutsch Memorial Fund for Rosenwald Schools provides grants for preservation planning. Grants are available to nonprofit organizations and public agencies. Only members of the National Trust at the Forum or Main Street levels are eligible to apply. Maximum grants are $5,000. Cash match is required. Applications can be submitted at any time. Southwest Intervention Fund www.preservationnation.org/resources/find-funding/special-funds/swi.html x Grants from the National Trust’s Southwest Intervention Fund are intended to further preservation efforts of the traditional cultures of the Southwest region. The Fund provides support for preservation planning efforts and enables prompt responses to emergency threats or opportunities. Strategic opportunities to save sites or help jumpstart preservation projects are eligible for the Fund’s small, catalytic grants. x Eligible area includes West Texas (west of U.S. 281 from the Oklahoma border to San Antonio and north of U.S. 90 from San Antonio to Del Rio). x Grants are available to nonprofit organizations and public agencies. Only members of the National Trust at the Forum or Main Street levels are eligible to apply. x Grants range from $2,500 to $10,000. Cash match is required. x Applications are due in February, June, and October. Texas Department of Agriculture P.O. Box 12847 Austin, TX 78711-2847 512/463-7476 800/TELL-TDA www.texasagriculture.gov Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for Rural Texas texasagriculture.gov/GrantsServices/RuralEconomicDevelopment/RuralCommunityDevelopmentBlockGran t%28CDBG%29.aspx x The CDBG Program for Rural Texas aims to develop viable communities by providing decent housing and suitable living environments, and expanding economic opportunities for persons of low- to moderate-income. x Grants are available to non-entitlement city or county governments, which do not receive direct funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and typically include cities with a population of less than 50,000 and counties of less than 200,000. x See United States Department of Housing and Urban Development under Preservation Funding for Homeowners above for more information on the CDBG program. Texas Capital Fund: Downtown Revitalization Program texasagriculture.gov/GrantsServices/RuralEconomicDevelopment/TexasCapitalFund.aspx x The Downtown Revitalization Program is intended to stimulate economic growth through the funding of public infrastructure improvements to aid in the elimination of slum and blight conditions in the historic downtown areas of rural communities. x Awarded cities receive funds to make public infrastructure improvements in the designated historic, downtown business district. Funds may be used for public infrastructure improvements; acquisition of needed land; water and sewer facilities/lines; road/street construction/improvements; natural gas line construction/improvements; electric, telephone, and fiber optic line construction/improvements; traffic signals and signs; drainage improvements; sidewalk construction/improvements, including lighting, ADA ramps and rails; public parking lot construction/improvements; other construction activities required to eliminate architectural barriers for the handicapped. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects x x x 11 Grants are available to non-entitlement city governments, which do not receive direct funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and typically include cities with a population of less than 50,000. Awards range from $50,000 to $150,000. Applications are due in July. Texas Capital Fund: Main Street Improvements Program texasagriculture.gov/GrantsServices/RuralEconomicDevelopment/TexasCapitalFund.aspx x Main Street Improvements Program is intended to stimulate economic growth through the funding of public infrastructure improvements to aid in the elimination of slum and blight conditions in the historic downtown areas of rural Main Street Communities, as identified by the Texas Historical Commission. x Awarded cities receive funds to make public infrastructure improvements in the designated Main Street business district. Funds may be used for public infrastructure improvements; acquisition of needed land; water and sewer facilities/lines; road/street construction/improvements; natural gas line construction/ improvements; electric, telephone, and fiber optic line construction/improvements; traffic signals and signs; drainage improvements; sidewalk construction/improvements, including lighting, ADA ramps and rails; public parking lot construction/improvements; other construction activities required to eliminate architectural barriers for the handicapped. x Grants are available to non-entitlement city governments, which do not receive direct funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and typically include cities with a population of less than 50,000. x Awards range from $50,000 to $150,000. x Applications are due in October. Texas Capital Fund: Infrastructure Development Program texasagriculture.gov/GrantsServices/RuralEconomicDevelopment/TexasCapitalFund.aspx x Infrastructure Development Program funds public infrastructure primarily in Texas' rural communities and counties in support of projects that create new jobs for low-to-moderate income persons. x Funds may be used for public infrastructure improvements to include: water and sewer facilities/lines; pre-treatment facilities; road/street construction/improvements; natural gas line construction/improvements; electric, telephone, & fiber optic line construction/improvements; harbor/channel dredging; purchase of real estate related to public infrastructure improvements; traffic signals and signs; drainage improvements; and railroad spurs. x Grants are available to non-entitlement city or county governments, which do not receive direct funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and typically include cities with a population of less than 50,000 and counties of less than 200,000. x Awards range from $50,000 to $1.5 million. x Applications are due on the 20th of each month. Texas Capital Fund: Real Estate Development Program texasagriculture.gov/GrantsServices/RuralEconomicDevelopment/TexasCapitalFund.aspx x Real Estate Development Program provides no-interest loans to fund the acquisition or renovation of an existing building, new construction, or land acquisition, primarily in Texas' rural communities and counties. The program supports projects that create new jobs for low and moderate-income persons. x Funds may be used for purchase and/or renovation of an existing building, new building construction or land acquisition, or private infrastructure. x Loans are available to non-entitlement city or county governments, which do not receive direct funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and typically include cities with a population of less than 50,000 and counties of less than 200,000. x Awards range from $50,000 to $1.5 million, and must be repaid by the business within 20 years. x Applications are due on the 20th of each month. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects 12 Texas Historical Commission P.O. Box 12276 Austin, TX 78711-2276 512/463-6100 www.thc.state.tx.us Certified Local Government (CLG) www.thc.state.tx.us/preserve/projects-and-programs/certified-local-government x Certified Local Government (CLG) Grants provide funding to participating city and county governments to develop and sustain an effective local preservation program critical to preserving local historic resources. Cities and county governments that have been individually certified by the National Park Service as CLGs (prior to the time of their grant application) are eligible to apply. x Grants can be used for local historic preservation projects, including surveys of historic properties/districts, preparation of nominations to the National Register of Historic Places, and other community-based preservation projects. x Awards range from $2,000 to $30,000 and require a one-to-one local cash or in-kind match. Only nonfederal monies may be used as a match, with the exception of Community Development Block Grants. x Applications are due November 4. x Contact the CLG program at 512/463-7812. Texas Historic Courthouse Preservation Program www.thc.state.tx.us/preserve/projects-and-programs/texas-historic-courthouse-preservation x Texas Historic Courthouse Preservation Program provides partial matching grants to Texas counties for the restoration of their historic county courthouses. x To participate in the grant program, counties must submit a master preservation plan for renovating and maintaining their historic county courthouse. Once a master plan is approved, the owner of the courthouse is eligible to apply for rehabilitation funding under this program. x Contact Sharon Fleming at 512/463-6268 or [email protected]. Texas Preservation Trust Fund Grant Program www.thc.state.tx.us/preserve/projects-and-programs/texas-preservation-trust-fund x Texas Preservation Trust Fund provides matching grants to qualified applicants for the acquisition, survey, restoration, preservation, planning and heritage education activities leading to the preservation of historic properties and archeological sites. x Competitive grants are awarded on a one-to-one match basis and are paid as reimbursement of eligible expenses incurred during the project. x Awards range from $10,000 to $50,000, with most under $30,000. x Applications follow a two-part process, with the initial applications due in the fall. x Contact Lisa Harvell at 512/463-6047 or [email protected]. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road Austin, TX 78744 512/389-8224 [email protected] tpwd.texas.gov/business/grants x Texas Parks and Wildlife Department acts as a silent partner in hundreds of communities across the state through its grant, assistance, education, and outreach programs. From the largest metroplex to the smallest rural community these programs help to build new parks, conserve natural resources, preserve historical sites, provide access to water bodies, and develop educational programs for youth. x Grants for land acquisition and park development include Outdoor Recreation Grants, Small Community Grants, and Urban Outdoor Recreation Grants. Maximum awards vary by grant type from $75,000 to $1 million. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects x x 13 Grants are available to municipalities, counties, municipal utility districts, and other local units of government. Applications are due in August. Union Pacific Foundation 1400 Douglas Street, Stop 1560 Omaha, NE 68179 402/544-5600 www.up.com/aboutup/community/foundation/index.htm x The Union Pacific Foundation supports the communities the Union Pacific Railroad serves. Grants are primarily made in the areas of community and civic service, including grants to museums and libraries, and health and human services. x Grants are available to nonprofit organizations and municipal governments. x Applications are due in August. United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development State Office 101 S. Main Street Temple, TX 76501 254/742-9700 offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?state=us&agency=rd Community Facility Grants and Community Facilities Direct and Guaranteed Loans http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/had-cf_grants.html and www.rurdev.usda.gov/had-cf_loans.html x Community Programs provides grants and loans to assist in the development of essential community facilities in rural areas and towns of up to 20,000 in population. x Funds may be used to develop essential community facilities by constructing, enlarging, or improving community facilities for health care, public safety, and community and public services. x Grants and loans are available to public entities such as municipalities, counties, and special-purpose districts, as well as nonprofit corporations and tribal governments. In addition, applicants must have the legal authority necessary for construction, operation, and maintenance of the proposed facility and also be unable to obtain needed funds from commercial sources at reasonable rates and terms. x For grants, the amount of assistance for project costs depends upon the median household income and the population in the community where the project is located and the availability of grant funds. x For direct loans, there are three levels of interest rates available (poverty, intermediate, and market) each on a fixed basis. For guaranteed loans, the interest rate is the lender’s customary interest rate for similar projects. Loan repayment terms may not exceed the applicant’s authority, the useful life of the facility, or 40 years. Farm Labor Housing Loans and Grants (See Preservation Funding for Homeowners above) Housing Preservation Grants (See Preservation Funding for Homeowners above) Rural Business Enterprise Grants (See Preservation Funding for Businesses above) United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grants (See Preservation Funding for Homeowners above) Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects 14 United States Economic Development Administration Austin Regional Office 903 San Jacinto, Suite 206 Austin, TX 78701 eda.gov/funding-opportunities Economic Development Assistance Programs x The Economic Development Administration’s (EDA’s) mission is to lead the Federal economic development agenda by promoting innovation and competitiveness, preparing American regions for economic growth and success in the worldwide economy. EDA supports development in economically distressed areas of the United States by fostering job creation and attracting private investment. x Under the Economic Development Assistance programs (EDAP), EDA makes construction, nonconstruction, and revolving loan fund investments under the Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Programs. Grants and cooperative agreements made under these programs leverage regional assets and support the implementation of economic development strategies that advance new ideas and creative approaches to advance economic prosperity in distressed communities. x Eligible applicants include state, county, and city governments, public and private institutions of higher education, Native American tribal governments, and nonprofits. Planning Program and Local Technical Assistance Program x Under the Planning program, EDA assists eligible recipients in creating regional economic development plans designed to stimulate and guide the economic development efforts of a community or region. As part of this program, EDA supports Partnership Planning investments to facilitate the development, implementation, revision, or replacement of Comprehensive Economic Development Strategies. x The Local Technical Assistance program strengthens the capacity of local or State organizations, institutions of higher education, and other eligible recipients to undertake and promote effective economic development programs through projects such as feasibility analyses and impact studies. x Eligible applicants include state, county, and city governments, public and private institutions of higher education, Native American tribal governments, and nonprofits. Preservation Funding for Nonprofit Organizations 1772 Foundation [email protected] www.1772foundation.org x 1772 Foundation offers grants related to historic properties redevelopment programs (revolving funds). Requests may include grants for feasibility studies for nonprofit preservation organizations considering establishing a revolving fund or grants to increase the capacity of existing revolving funds. x Applications are due in December. AT&T Foundation 208 S. Akard, Suite 100 Dallas, TX 75202-4206 800/591-9663 www.att.com x The AT&T Foundation supports nonprofit organizations and programs that address quality-of-life issues, with an emphasis on improving education and advancing community development. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects 15 Bank of America Charitable Foundation Contact your local Bank of America branch about.bankofamerica.com/en-us/global-impact/charitable-foundation-funding.html x The Bank of America Charitable Foundation supports efforts to address critical issues facing neighborhoods and communities. Funding priorities include community development, education, and workforce development. x Neighborhood preservation efforts include providing affordable housing, offering neighborhood residents home retention and foreclosure counseling, and promoting neighborhood stabilization. x The Neighborhood Builders program strengthens the capacity and infrastructure of select nonprofit groups to promote the professional development of their leaders. x Grants are available to nonprofit organizations in the Amarillo, Austin, Dallas/Fort Worth, El Paso, Houston, and San Antonio markets. BNSF Railway Foundation 2650 Lou Menk Drive Fort Worth, TX 76131-2830 817/867-6458 www.bnsffoundation.org [email protected] x BNSF Railway Foundation is dedicated to supporting the communities served by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway, and offers grants to nonprofit organizations in the areas of civic, cultural, educational, health and human service, and youth activities. x No application deadline, but grants require up to one year for a decision. The Rudy Bruner Award for Urban Excellence 130 Prospect Street Cambridge, MA 02139 617/492-8404 www.brunerfoundation.org/rba x The Rudy Bruner Award for Urban Excellence seeks to discover special places and celebrate and publicize their achievements. These places often transcend the boundaries between architecture, urban design and planning. They are born through processes of transformation ʊ the renewal of something old, or the creation of something new that resonates in the history of community life. The award seeks to illuminate the complex process of urban placemaking, so that it may be strengthened to better reflect the balance between form and use, opportunity and cost and preservation and change. x The award is made every other year in odd years, and applications are available in September of even years. Applications are due in December of even years. The Getty Foundation 1200 Getty Center Drive, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90049-1685 310/440-7320 www.getty.edu/foundation x The Getty Foundation supports institutions and individuals committed to advancing the understanding and preservation of the visual arts. The majority of funding is through initiatives that target a particular issue or region, and that are carried out in collaboration with the other Getty programs. x Apart from residential fellowships, most applications are by invitation rather than through open competition. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects 16 Graham Foundation for Advanced Studies in the Fine Arts 4 West Burton Place Chicago, IL 60610-1416 312/787-4071 www.grahamfoundation.org x The Graham Foundation for Advanced Studies in the Fine Arts makes project-based grants to individuals and organizations and produces public programs to foster the development and exchange of diverse and challenging ideas about architecture and its role in the arts, culture, and society. x Eligible projects may include, but are not limited to, publications, exhibitions, installations, conferences/lectures, films, new media projects, and other public programs. x Deadline for grants to individuals is in September. Deadline for grants to organizations is in February. Albert and Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation 6131 Westview Drive Houston, TX 77055 713/681-7868 www.herzsteinfoundation.org x The Albert and Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation supports charitable efforts that offer individuals opportunities for advancement through education and enrichment of the human spirit, and contribute to the quality of life in our society. x Grants are available to nonprofit organizations. Applications should be in the form of a written request. Meadows Foundation (See Preservation Funding for Government Agencies above) National Endowment for the Humanities (See Preservation Funding for Government Agencies above) Museums, Libraries, and Cultural Organizations: Planning and Implementation Grants Challenge Grants Collaborative Research Grants Preservation Assistance Grants for Smaller Institutions National Park Service (See Preservation Funding for Government Agencies above) American Battlefield Protection Program: Battlefield Planning Grants Land and Water Conservation Fund: Civil War Battlefield Acquisition Grants Tribal Preservation Program Grants Japanese American Confinement Sites Preservation Technology and Training Grants Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program National Trust for Historic Preservation (See Preservation Funding for Government Agencies above) Battlefield Preservation Fund Emergency/Intervention Funding Johanna Favrot Fund for Historic Preservation Hart Family Fund for Small Towns Cynthia Woods Mitchell Fund for Historic Interiors National Trust Preservation Funds Rosenwald Schools Southwest Intervention Fund Peter H. Brink Leadership Fund www.preservationnation.org/resources/find-funding/special-funds/the-peter-h-brink-leadership.html x Peter H. Brink Leadership Fund builds the capacity of existing nonprofit preservation organizations and encourages collaboration among these organizations by providing grants for mentoring and other peerto-peer and direct organizational development and learning opportunities. x Grant reimburses travel costs and provides an honorarium for the mentor up to maximum of $2,500. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects 17 Ed Rachal Foundation 500 North Shoreline Blvd, Suite 606 Corpus Christi, TX 78401-0323 361/881-9040 www.edrachal.org/index.shtml x The Ed Rachal Foundation supports charitable, scientific, literary or educational purposes. x Grants are made to nonprofit organizations. Grants are not made to individuals. x Submit a written application at any time of the year. Requests from the same organization are considered once every fiscal year. The Summerlee Foundation 5556 Caruth Haven Lane Dallas, TX 75225 214/363-9000 www.summerlee.org x The Summerlee Foundation funds a variety of Texas history programs in a multitude of disciplines, ranging from academic research to field archaeology, throughout every region of the state and is a strong advocate of collaborative projects between historical organizations. x Grants are made to nonprofit organizations. Texas Historical Commission Texas Preservation Trust Fund (See Preservation Funding for Government Agencies above) Texas Historical Foundation P.O. Box 50314 Austin, TX 78763 512/453-2154 texashistoricalfoundation.org/grants-and-gifts/grants x The Texas Historical Foundation funds bricks-and-mortar restoration projects, those promoting Texas history education, and archeological projects. The Foundation’s most frequent gifts are in the area of rural preservation in communities with populations of less than 30,000. x Applications should show a strong record of community support and the ability to obtain the financial resources necessary to ensure the project’s completion. x Grants are made to nonprofit organizations, religious organizations, and city/county/state historical agencies based in Texas. x Grant applications must be received by the first day of March, June, September, or December. Union Pacific Foundation (See Preservation Funding for Government Agencies above) United States Department of Agriculture Community Facility Grants and Community Facilities Direct and Guaranteed Loans (See Preservation Funding for Government Agencies above) Farm Labor Housing Loans and Grants (See Preservation Funding for Homeowners above) Housing Preservation Grants (See Preservation Funding for Homeowners above) Rural Business Enterprise Grants (See Preservation Funding for Businesses above) United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grants (See Preservation Funding for Homeowners above) United States Economic Development Administration (See Preservation Funding for Government Agencies above) Economic Development Assistance Programs Planning Program and Local Technical Assistance Program Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects 18 Preservation Funding for Religious Organizations Partners for Sacred Places Texas Office 6040 Camp Bowie Blvd., Suite 62 Fort Worth, TX 76116 866/315-4840 www.sacredplaces.org x Partners for Sacred Places is the only national advocate for the sound stewardship and active community use of America’s older religious properties. x The organization was founded in 1989 by a national task force of religious, historic preservation, and philanthropic leaders. Since then, Partners has served several thousand congregations and other local organizations and represents the needs and concerns of over 100,000 older, community-serving sacred places across America. x Offers matching grants for technical assistance and seed grants for repairs and capital projects. Texas Historical Commission Texas Preservation Trust Fund (See Preservation Funding for Government Agencies above) Texas Historical Foundation (See Preservation Funding for Nonprofit Organizations above) The Trull Foundation (See Regional Preservation Funding below) Preservation Funding for Rural Communities United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service State Office 101 S. Main Street Temple, TX 76501 254/742-9800 www.tx.nrcs.usda.gov Agricultural Conservation Easement Program www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/programs/easements/acep x The Agricultural Conservation Easement Program provides financial and technical assistance to help conserve agricultural lands and wetlands and their related benefits. x Under the Agricultural Land Easements component, NRCS helps Indian tribes, state and local governments, and non-governmental organizations protect working agricultural lands and limit nonagricultural uses of the land. Under the Wetlands Reserve Easements component, NRCS helps to restore, protect and enhance enrolled wetlands. x Land eligible for agricultural easements includes cropland, rangeland, grassland, pastureland and nonindustrial private forest land. NRCS will prioritize applications that protect agricultural uses and related conservation values of the land and those that maximize the protection of contiguous acres devoted to agricultural use. x USDA provides 100% of the easement value and 75-100% of restoration costs for permanent easements and 50-75% each of the easement value and restoration costs of 30-year easements. Financial Assistance Programs www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/programs/financial x NRCS offers voluntary programs to eligible landowners and agricultural producers to provide financial and technical assistance to help manage natural resources in a sustainable manner. Through these Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects x 19 programs the agency approves contracts to provide