Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
4D modelling in the northern part of the Fennoscandian Shield Case studies from the Skellefte and Vihanti-Pyhäsalmi districts Tobias E. Bauer, PhD Luleå University of Technology Why 3D- and 4D-modelling • Most European major mineral deposits that outcrop have been discovered • Estimation of the resource base below surface through geological modelling and estimation of geological conditions • Realistic to anticipate that by building the 4D geo-models of mature mining belts we will be able to estimate an increased resource base by up to 50% in the individual belts Key ingredients • • • • • • • • • Geology Geochemistry and hydrothermal alteration Metal zonation, isotope geochemistry, geochronology Fluid migration, geohydrology Tectonic evolution Magnetic data interpretations Gravity data interpretations High resolution reflection seismic interpretations Electromagnetic / electric / magnetotelluric interpretations The Fennocandian Shield • Case study I: Vihanti – Pyhäsalmi belt • Case study II: Skellefte district Case study I: Vihanti-Pyhäsalmi belt The main volcanic units of the VihantiPyhäsalmi ore district Vihanti group (~1925 -1920 Ma) • felsic to mafic early arc volcanism • abundant volcaniclastics • calc silicate rocks • subvolcanic felsic intrusion Pyhäsalmi group (~1930-1925 Ma) • bimodal felsic and mafic early arc volcanism • lavas, breccias and porphyries • subvolcanic felsic intrusion Vihanti model Pyhäsalmi model 3D/4D Modeling methods for regional and semi-regional 3D models Geophysical surveys,Geophysical maps drillholes and structural geological inference! Surpac Geological analogies Bedrock observations solidsGeological analogies from the from the surrounding geology, surrounding geology, seismic sections and theories and other geophysical assumptions of the surveys geological events and absolute age determinations Magnetic maps Surpac strings Bouguer maps Semi-regional 3D model of Vihanti Drill hole data Drill hole data Geological maps Methods used for Pyhäsalmi 3D/4D- models • Lithogeochemistry W ? • Deep penetrating geophysics – Seismics – Magnetotellurics Z=1000m E ? • Sructural analysis • Modeling with goCad and Surpac- programs Regional model of the Raahe-Ladoga zone Case study II: Skellefte district Regional scale Semi-regional scale Deposit scale Structural and facies analysis in the Vargfors syncline • • • Combination of structures and sedimentary stratigraphy Syn-extensional sedimentation along growth faults Inversion and formation of asymmetric synclines Regional scale structural analysis Regional scale structural analysis Regional scale structural analysis N: dominating coaxial deformation at shallower crustal level S: high metamorphic conditions and non-coaxial deformation at deeper crustal level Strain partitioning during one SSENNW transpressional event OR two separate events with contrasting bulk shortening directions Regional scale structural analysis 3D-modelling • All – Data import into 3D-software – Application of conceptual model – Modelling of surfaces and bodies • Deposit scale • Semi-regional scale (Nautanen shear zone) • Regional scale – Uncertainty model – Prospectivity model Deposit scale modelling in the Skellefte district Simplified 3D-models of VMS ore bodies illustrating varyiations in shape and orientation 3D-modelling in the Skellefte district Semi-regional and regional scale - - Structural data from field mapping in 3D (sparse plugin for GoCAD) Interpolation along map traces Cutting of surfaces Semi-regional scale 3D-model Detailed, semi-regional scale Voxet model of the Vargfors syncline 3D-modelling in the Skellefte district Uncertainty modelling Observed in field, mine or drillcore Interpreted from geophysical data (reflection seismic-, IP-, resitivity-, MAG-, or MTstudy) Interpreted from structural data or extrapolated from geophysical data Inferred / unknown 3D-modelling 4D-modelling in the Skellefte district • Adding geological time to the 3D-model • Visualisation of the conceptual model • Validation of the 3D-model Multi-scale geological modelling of the Gällivare area Svappavaara Malmberget Aitik