Download The Hadal Zone Deep-sea Trenches

The Hadal Zone
Deep-sea
Trenches
•! Hadal - Ocean habitats deeper than 6,000m
•! Deep-sea trenches comprise the overwhelming
majority of these habitats
•! Deepest: Mariana Trench – 10,998 m
The Hadal Zone Map > 6000 m (Not only trenches!)
World Hadal Trenches
(Jamieson et al. 2009)
37 deep-sea trenches
Most in the Pacific, deepest 9 in the Pacific
Trench Environment
Temperature: 1.0-2.5oC
Temperature increases below
4000 m due to adiabatic heating
South Pacific trench temperatures
increase from 1.16 to 1.91oC
between 6000 and 10000 m (40%)
North Pacific trench temperatures
rise from 1.67 to 2.40 oC between
6000 and 10000 m. (30%)
Temperatures in trenches are
comparable to 3000 m cont. margin
Tonga Trench Temperature
(Jamieson et al. 2009 TREE)
Challenger Deep Cross Section
CTD Casts Temperature and Salinity
Taira et al. 2005
J. Of Oceanography
Flow regime: Deep currents ventilate trenches with
values up to 8.1 cm/sec in the Challenger Deep
Up to 32 cm/s in other trenches
Currents exhibit lunar and semi-lunar tidal cycles
Mean oxygen in N. Pacific trenches 3.43 ml L-1
Why is the Mariana Trench so deep?
1. Plate configuration – Pacific plate is old and cold and
plunging beneath the Philippine plate.
The Philippine plate is young and soft and is carried downward
with the Pacific plate.
2. Remoteness from sediment sources – it doesn’t fill up over time!
Trench Biology – Historical
(courtesy of L. Blankenship)
•! Challenger – sounding to 8200 m (no fauna)
•! Incidental collection of arenaceous foraminiferan
at 7228 m Japan Trench (Brady 1984 – 14 spp.)
•! In 1899, the “Albatross” trawled the Tonga
Trench deeper waters for the first time.
•! All that was caught was fragments of a siliceous
sponge (whose origin could not be determined)
•! In 1901, “Princess Alice” successfully trawled a
deep-sea basin at a depth of 6,035m
•! Generally regarded as first authentic samples
from depths greater than 6,000m
•! 1948 – Swedish deep-sea expedition on the
“Albatross II” landed 2 Polychaetes, 1 Isopod
and 1 holothurian from 7.7 km (Japan Trench)
•! 1949 – Soviets on the Vityaz obtain “rich
collection of benthic invertebrates” from
Kurile-Kamchatka Trench (8100m)
•! Identified 20 species in 10 classes!!
Jan. 23,1960- Trieste
(bathyscape) dive confirms life at
10.9km in the Marianas Trench
Jacques Piccard
Donald Walsh
4h 48 min descent
20 min on bottom
3 h 17min ascent
‘red shrimp’ observed ?
No fish?
Are hadal depths
really a separate zone?
•!
•!
•!
•!
1953- Initially named “super-ocean”
1954 -“Ultra-abyss” proposed by Russians
1955-“Hadal” used outside USSR
Hadal originates from “Haides” or kingdom of
the dead.