financial assistance to help plan and implement conservation practices on agricultural lands and non-industrial private forest land. The Conservation Stewardship Program helps agricultural producers maintain and improve their existing conservation systems and adopt additional conservation activities to address priority resources concerns. The Environmental Quality Incentives Program provides financial and technical assistance to agricultural producers in order to address natural resource concerns and deliver environmental benefits such as improved water and air quality, conserved ground and surface water, reduced soil erosion and sedimentation or improved or created wildlife habitat. United States Department of Agriculture Farm Labor Housing Loans and Grants (See Preservation Funding for Homeowners above) Rural Business Enterprise Grants (See Preservation Funding for Businesses above) Rural Repair and Rehabilitation Loans and Grants (See Preservation Funding for Homeowners above) Regional Preservation Funding See also the Council on Foundations’ list of community foundations in Texas: www.cof.org/communityfoundation-locator. Abell-Hanger Foundation P.O. Box 430 Midland, TX 79702-0430 432/684-6655 www.abell-hanger.org x In furtherance of the mandate in its charter to support “any benevolent, charitable, educational, or missionary undertaking,” the Foundation makes grants to nonprofit organizations, which are involved in such undertakings for the public welfare, including, but not limited to, education, health services, human services, arts and cultural activities and community or societal benefit. x Grants are made to nonprofit organizations and institutions of higher education. Grants are not awarded to individuals. x Serves communities in the Midland area and 56 other counties in West Texas. x Applicants must submit a pre-application summary before receiving a grant application and deadline. Amarillo Area Foundation 801 South Fillmore, Suite 700 Amarillo, TX 79101 806/376-4521 www.amarilloareafoundation.org x Amarillo Area Foundation supports the entire range of human needs in the Panhandle and manages hundreds of funds in the form of donor-advised funds, scholarships, unrestricted funds and project funds. Emphasis is on education, health, human services, youth, and families. x Historic preservation projects are given a low priority for funding. x Grant awards are made to nonprofit organizations. Grants are not awarded to individuals. x Serves communities in the northernmost 26 counties of the Texas Panhandle. The Austin Community Foundation 4315 Guadalupe St., Suite 300 Austin, TX 78751 512/472-4483 www.austincommunityfoundation.org x The Austin Community Foundation grants funds for projects and programs that address community needs such as arts and culture, education and training, community development/community service, environment, health, human services, recreation and animal-related services. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects x x x 20 Competitive grant process open to nonprofit organizations and public agencies. Serves communities in central Texas. No application deadline, but applicants are advised that the awards process can take up to 4-6 months from when the application is submitted. Austin Convention and Visitors Bureau Attn: Steve Genovesi, Senior Vice President, Sales 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 200, Austin, Texas, 78701 512/583-7259 http://www.austintexas.org/about-acvb/heritage-marketing/ x The Austin Convention and Visitors Bureau works in conjunction with the City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission to administer a grant program for historic preservation. x Grants must promote tourism and the convention and hotel industry. Applications should demonstrate how the grant would encourage tourists and convention delegates to visit the historic site. x Eligible historic properties must be owned or leased by a governmental or non-profit entity. x Awards do not exceed $47,000. x Grant cycles are in spring and fall. Harry W. Bass Jr. Foundation 4809 Cole Ave., Suite 105 Dallas, TX 75205 214/599-0300 www.hbrf.org x The Harry W. Bass Jr. Foundation seeks to enrich the lives of the citizens of Texas by funding specific programs or special projects of public entities and nonprofit organizations in the areas of youth and education. Grants for arts and culture, civic and community, science and research, and health and human services are occasionally considered. x Unsolicited grant requests are restricted to organizations based in the Greater Dallas area. x Grant requests are considered year round. The Belo Foundation 901 Main Street, Suite 609 Dallas, TX 75202 214/977-8267 www.ahbelo.com/about/foundation.x2 x The Belo Foundation focuses the majority of its grant-making on college-level journalism education and the development of urban parks. x Grants are made to nonprofit entities, primarily in Dallas. x Grant requests are accepted year-round and are processed upon receipt. Brazos Community Foundation P.O. Box 2622 Bryan, TX 77805-2622 979/589-4305 www.cfbv.org x The Community Foundation of the Brazos Valley works with individuals, families, and businesses to build and manage permanent endowment funds which provide grants to charitable organizations that are working to improve the quality of life in the Brazos Valley. x Community grants of up to $1,000 benefit nonprofit organizations. x Applications are due in October. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects 21 The Brown Foundation, Inc. P.O. Box 130646 Houston, TX 77219-0646 713/523-6867 brownfoundation.org x The Brown Foundation distributes funds for public charitable purposes, principally for support, encouragement and assistance to education, the arts, and community service. x Current emphasis is in the field of public education at the primary and secondary levels. Visual and performing arts remain a principal area of interest. Foundation also supports community service projects which serve the needs of children and families. x Grants are available to nonprofit organizations. x Serves communities throughout the state of Texas with an emphasis on Houston. x No application deadline. Coastal Bend Community Foundation 615 N. Upper Broadway, Suite 1950 Corpus Christi, TX 78401 361/882-9745 www.cbcfoundation.org x Coastal Bend Community Foundation makes grants in the areas of arts and culture, education, environment, families and children, health and human services, and the public good. x Grants are available to nonprofit organizations and government or school entities applying for projects outside their basic services. x Serves communities in the Coastal Bend area of Aransas, Bee, Jim Wells, Kleberg, Nueces, Refugio, and San Patricio Counties. x Applications are due in June. Calvert K. Collins Family Foundation 3131 McKinney Ave., Suite 720 Dallas, TX 75204 214/528-5904 calvertcollins.com x Calvert K. Collins Family Foundation supports programs across Texas that help better educate the state's citizens and better preserve the state's historical structures. Foundation supports programs that restore historical buildings to their original luster, rejuvenate those buildings for a new use, or educate Texans as to the value of historical preservation. x Foundation board meets once a year in April to consider grant applications. Chisholm Trail Communities Foundation 116 West 8th Street Georgetown, TX 78626-5800 512/863-4186 www.chisholm-trail.org x The Chisholm Trail Communities Foundation seeks to enrich the communities it serves through grants in the areas of arts and culture, community development or community services, education, the environment, and health and human services. x Grants are available to nonprofit organizations. x Serves communities in the Williamson County area. x Grants are distributed at an annual Fast Pitch event or through quarterly applications due in February, May, August, and November. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects 22 Communities Foundation of Texas 5500 Caruth Haven Lane Dallas, TX 75225-8146 214/750-4222 www.cftexas.org x Communities Foundation of Texas’ major areas of grant funding distribution to nonprofit organizations include animals, arts, education, elderly, environment, health, social services, and youth. x At least 50% of the population served must be residents of Dallas, Tarrant, Denton, Collin or Rockwall counties. The Community Foundation of Abilene 500 Chestnut Street, Suite 1634 P.O. Box 1001 Abilene, TX 79604-1001 325/676-3883 www.cfabilene.org x The Community Foundation of Abilene builds endowments that enrich the quality of life in Abilene and the surrounding areas. The Foundation accepts gifts, administers funds, invests assets, and makes grants to charitable organizations. x Serves communities in the Abilene area. x Grants are available to nonprofit organizations. Grants typically range from $1,000 to $25,000. x Letters of intent are due in September and February, with proposals due in October and March. The Community Foundation of Brazoria County 104 W. Myrtle, Suite 204 Angleton, TX 77515 979/848-2628 cfbr.org x The Community Foundation of Brazoria County makes grants in the fields of arts and culture, education, environment, faith-based organizations, health and medical research and human services. x Serves communities in Brazoria County. x Applications are accepted at different times during the year. The Community Foundation of North Texas 306 West 7th Street, Suite 1045 Fort Worth, TX 76102 817/877-0702 www.cfntx.org x The Community Foundation of North Texas makes grants to nonprofit organizations in the areas of arts and culture, community and economic development, education, environment, and health and human services. x Serves communities in an 11-county region, including Bosque, Denton, Hill, Hood, Jack, Johnson, Parker, Somervell, Tarrant, Wise, and Young Counties. x Applications are accepted at different times during the year. Community Foundation of the Texas Hill Country P.O. Box 291354 Kerrville, TX 78029-1354 830/896-8811 www.communityfoundation.net x The Community Foundation of the Texas Hill Country enhances and supports the quality of life in the Texas Hill Country x Grants are available to nonprofit organizations and government entities applying for projects outside their basic services. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects x x 23 Serves communities in Bandera, Gillespie, Kendall, and Kerr Counties. Applications are accepted at different times during the year. Cullen Foundation 601 Jefferson St., 40th Floor Houston, TX 77002 713/651-8835 cullenfdn.org x Cullen Foundation supports a wide variety of charitable activities, including education, health, arts, and public service programs. x Grants are made to nonprofit organizations. x Serves communities throughout Texas, primarily in the Houston area. x No application deadline, but grants require up to six months for a decision. The Dallas Foundation 3963 Maple Avenue, Suite 390 Dallas, TX 75219 214/741-9898 www.dallasfoundation.org x Founded in 1929, the Dallas Foundation is the oldest community foundation in the state and awards grants to qualified nonprofit organizations in the areas of the arts, education, health, social services, and general community that improve the well-being of the residents. x Serves communities in Dallas County. x Applications are accepted at different times during the year. East Texas Communities Foundation 315 North Broadway, Suite 210 Tyler, TX 75702 903/533-0208 www.etcf.org x East Texas Communities Foundation aims to serve as a flexible and cost-effective vehicle for donors to invest in the community, promote philanthropy, and build permanent endowments for the region's changing issues and opportunities. x Serves communities in East Texas. x Applications are accepted at different times during the year. El Paso Community Foundation 333 North Oregon St., 2nd Floor El Paso, TX 79901 915/533-4020 www.epcf.org x El Paso Community Foundation awards funds to grant applicants in the areas of arts and humanities, education, environment/animal welfare, health and disabilities, human services and economic development. Priority is given to more effective ways of doing things and ideas that require risk-taking; projects where a moderate amount of grant money can have an impact; and projects that show collaboration with other organizations. x Serves communities in the southwest Texas border region. x Applications are due in February and August. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects 24 Foundation for Southeast Texas P.O. Box 3092 Beaumont, TX 77704-3092 409/833-5775 www.cfsetx.org x Foundation for Southeast Texas is a nonprofit, public charity that accepts funds from donors, manages them, and distributes them to nonprofits in our local community and beyond. x Grants are made to nonprofit organizations and government entities. x Serves communities in Hardin, Jefferson, and Orange Counties. Donald D. Hammill Foundation 8700 Shoal Creek Blvd. Austin, TX 78757 www.hammillfoundation.org x The Donald D. Hammill Foundation’s mission is to improve the quality of life for people who have disabilities, the aged, and people who are financially disadvantaged, including the working poor and those who are indigent or chronically ill. x Grants are made to nonprofit organizations. x Serves communities in the Austin area. x Proposals are due in March. Greater Houston Community Foundation 5120 Woodway Drive, Suite 6000 Houston, TX 77056 713/333-2200 www.ghcf.org x Greater Houston Community Foundation fosters the spirit of philanthropy and spans all areas of need in the Houston community, from education and research to arts and culture. x The foundation also administers the Port Arthur Communities Fund. x Serves communities in the Houston area. Greater Round Rock Community Foundation 206 East Main Round Rock, TX 78664 512/514-0046 www.rrcommunityfoundation.org x The mission of the Greater Round Rock Community Foundation is to serve as a catalyst to nurture and inspire philanthropic giving; to build “community capital” through a permanent endowment fund; to provide a flexible vehicle for donors with varied philanthropic interests; to take initiative in addressing needs and shaping effective responses; to enrich the quality of life in the Greater Round Rock Area. x Grants are made to nonprofit organizations. x Serves communities in the Round Rock area. x Applications are accepted year round. Houston Endowment 600 Travis, Suite 6400 Houston, TX 77002-3000 713-238-8100 www.houstonendowment.org x Houston Endowment supports programs in the areas of arts and culture, education, environment, health, and human services that improve life for the Houston area. x Capital improvement grants are available for the acquisition, construction (i.e. building renovations) or improvement of a physical asset that will lead over time to demonstrably better results for the people the organization serves. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects x x x 25 Grants are made to nonprofit organizations. Serves the greater Houston area, including communities in Harris, Brazoria, Chambers, Fort Bend, Galveston, Liberty, Montgomery, and Waller Counties. Applications are accepted year round. Dodge Jones Foundation P.O. Box 176 Abilene, TX 79604 325/673-6429 x Dodge Jones Foundation has granted to worthy projects, including the beautification of the T&P rightof-way, the restoration of the Paramount Theatre, and the rehabilitation of the Grace Museum, T&P Passenger Depot, REA/Baggage Express, T&P Freight Warehouse, the Elks Art Center, and the National Center for Children's Illustrated Literature. x Serves communities in the Abilene area. Lower Colorado River Authority P.O. Box 220 Austin, TX 78767 1-800-776-5272 www.lcra.org/community-services/community-and-economic-development/pages/community-grantprogram.aspx x The Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA) and its electric and water customers provide Community Development Partnership Program Grants for community projects. Volunteer fire departments, emergency medical services, school districts, libraries, civic groups, local governments, and nonprofit organizations may apply for the grants. x Emphasis is placed on projects that include energy efficiency and water conservation, volunteer fire departments, and public safety organizations that have been impacted by wildfires and drought. x Serves communities in the LCRA service area. x Applicants may request as much as $50,000. Applicants requesting $5,000 or more in grant funding must have at least 20% in matching funds. x Applications are due in January and July. Lubbock Area Foundation 2509 80th Street Lubbock, TX 79423 806/762-8061 www.lubbockareafoundation.org x Lubbock Foundation benefits the South Plains community through grants to nonprofit organizations, educational programs, and scholarships. Grants are made for start-up funding, general operating support, program support, and demonstration programs. x Typical grant awards range from $500 to $2,500, with $5,000 as the maximum. x Serves communities in the South Plains. x Applications are accepted year round. The Montgomery County Community Foundation 9320 Lakeside Blvd., Building 2, Suite 200 The Woodlands, TX 77381 281/363-8158 www.mccfoundation.org x The Montgomery County Community Foundation was established to create and build a permanent fund to provide for the present and future well-being of our community. x Grants are available to nonprofit organizations. x Serves communities in Montgomery County. x Applications are due in September. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects 26 The Moody Foundation 2302 Post Office Street, Suite 704 Galveston, TX 77550 409/797-1500 www.moodyf.org/index.asp x The Moody Foundation was established to benefit in perpetuity present and future generations of Texans. The Foundation was instrumental in Galveston’s revival of its historic past, making grants that enabled the Galveston Historical Foundation to purchase and save many buildings in the island’s older neighborhoods and The Historic Strand District and to acquire and refurbish the sailing barque Elissa. x The Foundation focuses its giving in Galveston but also makes grants primarily in Austin and Dallas, with an emphasis on education, social services, children’s needs, and community development. x Applicants should send a preliminary inquiry letter. Permian Basin Area Foundation 200 N. Loraine, Suite 500 Midland, TX 79701 432/617-3213 www.pbaf.org x Permian Basin Area Foundation makes discretionary and field-of-interest grants to nonprofit organizations to address needs in the areas of education, arts and culture, health and human services, community development, and the elderly. x Serves communities in West Texas. x Applications are due in April and October. San Angelo Area Foundation 221 S. Irving Street San Angelo, TX 76903-6421 325/947-7071 www.saafound.org x San Angelo Area Foundation seeks to support the entire range of human needs in the San Angelo area. Grant recipients have included programs in the areas of arts and culture, education, faith-based organizations, environment, and health and human services. x Grants are made to nonprofit organizations and government entities. x Serves 17 counties in the San Angelo area, including Coke, Concho, Crockett, Glasscock, Irion, Kimble, Llano, Mason, McCulloch, Menard, Reagan, Runnels, San Saba, Schleicher, Sterling, Sutton, and Tom Green. x Applications are considered twice a year, with awards made in June and December. San Antonio Area Foundation 303 Pearl Parkway, Suite 114 San Antonio, TX 78215 210/225-2243 www.saafdn.org x San Antonio Area Foundation works with donors to address San Antonio’s needs through grants, programs, scholarships, and training. Grants are made in the areas of animal services, arts and culture, biomedical research, children and youth, medicine and healthcare, seniors and community-at-large, high school completion, strengthening nonprofits, and programs serving the African American population, Hispanic population, and women and girls. x Grants are made to nonprofit organizations, schools, churches, and government entities. x Serves communities in the San Antonio area, including Atascosa, Bandera, Bexar, Blanco, Comal, Frio, Gillespie, Gonzales, Guadalupe, Karnes, Kendall, Kerr, Medina, and Wilson Counties. x Applications for community grants are due in February and July. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects 27 San Antonio Conservation Society 107 King William Street San Antonio, TX 78204-1312 210/224-6163 www.saconservation.org x Historic Preservation Grants for the restoration or rehabilitation of residential or commercial historic structures built before 1930 are available to individuals or organizations. x Educational Grants for projects such as research, video production, publication printing, and documents conservation (projects other than for the restoration of historic buildings) are available to individuals or organizations. x Applications are due in September. Nelda C. and H.J. Lutcher Stark Foundation 601 Green Avenue P.O. Drawer 909 Orange, TX 77631-0909 409/883-3513 www.starkfoundation.org x The Stark Foundation seeks to improve the quality of life in Orange and surrounding communities through grants for education, health and human services, arts and culture, community enhancement. x Serves communities in Southeast Texas. Sterling-Turner Foundation 5850 San Felipe Street, Suite 125 Houston, TX 77057-3292 713/237-1117 www.stfdn.org x The Sterling-Turner Foundation grants funds to nonprofit organizations for operating support, specific project funding, capital campaigns, building campaigns, scholarships, tuition supplements, renovations, direct services, educational needs and environmental issues. x Serves Fort Bend, Harris, Kerr, Tom Green, and Travis Counties. x Applications are due in March. T.L.L. Temple Foundation 204 Champions Drive Lufkin, TX 75901-7321 936/639-3900 x The T.L.L. Temple Foundation has played a part in a number of worthwhile projects and programs in East Texas. The San Augustine County Courthouse was partially funded by a grant awarded to the San Augustine Garden Club the T.L.L. Temple Foundation. The Trull Foundation 404 Fourth Street Palacios, TX 77465 361/972-5241 www.trullfoundation.org x The Trull Foundation grants funds to nonprofit, government, and religious organizations to help direct lives away from child abuse, neglect from hunger, poverty, and help persons and families devastated by the effects of substance abuse. The Foundation also has a concern for the coastal Texas environment including farming, ranching, aquaculture, and birds. x The Foundation usually does not grant funds for buildings, endowments, or research. x Serves Palacios and Matagorda Counties. x Applications are accepted year round. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects 28 The Waco Foundation 1227 N. Valley Mills Drive, Suite 235 Waco, TX 76710 254/754-3404 www.wacofoundation.org x The Waco Foundation’s grantmaking priorities are disadvantaged children and youth, low-income populations, disabled individuals, and traditionally marginalized populations. x Guidelines state that funding historic preservation is a low priority, but the foundation has funded preservation projects such as the Junior League of Waco’s Clifton House. x Grants are made to nonprofit organizations. x Serves communities in Waco-McLennan County area. x Applications are accepted year round. Wharton County Community Foundation 102 N. Washington El Campo, TX 77437-4431 979/543-2709 whartonccf.org x The purpose of the Wharton County Community Foundation is to improve the quality of life for the people of Wharton County. x Serves communities in Wharton County. Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation 807 8th Street, Suite 750 Wichita Falls, TX 76301 940/766-0829 www.wfacf.org x Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation responds to long-standing as well as to new and emerging local needs. The foundation will consider funding for special projects, innovative programs, equipment and capital building needs. x Grants can be awarded for the support of historical restoration and preservation projects. x Serves communities in the Wichita Falls area. x Letters of intent are due in January and August, with grant proposals due in February and September. Lola Wright Foundation 612 Toledo Trail Georgetown, TX 78628 512/869-2574 fdnweb.org/lolawright x Lola Wright Foundation supports children and youth, public health and human services, education and community development, and arts and culture. x Grants are made to nonprofit organizations. x Serves communities within a 50-mile radius of Austin. x Applications are due in February and August. Funding and Assistance for Preservation Projects 29 Federal Grant Resources x x x x x x x x United States Government’s Official Web Portal – www.usa.gov Grants.gov – grants.gov The Catalog for Federal Domestic Assistance – www.cfda.gov eCivis grant management system – www.ecivis.com The Federal Register – www.archives.gov/federal-register/index.html State, Tribal, and Local Plans and Grants (National Park Service) – www.nps.gov/orgs/1623/index.htm Show Me the Money: Tapping Federal Funds for Historic Preservation (National Park Service) – www.nps.gov/hps/hpg/downloads/Show-Me-the-Money-Oct2011.pdf United States Department of Transportation – www.dot.gov State Grant Resources x x x x Economic Development Handbook – www.governor.state.tx.us/files/ecodev/txecodevohdbk2013.pdf Friends of the Texas Historical Commission Development Seminar Series – thcfriends.org/development-series Regional Foundation Library – ddce.utexas.edu/foundationlibrary State Grants Team – www.governor.state.tx.us General Grantwriting Resources x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Charity Channel – www.charitychannel.com Council on Foundations – www.cof.org The Foundation Center – http://foundationcenter.org Forum of Regional Association of Grantmakers – www.givingforum.org Fundraising Online – www.resource-alliance.org/pages/en/fundraising-online.html Grant Seeker’s Guide to the Internet – www.nonprofit.net/info/guide.html Grants, etc. – archive.ssw.umich.edu/resources/index2.html?collection=grants The Grantsmanship Center – www.tgci.com Guidestar – www.guidestar.org Independent Sector – www.independentsector.org Nonprofit Gateway – www.usa.gov/Business/Nonprofit.shtml Nonprofit Genie – www.thenonprofitgenie.com Philanthropy Journal Online – www.philanthropyjournal.org The Philanthropy Roundtable – www.philanthropyroundtable.org Glossary of Terms ABAT-SON: large louvers in a belfry designed to direct the sound of church bells towards the ground. ABSORPTION: the amount of water a brick will soak up. The percentage of absorption for a piece of brick is measured by subtracting its dry weight from its wet weight, dividing the difference by the dry weight. ALTAR: the table in a Christian church which is used as the focus of a religious ritual. ANCHOR: a metal clamp fastened