Download 23 - Advantra Z

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Review of the Safety Data Available
on p-Synephrine, Caffeine, and p-SynephrineCaffeine Containing Combination Products
Prepared by
Barry Lynch, B.Sc., DABT, ERT
Associate Director
April 12, 2013
Overview: Intertek Cantox has reexamined the safety and dosing
guidelines of dietary supplements containing p-synephrine, a
direct-acting sympathomimetic amine derived from the plant
Citrus aurantium (bitter orange), alone and in combination with
caffeine. It was concluded that as a single one-time dose, up to
70 mg p-synephrine alone or 40 mg in combination with 320 mg
of caffeine is not likely to cause adverse effects. If taken as divided
doses spaced out over the course of a day, 100 mg of
p-synephrine alone (e.g., 50 mg twice a day or 33 mg three times
daily) or 70 mg in combination with 400 mg of caffeine is unlikely to
be associated with adverse effects.
Review of the Safety Data Available
on p-Synephrine, Caffeine, and p-SynephrineCaffeine Containing Combination Products
m-synephrine at human α-1a-adrenoreceptors, and even lower responses at α-2a and α-2c
adrenoreceptors (Ma et al., 2010). Little or no β-1 and β-2-adrenoreceptor activation was
reported in guinea pig atria and trachea, as p-synephrine was 40,000-fold less potent than
norepinephrine at binding to β-1 and β-2 adrenoreceptors (Jordan et al., 1987). p-Synephrine’s
poor binding affinity to α and β-1 and β-2 adrenoreceptors provides a mechanistic explanation
for the lack of observed effects on blood pressure and heart rate in several animal and human
studies (Stohs et al., 2011b).
p-Synephrine is hypothesized to bind primarily to β-3 adrenergic receptors, as it was reported to
induce lipolysis in vitro, and to decrease blood glucose levels, increase insulin secretion, and
decrease concentrations of cholesterol and triglycerides in serum of rats and mice (reviewed in
Stohs and Preuss, 2011; Stohs et al., 2011a,b). β-3 adrenoreceptors are located in white and
brown adipose tissues and muscles, and activation results in various metabolic effects such as
increases in lipolysis, and improvements in insulin resistance, glycemic control, and lipid
profiles. These metabolic effects could reduce fat mass in obese humans (Jordan et al., 1987).
p-Synephrine is present in citrus fruits, such as Seville oranges, grapefruit, mandarin, and other
species of oranges, and is consumed in the diet (reviewed in Stohs and Preuss, 2011). Typical
levels of p-synephrine in orange juices are 5 mg per 8 ounce glass, although 10 samples of
mandarin orange juice were reported to contain between 73 and 158 mg p-synephrine per litre.
Toxicological studies that examined C. aurantium extract or p-synephrine have reported effects
primarily associated with the pharmacological action of the test compounds (e.g., reduced body
weights and alterations in cardiovascular parameters); however, one study investigating effects
on fetal growth and development was identified.
In rats, acute oral doses of up to 10,000 mg/kg body weight of a C. aurantium product (Douds,
1997) showed no effect on mortality. Various clinical signs were noted during the first few days
of the study. No significant effects were observed at necropsy.
In a study that has not been reproduced, Calapai et al. (1999) evaluated the anti-obesity and
potential cardiovascular toxic effects in male Sprague-Dawley rats that were administered 2.5,
5, 10, or 20 mg/kg body weight/day of C. aurantium extracts containing 4 or 6% p-synephrine
via gavage for 7 or 15 consecutive days. Control animals were treated with saline (vehicle).
Arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and electrocardiogram (ECG) were evaluated on days 5, 10,
and 15, and clinical signs were observed daily. Body weight gain and food intake, which were
examined in animals treated for 7 days, were significantly and dose-dependently reduced in
treated animals compared to control animals. No other clinical signs were noted. Mortality was
observed in all groups administered the C. aurantium extracts, whereas no mortality was
observed in the control group. Although a significant trend between treatment and mortality was
observed in animals treated only with the 6% p-synephrine C. aurantium extract, the authors
reported that the data suggested that a causal relationship likely exists between treatment with
C. aurantium extracts and mortality. No significant effects on arterial blood pressure were
observed in rats administered C. aurantium extracts compared to the control group; however,
analysis of ECGs revealed the presence of ventricular arrhythmias and enlargement of QRS
complex in animals treated with C. aurantium extracts after 5 days of treatment, with this effect
April 12, 2013
Page 2
achieving significance after 10 days of treatment and persisting after 15 days of treatment. The
number of animals with ECG alterations was greater in those animals that received
C. aurantium extract containing 6% p-synephrine compared to those that received the 4%
extract, thus suggesting that ECG changes were possibly correlated to p-synephrine dose. The
results reported by Calapai et al. (1999) are difficult to extrapolate to p-synephrine directly since
the other constituents of the C. aurantium extract used were not identified.
When tested in mice for 28 days at daily doses of 30 or 300 mg/kg body weight/day,
p-synephrine was reported to be without toxic effect on biochemical, hematological, or organ
weight parameters. Treatment was, however, associated with a reduction in body weight gain
(to be expected) and with an increase in reduced glutathione concentration and inhibition of
glutathione peroxidise activity. The clinical significance of these changes was not clear (Arbo et
al., 2009).
The administration of up to 100 mg/kg body weight/day p-synephrine from C. aurantium or from
a pure extract by gavage to pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats from GD 3 to 20 did not result in
adverse effects on fetal growth or development (Hansen et al., 2011). It should be noted that a
dose of 100 mg/kg of p-synephrine in rats is equivalent, based on a body surface to body weight
ratio basis, to over 30-times a 40 mg daily dose in an 80 kg (176 lb.) human. The number of live
implantations per litter was significantly reduced in the group receiving 100 mg/kg body
weight/day p-synephrine from a pure extract compared to vehicle control; however, this effect
was not observed in the group receiving 100 mg/kg body weight/day p-synephrine from
C. aurantium, leading the authors to suggest that the reported effect was a spurious
observation. The authors also examined the potential maternal and fetal effects of 50 mg/kg
body weight/day p-synephrine from C. aurantium or from a pure extract plus 25 mg/kg body
weight/day caffeine or 25 mg/kg body weight/day caffeine alone. No evidence of fetal toxicity
was observed, and the only effect on the dams was a significant decrease in body weight in the
groups receiving 50 mg/kg body weight/day p-synephrine from C. aurantium plus caffeine and
the caffeine only group compared to vehicle control. The decreased body weight in these
groups was attributed to decreased food consumption.
C. aurantium (Zani et al., 1991) and p-synephrine (McGregor et al., 1988) have been reported to
be non-mutagenic.
