Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
704 Effects of Losartan on Blood Pressure, Plasma Renin Activity, and Angiotensin II in Volunteers Michael R. Goldberg, Wesley Tanaka, Aaron Barchowsky, Thomas E. Bradstreet, Jacqueline McCrea, Man-Wai Lo, Edward J. McWilliams Jr., and Thorir D. Bjornsson Losartan is an orally active, nonpeptide angiotensin II (Ang II) (site-1) receptor antagonist. We conducted a multiple-dose study in healthy male volunteers to investigate the tolerability, blood pressure effects, and changes in plasma renin activity (PRA) and plasma Ang II concentration associated with once-daily administration of 100 mg losartan for a week. Subjects were studied on a standardized sodium diet (24-hour urinary sodium excretion, 98±37 [SD] mEq per 24 hours on the placebo run-in day). Measurements of blood pressure, heart rate, PRA, Ang II, and aldosterone were taken during a placebo run-in day and after single and multiple (7 days) daily doses of losartan (100 mg, n = 10) or placebo (n=4). Ang II was measured specifically by high performance liquid chromatography coupled with radioimmunoassay. In subjects given losartan, respective decreases (systolic/diastolic) from run-in in supine blood pressure 6 hours after dosing were (mean±SD), compared with the placebo run-in day, first dose: -8.8±9.6/-6.8±5.0, last dose: -11.6±8.9/-7.0±4.8 mm Hg (p<0.05 for all changes). At this 6-hour time point, corresponding increases from run-in in PRA were from 1.2±0.6 to 12.0±6.3 (first dose) and 9.6±4.9 (last dose) ng angiotensin I per milliliter per hour and in Ang II were from 4.3±1.7 to 72.4±33J and 45.7± 14.1 pg/mL. All changes in PRA and Ang II were statistically significant within the losartan-treated group, and the biochemical changes were significantly greater than those in the placebo-treated group. The increment in Ang II was less after the last dose than after the first (p<0.05). The drug was well tolerated by all subjects. These data indicate that, under the conditions of this study, losartan administration (100 mg/day for eight doses over 9 days) results in treatment-related decreases in blood pressure and increases in PRA and Ang II octapeptide. (Hypertension 1993;21:704-713) KEY WORDS • losartan • DuP 753 • angiotensin II • plasma renin activity • receptors, angiotensin L osartan (Figure 1) is a potent, orally active nonpeptide angiotensin II (Ang II) antagonist.1"4 The drug is being investigated as therapy for hypertension and heart failure and is anticipated to be a more specific mechanism for inhibiting the renin-angiotensin system than angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Early clinical investigation of losartan has shown single and multiple doses up to 40 mg to be well tolerated and pharmacologically active, with doses of 10 mg or greater blocking pressor responses to exogenous angiotensin I (Ang I) and Ang II.5-6 Also, through blockade of Ang II receptors in the juxtaglomerular apparatus, which inhibits renin release, losartan administration results in dose-related increases in plasma renin activity (PRA) and immunoreactive Ang II. 5 6 Studies have also been completed that demonstrate the tolerability of single doses up to 300 mg and more than 90% blockade of responses to exogenous Ang II by oral doses of 80-120 mg (unpubFrom the Merck Research Laboratories (M.R.G., W.T., T.E.B., M.-W.L., E.J.M.), West Point, and the Division of Clinical Pharmacology (M.R.G., A.B., J.M., T.D.B.), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa. Supported by a grant from Merck Research Laboratories. Address for correspondence: Michael R. Goldberg, MD, PhD, Merck Research Laboratories, BL 2-7, West Point, PA 19486. Received July 28, 1992; accepted in revised form January 13, 1993. lished data, Du Pont Merck Pharmaceutical Corp. and Merck Research Laboratories). In these studies, effects of losartan on resting blood pressure and heart rate in healthy subjects have not been readily apparent. In addition, pharmacokinetic analyses have indicated that, although losartan has a relatively short half-life (unpublished data, Du Pont Merck Pharmaceutical Corp. and Merck Research Laboratories), the predominant circulating form of the drug is a carboxylic acid metabolite (E-3174, Figure 1) that is more potent and has a longer half-life than losartan.23 In fact, the time course of increases in PRA and plasma Ang II concentration and blockade of responses to exogenous angiotensin is better correlated to levels of the metabolite than to levels of parent drug (see Reference 5 and unpublished data, Du Pont Merck Pharmaceutical Corp. and Merck Research Laboratories). The general objective of the present study was to further investigate the effects of single and multiple doses of losartan in healthy male volunteers. Of interest were the following specific objectives: 1) confirming the tolerability and absence of hemodynamic effects in healthy subjects and 2) assessing changes in PRA and Ang II concentrations after single and multiple doses, during standardized sodium intake, using a highly specific radioimmunoassay (RIA) for Ang II coupled with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Goldberg et al Losartan in Healthy Volunteers 705 COOH FIGURE 1. Drawings show structures of losartan (Dup753, MK-954) and its active metabolite, E-3174. N-N E-3174 Losartan (Dup-753, MK-954) Methods Study Design This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study that was divided into three clinical phases: run-in, first-dose, and multiple-dose (Figure 2). In each phase, subjects were carefully studied during an inpatient testing day when blood pressure and heart rate