Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Spinal metastatic lesions: bridging the gap between imaging and interventions Bassem A. Georgy, M.D., North County Radiology Assistant Clinical Professor, University of California, San Diego Background • Not how to read MRI • It is about how the interventionalist or surgeons read MRI Tomita Classification Spine 2001 The WBB (Weinstein‐Boriani‐Biagini) 1997 Pre‐surgical planning for Malignant lesions Excisional procedure for metastatic spine tumor (A)intralesional excision or debulking, complete removal of the tumor piece-by-piece, (B) en bloc resection, the tumor is removed in a single piece Gasbarrini Cappuccio M, Mirabile L, et al.. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2004;8:269; Posterior decompression and stabilization is This procedure does not necessarily involve a direct approach to the tumor. Gasbarrini Cappuccio M, Mirabile L, et al.. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2004;8:269 En bloc tumor excision of the vertebral bodies can be performed with appropriate margins if the tumor is confined to zones 4–8 or 5–9, with one pedicle that is not involved by tumor. 67 years-old-women with primary breast cancer and diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Percutaneous Tumor Management • Complete ablation – Osteoid Osteoma – Single metastasis • Palliative treatment: Pain management – Cementoplasty – Ablation • RF ablation • Coblation • Cryoablation – Combined techniques RF for Osteoid Osteoma RF Single Metastasis RFA Schaefer Ablation umages Schaefer Ablation umages Schaefer Ablation umages Schaefer Ablation umages Schaefer et al. AJR 2003;180:1075-77 Spinal Metastasis, Good Candidates AJNR Nov 08 Pre‐Procedure (CT, MRI) •No Cortical Disruption •No Epidural Extension Para‐spinal Soft Tissue Extension •Cortical Disruption •Epidural Extension Conventional VP or KP RFA ,Cryo Augmentation Coblation with Augmentation Conventional VP or KP Type 1 & 2 Coblation with Augmentation Type 3, 4, ?5 RFA ,Cryo Augmentation Type 5 77 years old women History of Melanoma T6 NIM 89 year-old- woman; Myeloma, breast and stomach cancer Breast metastasis 67 year old women with lung metastasis Selective Nerve Root Block YA Spinal Metastasis, Good Candidates AJNR Nov 08 Pre‐Procedure (CT, MRI) •No Cortical Disruption •No Epidural Extension Para‐spinal Soft Tissue Extension •Cortical Disruption •Epidural Extension Conventional VP or KP RFA ,Cryo Augmentation Coblation with Augmentation Coblation Technology •Unique RF wave shape and frequency •Low energy Radiofrequency •Creates a layer of high energy plasma field comprised of highly ionized particles •Break organic molecular bonds in tissue •Converts the tissue into gas and create a volumetric space • It is the plasma that ablates the tissue at low temperatures and not the radio‐frequency itself. Ablation By‐products • Tissue is broken down into elementary molecules and low molecular weight gases, i.e. oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, carbon dioxide, etc. • For Nucleoplasty/vertebroplasty, gases exit disc through introducer needle Volumetric removal of target tissue results Vertebroplasty Meeting Electrocautery Coblation • In‐Vivo rabbit model; simulating PLIF exposure • Presented at NASS annual meeting, Nov. 2001 Paul McAfee, MD, et. al. Vertebroplasty Meeting Cavity Tumor Procedure 1 • Insert Access Cannula Cavity Tumor Procedure 2 • Deploy CAVITY SpineWand Cavity Tumor Procedure 3 • Create Void Cavity Tumor Procedure 4 • Augment with Cement cancer 71 years old women with Undefrentiated cancer and sacral lesion 55 years old Women with biopsy proven Plasmacytoma 76 years old woman with back pain 489001 Material and Methods • • • • • • Retrospective 44 levels in 37 patients Epidural extension and or cortical disruption Different metastatic lesions CT before and after procedure Plasma‐mediated RF ablation followed by cement injection AJNR July 2009 Results • 43%, 90‐100% of the cement was seen in the anterior 2/3 • 36%, 75% of the cement was seen in the anterior 2/3 • 13/15 levels cement deposited anterior to a posrteriorly located lesions • 30% no leakage • 89% reported pain relief AJNR July 2009 74 years old women with breast cancer 63 years old with lung cancer Less is only more where more is no good. Frank Lloyd Wright 60 years old women with Breast cancer High viscosity Confidence cement Peak at the future Height Restoration “Height Maintenance” Percutaneous Reconstruction Spine Waves Fenestrated cannulated screws Percutaneous Posterior fusion Viper II StabiliT Vertebral Augmentation System Purpose: Deliver Ultra‐high viscosity cement to Osteoporotic VCF Iman Maleki