Numerous clinical studies have investigated the efficacy of C. aurantium and p-synephrine,
alone or in combination with other ingredients, for weight loss. While the focus of the majority of
these studies was on efficacy, some parameters related to safety, including biochemical and
hematological parameters, were evaluated in some studies. A review had been published that
summarizes published as well as unpublished human studies involving bitter orange extract and
p-synephrine (Stohs et al., 2012). In general, bitter orange extract (p-synephrine) alone or in
combination with other herbal ingredients did not produce significant adverse events or alter
serum chemistry, blood cell counts or urinalysis.
Conflicting evidence exists for cardiovascular effects of synephrine after acute infusion
(4 mg/minute for 30 minutes) (Hofstetter et al., 1985) which cannot be equated with oral
administration and repeated dosing (5 mg p-synephrine twice/day for 8 weeks) (Kalman et al.,
April 12, 2013
Page 3
2000). A wide range of acute doses of p-synephrine have been reported to elicit cardiovascular
changes (e.g., increased peripheral vascular resistance, decreased heart rate, increased blood
pressure) in humans (Zhao et al., 1978; Thomas et al., 1991; Grassi et al., 1997; Haller et al.,
2005; Bui et al., 2006).
In other single dose human studies, no significant differences in SBP, DBP, cardiac index,
systemic vascular resistance index, or PR, QRS, QT, RR, or QTc intervals over 8 hours were
reported between placebo and an active product containing 27 mg p-synephrine from
C. aurantium (Min et al., 2005), and no significant differences in heart rate, SBP, or DBP over
5 hours compared to baseline were reported following consumption of C. aurantium capsules
providing 26 mg p-synephrine (Gougeon et al., 2005). In addition, SBP, DBP, and heart rate
75 minutes following the consumption of 50 mg synephrine in V-8 juice did not differ from
baseline or compared to controls receiving placebo V-8 juice (Stohs et al., 2011c). Although
Min et al. (2005) reported that the active constituent in C. aurantium was m-synephrine, it has
since been demonstrated that C. aurantium contains only p-synephrine (Roman et al., 2007;
reviewed in Stohs et al., 2011a,b). Thus, the discussion of m-synephrine’s effects on cardiac
and hemodynamic parameters is not relevant.
A crossover, open-label, cardiovascular toxicity study (that also monitored caffeine intake) in 12
normotensive, healthy young adults examined heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures,
and mean arterial pressure after 2 oral doses (8 hours apart) of 8 ounces of C. aurantium juice
(containing 13 to 14 mg synephrine) (Penzak et al., 2001). Approximately one week later, the
test was repeated with the crossover treatment, which consisted of water. The synephrine
content in this study was reported as m-synephrine, rather than p-synephrine, even though the
analytical methods employed were unable to separately quantify the respective isomers.
Cardiovascular parameters were measured immediately prior to the second dose and once per
hour over 5 hours following the second dose; adverse effect reporting was not included as part
of the study design. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures, mean arterial pressure, and heart
rate were not affected by p-synephrine treatment.
Blood pressure, heart rate, and ECGs assessed in the first 8 hours following the first dose and
at Weeks 1 and 2 were not significantly different in healthy subjects consuming 50 mg
p-synephrine/day in capsules for 14 days compared to placebo (Shara and Stohs, 2011).
These results were further extended in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study (Kaats et al.,
2013). The study was of a double-blind, placebo-controlled design involving 75 healthy
subjects. Three groups of 25 subjects (15 males and 60 females; average age 51.3 years,
weight 185.6 lbs, and BMI 30.8) consumed, in capsule form, either: a) a placebo, b) bitter
orange extract twice daily to provide 98 mg of p-synephrine, or c) bitter orange extract twice
daily (98 mg of p-synephrine/day) in combination with naringin (~100 mg/day) and hesperidin
(~576 mg/day). Subjects consumed their daily allotments for 60 consecutive days. At baseline
and the completion of the study, subjects were evaluated with respect to resting perception of
quality of life, heart rate, blood pressure, and a comprehensive blood chemistry and hematology
panel for evaluation of hepatic, renal, and cardiac function. A total of 67 subjects completed the
study, with similar numbers of losses in each of the 3 groups. After 60 days of treatment, there
were no adverse effects on any of the parameters evaluated. Small, statistically significant
increases in resting heart rate (+2.9 bpm) were noted between the p-synephrine and
April 12, 2013
Page 4
naringin/hesperidin group vs. p-synephrine alone and placebo groups. This finding was
considered of no clinical significance. In addition, no such differences were noted between the
p-synephrine alone group and the placebo controls. There were no reports of adverse events in
any of the 3 groups. Efficacy of treatment, in the form of weight loss, was not evaluated. The
study was designed and conducted as a safety study per se.
No adverse events were reported following consumption of 30.6 mg p-synephrine/day from
C. aurantium for 28 days by 12 young healthy adults (Gurley et al., 2004). Furthermore, the
lack of an effect on phenotypic ratios of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes CYP1A2, CYP2D6,
CYP2E1, or CYP3A4 suggests minimal risk of herb-drug interactions via these drug
metabolizing enzymes.
It should be noted that case reports exist in the scientific literature that allege adverse
cardiovascular events in persons consuming p-synephrine or C. aurantium (Keogh and Baron,
1985; Health Canada, 2004; Firenzuoli et al., 2005; Gange et al., 2006; Stephensen and Sarlay,
2010). Many of these have been recently reviewed (Rossato et al., 2011). Due to the lack of
detailed reporting, few numbers of subjects, and concomitant exposure to other products,
causal relationships of p-synephrine exposure with cardiovascular effects cannot be ascertained
(Rossato et al., 2011). Concerns about the cardiovascular effects of p-synephrine, particularly
at high doses (e.g., 100 mg/day or more) that could be consumed based on the suggested
serving size of some supplements, were re-iterated in a recent review article (Inchiosa, 2011).
The present knowledge of the pharmacology of p-synephrine is inconsistent with it having a
causal role in the case reports of cardiovascular incidents especially at serving sizes/doses
recommended on most product labels.
Caffeine
The toxicology of caffeine has been extensively studied in both animals and in humans.
Caffeine binds and inhibits the action at adenosine A1 and A2a receptors (Benowitz, 1990;
Fredholm, 1995; Donovan and DeVane, 2001; Nawrot et al., 2003). When normally occupied
by adenosine, activation of the A1 receptor results in the inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity
(i.e., the G protein blocks adenylate cyclase rather than activating it), and decreased
subsequent activity of protein kinase A, with resultant downstream pharmacological effects such
as decreased energy metabolism, decreased smooth muscle contraction, vasodilatation, and
decreased neurotransmitter release (Benowitz, 1990; Fredholm, 1995; Donovan and DeVane,
2001; Orton, 2005). Occupation of the A1 receptors by caffeine in the tissues in which this
receptor is located results in increased adenylate cyclase activity and is responsible for
caffeine’s inhibition of depressant effects in the CNS, positive inotropic effects on the heart
(possibly weak chronotropic as well), vasoconstriction, increased blood pressure and, in the
kidney, diuresis, vasodilatation and sodium reabsorption in response to increased glomerular
filtration rate due to increased blood pressure (Benowitz, 1990; Donovan and DeVane, 2001;
Nawrot et al., 2003; Orton, 2005). At normal levels of consumption, approximately 100 to
400 mg/day, caffeine concentrations in plasma attain levels known to be associated with the
antagonism of the A1 receptor.