were carefully monitored and blood was collected at defined intervals for measurement of PRA, plasma Ang II concentration, and plasma aldosterone concentration. The first phase was a single-blind placebo run-in day (first testing day). The second phase (next day) was a double-blind single-dose day (second testing day) during which subjects received either a single oral 100-mg dose of losartan (n = 10) or a single dose of placebo (n=4), with treatment assignment according to an unbalanced, random-allocation schedule. Forty-eight hours later, subjects entered the third, double-blind multiple-dose phase, during which those previously alDay Run-in I I Screening Visit (1-2 weeks prior) i • i • Placebo Diet First-Dose 135-165 meq Na+ Double-Wind Treatment Losartan (N=10) Placsbo(N=4) 70-90 meqK+ FIGURE 2. Schematic shows outline of study design. On procedure days, subjects were sequestered on the research unit the night before and were fasted overnight. On these days, multiple measurements of blood pressure and heart rate were made and blood samples collected for measurement of plasma renin activity, plasma angiotensin II concentration, and plasma aldosterone concentration. On the first-dose day, subjects were randomly allocated to receive losartan, 100 mglday (n=10), orplacebo (n=4), for eight doses over 9 days. located to receive losartan continued to take the drug, 100 mg once daily for 7 consecutive days (a total of eight doses over 9 days), and those allocated to placebo continued to receive placebo. The third testing day coincided with the 24-hour period after administration of the eighth (and last) dose of the double-blind study drug. For each of the three testing days, subjects were sequestered at the clinical research unit the evening before dosing and fasted from midnight that night until 3 hours after the dose. Subjects were fed 3 and 6.5 hours after dosing on the testing days. Subjects remained in the unit the night after each testing day. On other study days, all doses of the study drug were administered under direct observation, at the same time (±30 minutes) each day, with 250 mL water and 30 minutes before a meal. Beginning 3 days before the run-in day and continuing through the third testing day (a total of 13 days), subjects were provided a diet estimated to contain 135-165 mEq sodium and 70-90 mEq potassium per 24 hours. The purpose of the diet was to standardize sodium intake to aid in interpretation of changes in PRA, Ang II concentration, and blood pressure. However, we did not attempt to assure that subjects were truly in "balance" on the diet before testing. To monitor the diet, we made 24-hour urine collections during the run-in day and after the first and last dose of losartan. Respectively, on each of these collections, urinary sodium excretion (mean±SD) in subjects given losartan/placebo were 98 ±37/93 ±8, 66±16/46±11, and 85±21/75±23 mEq per 24 hours. Based on these sodium excretion rates, the subjects appear to have been moderately sodium restricted, as indicated by the 0.7±0.6 ng Ang I per milliliter per hour (p<0.01) increase in predose PRA from run-in to first-dose days in the losartan group (Table 2). Fourteen male subjects were enrolled, aged 18-31 (mean, 24.4) years and weighing 161 ±22 lb (within ±20% of ideal body weight). Subjects were in general good health, without excessive intake of caffeine (<4 cups of coffee per day) or tobacco (<10 cigarettes per day) and with sitting blood pressure < 135/85 mm Hg. Before the study was begun, the protocol and consent form were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Thomas Jefferson University. All 706 Hypertension Vol 21, No 5 May 1993 subjects provided written, informed consent before enrollment into the study. Subjects were studied in two groups of seven subjects each. Study Procedures and Assay Methods Blood pressure and heart rate measurements. On each testing day, supine (average of two measurements after 5 minutes in a supine position) and standing (single measurement after 2 minutes of standing) blood pressure and heart rate were measured at denned intervals after dosing using a Dinamap (Critikon, Tampa, Fla.) automated sphygmomanometer. In evaluating blood pressure changes after losartan or placebo, the first 8 hours of each testing day were analyzed statistically. Plasma renin activity and aldosterone assays. For measurement of PRA and aldosterone, samples were collected in precooled syringes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA, 1.5 mg/mL whole blood) and quickly centrifuged at 4°C. Plasma was frozen in 1-mL aliquots at — 20°C until time of assay. Plasma aldosterone levels were measured by solidphase RIA (Coat-a-count, Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, Calif.). Briefly, 0.2 mL plasma was pipetted into antibody-impregnated tubes, followed by addition of 1 mL 125I-aldosterone. The tubes were incubated at 37°C for 3 hours and decanted, and bound radioactivity was measured by gamma radiation counting. Sample values were calculated from comparison with log-logit calibration curves created using increasing amounts of standards (0-1,200 pg/mL). The sensitivity of the assay was approximately 16 pg/mL. PRA was determined by a modification of the methods described by Kodish and Katz.7-9 Plasma aliquots (300 fiL) were added to two separate ice-cold tubes containing 200 ju,L of 0.12 M maleate buffer, pH 6.0, which contained the protease inhibitors phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (0.1 mM), soybean trypsin inhibitor (4 mg/mL), and benzamidine (1 mM). One assay tube remained in an ice bath, and the other was placed in a 37°C bath for 2 hours. At