Download Are diode bridges really needed

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Current source wikipedia , lookup

Fault tolerance wikipedia , lookup

Wireless power transfer wikipedia , lookup

Power factor wikipedia , lookup

Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup

Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup

Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup

Power inverter wikipedia , lookup

Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup

Electrification wikipedia , lookup

Audio power wikipedia , lookup

Islanding wikipedia , lookup

Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup

Electric power system wikipedia , lookup

Metadyne wikipedia , lookup

Optical rectenna wikipedia , lookup

Amtrak's 25 Hz traction power system wikipedia , lookup

Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup

History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup

Rectifier wikipedia , lookup

Distribution management system wikipedia , lookup

Power engineering wikipedia , lookup

Power electronics wikipedia , lookup

Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup

Surge protector wikipedia , lookup

Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup

Alternating current wikipedia , lookup

Power over Ethernet wikipedia , lookup

Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Buck converter wikipedia , lookup

Diode wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Are diode bridges really needed?
Christian Beia, Antonio Rotta - STMicroelectronics
Supporters: Lennart Yseboodt, Matthias Wendt, Musa Unmehopa - Philips
IEEE 802.3bt 4-Pair Power over Ethernet Task Force - Indian Wells - January 2014
Background
Goal of this task force is to make the highest power available for the
final PoE users
 The power dissipated on diode bridges can reach about:
4*(0.75V*0.6A + 0.3Ohm*0.6A2) = 2.2W @ 50W output
Diodes are the main responsible for the current unbalance in 4 pairs
systems, limiting the available power at PD interface of more than 2W
More sophisticated solutions, like active bridges, are an option in high
power applications, especially in the 4Pair applications. They imply
additional complexity and anyway the losses are still there:
4*(0.3Ohm*0.6A2) = 0.4W
1
Diode bridge reasons
• Diode bridges were specified in previous PoE standards
for blind compatibility with existing infrastructures:
• Crossover cables
• Installation done by non–IT people
• Now the situation is different:
• High power systems are typically for professional usage
• Installation will be managed by educated personnel
2
Why do not think about diode bridges
removal ?
• Now try to answer to this simple question :
• Can we remove the diode bridges from our system ?
• The answer will be :
yes!
• So why do not seriously think about building a standard which is not
strictly requiring diode bridges?
• What do we need? To specify a single PSE output voltage polarity!
(Table 33-2)
• Why not to get rid of Alternative A MDI-X? Do we still need it?
3
Advantages
• Less losses = More power at the PD
• More balanced pairs = More power at the PD
• Less components on the BOM = less complexity
(savings!)
• Less components = higher reliability (what is not there
won’t get busted!)
4
PD systems are still protected
• Protection against reverse polarity can be done with TVS + polyswitch
• The same TVS that limits surges due to line transients can be used to
protect the converter input stage from reverse voltage applied to its
input.
• During detection PSE limits the current to 5mA (short circuit current)
• In case of reverse polarity a red led can be possibly turned on
• Backfeed voltage can be avoided just adding a single switch (or a
diode that will be shorted after power on)
5
Questions? - Comments
6
7
Thanks!