April 12, 2013
Page 5
Acute and chronic symptoms of caffeine exposure include anxiety, tension, headache,
insomnia, diarrhea, irritability, loss of appetite, dizziness, and a decrease in hand steadiness
(Abbott, 1986). Cardiovascular effects include palpitations, extra-systoles, tachycardia,
arrhythmias, flushing, and with extremely large doses, marked hypotension and circulatory
failure (Abbott, 1986). Additionally, gastrointestinal effects include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea,
epigastric pain, and occasionally peptic ulcer and hematemesis. Prolonged consumption of
high levels of caffeine may result in tolerance to some of the pharmacological actions (Leonard
et al., 1987; Myers, 1988; Sweetman, 2002; Nawrot et al., 2003), and abrupt discontinuation
may lead to physical symptoms of withdrawal such as irritability, lethargy, and headache
(Sweetman, 2002).
Overdose can occur at >300 mg caffeine and may result in restlessness, tremor, and elevated
reflex excitability, and be accompanied by vomiting and abdominal spasm. The available data
do not indicate that moderate caffeine intake of <400 mg/day adversely affects cardiovascular
health or bone and calcium economy (Nawrot et al., 2003). Estimates of a fatal dose of caffeine
in humans are greater than 10 g, equivalent to 140 mg/kg body weight (Abbott, 1986; Nawrot et
al., 2003). This quantity of caffeine would be approximately equivalent to that found in 75 cups
of coffee, 125 cups of tea, or 200 cola beverages (Curatolo and Robertson, 1983). The
cardiovascular effects of caffeine have been extensively studied. The rapid development of
tolerance to caffeine greatly complicates the interpretation of cardiovascular data. Caffeine has
been reported to raise, lower, and not affect blood pressure and heart rate, as well as lower or
not affect levels of epinephrine (Robertson and Curatolo, 1984; LeBlanc et al., 1985; Poehlman
et al., 1985; Abbott, 1986; Leonard et al., 1987; Myers, 1988; Astrup et al., 1990; Arciero et al.,
1995; Bracco et al., 1995; Green et al., 1996; Nawrot et al., 2003). Following review of more
than 50 acute studies, results indicate that caffeine increases both systolic and diastolic blood
pressure at doses >250 mg/person in adults of both sexes, irrespective of age, although the
effect is more pronounced in the elderly (Nawrot et al., 2003). However, these effects were
seen less consistently in repeat-dose studies (Nawrot et al., 2003). It is generally agreed that
the pressor effects of caffeine subside within 1 to 3 days due to tolerance, although tolerance is
partially lost with as little as 12 hours of abstinence, which may partially explain conflicting
results (Leonard et al., 1987; Myers, 1988; Nawrot et al., 2003). The possibility that heavy
coffee consumption may adversely affect the incidence of heart disease cannot be ruled out
(Nawrot et al., 2003). Also, recent case reports of adverse cardiovascular effects have
appeared in the scientific literature in regard to the use of caffeine as a weight loss supplement
in combination with ephedra (Saper et al., 2004), and more recently with synephrine or
synephrine containing botanicals (Health Canada, 2004; Nykamp et al., 2004; Bouchard et al.,
2005).
Due to caffeine’s extensive use in foods and beverages, there exists an enormous amount of
genotoxic and mutagenic data. The scientific literature reviewed utilized various animal,
prokaryotic, eukaryotic and mammalian cell culture systems, and the mutagenic activity of
caffeine varied between test systems. There is little evidence of mutagenic activity in
mammalian cells in vivo, despite the fact that caffeine has been found to be mutagenic both
alone and in combination with other DNA damaging agents in various in vitro tests systems
(Haynes and Collins, 1984; Abbott, 1986; D’Ambrosio, 1994). A large number of studies in
April 12, 2013
Page 6
experimental animals investigating the carcinogenicity of caffeine have concluded that caffeine
is not carcinogenic (Zeitlin, 1972; Bauer et al., 1977; Mohr et al., 1984; Pozniak, 1985).
Overall, clinical studies have indicated that single doses of <450 mg of caffeine do not increase
the severity or frequency of cardiac arrhythmia (Nawrot et al., 2003). The available data do not
indicate that moderate caffeine intake of <400 mg/day adversely affects cardiovascular health
(Nawrot et al., 2003). Caffeine may cause anxiety, tachycardia, palpitation, insomnia,
restlessness, nervousness, tremor, and headache at doses >600 mg/day (Health Canada,
2008). Health Canada (2008) has indicated that hypersensitivity/allergy to caffeine is known to
occur, in which case, the use of caffeine should be discontinued.
Synephrine/Caffeine Combination Products
Toxicological studies that examined C. aurantium extract or p-synephrine in combination with
caffeine are lacking. In a review of human published and unpublished studies, approximately
half of the studies used a product that contained p-synephrine plus caffeine (Stohs et al., 2012).
A single animal study examining the cardiovascular effects of the combination was identified
(Hansen et al., 2012). A study conducted with a combination product that included other
alkaloids also was identified and is discussed below (Schmitt et al., 2012).
Hansen et al. (2012) examined cardiovascular effects (i.e., SBP, DBP, heart rate, QT interval) of
isolated p-synephrine (90% p-synephrine) and synephrine provided in a C. aurantium extract
(6% p-synephrine) alone and in combination with caffeine in rats. Female Sprague-Dawley rats
were administered by gavage 0, 10, or 50 mg/kg body weight/day of p-synephrine from each
source with or without the addition of 25 mg/kg body weight/day of caffeine for a period of 28
days and SBP, DBP, heart rate, and ECG endpoints were continuously monitored. In
comparison to baseline values, SBP and QT interval were not significantly changed in any of the
treatment groups at the end of the 28 days, and DBP was not significantly different in the
p-synephrine only groups; however, DBP was significantly decreased in all groups administered
caffeine, except for the 50 mg/kg body weight/day p-synephrine extract plus caffeine. In
addition, heart rate was significantly decreased in all groups receiving p-synephrine, except for
the 50 mg/kg body weight/day group of p-synephrine from C. aurantium extract. When
comparing the effects over the first 8 hours following dosing (day of assessment not reported)
between groups, SBP was significantly elevated at 1, 2, and 4 hours in the groups receiving psynephrine at a dose of 50 mg/kg body weight/day from either source and also at 8 hours in the
group administered 50 mg/kg p-synephrine from C. aurantium extract compared to the vehicle
control. SBP also was significantly increased in the group receiving 50 mg/kg body weight/day
p-synephrine from C. aurantium at 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours compared to the group receiving
50 mg/kg body weight/day p-synephrine from the purified extract, leading the authors to suggest
that other components of the C. aurantium extract had an adverse effect on blood pressure.