the end of this period, 200-/xL aliquots from each tube were transferred for RIA of generated Ang I using previously described methods. Specific renin activity was determined by subtracting the values obtained in the cooled assay tube from those at 37°C. The sensitivity for the assay was approximately 10 pg Ang I, and values are reported as nanograms Ang I per milliliter per hour. Angiotensin II assay. Ang II concentration in plasma was measured by modification of published methodology that couples RIA with a relatively specific antibody for Ang II with HPLC separation of angiotensin peptides.10-12 For these measurements, blood was placed into a prechilled tube containing (final concentrations) enalaprilat (3.6 fiM), 1,10-phenanthroline (2.5 mM), and K3EDTA (1.5 mg/mL), cooled thoroughly, centrifuged at 4°C, and plasma stored frozen at -20°C until analysis. Thawed samples (2.0 mL) were spiked with 125 I-Ang II as internal standard and chromatographed on hexane-prewashed, preconditioned 500-mg C8 disposable Bond Elute columns (Analytichem International, Harbor City, Calif.). Angiotensin peptides were eluted with 2 x 1-mL 50% acetonitrile/50% water, containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, and were dried, resuspended in 300 fiL 20% acetonitrile/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, and filtered. The filtered samples were chromatographed on a 4.6x150 mm Dynamax C8 reversed-phase HPLC column (Rainin Instrument Co., Woburn, Mass.) using a flow rate of 1 mL/min at 45°C. Angiotensin peptides were separated with a 20-minute linear gradient from 20% to 35% acetonitrile containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid adjusted to pH 4.0 with NH4OH. Retention times (minutes) for various angiotensin peptides were: Ang I, 16.5; [Des-Asp]Ang 1,17.4; Ang II, 11.9; angiotensin III ([Des-Asp]Ang II), 13.2; Ang 11(3-8) hexapeptide, 13.5; Ang II-(4-8) pentapeptide, 10.8; and 125I-Ang II, 16. HPLC fractions (0.5 mL) were dried, reconstituted with 200 mL buffer containing 10 mM potassium phosphate, 1 mM EDTA, 0.25 mM thimerasol, and 0.1% (wt/vol) gelatin, pH 7.3, and an aliquot was counted for determination of overall recovery. Ang II was quantitatively measured by competitive binding RIA using a commercially available Ang II antisera (Amersham No. RPN1771). The RIA reaction mixture was incubated overnight at room temperature and treated with dextran-coated charcoal to separate bound and unbound Ang II. The supernatent was counted, and the Ang II values were read off a standard curve made from solutions of known (0-96 pg per tube) Ang II concentration. Day-to-day precision for plasma control material yielded coefficient of variation values of 16% at 18.3 pg/mL (« = 15) and 13% at 5.1 pg/mL (n = 12). Crossreactivity of Ang II antisera with angiotensin peptides was: Ang II, 100%; angiotensin III, 53%; Ang I, 0.1%; Ang II-(3-8), 11%; and Ang II-(4-8), 15%. Clinical tolerability assessment. The tolerability of losartan in each subject was monitored by periodic assessment of complete blood counts, chemistry panels, urinalyses, and electrocardiograms. On each testing day, 24-hour urine was collected for measurement of electrolyte, protein, and creatinine excretion. Data Analysis In planning this study, published data on variability of PRA and Ang II in healthy volunteers given enalapril were used to determine sample size. Based on these data10 and assuming a correlation, p, of 0.5 between pretreatment and multiple-dosing values, with nine subjects completing, the study had 80% power (a=0.05, two-tailed) to detect respective increments in PRA and Ang II concentration of 4.5 ng Ang I per milliliter per hour and 4.3 fmol Ang II per milliliter (approximately 4.3 pg/mL). The general approach to the statistical analysis was to compare measurements collected after the first and last dose of losartan with measurements at the corresponding times after dosing on the placebo run-in day. Multiple-dosing results were then compared with singledose results. For measurements of PRA, Ang II, and aldosterone, all time points were of interest. For blood pressure and heart rate, measurements during the first 8 hours after dosing on each day were analyzed, with baseline for supine measurements on each day defined as the average of measurements made at the time of dosing and 15 minutes before dosing. A single measurement of standing blood pressure and heart rate, immediately before dose, was baseline for changes in standing blood pressure and heart rate. For the purposes of reporting the results, run-in refers to the single-blind placebo run-in day; first dose is the period after the first Goldberg et al Losartan in Healthy Volunteers 707 TABLE 1. Supine Blood Pressure and Heart Responses to Losartan and Placebo Hours oftp»r alter dosing Treatment Losartan 0 Placebo 1 Losartan Placebo Losartan 2 Placebo Losartan 3 Placebo Losartan 4 Placebo 5 Losartan Placebo Losartan 6 Placebo Losartan 8 Placebo Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) Run-in 60.3 ±8.0 62.5 ±8.3 57.1±9.5§ 57.0±11.3 58.2±11.0 60.3±9.5 60.7±9.6 60.8±10.8 60.0+8.2 62.5±10.1 59.9±8.4 59.5 ±7.9 60.2±7.6 62.3±11.8 59.0±9.8 61.5±6.8 First dose 1.1±4.2 -3.3±5.7 1.6±5.0 2.3±2.9 -4.2+6.7* -2.0±2.9 -6.6±8.9|| 1.5±4.7 -6.6±4.4t -4.3±5.4 -9.9±6.0t 0.5 ±4.4 -6.8±5.0t -0.5±4.2 -4.6±5.4|| -3.5±4.2 Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) Last dose Run-in -3.7±5.6*t -5.9±4.3 -3.2±6.4§ -1.0±4.7 -5.6±7.7|| -0.8±7.0 -9.0±5.3* -0.8±6.0 -9.1±5.0t -5.8±5.1 -9.3±5.6t -3.3±3.4 -7.0±4.8t -0.5±5.1 -5.9±6.8|| -0.3±3.9 109.2±8.4 113.3±17.9 108.4±6.6 105.0+20.0 110.5±9.7 105.5±15.4 113.9±7.2 116.0±14.8 114.3±7.0 