Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
THE LITIGATION DEPARTMENT U.S. Product Liability Law e-Newsletter PLL #13 - 6/3/2004 Product Liability Update #13 - Good Mississippi Justice; Ethical Marketing WIGGIN AND D ANA Counsellors at Law For more information on U.S. product liability law please contact: Remy Zimmermann +1 203.498.4316 [email protected] Shaun Sullivan +1 203.498.4315 [email protected] Alan Schwartz +1 203.498.4332 [email protected] or visit us at www.wiggin.com Happy Summer (almost)! On a chilly, windy day in the northeastern United States, I thought I'd try to warm things up by telling you about two interesting court decisions which reached my desk recently. (1) In a decision which should gladden the hearts of mass tort defendants, the Mississippi Supreme Court threw out a $100,000,000 jury verdict against Johnson & Johnson because of the improper joinder of ten plaintiffs; and (2) a New York federal judge overseeing multi-district litigation against drug manufacturer Warner-Lambert refused to allow plaintiffs' expert scientists to testify concerning ethical standards in marketing. The Mississippi case involved Propulsid, a prescription medication used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease. The plaintiffs ranged in age from three to seventy-nine; they complained that ingestion of Propulsid caused a wide variety of injuries including stroke, chest pain, congestive heart failure, fast heartbeats and slow heartbeats; they alleged medical expenses ranging from zero to $100,116. After a four week trial the jury took only two hours to award each plaintiff $10,000,000. The Mississippi Supreme Court found improper joinder of plaintiffs and quoted an earlier decision stating, "the prescribing of the drug Propulsid by ... different physicians to ... different patients did not arise out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences, and ... joinder in this case unfairly prejudices the defendants." The court added, "The plaintiffs were prescribed Propulsid ... in different amounts for different ailments ... at different times, thus falling under different labels and different warnings. The plaintiffs also presented ten unique medical histories." Although Mississippi has a well-deserved reputation for being a difficult trial court venue for an out-of-state manufacturer, the common sense approach which the Mississippi Supreme Court has taken in this case is not unique. Several Supreme Court decisions in recent years indicate that good Mississippi justice is at least available in the state's highest court. In New York U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan felt that plaintiffs suing manufacturers of the diabetes drug Rezulin were going too far when they offered expert witness testimony as to whether the defendants' marketing practices were ethical: "the opinions of plaintiffs' witnesses, however continued ©2004 Wiggin and Dana llp THE LITIGATION DEPARTMENT PLL #13 - 6/3/2004 Product Liability Update #13 - Good Mississippi Justice: Ethical Marketing WIG GIN AND DANA Counsellors at Law distinguished these individuals may be as physicians and scientists, concerning the ethical obligations of pharmaceutical companies ..., are inadmissible." Judge Kaplan noted that "the principle issues" were "whether the defendants breached their legal duties in manufacturing, labeling and marketing of Rezulin .... "He commented, "While the defendants may be liable in the court of public opinion or before a divine authority for any ethical lapses, expert opinion as to the ethical character of their actions simply is not relevant to these lawsuits." Hope this is helpful. As always, let me know if you have questions or comments. Best regards. Remy The Wiggin and Dana U.S. Product Liability Law E-Newsletter is a periodic newsletter designed to inform clients and others about recent developments in the field of product liability law. Nothing in the E-Newsletter constitutes legal advice, which can only be obtained as a result of personal consultation with an attorney. The information published here is believed to be accurate at the time of publication, but is subject to change and does not purport to be a complete statement of all relevant issues. If you have any requests for topics or other suggestions, please contact Remy Zimmermann 203.498.4316, [email protected]. One Century Tower P.O. Box 1832 New Haven CT 06508-1832 Telephone 203.498.4400 Telefax 203.782.2889 400 Atlantic Street P.O. Box 110325 Stamford CT 06911-0325 Telephone 203.363.7600 Telefax 203.363.7676 www.wiggin.com 450 Lexington Avenue Suite 3800 New York NY 10017-3913 Telephone 212.490.1700 Telefax 212.490.0536 One CityPlace 185 Asylum Street Hartford CT 06103-3402 Telephone 860.297.3700 Telefax 860.525.9380 Quaker Park 1001 Hector Street, Ste. 240 Conshohocken PA 19428-2395 Telephone 610.834.2400 Telefax 610.834.3055 ©2004 Wiggin and Dana llp