The addition of caffeine significantly increased SBP at 1, 2, and 4 hours in all p-synephrine
groups compared to p-synephrine alone. DBP was not significantly affected by p-synephrine,
except for transient increases compared to controls at 4 and 8 hours in the group receiving
50 mg/kg body weight/day p-synephrine from C. aurantium extract. p-Synephrine did not affect
heart rate in a consistent manner. Heart rate was significantly increased at 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours
in the group receiving 10 mg/kg body weight/day p-synephrine from the purified extract
April 12, 2013
Page 7
compared to control, but not in the 50 mg/kg body weight/day group. In the groups receiving
p-synephrine from C. aurantium extract, heart rate was significantly increased at 2 hours in the
10 mg/kg body weight/day group and at 1, 2, and 4 hours in the 50 mg/kg body weight/day
group compared to controls.
The addition of caffeine significantly increased heart rate 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours in all groups
provided caffeine compared to vehicle control. The addition of caffeine also significantly
increased heart rate compared to p-synephrine alone at 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours in both 50 mg/kg
body weight/day dose groups and in the 10 mg/kg body weight/day p-synephrine from
C. aurantium dose group. In the 10 mg/kg body weight/day p-synephrine from purified extract
plus caffeine dose group, heart rate was significantly increased at 2 and 4 hours compared to
p-synephrine alone. Uncorrected QT interval was not affected by p-synephrine alone in any of
the dose groups compared to control, and no consistent effects attributable to caffeine or
p-synephrine source were observed. Based on the reported effects, the authors concluded that
“p-synephrine, either as the purified component or as part of a botanical extract with other
components, can increase heart rate and blood pressure. These effects tend to be more
pronounced when the source of p-synephrine is a multi-component product or when caffeine is
added.” In addition, it was noted that in contrast to the results of Calapai et al. (1999), there
was no weight loss, decrease in food consumption, or differences in mortalities in the present
study in rats that received up to 50 mg/kg body weight/day p-synephrine for 28 days compared
to control. It should also be noted that the doses of p-synephrine used in these studies were up
to 20-times the typical daily doses consumed by humans, and although the cardiovascular
changes were statistically significant, because they were small it is doubtful that they would be
clinically significant.
The acute administration of a mixture of p-synephrine, caffeine, ephedrine, and salicin in a
10:80:4:6 ratio at doses totalling 300, 350, or 400 mg/kg body weight/day to male and female
albino CF1 mice (6/group) resulted in 1 death in mid-dose males and 5 deaths in high-dose
males (Schmitt et al., 2012). Following necropsy, cardiopulmonary hemorrhage was observed
in the animals that died. Clinical signs of toxicity such as a reduction in locomotor activity and
ptosis were significantly increased in all treated groups, whereas observations of other clinical
signs of toxicity, such as piloerection, gasping, tearing, salivation, agitation, tremors, and muscle
spasms reached statistical significance mainly in high-dose groups. Due to the presence of
ephedrine and salicin, it is not possible to determine what contribution p-synephrine made to the
observed effects; however, in a separate acute test of spontaneous locomotor activity, the
administration of 30 mg/kg p-synephrine to male albino CF1 mice resulted in decreased
locomotor activity compared to controls. The p-synephrine used in these studies was (±)-psynephrine and was obtained from MP Biomedicals; thus, it was likely synthetic and not isolated
from C. aurantium. The doses of p-synephrine and ephedrine ranged from approximately 4 to 8
times an equivalent average human daily dose.
There also were limited human data available specifically on combination products containing
only p-synephrine and caffeine. The limitations of the available data have raised some concern
with respect to the adequacy of demonstration of product safety (Haaz et al., 2006; Rossato et
al., 2011).
April 12, 2013
Page 8
In the one double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study that assessed the effects of caffeine
(304 mg) and p-synephrine (21 mg) on vital signs, serum electrolytes, and oxygen consumption
during rest and after intense exercise (30 minutes and 75 to 80% maximum heart rate) in 10
healthy adults, slight increases were reported in post-exercise diastolic blood pressure
(71.7 mmHg vs. 63.0 mmHg) and postprandial glucose concentrations (121.0 mg/dl vs.
103.7 mg/dl with the placebo treatment) (Haller et al., 2008). There was no effect at rest or
during exercise on heart rate, systolic blood pressure, or exercise-related changes in oxygen
consumption, serum lactate, or insulin. With supplementation subjects did perceive the exercise
routine to be less strenuous. No significant adverse events were reported to have occurred.
Haller et al. (2005) previously conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled double blind, crossover trial in which 10 healthy non-smoking adults consumed single doses of C. aurantium
(Advantra Z) to provide a p-synephrine dose of 46.9 mg, a multi-ingredient product (Xenadrine
EFX) to provide 5.5 mg of p-synephrine along with 5.7 mg of octopamine and 239.2 mg of
caffeine, or a placebo. A 1-week washout was incorporated between treatments. Effects on
heart rate and blood pressure were recorded at regular intervals. Xenadrine EFX was found to
increase both systolic and diastolic blood pressure by about 9 mmHg 2 hours following dosing.
The p-synephrine-only containing product, Advantra Z had no effect on blood pressure. Both
products induced a slight increase in heart rate (Xenadrine EFX 16.7 bpm and Advantra Z
11.4 bpm). The lack of effect of Advantra Z on blood pressure, despite containing nearly 10-fold
higher concentrations of p-synephrine was attributed to caffeine and other stimulants present in
Xenadrine EFX. Another human trial in healthy overweight males conducted by Sale et al.
(2006) on Xenadrine EFX (to provide 6 mg p-synephrine, 150 mg caffeine, and 150 mg catechin
polyphenols) failed to show any effects of treatment on either blood pressure or heart rate.
Most of the human trial data that have been published pertain to combination products
containing several or many ingredients in addition to p-synephrine and caffeine. In relation to
safety, these clinical trials have assessed potential effects on heart rate, blood pressure, mean
arterial pressure, and glucose tolerance/energy metabolism. The results of the studies have
been mixed, with some showing no direct effects of combination products on cardiovascular
parameters with others demonstrating slight to moderate effects. The more notable studies are
summarized below.