115.0±15.2 111.5±7.4 107.3±10.1 113.8±11.5 111.0±13.7 114.5±11.3 112.3±10.9 First dose 2.5±5.2 -4.2±4.3 -2.4±10.0 -2.3±8.0 -5.6±9.2|| -1.3±5.5 -8.5±8.6|| -7.5±2.7 -6.3+5.2* -2.8±5.8 -9.9+8.4t 0.3±2.1 -8.8±9.6|| -1.0+6.1 -10.1±11.5|| -3.3±8.8 Heart rate (bpm) Last dose Run-in First dose -6.0±4.6+t -11.5+5.2 -6.6±7.2|| -6.0±11.7 -10.2± 10.0|| 0±5.8 -14.9+5.7* -12.8+10.7 -10.8±5.4 + t -7.3±5.9 -10.6±6.6* -2.8±1.7 -11.6±8.9t -5.0±5.7 -7.3±6.7* -5.8±6.5 53.3±7.3 62.5 ±10.2 50.4±5.2 59.3±7.6 53.0+5.1 62.0±8.7 53.4±5.4 60.5 ±5.6 56.4±5.1 65.3±8.5 55.5±6.6 61.3±5.3 56.0±6.8 65.0±4.6 58.9±10.5 62.5±3.7 0.9±3.8 -5.9±5.4 2.1±5.5 -2.8±1.7 0.3±2.0 -4.0±12.0 0.9±8.0 -3.3±3.9 5.9±5.6t 0±4.3 5.7±7.2|| 0±1.4 1.2+5.1 -1.3±7.7 3.7+11.6 6.3±8.3 Last dose -0.3±5.7 -6.0±1.8 4.4±6.5* -4.0±1.4 -1.6+4.1 -7.5±9.9 0.3±5.4 -0.3±2.5 3.6+4.2H 1.5±8.0 4.5+5.7H 1.5±3.0 2.2±5.9 -2.5±2.9 0.6±7.8 1.5±9.3 bpm, Beats per minute. Values are mean+SD from run-in day to first dose and last dose at corresponding times after dosing. n = 10 for losartan (100 mg); n=4 for placebo. *0.05</7<0.10, mean changes from run-in. tpsO.Ol, mean changes from first to last dose (last dose measurement minus first dose measurement). t/><0.01, mean changes from run-in. §/><0.05, mean changes from first to last dose. ||p<0.05, mean changes from run-in. dose of double-blind losartan or placebo; and last dose is the period after the last dose of double-blind losartan or placebo, i.e., the last of seven consecutive once-daily doses, eight doses total over 9 days. Mean changes from run-in to first and last dose and from first to last dose were evaluated statistically for the losartan treatment group with a two-tailed paired t test.13 The Type I error rate was set at a=0.05. No statistical evaluation was performed for changes within the four subjects in the placebo treatment group. Differences between the losartan and placebo treatment groups in mean changes were evaluated statistically with a two-tailed pooled variance Student's t test13 or a two-tailed Aspin-Welch separate variance t test.13 The assumption of homogeneity of variances was evaluated using the Folded Form F Statistic.13 The Type I error rate was set at a=0.05 for the / tests and at a=0.10 for the evaluation of homogeneity of variances. Results Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Changes Supine and standing blood pressures were carefully monitored to determine whether Ang II blockade would alter blood pressure in nonhypertensive subjects. A depressor effect was noted. Table 1 and Figure 3 summarize the changes in supine blood pressure and heart rate from the run-in day to the corresponding time after dosing following the first and last dose of doubleblind study drug. An average reduction of 9 mm Hg was apparent. Statistical analysis of these changes within the losartan group is summarized in Table 1. Because of the small number of subjects given placebo, a within-group analysis was not performed for this treatment. However, statistical analysis between the two groups showed some statistically significant (or nearly significant) differences between treatments at the times of apparent maximal effect: hours 3 (p<0.05 for last dose), 5 (p<0.01 for first dose,p=0.07 for last dose), and 6 (/?<0.05 for first and last dose) for supine diastolic blood pressure, and hour 5 (p<0.01 for first and last dose) for supine systolic blood pressure. During the 8-hour observation period, particularly after the first dose, supine heart rate (Figure 4) tended to increase more in the losartan than placebo group. It was noted that, during the run-in day, supine heart rate was stable in both groups but significantly higher in the placebo group at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after single-blind placebo. Together, these data suggest a modest blood pressure-lowering effect of losartan, under the conditions of this study. Similar trends to those seen for supine blood pressure were apparent for mean standing blood pressure measurements (not shown). For example, the change in standing blood pressure 6 hours after dosing was —14+12/—7±12 and -10±10/-6±9 mm Hg for first and last dose, respectively, in the losartan group, and 0.3±10/-l±7 and -10±10/-l±10 mmHg at corresponding times in the placebo group. These effects are generally similar to the changes in supine blood pressure summarized in Table 1. On the average, standing heart rate changes within groups, relative to the placebo day, tended to be greater in the losartan group than in the placebo group (Figure 4), with effects most apparent after the first dose of losartan. These results are consistent with the supine hemodynamic changes described above (Table 1). Renin-Angiotensin II-Aldosterone System Responses Earlier reports at lower doses 56 indicated that losartan administration is associated with sustained, dose- 708 Hypertension Vol 21, No 5 May 1993 Supine Diastolic Blood Pressure Time ( h o w after dosing) Time (hours after dosing) Supine Systolic Blood Pressure T i m (hours after dosing) Time (hows after dosing) FIGURE 3. Line graphs show mean changes in supine diastolic (top panels) and systolic (bottom panels) blood pressures after first (o—o) and last (•—9) dose ofplacebo (right panels) and losartan (left panels), 100 mg once daily for eight doses over 9 days. Shown are changes (numbers in parentheses indicate reductions) in measurements from the corresponding time after dosing during the placebo run-in day. *y<0.05 for within-group change, losartan-treated subjects only; arrows on placebo graphs indicate where the change after losartan was significantly different (p<0.05) from that after placebo, after the first