•! 1967- “Trench floor fauna” used but quickly
squashed by opponents
The case for the Hadal zone as distinct from the
abyssal zone
•! Physical Properties •! Hydrostatic pressure
•! Temperature
•! Sediments
•! Animal samples
•! An analysis in 1964
showed that 2/3 of all
hadal animals are
endemic to the hadal
zone
= Ecological Isolation from abyssal zone (Wolff, 1964)
Early observations about hadal fauna
•! In 1960, Wolff stated that 58% of
species endemic to hadal zone
using 6km boundary
6 km
•! If boundary extended to 6.8-7km,
then 74% of species endemic
7 km
•! Species list at 85 (from 8
8 km
trenches) More than expected
•! Benthic species richness and
9 km
biomass directly correlates with
10 km
overlying water production
# species found
11 km
Actual
Expected
Wolff 1971. The hadal fauna relative to the abyssal zone
(a)!higher percentage of species of amphipods, polychaetes, bivalves,
echiurids and holothurians than in abyss
(b)! a lower percentage of species of asteroids, echinoids, sipunculids, and
ophiuroids than in abyss
(c)!the insignificance of several groups, including--in addition to the four
latter groups---coelenterates (except actinians and scyphozoans),
bryozoans, cumaceans and fishes
(d) the total lack of decapod crustaceans
Barophilic bacteria in the Trench – MT 41
from amphipod (Hirondellea gigas) guts –
Yayanos et al. 1981
Optimal growth at pressure less than site of origin
Adaptations to high P, low T
•! Use of intracellular protein-stabilizing osmolytes
(TMAO). Increases cell volume to counteract the
effects of pressure.
•! Increased use of unsaturated fatty acids in cell
membrane phospholipids to maintain fluidity and cell
function
•! Reduced metabolic rate ? Not directly linked to
pressure. Note – an animal going from 6k to 10K m
only experiences a doubling in pressure (but animals
on abyssal plains may be stenobathic).
•! Wax esters for storage in animals (between bouts of
feeding) - also act to maintain neutral buoyancy
Absence of calcareous &
siliceous structures ?
•! Calcium compensation depth of
4000-5000 m & opal
undersaturation leads to:
–! Organic-walled, soft-bodies foraminifera
–! Soft bodied holothurians
Challenger Deep Foraminifera
Conicotheca nigrans
Nodellum aculeata
Photos by A. Gooday
Resigella bilocularis
Resigella laevis
Agglutinated surfaces on at least
parts of Nodellum
(Gooday et al. 2008)
Metazoan Meiofauna in Trenches
Atacama Trench (N. Chile) Danovaro et al. 2002 DSR
•! Trench sediments have TOC, chloroplastic equivalents to
bathyal depths; 50% chlor a/ High OM quality
•! Meiofauna contribution to total biomass
(microbial + metazoan meiofauna)
–! 50% at bathyal depths, 70% at 7800 m
–! More food channeled to higher trophic levels
•! Composition: Nematodes – 80% density, 50% biomass at 7800 m
–! Also copepods, polychaetes, kinorhynchs
•! Meiofaunal dwarfism (30-40% body size reduction)
NOT OLIGOTROPHY! Alternatives:
More juveniles, selective predation on lg animals,
barophily associated with small size.
Puerto Rico Trench Meiofauna
abundant
91-97% nematodes and harpacticoids
17,000 ind. /m2 at 8560-8580 m in Brownson Deep
George and Higgins 1979
Eutrophic setting
Lots of plant debris
anthozoans, pogonophorans, gastropods
Isopods, amphipods, cumaceans at 7600 m
RICHARDSON et al. 1995 DSR
Depauperate meio and macrofauna!
Refractory OM and turbidite flows.
Macrofauna in Trenches
•! Macrofauna were studied from the Aleutian Trench
by Belyaev (1966) (2 cores) and
•! Jumars and Hessler (1976) (1 core) )between
6460 m and 7298 m - Density high (1272 ind.
m-2) but less than abyssal samples (2000-3800
ind. m-2 – in Rathburn et al. 2009)
•! One box core at 7460 m in Japan Trench
•! > 3,000 ind/m2 (Shin 1984)d 7298 m
Hadal Limpets!
Cocculinidae and Pseudococculinidae in the Cayman and
Puerto Rico Trenches (6740-7247 m) on wood and turtle grass
José H. Leal and M. G. Harasewych 1999 Invert. Biol.
•! Fedikovella caymanensis
caymanensis
Caymanabyssia spina
Lots of Scavenging Amphipods
•!
http://planetearth.nerc.ac.uk/blogs/
post.aspx?id=
Uristes sp.
