Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Rational trigonometry wikipedia , lookup
Noether's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Four color theorem wikipedia , lookup
Brouwer fixed-point theorem wikipedia , lookup
Trigonometric functions wikipedia , lookup
History of trigonometry wikipedia , lookup
Integer triangle wikipedia , lookup
Right Triangle Congruence: HL, HA, LL, and LA Isosceles and equilateral triangles aren't the only classifications of triangles with special characteristics. Right triangles are also significant in the study of geometry and, as we will see, we will be able to prove the congruence of right triangles in an efficient way. Before we begin learning this, however, it is important to break down right triangles into parts. Learning terms that refer to the parts of a right triangle will help us avoid confusion throughout this section. All right triangles have two legs, which may or may not be congruent. The legs of a right triangle meet at a right angle. The other side of the triangle (that does not form any part of the right angle), is called the hypotenuse of the right triangle. This side of the right triangle will always be the longest of all three sides. The angles of a right triangle that are not the right angle must be acute angles. Now, let's learn what the Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem is and how to apply it. Hypotenuse-Leg (HL) Theorem If the hypotenuse and one leg of a right triangle are equal to the hypotenuse and one leg of another right triangle, then the two right triangles are congruent. Recall that the criteria for our congruence postulates have called for three pairs of congruent parts between triangles. The HL Theorem essentially just calls for congruence between two parts: the hypotenuse and a leg. Let's look at an illustration that shows the correct way to use the Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem. In the figure, we have congruent hypotenuses (AB and DE) and congruent legs (CA and FD). We are ready to begin practicing with the HL Theorem. Let's go through the following exercises to get a feel for how to use this helpful theorem. Exercise 1 What additional information do we need in order to prove that the triangles below are congruent by the Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem? Answer: Notice that both triangles are right triangles because they both have one right angle in them. Therefore, if we can prove that the hypotenuses of the triangles and one leg of each triangle are congruent, we will be able to apply the HL Theorem. Looking at the diagram, we notice that segments SQ and VT are congruent. Recall that the side of a right triangle that does not form any part of the right angle is called the hypotenuse. So, the diagram shows that we have congruent hypotenuses. No other information about the triangles is given to us, though. Had we been given that another pair of legs was congruent, then our criteria for using the HL Theorem would have been satisfied. Below, we show two situations in which we could have used the HL Theorem to prove that Triangle QRS is congruent to Triangle TUV. In the diagram above, we are given all of the same information as in the original, as well as the fact that segments QR and TU are congruent. We could have applied the HL Theorem in this situation to prove congruence. In the diagram above, we note that all of the original information has been given to us as well as the fact that RS and UV are congruent. Here, we could have applied the HL Theorem to prove that the triangles are congruent. Exercise 2 In which of the following figures could we use the Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem to show that the triangles are congruent? (a) (b) (c) (d) Answer: We can only apply the HL Theorem in (c) to show that the triangles are congruent. Exercise 3 Answer: diagram and the two-column geometric proof are shown below. The HL Theorem will be used throughout the rest of our study of geometry. There are other theorems that are specific to right triangles. These theorems and their equivalent postulates are explained below. Leg-Leg (LL) Theorem If the legs of one right triangle are congruent to the legs of another right triangle, then the two right triangles are congruent. This statement is the same as the SAS Postulate we've learned about because it involves two sides of triangles, as well as the included angle (which is the right angle). Leg-Acute (LA) Angle Theorem If a leg and an acute angle of one right triangle are congruent to the corresponding parts of another right triangle, then the two right triangles are congruent. This statement is equivalent to the ASA Postulate we've learned about because it involves right angles (which are congruent), a pair of sides with the same measure, and congruent acute angles. Hypotenuse-Acute (HA) Angle Theorem If the hypotenuse and an acute angle of a right triangle are congruent to the hypotenuse and an acute angle of another right triangle, then the two triangles are congruent. This statement is the same as the AAS Postulate because it includes right angles (which are congruent), two congruent acute angles, and a pair of congruent hypotenuses.