dose (filled arrow) or last dose (open arrow). A meal was served approximately 3 hours after dose. related increases in PRA and Ang II. However, Ang II was measured by RIA without separation of peptides to confirm that observed increments were in the Ang II octapeptide. It was therefore of interest to determine the level of stimulation of PRA after single- and multiple-dose administration of losartan using HPLC to separate the Ang II octapeptide from Ang I and smaller peptide fragments. Table 2 summarizes the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system measurements during the single-blind run-in placebo day and the changes from these measurements before ( - 1 hour) and after (6, 6.5, and 24 hours) dosing with the first and last doses of doubleblind losartan or placebo. As with the analysis of blood pressure and heart rate, mean change is shown in measurements on the "dosing" days from the run-in day. Also included in the table are the differences between first and last doses. Figure 5 depicts the changes in supine measurements of PRA and Ang II. With respect to both supine and standing measurements of PRA and Ang II, clinically meaningful1415 and statistically significant (p<0.01) increases from run-in were noted within the losartan group and between the losartan and placebo groups. Of note, the significant increase in predose PRA and Ang II from run-in to first dose in the losartan group was not different from the similar increases in the placebo group. Presumably, as indicated above, this increment is secondary to modest sodium restriction resulting from the diet provided to the volunteers. Plasma aldosterone levels did not change appreciably during the study. Several other observations are relevant to these data. As indicated in Table 2, the 6.5-hour renin-angiotensinaldosterone system measurements were made in samples collected after 30 minutes of ambulation. With respect to PRA, during the run-in day, there was the expected increase in mean activity of 1-2 ng Ang I per milliliter per hour (approximately doubling) from supine to standing positions. As indicated by the changes from run-in to treatment days, this absolute postural increment in PRA was maintained during the doubleblind portion of the study. A similar postural increment in Ang II was noted during the run-in day and after the last dose of losartan. Six to 6.5 hours after the first dose of losartan, the postural increment in mean Ang II concentration was not apparent. Six hours after dosing, PRA did not change significantly from first to last dose (-2.5±6.4 ng Ang I per milliliter per hour,p=NS). In contrast, the mean change in Ang II concentration was significantly less after the last dose compared with the first dose (-26.7±35.2 pg/mL, p<0.05), suggesting some attenuation of this aspect of the response to losartan after several days of administration. To investigate the relation between PRA and Ang II during the study, we initially constructed a scatterplot of supine Ang II concentration versus supine PRA 6 and 24 hours after single-blind placebo and after the first and last dose of each double-blind treatment (Figure 6). In general, this plot suggested a relation between Ang II Goldberg et al Losartan in Healthy Volunteers 709 Tim (horn altar doaing) Tim* ( h o n atar 1km (hom FIGURE 4. Line graphs show mean changes in supine (top panels) and standing (bottom panels) heart rates after first (O—O) and last (m—») dose of placebo (right panels) and losartan (left panels), 100 mg once daily for eight doses over 9 days. Shown are changes (numbers in parentheses indicate reductions) from the corresponding time after dosing during the placebo run-in day (see Table 1 for statistical analysis of supine measurements). *p<0.05 for within-group change, losartan-treated subjects only; arrows on placebo graphs indicate where the change after losartan was significantly different (p<0.05) from that after placebo, after the first dose (filled arrow) or last dose (open arrow), bpm, Beats per minute. and PRA. It is apparent from this plot that Ang II levels relative to PRA in four subjects at 6 hours after the first dose are elevated from the other points, suggesting greater increments in Ang II for each unit of PRA. To explore this further, we calculated the ratio of Ang II to PRA for each of these points. The geometric mean ratios of Ang II to PRA are summarized in Figure 7. A statistical analysis of the change in these ratios shows significant increases within the losartan group 6 (/?<0.05) and 24 (/?<0.01) hours after the first dose of losartan. In one extreme, one subject had ratios of 2.9 6 hours after placebo, 16.1 after his first dose, and 10.2 6 hours after his last dose of losartan. By the last dose of losartan, on the average, ratios of Ang II to PRA had returned toward baseline, being significantly less 6 hours after the last dose than 6 hours after the first dose Tolerability As in any early study of a new drug, it was also important to carefully evaluate subjects for untoward consequences of study drug administration. Subject tolerability was monitored by regular assessment of clinical laboratory tests (complete blood count, chemistry panel, and urinalysis), by electrocardiogram, and by observation and questioning for clinical adverse events. Analysis of serum chemistry panels showed no significant (/?