Seifert et al. (2011) conducted an acute, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study in
23 mildly overweight (BMI 26.6 ± 3.8) volunteers to investigate the cardiovascular effects of a
product containing caffeine and bitter orange extract (p-synephrine), as well as green tea
extract, bee pollen, white willow bark powder, Panax ginseng root, Garcinia cambogia extract,
and vanadium. On the study day 1, heart rate, blood pressure, and non-protein respiratory
exchange ratio (RER) were determined following an overnight fast. Subjects were then
provided with 3 study capsules and instructed to consume 1 at each meal of the day. The
following day, subjects returned to the laboratory following an overnight fast, consumed the 4th
capsule, and blood pressure, heart rate, and RER were determined 60 to 75 minutes following
consumption of the capsule. Following a 1-week washout period, the subjects returned to the
laboratory and followed the same procedure on the alternate capsule. Each active product
capsule contained 176 mg caffeine (from guarana) and 13 mg p-synephrine (from
C. aurantium), providing a total dose of 704 mg caffeine and 52 mg p-synephrine over the
April 12, 2013
Page 9
24-hour period. No adverse effects were reported by any of the subjects, and there were no
significant between-group or within-group differences in heart rate, systolic blood pressure
(SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), or RER for the entire
population or when the data were separated by gender. When high caffeine users were
separated from low caffeine users, a significant decrease in RER compared to placebo and
baseline values was reported for the low caffeine users; however, there were no significant
differences in heart rate, SBP, DBP, or MAP.
Significant increases in SBP at 2 hours and in the 3-hour average and in DBP at 2 hours
following the consumption of 1.5 cups of an enriched coffee providing 450 mg caffeine and
21.6 mg p-synephrine compared to regular coffee were reported in 10 healthy & physically
active young adults (Hoffman et al., 2006). Although the authors concluded that “the 150 mg
higher caffeine dose found in JavaFit™ in combination with p-synephrine likely contributed to
the modest 3 mmHg average increase in systolic blood pressure”, the enriched coffee also
contained Garcinia cambogia and chromium polynicotinate. Thus, it is not possible to determine
which ingredients were responsible for the observed effects.
Cardiovascular function was assessed in a 2-week study in which 27 healthy overweight adults
(17 females, 10 males) consumed a placebo (n=8) or a commercial weight loss supplement
(n=19) containing 335 mg Ma Huang (20 mg ephedrine alkaloids), 910 mg guarana (200 mg
caffeine), and 85 mg bitter orange (5 mg p-synephrine) per 2 capsules (1 serving) (Kalman et
al., 2002). For the first 7 days of the study, each subject was instructed to ingest 1 capsule
twice a day, while for the second 7 days of the study, each subject was instructed to ingest 2
capsules twice per day. Cardiovascular parameters that were evaluated on days 0, 7, and 14 of
the study included systolic and diastolic blood pressures, heart rate, and serial ECG, while a
Doppler echocardiogram was conducted on day 14 in all subjects. No serious adverse events
were reported throughout the 14-day study; however, minor adverse events, such as dry mouth,
feeling hyperactive, headache, increased thirst, and difficulty initiating sleep, were reported, with
no significant differences between treatment and placebo groups. In addition, there were no
significant differences between the treatment and placebo groups with respect to heart rate,
blood pressure, serial ECG, Doppler echocardiogram, left ventricular ejection fraction, and heart
valve function.
In a 6-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 23 healthy obese adults
received daily either a combination product (528 mg caffeine, 900 mg St. John’s Wort)
containing 975 mg of C. aurantium extract (6% p-synephrine or 58.5 mg p-synephrine) (n=9), a
placebo (maltodextrin) (n=7), or nothing (control) (n=4) (Colker et al., 1999). The study also
included diet and exercise components. Study parameters included body composition and
metabolic variables (taken at baseline and at 6 weeks), plasma lipid levels, and mood states.
ECG was monitored at baseline and at 3 and 6 weeks. Twenty out of 23 subjects completed
the study, with reasons for discontinuation reportedly unrelated to treatment. No significant
adverse effects were reported. Significant reductions in body weight, percentage body fat, and
fat mass were observed in the treated group compared to baseline values. The basal metabolic
rate of the treated subjects was significantly increased, whereas the placebo group showed a
significantly decreased metabolic rate compared to baseline, which, in a review by Preuss et al.
(2002), was suggested to be related to the implementation of caloric restriction throughout the
April 12, 2013
Page 10
study. No significant changes in ECG, serum chemistry, urinalysis, cholesterol, triglyceride
levels, fatigue and vigor (as assessed by a Profile of Mood States questionnaire), heart rate, or
blood pressure were observed in any treatment group.
To examine the effects of an ephedrine- and p-synephrine-based product on body mass, body
composition, metabolic variables, and mood states in healthy overweight adults, 30 subjects
were randomly assigned to the experimental or placebo group (Kalman et al., 2000). For 8
weeks, the experimental group received a capsule containing 20 mg ephedrine alkaloids, 5 mg
p-synephrine, 200 mg caffeine, and 15 mg salicin twice daily. The study included diet and
exercise components and examined body mass, body composition, metabolic parameters,
mood states, ECG, blood pressure, and pulse monitoring at baseline and weeks 4 and 8.
Twenty-five out of 30 subjects completed the study, with reasons for dropouts reportedly
unrelated to treatment. The experimental group had a significantly greater weight loss
compared to the placebo group, with a 16% decrease in body fat compared with a 1% increase
for the placebo group. No significant changes in blood pressure, serial ECGs, heart rate, serum
chemistry, or caloric intake were noted throughout the study.
No significant differences in heart rate, SBP, DBP, or overall incidence of adverse events were
reported between healthy overweight subjects consuming a multi-ingredient product providing
36 mg p-synephrine and 308 mg caffeine per day for 8 weeks or those consuming a rice powder
placebo in a study designed to assess the effects of the product on resting metabolic rate (Zenk
et al., 2005). Of the 7 adverse events reported in the active product group, 2 (1 case each of
nausea and urticaria) were considered to be possibly related to treatment. The multi-ingredient
product also contained 3-acetyl-7-oxo-dehydroepiandrosterone, coleus forskohlii extract, yerba
mate, piper nigrum, and dandelion leaf and root powder.
As with the use of p-synephrine containing products, there have been several case reports with
combination products containing synephrine/caffeine and/or other ingredients of adverse
cardiovascular effects (Health Canada, 2004; Nasir et al., 2004; Nykamp et al., 2004; Bouchard
et al., 2005; Holmes and Tavee, 2008; Smedema and Müller, 2008; Thomas et al., 2009;
Moaddeb et al., 2011). The relationship of these effects to the consumption of the dietary
supplements involved is difficult to assess given the lack of details regarding concomitant
exposures to other products, existing medical conditions, and lifestyle factors.