to the outside of a wall, or between two materials, and used to tie elements together. APRON: a piece of interior trim found below the stool of a window. Also used to describe paneling found on the exterior of a building. ASTRAGALDEHDGZKLFKLVXVXDOO\KDOIURXQGZLWKD¿OOHWRQRQHRUERWKVLGHV Term is often used to describe the classical molding consisting of a small convex molding decorated with a string of beads or bead-and-reel shapes. $OVRDPHPEHURUFRPELQDWLRQRIPHPEHUV¿[HGWRRQHRIDSDLURIGRRUV or casement windows to cover the joint between the meeting stiles and to close the clearance gap. AWNING WINDOW: type of window in which the sash projects outward, hinged on top. BALUSTER: one of a number of short vertical members, often circular in section, used to support a stair handrail or coping. BALUSTRADE: a series of short pillars or other uprights connected on top by coping or a handrail and usually on the bottom by a bottom rail; found on staircases, balconies, and porches. BASE: the lowest portion of a column or other architectural structure. BASEMENT WINDOW: window with wood or metal in-swinging sash hinged at either the top or bottom. BEADED BOARDDWRQJXHDQGJURRYHZRRG¿QLVKPDWHULDOFRQVLVWLQJRIXVXDOO\ 4” or 6” boards with a milled bead along the centerline and along the edge adjoining the tongue. Commonly used for porch ceilings and for wainscots in mid 19th to early 20th century housing. BEARING WALLDZDOOWKDWVXSSRUWVPRUHWKDQLWVRZQZHLJKWVXFKDVDURRIRUÀRRU BELFRY: a roof at the top of the tower, which holds the bell itself. BELT COURSEDKRUL]RQWDOERDUGDFURVVRUDURXQGDEXLOGLQJXVXDOO\DÀDWZRRG member with a molding beneath. BLISTERING: a condition, usually found on sandstone and sometimes on granite, which involves swelling accompanied by the rupturing of a thin uniform skin both across and parallel to the bedding plane; often leads to greater surface peeling (exfoliation, delamination or spalling). BOND: the systematic lapping pattern of brick masonry construction; or the adhesion between items, such as that between plaster and masonry. BOTONEE: a cross with arms terminating in the form of a trefoil. BOX GUTTER (ALSO K-TYPE OR OGEE GUTTER): at the eaves of a building, a metal trough with a nearly square or rectangular cross-section to catch rainwater and carry it off. May be suspended from the cornice, incorporated into the cornice, or inlaid in the roof surface near the bottom edge. BOX-HEAD WINDOW: a window made so that the sash can slide vertically into the wall space above the head. BRACKET: any overhanging member projecting from a wall or column serving to support any overlying member. CANTILEVER: a projecting bracket used for carrying the cornice or the extended eaves of a building. Also, a structural member which projects beyond its supporting wall or column. CAPITAL: the upper decorated portion of a pilaster or column which is supporting an entablature. '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 CASING¿QLVKHGYLVLEOHIUDPHZRUNDURXQGDZLQGRZRUGRRU CAST IRON,URQZLWKWRRKLJKDFDUERQFRQWHQWWREHFODVVL¿HGDVVWHHO CAST STONE: precast concrete components made with a high degree of quality and SUHFLVLRQDOVRFDOOHG³DUWL¿FLDOVWRQH´ CAULKINGWKHZHDWKHUUHVLVWDQWVHDOLQJRIDMRLQWE\¿OOLQJWKHYRLGRUFUDFNZLWK a permanently elastic material. CHAMFER: a bevel or cant, such as a small splay at the external angle of a masonry wall. Also, an oblique surface produced by beveling an edge or corner. CLADDING: a material used as the exterior wall enclosure of a building. COLUMN: a circular upright member; usually slightly tapering. Designed to carry an entablature or other load, but is also used ornamentally in isolation. CONSERVATION: the careful preservation and protection of a natural or cultural resource through planned management to prevent exploitation, destruction or neglect. C O N S O L I D AT I O N : a process carried out in an effort to strengthen masonry, particularly natural stone and concrete. The process generally involves the application of an inorganic substance or the injection of some type of a chemically-curable monomer or clear silicone polymer. Silicon surface coatings, wax or other water-repellent coatings are also often tried as consolidants. COPING: a covering on top of a wall, usually of metal or masonry. CORBEL D VWHSSHG FRQ¿JXUDWLRQ DV LQ PDVRQU\ IRUPHG E\ WKH SURMHFWLRQ RI successive horizontal courses. CORNERSTONE: a stone which is located near the base of a corner in a building and displays information recording the dedicatory ceremonies, and in some instances containing or capping a vault in which contemporary memorabilia are preserved; a foundation stone. CORNICE: a decorative element projecting from a wall, forming a horizontal division which crowns an architectural composition. CORROSION: the surface deterioration of metal created by the chemical reaction of the metal with moisture, oxygen, or a chemical substance. COUPLED WINDOW (also double window): two windows separated by a mullion. COURSE: a horizontal band of masonry. CRENELLATION: a parapet with alternating solid parts and openings, especially used LQPHGLHYDO(XURSHDQDUFKLWHFWXUHDORQJWKHWRSRIDIRUWL¿HGZDOOWKURXJK which arrows or other weapons can be shot. CRESTING: the ornamental work forming the top of a wall or screen, or the decorative railing which runs along the ridge of a roof; oftentimes perforated as well as decorated. CRICKET: a small false roof or a canted part of a roof to throw off water from behind an obstacle such as a chimney. CROWN MOLDING a continuous decorative band located on the extreme top edge of an exterior wall or in the area of transition between wall and ceiling. CUPOLA: a dome-shaped roof on a circular base, often set on the ridge of a roof. DENTILS: small square blocks located on cornices, moldings and other features; usually found in series. Door Frame: structure, surrounding door opening, to which the door is hinged. DOOR Sill: the lower horizontal member of a door frame. DOUBLE GLAZED WINDOW: a window with two layers of glass, often with an air space between the panes, primarily for insulating purposes. DOUBLE-HUNG WINDOW: windows in which both the upper and lower sash operate vertically. DOWNSPOUT: a pipe carrying water from the gutters to the ground or the sewer connection. '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 DRIP CAP: projecting horizontal molding located above doors, windows, and archways which causes water to drip beyond the outside of the frame. DUTCHMAN REPAIR: process which involves replacing a small area of damaged stone or wood with a new unit consisting of the same or a matching material. The replacement can be wedged in place or secured with an adhesive. EAVE: the portion of roof projecting beyond the walls. ENGAGED COLUMN: a column that is in direct contact with a wall, but has at least half of its diameter projecting beyond the surface of that wall. EPOXY PATCH: an epoxy based compound applied in paste or putty form to repair, H[WHQGRU¿OOVWUXFWXUDODQGGHFRUDWLYHZRRG/LTXLGIRUPVPD\DOVREHDSSOLHG to strengthen or harden deteriorated wood.” FACADE: an exterior face or elevation of a building. FANLIGHT WINDOW: a semicircular window over a door or window with bars that spread out from the center. FASCIADQ\ÀDWKRUL]RQWDOPHPEHURUPROGLQJZLWKOLWWOHSURMHFWLRQDVWKHEDQGV into which the architraves of Ionic and Corinthian entablatures are divided. Also any narrow vertical surface which is projected or cantilevered or supported on any element other than a wall below. FENESTRATION: the arrangement of windows and other openings on the exterior of a building. FINIAL: a formal ornament which caps a canopy, gable, pinnacle, or other architectural feature. FIXED WINDOW: a window in which the sash does not open or operate. FLASHING: sheet-metal weather protection placed over a joint between different building materials, or between parts of a building, in such a manner that water is prevented from entering the joint. FLAT ARCHDQDUFKZLWKDÀDWLQWUDGRV FLAT SEAM METAL ROOFDURRIFRPSRVHGRIVKHHWPHWDOURR¿QJZLWKVHDPVWKDW DUHIRUPHGÀDWDJDLQVWWKHVXUIDFHRIWKHURRI FOOTING: the part of a foundation that is widened in order to spread the load from the building across a broader area of soil. GABLE: the triangular segment of an exterior wall on a building that has a ridged roof. GLAZED DOOR: a door with glass comprising all or almost all of its surface. GLAZED PANEL DOOR: a door made up of vertical and horizontal wood members or rails with sunken panels and a window. GLAZED SHEATHED/FLUSH DOORDÀDWGRRUXVXDOO\FRPSULVHGRIDWKLQSO\VXUIDFH over internal structural members, with a window; can have solid or hollow core type. GLAZING: glass and its installation. HIP: the angle formed at the junction of two sloping roof surfaces. HIP ROOF (hipped roof): a roof consisting of four pitched surfaces. H ISTORIC A RCHITECT : an architect meeting the Secretary of Interior ’s minimum professional qualifications in historic architecture including a professional degree in architecture or a state license to practice architecture and at least one year of study in