<0.05) within-group or between-group changes in any of the measured analyses during the study (the chemistry panel consisted of measurements of urea nitrogen, creatinine, total bilirubin, alanine and aspartate aminotransferases, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, glucose, total protein, sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, calcium, and inorganic phosphorous). Approximately 600 mL blood was collected during the entire 10-day study. Presumably as a result of this blood loss, at the time of the poststudy evaluation, hemoglobin had decreased approximately 2 g/dL and hematocrit had decreased approximately six percentage points in subjects given either losartan (p<0.01 within this group) or placebo. Urinalysis results showed no remarkable changes. No clinically significant changes in electrocardiographic intervals or interpretation were noted in any subject. Clinical adverse events were mild and nonspecific, including one episode of loose bowel movements in one subject, epigastric discomfort in another individual, and several occurrences (four subjects) in which blood pressure decreases from supine to standing position were noteworthy but asymptomatic (e.g., supine: blood pressure, 102/46 mm Hg; heart rate, 50 beats per minute; 2 minutes standing: blood pressure, 70/50 mm Hg; heart rate, 70 beats per minute). One subject reported superficial peeling of his palms beginning during the first several days of losartan administration. No local symptoms (such as burning, itching, or exudate) were associated with these findings, which resolved over several weeks. However, this subject also had evidence of 710 Hypertension Vol 21, No 5 May 1993 TABLE 2. Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone Responses to Losartan and Placebo Parameter at indicated hour after dosing Variable Plasma renin activity [(ng Ang I/mL)/hr] Day Treatment Hour - 1 Run-in Losartan Placebo 1.2±0.6 1.2±0.6 Run-in to first dose Run-in to last dose First to last dose Losartan Placebo Losartan Placebo Losartan Placebo 0.73±0.62* 0.43±0.61 3.1±1.9*t -0.05±0.44 2.4±1.8* -0.57±0.78 Run-in Losartan Placebo 5.0±2.0 4.0±2.4 Run-in to first dose Run-in to last dose First to last dose Losartan Placebo Losartan Placebo Losartan Placebo 3.3±2.6* 1.4±1.9 13.1±7.9*t 0.09 ±2.02 9.8±7.1*t -1.4±3.5 Run-in Losartan Placebo 151.1±38.7 124.6±40.7 Run-in to first dose Run-in to last dose First to last dose Losartan Placebo Losartan Placebo Losartan Placebo 24.4 ±38.8* 82.9±53.0 23.2+68.7 32.8±21.7 -1.2±51.2 -50.1±52.4 Plasma angiotensin II (pg/mL) Plasma aldosterone (pg/mL) Hour 6 Hour 6.5 Mean measurement (±SD) 1.2±0.6 2.5±1.2 3.2±1.9 l.l±0.3 Mean change (±SD) 12.0±6.3*t 12.0±5.6*t 1.0±0.6 2.2±1.3 9.6±4.9*t 9.9±5.2*t 0.05 ±0.38 0.48±1.13 -2.5±6.4 -2.2±6.5 -2.7±2.3 -0.95±0.76 Mean measurement (±SD) 4.3±1.7 9.7±4.7 3.7±2.0 14.4±13.7 Mean change (±SD) 67.3±34.3*t 72.4±33.3*t 16.1 ±14.6 4.5±2.8 45.7±14.1*f 66.2±43.1*t 1.5±4.3 -3.0±8.5 -26.7±35.2§ -1.1±43.8 -3.1±5.3 -19.1+22.5 Mean measurement (±SD) 104.1 ±28.9 160.1 ±50.6 117.5±10.7 234.2+114.1 Mean change (±SD) 10.1 ±49.1 36.1 ±78.3 52.6±62.0 132.2±61.8 -10.5±15.0$ -14.7±67.0 -4.7±28.3 -3.7±41.7 -20.6±53.2 -50.9±112.1 -57.3±65.1 -135.8±63.1 Hour 24 1.5±0.8 1.6±0.9 5.1±2.3*t 0.95 ±0.37 4.1±3.2*t 0.10±0.44 -0.94 ±1.60+ -0.85±0.71 5.9±2.4 6.2+4.3 27.7±10.2*t 7.8±5.8 18.1±10.9*t 0.19±3.14 -9.6±8.8t -8.0±8.7 137.6±49.4 168.0±77.8 82.9±44.2* 103.8±84.4 52.6±78.7t -34.4 ±75.8 -30.3 + 64.6 -138.2+151.0 Ang I, angiotensin I. Values are mean±SD measurements on the run-in day and changes from run-in tofirstdose (day 1) and last dose (day 9) and from first to last dose at corresponding times after dosing. n = 10 for losartan (100 mg); n=4 for placebo. Measurements at Hour 6.5 were taken after 30 minutes ambulation. *p<0.01, mean changes from run-in or first to last dose. tpfiO.01, losartan vs. placebo. $0.05</?£0.10, §p<0.05, mean changes from run-in or first to last dose. hemolysis (schistocytes, crenated red blood cells) on his peripheral smear during the treatment period without decreases in haptoglobin, hemoglobinuria, increases in lactate dehydrogenase, or decreases in hemoglobin or hematocrit (other than as expected in such a study). These events were judged to be of uncertain relation to administration of losartan. Discussion In summary, losartan was found to be sufficiently well tolerated at 100 mg once daily to permit use of this dose in future studies. Modest decreases of blood pressure were noted during losartan administration, which indicate that, in healthy men, Ang II can play a role in the maintenance of resting blood pressure. However, these observations were made under conditions of modest sodium restriction (based on 24-hour urinary sodium excretion and small increases in PRA before administration of double-blind losartan or placebo). The extent to which this study condition influenced our results cannot be determined from this exploratory study. Blockade of endogenous Ang II was indicated by clearly denned increases in PRA and concomitant increases in plasma Ang II concentration. Effects on aldosterone concentration in blood were not apparent, presumably because of the complex mechanisms known to control aldosterone release.16-17 Based on prior data5-6 and the known capacity of endogenous Ang II to act on a feedback receptor on the juxtaglomerular apparatus,18"20 it was anticipated that losartan administration would result in an increase in PRA and Ang II. As indicated above, both supine PRA and plasma Ang II concentration were significantly increased 6 and 24 hours after administration of the first Goldberg et al Losartan in Healthy Volunteers 711 Supine Plasma Renin Activity RalDoM Supine Plasma AngiotenBn Con vitiation * FMDOH RntDoM LMIDOM LatfDoa* FIGURE 5. Bar graphs show mean change from the corresponding time after dosing on the run-in day of plasma renin activity (top panels) and plasma angiotensin II concentration (bottom panels) in