Stohs (2010) conducted a critical review of 22 adverse event reports received by the U.S. FDA
between April 2004 and October 2009 and 10 clinical case reports published during the same
time period. In each of the reports, C. aurantium or p-synephrine were considered as the most
probable cause of the adverse event; however, all cases involved the use of products that
contained multiple herbal ingredients and multiple alkaloids, thus it is not possible to ascribe the
reported effects to a single ingredient. Furthermore, in the majority of the cases, additional
confounding factors were present and may have contributed to or caused the observed adverse
event. Many of the discussions in the clinical case reports centered on the structural similarity
between ephedrine and p-synephrine; however, Stohs (2010) highlighted the structural
differences that are responsible for their different pharmacological activities. Stohs (2010) also
noted that p-synephrine is consumed in the diet at levels ranging from 6 mg from a typical sweet
orange to 35 mg from an 8 ounce glass of mandarin orange juice with no reports of adverse
April 12, 2013
Page 11
events. Based on the totality of the afore-mentioned information, Stohs (2010) concluded that
C. aurantium and p-synephrine had been unjustifiably singled out as the causative agent in the
adverse event and case reports.
Based on a report available on the Internet, it appears that Health Canada has recently
conducted an assessment of the risk to human health of natural health products containing
p-synephrine and caffeine (Marles, 2011). Following review of information pertaining to the
structure, receptor binding properties, preclinical pharmacology and toxicology, conditions of
use in humans, dose-response, adverse reaction reports, and exposure to p-synephrine, Health
Canada concluded that doses up to 50 mg/day of p-synephrine alone and up to 40 mg/day
p-synephrine plus 320 mg/day caffeine would not likely cause any adverse health
consequences. Health Canada noted that in single ingredient products, the risk of
cardiovascular adverse effects “had been overstated in the literature and probably incorrectly
linked causally to case reports”. Nonetheless, a limit of 50 mg/day p-synephrine was
determined, as at doses above 50 mg/day, the dose-response curve was considered not
adequately characterized to assess safety.
Discussion and Conclusions
Although p-synephrine and caffeine have been assumed to produce similar clinical effects, but
through different mechanisms, recent data regarding the isoform of synephrine present in
C. aurantium extracts and from receptor binding studies indicates that p-synephrine is unlikely
to have significant effects on inotropy, vasoconstriction, or blood pressure. At physiologically
attainable serum concentrations, therefore, additive or synergistic effects on inotropy,
vasoconstriction, and blood pressure also are unlikely. Although additive or synergistic effects
on cardiovascular functioning are not anticipated based on the receptor binding properties of psynephrine, it is prudent use submaximal amounts of p-synephrine in combination products that
also include caffeine. This remains the conservative approach in the absence of specific data to
support safety of a wide range of p-synephrine/caffeine dosage combinations.
Overall, it is concluded that as a single one time dose, up to 70 mg p-synephrine alone or 40
mg in combination with 320 mg of caffeine is not likely to cause adverse effects. It should be
noted that the half-life of p-synephrine is approximately 3 hours (Haller et al., 2005; 2008). As a
result, if dosing is spaced by at least 6 hours, slightly higher amounts of p-synephrine could be
consumed. If taken as divided doses (2 or more) spaced out over the course of the day, 100
mg of p-synephrine (e.g., 50 mg twice a day or 33 mg thrice daily) alone, or 70 mg p-synephrine
in combination with 400 mg caffeine (e.g., 35 mg p-synephrine and 200 mg caffeine twice per
day), is unlikely to be associated with adverse effects. Total exposure to p-synephrine and/or
caffeine should not exceed these limits. The human clinical data that are available do indicate
that there may be some slight increase in blood pressure, and to a lesser extent heart rate, in
some consumers of p-synephrine/caffeine combination products. Also, as noted by Rossato et
al. (2011), Health Canada (Marles 2011), and Inchiosa (2011), there are several case reports of
adverse cardiovascular effects of p-synephrine or p-synephrine/caffeine combination products.
While these reports do not provide causal association, they do highlight the need for appropriate
labeling of the product.
April 12, 2013
Page 12
It is recommended that the product be labeled to indicate that: clearance from a physician is
strongly recommended; duration of use not to exceed 8 weeks; users of the product should be
healthy; avoid using the product and/or consult a physician if they have various medical
conditions, taking certain medications, other dietary supplements, or wish to consume other
caffeine-containing products. In particular, contraindicated populations would include: pregnant
and nursing women; children; individuals with high blood pressure, cardiac arrhythmias, or
heart, kidney, or liver disease; people with psychiatric or epileptic disorders; and those currently
taking blood pressure medications, sympathomimetics, or over-the-counter dietary supplements
(containing ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, or phenylpropanolamine). Also, the product should
provide a dosing formulation (e.g., break the dose down into 2 or 3 daily servings) so as to allow
for a “tolerance test” at the initiation of dosing and to reduce the likelihood of a pharmacological
effect of bolus dosing. The incorporation of a tolerance period (i.e., consumption of 1/2 or 1/3
the suggested serving size) should also appear on the label.
Based on the foregoing, under conditions prescribed by the label, the use of p-synephrine alone
or in combination with caffeine within the specified limits, is not considered to pose significant
concerns. Under conditions of widespread use, there remains some potential (not quantifiable)
for cardiovascular effects, or adverse events in persons with unrecognized sensitivity to caffeine
or who have undiagnosed cardiovascular conditions; hence, the importance of the inclusion on
the label of a strong recommendation for clearance by a physician prior to the use of the
product.
Sincerely,
Barry Lynch, B.Sc., DABT, ERT
Associate Director
Intertek Cantox
April 12, 2013
Page 13
References
Abbott PJ (1986). Caffeine: a toxicological overview. Med J Aust 145(10):518-521.
Arbo MD, Schmitt GC, Limberger MF, Charao MF, Moro AM, Ribeiro GL et al. (2009).
Subchronic toxicity of Citrus aurantium L. (Rutaceae) extract and p-synephrine in mice.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 54(2):114-117.
Arciero PJ, Gardner AW, Calles-Escandon J, Benowitz NL, Poehlman ET (1995). Effects of
caffeine ingestion on NE kinetics, fat oxidation, and energy expenditure in younger and
older men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 268(6, Part 1):E1192-E1198.
Astrup A, Toubro S, Cannon S, Hein P, Breum L, Madsen J (1990). Caffeine: a double-blind,
placebo-controlled study of its thermogenic, metabolic and cardiovascular effects in
healthy volunteers. Am J Clin Nutr 51(5):759-767.
Bauer AR Jr, Rank RK, Kerr R, Straley RL, Mason JD (1977). Effects of prolonged coffee intake
on genetically identical mice. Life Sci 21(1):63-70.
Benowitz NL (1990). Clinical pharmacology of caffeine. Annu Rev Med 41:277-288.
Bouchard NC, Howland MA, Greller HA, Hoffman RS, Nelson LS (2005). Ischemic stroke
associated with use of an ephedra-free dietary supplement containing synephrine. Mayo
Clin Proc 80(4):541-545.