•! 363&pid=143
Photo by L. Blankenship
3D model
of Tonga
Trench
Blankenship papers: Amphipod structure and diet
Zonation below the Abyss?"
Vertical zone partitioning by
amphipods in Tonga/Kermadec
Trenches- 13 traps; 5155-10786 m!
A!
Blankenship!
et al. 2006!
Deep-Sea Res.!
Blankenship & !
Levin 2007!
L and O!
A
B
B
C
D
Scopelocheirus
schellenbergi.
Ontogenetic vertical partitioning
in the Tonga Trench
7,349 m
6,252 m
7,349 m
Hirondellia dubia
Smallest instars are found only in
In shallow waters
physiological advantage?
nutritional advantage?
8,723 m
9,273 m
8,582 m
10, 273 m
10, 782 m
8, 723 m
Brooding amphipods do not attend bait
Blankenship et al. 2006
“There is a correlation between the extent to which a gut distends
and the reproductive stage of females that will attend baited
traps. In lysianassoid amphipods where the midgut and brood
occur in the same position along the body axis (e.g.
Eurythenes, Scopelocheirus and Hirondellea; Dahl, 1979),
gluttonous forging would greatly expand the midgut. The
developing brood would either be forcefully expelled or possibly
crushed.”
Uristes sp.
No fish or decapods in trenches?
Liparidae at 7500 m
Trench endemic fishes are
Liparidae (Snailfish)
Jamieson et al 2009
Proc. Roy. Soc. London
Decapods – 7700 m limit?
Decapods observed on video
to consume
scavenging amphipods
Jamieson et al. 2009
Deep-sea Research
AArrival time reveals densities
Jamieson et al. 2009 P.Roy. Soc. B
How important is primary productivity of
overlying waters?
Atacama Trench – over 8000 m,
beneath upwelling in N. Chile
(9.9 g C/m2/da, 80 km from
shore!
Meiofauna 10x higher than at
bathyal depths
(Danovaro et al. 2002 DSR)
Nematode diversity low, body size
low
(Gambi et al. 2003, DSR)
Blankenship et al. 2006
Tonga trench – oligotrophic
Female H. dubia have greater
size at maturity
Kermadec trench –
more productive
Annual spring bloom (higher latitude)
Female H. dubia have lower
size at maturity, greater abundance
Diets of hadal fauna
•! Old ideas – scavengers consume carrion
•! New ideas –
–! Surface derived POM (phytodetritus)
–! Chemosynthetic bacteria/inverts associated
with seepage
–! Other invertebrates – especially scavenging
amphipods
–! Sediments & phytoplankton!
Carnivory, Cannibalism, Carrion feeding
A!
Diet partitioning among amphipod species
-within and between depths
Blankenship and Levin 2007 L & O
B
Hirondellia
gut contents
Amphipod Gut Analysis
371 HinfI 2
SS2366 BsaBI 7
SS1- HinfI 2
230 HinfI 6
ET-HinfI
BsaBI 7
230 SacII 2
ET-SacII
6
366 HinfI 3
2 SS1371 HinfI 3
SS2-3
HinfI
Mollusca 12
HinfI 3
Brachiopoda 3
230 SacII 7
ET-SacII
230 HinfI 5
ET7
230 SacII 32
ET-SacII
HinfI
5
230 SacII 15
32ET-SacII
366 BsaBI 23
SS115
230 SacII 41
ET-SacII
BsaBI 23
Platyhelminthes 6
40
Platyhelminthes 5
Playthelminthes 4
Platyhelminthes 3
Platyhelminthes 2
Platyhelminthes 1
Mollusca 8
Mollusca 5