subjects allocated to receive losartan 100 mg daily (left panels) and placebo (right panels) for eight doses over 9 days. In each panel, changes after the first and last dose of double-blind therapy are shown. Solid bars indicate changes from 1 hour predose on the run-in day to 1 hour before the first and last dose. Shaded bars indicate corresponding changes 6 hours after dosing. Open bars indicate changes 24 hours after dosing. *p<0.01 vs. change in placebo group. AI, angiotensin I. and last 100-mg dose of losartan. The methodology used specifically measures Ang II octapeptide, indicating that observed increments reflect changes in the concentration of the most biologically active peptide.10"12 The magnitude of the change was greater 6 hours after dosing, compared with 24 hours. The data also indicate that the level of stimulation of PRA and Ang II is slightly less after the last than the first dose, consistent with the hypothesis that the magnitude of the initial response is related to discharge of stored renin 160 •=•120 \ a. .£ en c r Run-in, Hr 6 Run-in, Hr 24 First Dose. Hr 6 First Dose. Hr 24 Lost Dose, Hr 6 Lost Dose, Hr 24 A A O • •• FIGURE 6. Scatterplot shows supine plasma angiotensin II and plasma renin activity measurements in subjects given losartan and placebo (inset). 80 D •• < from the juxtaglomerular apparatus, as has been shown in animals given angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.21 This differs somewhat from prior observations.5 However, study conditions (i.e., sodium balance), losartan dose, and methodology for measurement of Ang II also differed between the studies. The implications of these increases in PRA and Ang II cannot be determined from this study in healthy volunteers. Studies in hypertensive patients are required to determine whether similar increases are noted 40 D° o ffl) 10 15 20 Plasma Renin Activity (ng/ml/hr) 25 30 712 Hypertension Vol 21, No 5 May 1993 Lasa«w(N= =10) FIGURE 7. Line graph shows ratio of angiotensin II to plasma renin activity (PRA) 6 and 24 hours after placebo (Run-in) and first and last doses of double-blind study drug (see text for statistical analysis of changes in this ratio). AI, angiotensin I. in this target population. Furthermore, losartan is a selective antagonist of only a single Ang II binding site,22-25 which mediates all known physiological effects of angiotensin. It is not known whether unblocked effects of increased Ang II at other binding sites are of any clinical consequence to the safety profile and hemodynamic effects of losartan. In the absence of longlasting Ang II blockade, increases in plasma Ang II concentration of the magnitude demonstrated would be expected to have hemodynamic activity.14'15 In general, a relation between PRA and Ang II could be defined; the ratio of Ang II concentration to PRA was assumed to be an index of this relation. It was of interest that this ratio was higher after the first dose of losartan, when the greatest increases in Ang II were noted, than during the run-in day and after the last dose of losartan. The implication is that more Ang II is produced per unit of PRA at this time than at other times. An explanation for this observation is not readily apparent from the data collected in this study. It is possible that these differences are a result of greater in vitro generation of Ang II associated with initial stimulation of renin release.10 Alternatively, several physiological hypotheses are possible, including changes in Ang II clearance, which seem unlikely, and changes in Ang II generation.26 One explanation is that angiotensin converting enzyme is somehow downregulated, resulting in less-efficient conversion of Ang I to Ang II. This seems unlikely in view of the ubiquity of the enzyme.26 Another potential control point in the system that could be rate limiting is the amount of circulating angiotensinogen, which is under the control of both renin and Ang II. 27 Thus, it has been demonstrated that (in addition to consuming angiotensinogen) increases in renin decrease the production and release of angiotensinogen, whereas Ang II stimulates its release, an effect apparently antagonized by the peptide Ang II antagonist saralasin.27 During Ang II blockade with losartan, it is reasonable to postulate that secondary increases in PRA with blockade of Ang II receptors results in net inhibition of angiotensinogen synthesis and release, functionally downregulating the system. This hypothesis needs to be tested in appropriate preclinical and clinical models. It was anticipated that Ang II blockade would result in a decrease in plasma aldosterone concentration. This effect was not observed. However, in the presence of 10-fold elevations of Ang II concentrations, it is reasonable to assume that the absence of changes in aldosterone concentration is consistent with Ang II blockade.14-17 Clarification of the effect of Ang II blockade on aldosterone release awaits further study. The tolerability of losartan for future studies in healthy subjects and patients was investigated through evaluation of hemodynamic effects, clinical adverse effects, and clinical laboratory tests. Hemodynamic effects were of particular interest, as the role of Ang II in the regulation of blood pressure in healthy volunteers under the conditions of this study was of physiological interest. A modest, sustained, and persistent effect of losartan to reduce blood pressure was noted in this study. These changes did not result in apparent clinical symptoms. Also noted were statistically significant increases in standing heart rate, particularly after the first dose of losartan, but without postural