architectural preservation, $PHULFDQDUFKLWHFWXUDOKLVWRU\SUHVHUYDWLRQSODQQLQJRUFORVHO\UHODWHG¿HOG or at least one year of full-time professional experience on historic preservation projects. INTEGRITY: the authenticity of a property’s historic identity, evidenced by the survival of physical characteristics that existed during the property’s historic or prehistoric period. ITALIANATE: an architectural style characterized by multiple stories; low-pitched roof '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 with widely overhanging eaves with decorative brackets beneath; tall, narrow windows, often curved or arched above; windows frequently with elaborate crowns, usually of inverted U shape. Buildings of this style are often topped with a square cupola or tower. JOISTRQHRIDVHULHVRISDUDOOHOWLPEHUEHDPVZKLFKDUHXVHGWRVXSSRUWÀRRUDQG ceiling loads and which are also supported by larger beams, girders, or bearing walls; the widest dimension is vertically oriented. ” KEYSTONE: stone with a wedge shape located at the center of an arch. LANCET: a tall, narrow window with a pointed arch at the top. Resembles a lance and popular in Gothic architecture. LIMESTONE: a sedimentary rock consisting of calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate, or both. LINTEL: a horizontal structural member, usually made of wood, stone, or steel, that supports a load over an opening. This can be exposed or obscured by wall covering. LOUVER: small lantern or other opening used for ventilating attics or other spaces; often has wood slats. MASONRY KLVWRULFDOO\ VWRQH RU ¿UHGFOD\ XQLWV XVXDOO\ ERQGHG ZLWK PRUWDU LQ modern terms, items such as concrete blocks are also called masonry. MOLDING: a continuous decorative band used on the interior or exterior of a building as an ornamental device or to obscure the joint formed when two surfaces meet. MULLION: vertical member dividing a window or other opening into two or more lights. M U N T I N : a secondary framing member which secures panes within a window, glazed door, or window wall. Also, an intermediate vertical member dividing the panels of a door. NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES WKH RI¿FLDO OLVW RI WKH 1DWLRQ¶V FXOWXUDO resources which have been determined to be worthy of preservation. Properties OLVWHGLQFOXGHGLVWULFWVVLWHVEXLOGLQJVVWUXFWXUHVDQGREMHFWVWKDWDUHVLJQL¿FDQW in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture. OGEE ARCH: a pointed arch composed of reversed curves, the lower concave and the upper convex. PANEL DOOR: a door made up of vertical and horizontal wood members or rails with sunken panels. PANEL WINDOWDIRUPRISLFWXUHZLQGRZFRQVLVWLQJRIVHYHUDOVDVKRU¿[HGJOD]HV separated by crossbars, mullions, or both. PARTING STRIP: a vertical strip of wood separating the sashes of a window. PIER: an isolated column of masonry or concrete, generally having a low ratio of height to width. PILLARS: upright members used to support superstructures. PLINTH: a square or rectangular base for column, pilaster, or door framing; a solid monumental base to support a statue or memorial; or a recognizable base of an external wall. Also in reference to the base courses of a building collectively, if so treated as to give the appearance of a platform. POINTING: forming and tooling of joints after the masonry units have been laid for the purpose of protecting against weather and improving appearance. PORTLAND CEMENT: a type of cement which forms a very hard, dense mortar with low porosity. PRESERVATION: the act or process of applying measures to sustain the existing form, integrity, and material of a building or structure, and the existing form and vegetative cover of a site. It may include initial stabilization work, where necessary, as well as ongoing maintenance of the historic building materials. PRIMER¿UVWFRDWRISDLQWDSSOLHGRQDEDUHPDWHULDO '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 RECONSTRUCTION: the act or process of reproducing by new construction the exact form and detail of a vanished building, structure, or object, or a part thereof, DVLWDSSHDUHGDWDVSHFL¿FSHULRGRIWLPH RECORDED TEXAS HISTORIC LANDMARK (RTHL): resources designated by the Texas Historical Commission under Texas Government Code, Chapter 442, as worthy of preservation for their architectural integrity and historical associations. The highest honor the state can bestow on historic structures in Texas. REHABILITATION: the act or process of returning a property to a state of utility through UHSDLURUDOWHUDWLRQZKLFKPDNHVSRVVLEOHDQHI¿FLHQWFRQWHPSRUDU\XVHZKLOH SUHVHUYLQJWKRVHSRUWLRQVRUIHDWXUHVRIWKHSURSHUW\ZKLFKDUHVLJQL¿FDQWWR its historical, architectural, and cultural values. REPOINTINGWKH¿OOLQJDQGWRROLQJRIRSHQMRLQWVEHWZHHQEULFNV RESTORATION: the act or process of accurately recovering the form and details of a property and its setting as it appeared at a particular period of time by means of the removal of later work or by the replacement of missing earlier work. RETAINING WALL: a freestanding or laterally braced wall that bears against an earth RURWKHU¿OOVXUIDFHDQGUHVLVWVODWHUDODQGRWKHUIRUFHVIURPWKHPDWHULDOLQ contact with the side of the wall. RIDGE: the horizontal line created by the junction of the upper edges of two sloping roof surfaces. RIDGECAP: a covering of metal, wood, shingle, or any similar material which is used to cover the ridge of a roof. RISING DAMP: ground water that travels upward through a masonry wall by natural capillary action. Often indicated on the wall by an actual “tide line”. ROUND-HEAD WINDOW: a window with a rounded or arched top member. RUBBLE MASONRY: stone masonry built with rough stones of irregular shapes and sizes. SASH: the framework into which the panes of a window are set. SCORE: the formation of a notch or groove in a smooth surface to create a pattern or line as in ashlar masonry. SOFT-BURNT BRICK VRIWEULFNEULFN¿UHGDWORZWHPSHUDWXUHVSURGXFLQJXQLWVRI low compressive strength and high absorption. SPALLS (spalling): sheets of masonry separated from the surface by the action of water inside the masonry. Water soaking into the masonry causes spalling when temperatures change, thus forcing the surface to expand and pop off in pieces. SPLASH BLOCK: a concrete or plastic precast block which diverts water at the bottom of a downspout. STABILIZATION: the act or process of applying measures designed to reestablish a weather resistant enclosure and the structural stability of an unsafe or deteriorated property while maintaining the essential form as it exists at present. STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF: a sheet metal roof with seams that project at right angles to the plane of the roof. STATE ARCHEOLOGICAL LANDMARK (SAL): designation made by a vote of the Texas Historical Commission (THC) in order to protect an archeological site or historic structure under the Texas Antiquities Code. Designation places the UHVRXUFHLQDVWDWHZLGHLQYHQWRU\RIVLJQL¿FDQWVLWHVZKLFKDOORZVORQJUDQJH protection planning for the cultural heritage of Texas. It also provides that a designated resource cannot be removed, altered, destroyed, salvaged, or excavated without a permit from the THC. STILE: one of the vertical structural members of a frame, such as the outer edge of a door or a window sash. STRIKINGWKH¿QLVKLQJRIDMRLQWZLWKDQ\RIDYDULHW\RIWRROV '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1 TOOLING: forming a masonry joint to a particular shape. TRANSOM: a window unit above a door. TREFOIL: a decorative motif having three lobes, like a clover leaf. TRIGLYPHS: the three vertical bands which alternate with the metopes on a Doric frieze or its derivatives. TRIM: edging or framing of openings and other features on a facade or indoors. Often of a different color and material than that of the adjacent wall surface. VENEER: a decorative layer of brick, wood, or other material which provides a cover for inferior structural material and gives an improved appearance at a low cost. WATERPROOFING: the act or process of making something impervious to water. WEATHER STRIPPING: piece of metal, wood or other material installed around a door or ZLQGRZRSHQLQJWRSURWHFWDJDLQVWDLULQ¿OWUDWLRQDQGPRLVWXUHSHQHWUDWLRQ WINDOW: an opening in a wall, primarily to provide light or ventilation. See also Awning Window, Austral Window, Bay Window, Bow Window, BoxHead Window, Bull’s Eye Window, Combination Window, Cameo Window, Casement Window, Chicago Window, Clerestory Window, Coupled Window, Continuous Window, Double Glazed Window, Double-hung Window, False Window, Fixed Window, French Window, Fanlight Window, Gable Sash :LQGRZ +RSSHU :LQGRZ ,QGXVWULDO :LQGRZ -DORXVLH :LQGRZ /DWWLFH Window, Oriel Window, Palladian Window, Panel Window, Projected Window, Pivoted Window, Round-head Window, Ribbon Window, Single-hung Window, Sliding Window, Stacked Window Unit, Triple Window, Triple Glazed Window, Triple-hung Window, Transom. W INDOW F RAME : frame set in wall to receive and hold a window and its hardware. WINDOW SILL: lower, usually projecting, lip of a window frame. '$//$6ZZZDUFKLWH[DVFRP$867,1