Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
SCOTT W. TINKER: Challenges are the essence of science | Herald Democrat 89 ° F Partly sunny Tuesday, June 14, 2016 About Contact Subscribe Search this site Home News Letters to the Editor Homes Sports Opinion Local Commentary Obituaries Living Religion National Commentary Blogs Classifieds Galleries e-Edition Jobs Search Autos Good Morning Home » Opinion » National Commentary 0 0 Share 0 0 BARTON SWAIM: The left won... Share 0 New MIKE HASHIMOTO: Uneasy... Posted May 30, 2016 - 10:42am SCOTT W. TINKER: Challenges are the essence of science Most Popular Top Commented Dykes returns to Collinsville ISD for superintendent role Man says he’s assaulted by vehicle inspector; more police reports Grayson County land sales remain steady despite regional price drop The slow fade: Locals discuss importance of addressing growing issue of suicide Former SISD Superintendent Wendell Hubbard dies at 89 Scott W. Tinker HPE Hybrid Infrastructure Transform Your Infrastructure w/ Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By Scott W. Tinker Special to the Herald Democrat When did it become wrong to challenge science? There is a recent move to publicly bully, disparage and shame those who challenge a purported scientific consensus. It may feel satisfying in the short term to deal with the “deniers” via public belittling or even legal action, but in the long run, this tactic will erode the integrity of scientific institutions and the very process of science. A current example of this strategy is the effort by the U.S. attorney general and a coalition of 17 state attorneys general to “defend” science by taking on http://heralddemocrat.com/opinion/national-commentary/scott-w-tinker-challenges-are-essence-science[6/14/2016 1:46:04 PM] SCOTT W. TINKER: Challenges are the essence of science | Herald Democrat climate change deniers. On the other side, congressional committees are conducting interrogations of climate change believers. The use of religious terms such as “believer” and “denier” in these arguments has little place in science. Regardless of the scientific topic or the strength of the science — from evolution to climate change to earthquakes — the integrity of science relies on iterative discourse and challenge, however misinformed or conflicted it may appear. One such scientific issue is increased earthquake activity in the U.S., particularly in Texas and Oklahoma. During the past decade, the number of earthquakes, especially those felt at the ground surface, has increased substantially. The question is whether human activity is causing the increase and, if so, what can be done about it. French Time Remaining: 15 seconds policeman killed in fresh terror attack AFP Not surprisingly, addressing and answering that question is difficult. In some places, the increase in earthquakes is associated with the disposal back into the earth of water that has been produced from oil and gas wells. But, as we learned in science class, association does not necessarily imply causation. In fact, causation in science can be difficult to prove, especially in complex systems such as climate and earthquakes. Instead, the scientific method prescribes how to test various hypotheses. In the case of earthquakes, a combination of observational, experimental, statistical and modeling approaches and tools is required. Those methods, neither easy nor fast, and rarely definitive, benefit from interdisciplinary collaboration and from scientific challenge. Science depends on independent reproduction of results and rigorous testing, and is improved by challenges brought forth from skeptics, however irritating those challenges may seem. In 2015, the Texas Legislature recognized the complexity and importance of the earthquake issue and put in place a program called TexNet at The University of Texas at Austin’s Bureau of Economic Geology. TexNet will deploy 22 permanent seismometers across Texas and an additional 36 portable seismometers where seismic activity occurs. It also provides research funding to combine key scientific, engineering and other disciplines from several universities to address the complex earthquake issue. Think about the implications of such collaboration. TexNet, by design, brings together key groups of stakeholders to address the earthquake issue in what I have called “the radical middle” — that all-to-often lonely space where varying interests should, ideally, converge. Is this not inherently a conflict of interest? How can industry work with those who regulate them? Must not academics maintain autonomy from regulators and industry? Not if we want to meaningfully address the problem, which requires data collected from the new seismometer array, and independent analysis and modeling provided by leading university scientists. Addressing the problem also requires funding, data and cooperation from the capable technical people exploring for oil and gas as well as those drilling the wells and disposing of the produced water. And finally, addressing the problem requires an understanding of the issues and thoughtful policy from a dedicated regulatory staff that adapts, and not overreacts, to evolving scientific understanding — policy that protects our environment even as it allows industry to operate to provide the energy that fuels our global economy. Functioning in this radical middle and managing the inherent challenges is not easy, but it is critical for true progress. It takes time to establish trust and bring together different perspectives. It takes patience to deal with — and manage — those who undermine the process. And it takes fortitude to see the process through and thoughtfully address the challenges from skeptics. But it is those challenges, however frustrating, that will ultimately make the scientific outcome more robust and valuable. The concept of “settled science” is silly. Scientists should at all costs defend the right to challenge science. In addressing challenges, science advances, little by little. Scott W. Tinker is the state geologist of Texas, director of the Bureau of Economic Geology, and the Allday Endowed Chair in the Jackson School of Geosciences at The University of Texas at Austin. He has been intimately involved with forming and managing TexNet. BARTON SWAIM: The left won... From the Web MIKE HASHIMOTO: Uneasy... Sponsored Links by Taboola http://heralddemocrat.com/opinion/national-commentary/scott-w-tinker-challenges-are-essence-science[6/14/2016 1:46:04 PM] SCOTT W. TINKER: Challenges are the essence of science | Herald Democrat This Service in Austin is Changing the Way People Cook at Home Former Congressman: Get Ready For Financial Martial Law How This Sock is Changing the Industry HelloFresh Stansberry Research Bombas Socks Do You Binge-Watch Documentaries? You'll Love This Website This game will keep you up all night! Why Guys in Texas Love This Shirt Company Stormfall: Free Online Game Proper Cloth LA Times | Curiosity Stream Rules for posting comments Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of GateHouse Media, Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum. Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. GateHouse Media, Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties. IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process. Do not post: Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo. Obscene, explicit, or racist language. Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder. Personal attacks, insults or threats. The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity. Comments unrelated to the story. If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment. Comments for this thread are now closed. × http://heralddemocrat.com/opinion/national-commentary/scott-w-tinker-challenges-are-essence-science[6/14/2016 1:46:04 PM] SCOTT W. TINKER: Challenges are the essence of science | Herald Democrat Herald … 7K likes 0 Comments 1 Herald Democrat Login Like Page Recommend ⤤ Share Sort by Newest Lik d You like thisBe the first o your friends to like this Affiliates CarsTexoma.com This discussion has been closed. Van Alstyne Leader Anna Melissa Tribune Prosper Press ALSO ON HERALD DEMOCRAT Texas Newspapers Council approves demolition of Area plans improvements to dilapidated Denison home, 2 othersHighway 75 corridor 1 comment • 8 days ago• 1 comment • 6 days ago• Robert — Both Denison and Sherman poppi_64 — Just pray they don't use should be applauded for getting rid of eyesores that have ruined the … those from the Hwy75/635 exchange - all on LSD. From the Web Sponsored Links by Taboola This Service in Austin is Changing the Way People Cook at Home Former Congressman: Get Ready For Financial Martial Law HelloFresh Stansberry Research Connect Best of Texoma Services How This Sock is Changing the Industry Bombas Socks Solutions Follow Us About us Subscribe Advertise with us Facebook Contacts Manage subscription Legal Notices Twitter Feedback All-Digital Access Online rates RSS Submit story E-edition Letter to the Editor NIE FAQs eNewsletter Sign Up Submit Engagement / Wedding Copyright © GateHouse Media, Inc. 2016. All rights reserved. • Privacy Policy http://heralddemocrat.com/opinion/national-commentary/scott-w-tinker-challenges-are-essence-science[6/14/2016 1:46:04 PM]