* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Stefan Wild: God, Man and Prop
International reactions to Fitna wikipedia , lookup
The Jewel of Medina wikipedia , lookup
Islamic marital practices wikipedia , lookup
Islamic fashion wikipedia , lookup
Islamic feminism wikipedia , lookup
Islamic Golden Age wikipedia , lookup
Political aspects of Islam wikipedia , lookup
Islam and violence wikipedia , lookup
Criticism of Islamism wikipedia , lookup
Islam and Sikhism wikipedia , lookup
Islam and secularism wikipedia , lookup
War against Islam wikipedia , lookup
Schools of Islamic theology wikipedia , lookup
Islam in Egypt wikipedia , lookup
Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain wikipedia , lookup
Muslim world wikipedia , lookup
Islamic socialism wikipedia , lookup
Islam and war wikipedia , lookup
Muslim women in sport wikipedia , lookup
Gender roles in Islam wikipedia , lookup
Islam in the United Kingdom wikipedia , lookup
Liberalism and progressivism within Islam wikipedia , lookup
Islam in South Africa wikipedia , lookup
Islam and modernity wikipedia , lookup
Islamic schools and branches wikipedia , lookup
Islamic culture wikipedia , lookup
Soviet Orientalist studies in Islam wikipedia , lookup
Reception of Islam in Early Modern Europe wikipedia , lookup
free, honourable women, in contrast to dishonourable women”. In the presentday context this implies “uncovered” women are not decent, which involves duress for unveiled Muslim women and is a slur on all non-Muslim women. The sense of the original text is often restricted by reading into it later Islamic interpretations. A. Khoury and R. Paret’s rendering of the divine command to Ibrahim “Aslim!” (Surah 2:131), “be subject to me”, is for instance here replaced by the technical expression “become a Muslim.” Ibrahim (Abraham) is thus portrayed as though he had been Muslim, buttressing Islam’s claim to be the original authentic religion which Muhammad restored. Similarly when Isa’s (Jesus’) disciples declare in Surah 5:111 that they “are devoted” to him, the footnote supplements “i.e. Muslims”. The greatest profit will be derived from this edition by those who can read the parallel Arabic original. The translation regrettably fails to indicate the origin of individual Surahs, whether from Mecca (610-622 AD) or Medina (622-632 AD), a lack insufficiently compensated by a list in the appendix, which also includes an index of terms and names giving the translation of Arabic personal names and occasionally but unsystematically their derivation from Greek, Aramaic or Hebrew. On first sight an unusual edition of the Koran, which will prove useful to Muslims and non-Muslims alike. Muslims will appreciate not only the Arabic text but also the division into paragraphs for recitation with signs indicating where to prostrate oneself. NonMuslims will appreciate the dignified, faithful and “unsmoothed” translation in contrast to some Western versions which tend too readily to identify the Judaeo-Christian terminology admittedly present in the Koran with JudaeoChristian ideas. Of the dozen or so translations of the Koran into German the present edition may be regarded as one of the most successful both on optical and linguistic grounds and from the point of view of Islamic theology. (Heidi Josua) The Koran. Arabic-German. Translation and commentary by Adel Theodor Khoury. Chr. Kaiser/Gütersloher Verlagshaus: Gütersloh 2004, 813 pp., 69,00 € [in German only: Der Koran. ArabischDeutsch. Übersetzt und kommentiert von Adel Theodor Khoury] The text of this further GermanArabic version of the Koran is based on the 1987 translation of the well-known Professor emeritus of Religious Science at the Roman Catholic theological faculty of the University of Münster (Westphalia), T. A. Khoury, published in association with leading Muslim theologians including the General Secretary of the Muslim World Congress. The introduction gives a brief history of the origins of Islam and the Koran, Muslim and Western assessments of the Koran’s importance, its content, style, date, structure and interpretation. A particular feature of this edition is the German-Arabic text set in parallel, permitting an immediate comparison. This is complemented by explanatory footnotes to individual verses and a helpful index of proper names and sub43 jects with important Koranic terms. (CS) Christoph Burgmer (Ed.). The Koran in Dispute. The Luxenberg Thesis: The Debate so Far. [in German only: Streit um den Koran. Die Luxenberg-Debatte: Standpunkte und Hintergründe]. Verlag Hans Schiler: Kempten, 2005, 152 pp. 16,00 € The year 2000 saw the pseudonymous publication of “The Reading of the Koran” setting out Christoph Luxenberg’s thesis that certain passages of the Koran should be understood not according to the Arabic sense of the words but to an underlying Syriac-Aramaic sense, thereby giving the Koran a whole new meaning. The present collection of essays is not limited to the views of advocates and opponents of the thesis but contains interviews and general articles on the current state of Koran studies which will appeal also to the non-specialist reader interested in this field. Stefan Wild. God, Man and Prophet in the Koran. Twentieth century Muslim Exegetes and the Modern Worldview. [in German only: Stefan Wild. Mensch, Prophet und Gott im Koran. Muslimische Exegeten des 20. Jahrhunderts und das Menschenbild der Moderne.] Gerda Henkel Lecture. Rhema: Münster, 2001, 54 pp., 9,20 € Wild’s essay provides a clearlywritten and useful summary of the Koranic view of God and human beings. His discussion of Islamic and 44 non-Islamic concepts of revelation brings out clearly the immense gulf which continues to separate the two positions. His survey of some Muslim exegetes’ alternative, non-traditional approaches makes plain to what extent research findings differing from the customary consensus are limited to individual intellectuals and a handful of theologians, whose cautiously stated conclusions have not seldom resulted in their being threatened, expelled from office or country or even losing their life. Traditional theology still calls the tune nearly everywhere and is not about to listen to them or even grant them freedom of research. (CS)