Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
368 EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION / AE / August 2007 Skin Diseases Refresher Urticaria R. C. PILSWORTH* AND D. KNOTTENBELT *Greenwood Ellis and Partners, 166 High Street, Newmarket, Suffolk CB8 9WS; and Philip Leverhulme Hospital, University of Liverpool, Leahurst, Neston, Cheshire CH64 7TE, UK. Keywords: horse; urticaria Disease profile The horse is more prone to urticaria than other species, and this one of the commonest skin conditions of horses. Urticaria is a clinical sign rather than a disease. All types and ages of horses are affected, but it is particularly common in Thoroughbreds. The aetiology in many cases is unknown or cannot be established, but food sensitivities have been strongly implicated (cereal foods are probably responsible for most cases). A single insect bite can cause generalised urticaria in sensitised horses. Drug reactions are the commonest known causes of urticaria; penicillin, clenbuterol and especially phenylbutazone are often implicated, but reactions can develop to the carriers and preservatives rather than the drug itself. Larger plaques of oedema can develop and coalescence can cause extensive lesions (Fig 2). The lesions should always ‘pit on pressure’ with a cotton wool bud or a fingertip. Some forms have a gyrate or ‘doughnut’ form (Fig 3) and others are diffuse and exude serum (angio-oedema). Mild pruritus may be present but more usually the lesions are nonpruritic. Clinical signs Multiple, raised, oedematous plaques of varying size (0.5–10 cm diameter) over the body surface (Fig 1). Lesions may affect localised areas of the skin and limb involvement is less common than the body trunk and head. Fig 1: Multiple diffuse lesions of urticaria produced following a single injection of phenylbutazone, as part of an induced anaphylactoid reaction. Fig 2: Urticaria produced on the thigh of a horse following recumbency in the paddock and presumed contact with nettles. Fig 3: These circular urticarial ‘doughnuts’ were part of a suspected atopic dermatitis linked to feed. The lesions resolved spontaneously on an exclusion diet of lucerne cubes, but developed again following test-feeding on the original diet. EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION / AE / August 2007 369 Fig 4: The head of a horse showing an anaphylactoid reaction of unknown aetiology. This resolved completely following a single i.v. injection of dexamethasone. Fig 5: A case of dermatophyte infestation. This horse was misdiagnosed (R.C.P.) as an urticaria several days previously when multiple raised plaques were seen across the body, but no alopecia was present. Treatment with dexamethasone, an immunosuppressant, hastened the development of severe, widespread dermatophyte infestation. Recurrent episodes are frequently encountered often with increasing severity and reducing response to therapy. Urticaria can develop as part of an anaphylactoid response (Fig 4) but the skin lesions are seldom the main clinical focus. Investigations 1) Clinical recognition. 2) Skin scraping (to eliminate dermatophytosis if in doubt). 3) Skin biopsy (in recalcitrant or recurrent cases). Differential diagnosis • • • • • • • • Dermatophyte infection. Eliminate by culture and biopsy. Insect bites. Careful clipping of a single lesion may identify a haemorrhagic focus in the centre of the wheals. Erythema multiforme. Contact hypersensitivity. Very rare in horses and seldom causes wheals. Infectious and immune mediated vasculitis. Focal or diffuse angio-oedema with evidence of cutaneous necrosis and/or purpura. Confirmation of diagnosis A history of sudden onset and the clinical appearance is characteristic. Skin biopsy of fresh lesions confirms the existence of dermal oedema but specific aetiology is seldom identified. Cases that do not respond to cortisone therapy, and other conditions with clinically similar lesions that either do not respond to corticosteroid therapy (see below) or lesions that do not pit on pressure may be identified by biopsy. Urticaria-like lesions sometimes occur with dermatophyte infection; this may be due to an allergic response in the skin to the fungi. Corticosteroid administration usually causes a significant exacerbation of the disease (Fig 5). Confirmation of the diagnosis by biopsy or culture will preclude such inappropriate treatment. Dermatographism is urticaria that is induced by skin pressure. This is an urticarial response to pressure. An urticarial wheal should follow writing on the skin with a relatively blunt tipped object, within a few minutes. Development of urticaria in contact sites with tack is suggestive of this form. Cold induced urticaria can be tested for by application of ice cubes directly to the skin, which should be followed by a wheal of the same shape within half an hour of removal of the ice cube. Management Acute onset allergic urticaria may resolve spontaneously within 24–48 h so delay in treatment is a sensible option for a first episode. The best treatment is avoidance of the allergen but it is seldom possible to identify it. A careful investigation involving dietary and environmental restrictions should be performed in recurrent cases or those that fail to respond fully to corticosteroid injections. Radio-allergosorbent tests (RAST) for specific IgE types is sometimes used to identify putative allergens but they are expensive, unreliable and seldom helpful. Lesions may resolve following vigorous exercise and sweating or swimming: this may be useful if the use of drugs precludes competitive work. Almost all cases respond rapidly to i.v. injection of dexamethasone (0.04 mg/kg bwt). Oral prednisolone has much less (or no) effect in many cases. If the urticaria is part of an anaphylactoid reaction, adrenaline, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids and supportive therapy may also have to be considered (Fig 4).