Bracco D, Ferrarra J-M, Arnaud MJ, Jéquier E, Schutz Y (1995). Effects of caffeine on energy
metabolism, heart rate, and methylxanthine metabolism in lean and obese women. Am J
Physiol Endocrinol Metab 269(4, Part 1):E671-E678.
Brown CM, McGrath JC, Midgley JM, Muir AGB, O’Brien JW, Thonoor CM et al. (1988).
Activities of octopamine and synephrine stereoisomers on alpha-adrenoceptors. Br J
Clin Pharmacol 93(2):417-429.
Bui LT, Nguyen DT, Ambrose PJ (2006). Blood pressure and heart rate effects following a
single dose of bitter orange. Ann Pharmacother 40(1):53-57.
Calapai G, Firenzuoli F, Saitta A, Squadrito F, Arlotta MR, Costantino G et al. (1999).
Antiobesity and cardiovascular toxic effects of Citrus aurantium extracts in the rat: a
preliminary report. Fitoterapia 70(6):586-592.
Colker CM, Kalman DS, Torina GC, Perlis T, Street C (1999). Effects of Citrus aurantium
extract, caffeine, and St. John' s wort on body fat loss, lipid levels, and mood states in
overweight healthy adults. Curr Ther Res 60(3):145-153.
Curatolo PW, Robertson D (1983). The health consequences of caffeine. Ann Intern Med 98(5,
Part 1):641-653.
April 12, 2013
Page 14
D'Ambrosio SM (1994). Evaluation of the genotoxicity data on caffeine. Regul Toxicol
Pharmacol 19(3):243-281.
Donovan JL, DeVane CL (2001). A primer on caffeine pharmacology and its drug interactions in
clinical psychopharmacology. Psychopharmacol Bull 35(3):30-48.
Douds DA (1997). An Acute Oral Toxicity Study in Rats with Advantra Z™. Fairfield (NJ):
Nutratech, Inc.
Firenzuoli F, Gori L, Galapai C (2005). Adverse reaction to an adrenergic herbal extract (Citrus
aurantium). Phytomedicine 12(3):247-248.
Flechtner-Mors M, Jenkinson CP, Alt A, Adler G, Ditschuneit HH (2002). In vivo 1-adrenergic
lipolytic activity in subcutaneous adipose tissue of obese subjects. J Pharmacol Exp
Therap 301(1):229-233.
Fredholm BB (1995). Adenosine, adenosine receptors and the actions of caffeine (Astra Award
Lecture). Pharmacol Toxicol 76(2):93-101.
Gange CA, Madias C, Felix-Getzik EM, Weintraub AR, Estes NA(IIIrd) (2006). Variant angina
associated with bitter orange in a dietary supplement. Mayo Clin Proc 81(4):545-548.
Grassi G, Cattaneo BM, Seravalle G, Lanfranchi A, Bolla G, Mancia G (1997). Baroreflex
impairment by low sodium diet in mild or moderate essential hypertension. Hypertension
29(3):802-807.
Green PJ, Kirby R, Suls J (1996). The effects of caffeine on blood pressure and heart rate: a
review. Ann Behav Med 18(3):201-216.
Haaz S, Fontaine KR, Cutter G, Limdi N, Perumean-Chaney S, Allison DB (2006). Citrus
aurantium and synephrine alkaloids in the treatment of overweight and obesity: an
update. Obes Rev 7(1):79-88.
Haller CA, Benowitz NL, Jacob P III (2005). Hemodynamic effects of ephedra-free weight-loss
supplements in humans. Am J Med 118(9):998-1003.
Haller CA, Duan M, Jacob P III; Benowitz N (2008). Human pharmacology of a performanceenhancing dietary supplement under resting and exercise conditions. Br J Clin
Pharmacol 65(6):833-840.
Haynes RH, Collins JDB (1984). The mutagenic potential of caffeine. In: Dews PB, editor.
Caffeine: Perspectives from Recent Research. Berlin, Germany / New York (NY):
Springer-Verlag, pp. 221-238.
April 12, 2013
Page 15
Health Canada (2008). Monograph - Caffeine. In: Compendium of Monographs. Ottawa (ON):
Health Canada, Natural Health Products Directorate (NHPD). Available at:
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/prodnatur/applications/licenprod/monograph/mono_caffe-cafe-eng.php [Date Modified: 2007-12-31, 2008-01-02].
Health Canada (2004). Bitter orange (synephrine): cardiovascular reactions. In: Canadian
Adverse Reaction Newsletter Volume 14, Issue 4, pp. 3-4. Available at: http://www.hcsc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/alt_formats/hpfb-dgpsa/pdf/medeff/carn-bcei_v14n4-eng.pdf.
Hofstetter R, Kreuder J, Von Bernuth G (1985). Wirkung von oxedrin auf den linken ventrikel
und den peripheren gefasswiderstand. [The effect of oxedrine on the left ventricle and
peripheral vascular resistance]. Arzneimittelforschung 35(12):1844-1846.
Inchiosa MA (2011). Experience (mostly negative) with the use of sympathomimetic agents for
weight loss. J Obes 2011(Article ID: 764584). doi:10.1155/2011/764584.
Jordan R, Midgley JM, Thonoor CM, Williams CM (1987). J Pharm Pharmacol 39(9):752. Cited
In: Calapai et al., 1999.
Kaats G R, Miller H, Preuss HG, Stohs SJ (2013). A 60 day double-blind, placebo-controlled
safety study involving Citrus aurantium (bitter orange) extract. Food Chem Toxicol Epub
ahead of print. pii: S0278-6915(13)00035-5. doi: 10.1016.
Kalman DS, Colker CM, Shi Q, Swain MA (2000). Effects of a weight-loss aid in healthy
overweight adults: Double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Curr Ther Res
61(4):199-205.
Kalman D, Incledon T, Gaunaurd I, Schwartz H, Krieger D (2002). An acute clinical trial
evaluating the cardiovascular effects of an herbal ephedra-caffeine weight loss product
in healthy overweight adults. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 26(10):1363-1366.
Keogh AM, Baron DW (1985). Sympathomimetic abuse and coronary artery spasm. Br Med J
291(6500):940. Cited In: Nykamp et al., 2004.
LeBlanc J, Jobin M, Côté J, Samson P, Labrie A (1985). Enhanced metabolic response to
caffeine in exercise-trained human subjects. J Appl Physiol 59(3):832-837.
Leonard TK, Watson RR, Mohs ME (1987). The effects of caffeine on various body systems: a
review. J Am Diet Assoc 87(8):1048-1053.
Marles R (2011).Synephrine, Octopamine and Caffeine Health Risk Assessment (HRA) Report.
Health Canada Natural Health Products Directorate, File No. 172091, May 2011, pp.149. Report available at:
http://www.nutratechinc.com/advz/Studies2011/Safety/S1%20Health%20Canada%200511.pdf
April 12, 2013
Page 16
McGregor D, Riach C, Brown A, Edwards I, Reynolds D, West K et al. (1988). Reactivity of
catecholamines and related substances in the mouse lymphoma L5178Y cell assay for
mutagens. Environ Mol Mutagen 11(4):523-544.