hypotension. Together, these data suggest that, under the conditions of this study (overnight supine rest, moderate sodium depletion, limited environmental stimulation), the blood pressure of healthy male volunteers is somewhat dependent on endogenous Ang II. Acknowledgment Betty Jean Miller is acknowledged for preparation of the manuscript. References 1. Smith RD, Chiu AT, Wong PC, Herblin WF, Timmermans PBMWM: Pharmacology of nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1992;32:135—165 2. Chiu AT, McCall DE, Price WA, Wong PC, Carini DJ, Duncia JV, Wexler RR, Yoo SE, Johnson AL, Timmermans PBMWM: Nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists: VII. Cellular and biochemical pharmacology of DuP 753, an orally active antihypertensive agent. / Pharmacol Exp Ther 1990;252:711-718 3. Wong PC, Price WA Jr, Chiu AT, Duncia JV, Carini DJ, Wexler RR, Johnson AL, Timmermans PBMWM: Nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists: XI. Pharmacology of EXP3174: An active metabolite of DuP 753, an orally active antihypertensive agent. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1990;255:211-217 4. Timmermans PBMWM, Wong PC, Chiu AT, Herblin WF: Nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Trends Pharmacol Set 1991;12:55-62 5. Christen Y, Waeber B, Nussberger J, Porchet M, Borland RM, Lee RJ, Maggon K, Shum L, Timmermans PBMWM, Brunner HR: Oral administration of DuP 753, a specific angiotensin II receptor antagonist, to normal male volunteers: Inhibition of pressor response to exogenous angiotensin I and II. Circulation 1991;83: 1333-1342 6. Christen Y, Waeber B, Nussberger J, Lee RJ, Timmermans PBMWM, Brunner HR: Dose-response relationships following oral administration of DuP 753 to normal humans. Am J Hypertens 1991;4:350S-353S 7. Kodish ME, Katz FH: Plasma renin concentration: Comparison of angiotensinase inhibitors and correlation with plasma renin activity and aldosterone. J Lab Clin Med 1974;83:705-715 8. Barchowsky A, Data JL, Whorton AR: Effects of prostaglandin synthesis inhibition on direct stimulation of renin release from rabbit renal cortical slices. Prostaglandins 1984;27:51-68 9. Barchowsky A, Data JL, Whorton AR: Inhibition of renin release by analogues of adenosine in rabbit renal cortical slices. Hypertension 1987;9:619-623 Goldberg et al 10. Nussberger J, Brunner DB, Waeber B, Brunner HR: Specific measurement of angiotensin metabolites and in vitro generated angiotensin II in plasma. Hypertension 1986;8:476-482 11. Campbell DJ, Kladis A: Simultaneous radioimmunoassay of six angiotensin peptides in arterial and venous plasma of man. J Hypertens 1990;8:165-172 12. Kohara K, Tabuchi Y, Senanayake P, Brosnihan KB, Ferrario CM: Reassessment of plasma angiotensins measurement: Effects of protease inhibitors and sample handling procedures. Peptides 1991;12: 1135-1141 13. Steel RGD, Torrie JH: Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co, 1980, pp 96-113 14. Kisch ES, Dluhy RG, Williams GH: Enhanced aldosterone response to angiotensin II in human hypertension. Ore Res 1976; 38:502-505 15. Moore TJ, Williams GH, Dluhy RG, Bavli SZ, Himathongkam T, Greenfield M: Altered renin-angiotensin-aldosterone relationships in normal renin essential hypertension. Circ Res 1977;41:167-171 16. Ames RP, Borkowski AJ, Sicinski AM, Laragh JH: Prolonged infusions of angiotensin II and norepinephrine and blood pressure, electrolyte balance, and aldosterone and cortisol secretion in normal man and in cirrhosis with ascites. J Clin Invest 1965;44: 1171-1186 17. Williams GH, Hollenberg NK, Moore TJ, Swartz SL, Dluhy RG: The adrenal receptor for angiotensin II is altered in essential hypertension. J Clin Invest 1979;963:419-427 18. Nakamura N, Soubrier F, Menard J, Panthier J-J, Rougeon F, Corvol P: Nonproportional changes in plasma renin concentration, renal renin content, and rat renin messenger RNA. Hypertension 1985;7:855-859 Losartan in Healthy Volunteers 713 19. Gomez RA, Lynch KR, Chevalier RL, Everett AD, Johns DW, Wilfong N, Peach MJ, Carey RM: Renin and angiotensinogen gene expression and intrarenal renin distribution during ACE inhibition. Am J Physiol 1988;254:F900-F906 20. Menard J, Guyene TT, Chatellier G, Kleinbloesem CH, Bernadet P: Renin release regulation during acute renin inhibition in normal volunteers. Hypertension 1991;18:257-265 21. Dominick MA, Bobrowski WF, Metz AL, Gough AW, MacDonald JR: Ultrastructural juxtaglomerular cell changes in normotensive rats treated with quinapril, an inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme. Toxicol Pathol 1990;18:396-406 22. Chang RSL, Lotti VJ: Two distinct angiotensin II receptor binding sites in rat adrenal revealed by new selective nonpeptide ligands. Mol Pharmacol 1989;29:347-351 23. Dudley DT, Panek RL, Major TC, Lu GH, Bruns RF, Klinkefus BA, Hodges JC, Weishaar RE: Subclasses of angiotensin II binding sites and their functional significance. Mol Pharmacol 1990;38: 370-377 24. Chiu AT, McCall DE, Ardecky RJ, Duncia JV, Nguyen TT, Timmermans PBMWM: Angiotensin II receptor subtypes and their selective nonpeptide ligands. Receptor 1990;l:33-40 25. Rowe BP, Grove KL, Saylor DL, Speth RC: Discrimination of angiotensin II receptor subtype distribution in the rat brain using non-peptidic receptor antagonists. Regul Pept 1991;33:45-53 26. Schalekamp MAD, Admiraal PJJ, Derkx FHM: Estimation of regional metabolism and production of angiotensins in hypertensive subjects. BrJ Clin Pharmacol 1989;28:105S-113S 27. Nakamura A, Iwao H, Fukui K, Kimura S, Tamaki T, Nakanishi S, Abe Y: Regulation of liver angiotensinogen and kidney renin mRNA levels by angiotensin II. Am J Physiol 1990;258:El-E6