Mohr U, Althoff J, Ketkar MB, Conradt P, Morgareidge K (1984). The influence of caffeine on
tumour incidence in Sprague-Dawley rats. Food Chem Toxicol 22(5):377-382.
Myers MG (1988). Effects of caffeine on blood pressure. Arch Intern Med 148(5):1189-1193.
Nasir JM, Durning SJ, Ferguson M, Barold HS, Haigney MC (2004). Exercise-induced syncope
associated with QT prolongation and ephedra-free Xenadrine. Mayo Clin Proc
79(8):1059-1062.
Nawrot P, Jordan S, Eastwood J, Rotstein J, Hugenholtz A, Feeley M (2003). Effects of caffeine
on human health. Food Addit Contam 20(1):1-30.
Nykamp DL, Fackih MN, Compton AL (2004). Possible association of acute lateral-wall
myocardial infarction and bitter orange supplement. Ann Pharmacother 38(5):812-816.
Orton S (2005). Caffeine: A Pharmacological Perspective. PHARMACOLOGY 4AA3, Advanced
Topics in Pharmacology, Student Seminar and PowerPoint Presentation. 13 March,
2005.
Penzak SR, Jann MW, Cold JA, Hon YY, Desai HD, Gurley BJ (2001). Seville (sour) orange
juice: Synephrine content and cardiovascular effects in normotensive adults. J Clin
Pharmacol 41(10):1059-1063.
Poehlman ET, Després JP, Bessette H, Fontaine E, Tremblay A, Bouchard C (1985). Influence
of caffeine on the resting metabolic rate of exercise-trained and inactive subjects. Med
Sci Sports Exerc 17(6):689-694.
Pozniak PC (1985). The carcinogenicity of caffeine and coffee: a review. J Am Diet Assoc
85(9):1127-1133.
Preuss HG, DiFerdinando D, Bagchi M, Bagchi D (2002). Citrus aurantium as a thermogenic,
weight-reduction replacement for ephedra: an overview. J Med 33(1-4):247-264.
Robertson D, Curatolo PW (1984). The cardiovascular effects of caffeine. In: Dews PB, editor.
Caffeine. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, pp. 77-85. Cited In: Myers, 1988.
Rossato LG, Costa VM, Limberger RP, Bastos MD, Remiao F (2011). Synephrine: from trace
concentrations to massive consumption in weight-loss. Food Chem Toxicol 49(1):8-16.
Sale C, Harris RC, Delves S, Corbett J (2006). Metabolic and physiological effects of ingesting
extracts of bitter orange, green tea and guarana at rest and during treadmill walking in
overweight males. Int J Obes (London) 30(5):764-773.
April 12, 2013
Page 17
Saper RB, Eisenberg DM, Phillips RS (2004). Common dietary supplements for weight loss. Am
Fam Physician 70(9):1731-1738.
Shara M, Stohs SJ (2011). Safety evaluation of bitter orange extract (p-synephrine) in healthy
volunteers. J. Amer. Coll. Nutr. 30: 358.
Smedema JP, Müller GJ (2008). Coronary spasm and thrombosis in a bodybuilder using a
nutritional supplement containing synephrine, octopamine, tyramine and caffeine. S Afr
Med J 98(5):372-373.
Stephensen TA, Sarlay R Jr (2010). Ventricular fibrillation associated with use of synephrine
containing dietary supplement. Mil Med 174(12):1313-1319.
Stohs SJ (2010). Assessment of the adverse event reports associated with Citrus aurantium
(bitter orange) from April 2004 to October 2009. J Funct Foods 2: 235-238.
Stohs SJ, Preuss HG (2011).The safety of bitter orange (Citrus aurantium) and its primary
protoalkaloid p-synephrine. HerbalGram 89: 34-39.
Stohs SJ, Preuss HG, Shara M (2011a). Review of the receptor binding properties of psynephrine as related to its pharmacological effects. Oxid Med Cell Long doi:
10.1155/2011/482973.
Stohs SJ, Preuss HG, Shara M (2011b). The safety of Citrus aurantium (bitter orange) and its
primary protoalkaloid p-synephrine. Phytother Res 25: 1421-1428.
Stohs SJ, Preuss HG, Keith SC, Keith PL, Miller H, Kaats GR (2011c). Effects of p-synephrine
alone and in combination with selected bioflavonoids on resting metabolism, blood
pressure, heart rate and self-reported mood changes. Int J Med Sci 8(4): 295-301.
Stohs SJ, Preuss, HG, Shara M (2012). A review of the human clinical studies involving Citrus
aurantium (bitter orange) extract and its primary protoalkaloid p-synephrine. Int J Med
Sci 9 (7): 572-538.
Sweetman SC, editor (2002). Phenylephrine; oxedrine tartrate. In: Martindale: The Comlete
Drug Reference, 33rd edition. London, Engl. / Chicago (IL): Pharmaceutical Press, pp.
1097-1098, p. 950.
Thomas SHL, Clark KL, Allen R, Smith SE (1991). A comparison of the cardiovascular effects of
phenylpropanolamine and phenylephrine containing proprietary cold remedies. Br J Clin
Pharmacol 32:705-711.
Thomas JE, Munir JA, McIntyre PZ, Ferguson MA (2009). STEMI in a 24-year-old man after use
of a synephrine-containing dietary supplement: a case report and review of the literature.
Texas Heart Inst J 36(6):586-590.
April 12, 2013
Page 18
Williams CM, Couch MW, Thonoor CM, Midgley JM (1987). Isomeric octopamines: Their
occurrence and functions. J Pharm Pharmacol 39(3):153-157.
Zani F, Massimo G, Benvenuti S, Bianchi A, Albasin A, Melegari M et al. (1991). Studies on the
genotoxic properties of essential oils with Bacillus subtilis rec-assay and
Salmonella/microsome reversion assay. Planta Med 57(3):237-241.
Zeitlin BR (1972). Coffee and bladder cancer. Lancet 299(7759):1066.
Zhao J, Cannon B, Nedergaard J (1997). 1-Adrenergic stimulation potentiates the thermogenic
action of 3-adrenoreceptor-generated cAMP in brown fat cells. J Biol Chem
272(52):32847-32856.
Zhao XW, et al. (1978). Pressor effect of fructus Auruntii immaturus in septic shock. Chin J
Pediatr 16:95. Cited In: Zhao et al., 1989.
Zhao XW, Li JX, Zhu ZR, Sun DQ, Liu SC (1989). Anti-shock effects of synthetic effective
compositions of fructus aurantii immaturus. experimental study and clinical observation.
Chin Med J (Engl) 102(2):91-93.
April 12, 2013
Page 19