Brachiopoda 1
Mollusca 3
366 BsaBI 3
SS1Nematoda 5
BsaBI 3
Nematoda 4
Nematoda 3
Nematoda 2
Nematoda 1
371 HinfI 1
SS2-HinfI
Urochordata 2
1
Urochordata 1
Annelida 1
Annelida 6
Annelida 5
Annelida 2
Annelida 3
Annelida 4
Annelida 7
Mollusca 1
Mollusca 9
Mollusca 7
Mollusca 6
Mollusca 4
Mollusca 2
Vertebrata 2
Vertebrata 7
366 HinfI 1
SS1-HinfI
371 BsaBI 10
SS21
230 HinfI 1
ET-HinfI
BsaBI
10
366 BsaBI 24
SS11
Vertebrata 1
BsaBI 24
Vertebrata 3
Vertebrata 6
Vertebrata 5
Vertebrata 4
Amphioxus 1
Echinodermata 5
Echinodermata 2
Echinodermata 1
Echinodermata 6
Echinodermata 4
Echinodermata 3
Hemichordata 1
366 HinfI 2
SS1-HinfI
230 HinfI 3
ET-HinfI
2
Scopelocheirus schellenbergi
3
Hirondellea dubia
Eurythenes gryllus
Eurythenes sp. TT #230
371 BsaBI 18
SS2Scopelocheirus
shellenbergi
230 SacII 8
ET-SacII
BsaBI
18
Hirondellea dubia
230 SacII 34
ET-SacII
8 Eurythenes
gryllus
371 BsaBI 3
SS234 Eurythenes
sp.
Tonga
230 SacII 10
ET-SacII
BsaBI
3
Arthropoda 9
Trench
10
Arthropoda 5
Arthropoda 8
Arthropoda 7
Arthropoda 4
Arthropoda 3
Arthropoda 2
Arthropoda 1
Arthropoda 6
Mollusca 10
Mollusca 11
Brachiopoda 2
Porifera 2
Porifera 1
Cnideria 1
Cnideria 3
Cnideria 2
Fungi 1
Fungi 2
Chlorophyta 1
Rhodophyta 1
Acanthamoebidae 1
Bryozoa 1
Stramenopile 1
Mysteries
of the
deep?
Flatworms
Mollusks (Bivalves)
Roundworms
Tunicates
Blankenship et al. 2005
Molecular Ecology
Annelids
Mollusks
Vertebrates
Echinoderms
Amphipods
Arthropods
Mollusks (Gastropods)
0.05 changes
Diets of trench
amphipods
as determined by
DNA sequencing of
guts and stable
isotope analyses
Blankenship and Levin 2007
Chemosynthetic communities
Japan Trench 6370 m
Shinkai 6500 (manned)
9 agglutinating and 3 calcareous
Foraminiferal taxa in the clam bed
Kazumi and Chiaki 1999
Calcareous forams (Cibicides &
Melonis persist below the CCD!
Calyptogena phaseoliformis
Track faults/ fluid flow
Geometry of the clam colonies has the potential to provide
sensitive kinematic indicators of plate movements
Ogawa et al. 1996
in plate margin settings.
Maorithyas hadalis (Thyasiridae)
Japan Trench 7326 m
Fujikura et al. 1999;
Fujiwara et al. 2001 MEPS
•! Dual symbiosis, spatially
segregated
•! (1) gamma Proteobacteria
(thiotroph)
•! (2) gamma Proteobacteria
•! (unknown metabolism..
Related to free living
thiotrophs and H oxidizers)
•! Distinctive features –
–! Intracellular symbionts
–! Spatial segregation of bacteria
Endemism of hadal fauna
•! Species list over 700 (Belyaev, 1989) and most
trenches have been sampled at least once
•! 56.4% of species endemic to hadal zone (using 6 km
threshold)
•! Of these, 47% found in single trench
•! Only 3% found in geographically separated trenches
•! = Hadal fauna as a whole are distinct from abyssal
fauna but each trench harbors its own distinct
community
•! = Similarities in community structure across
trenches?
-Vinogradova, 1997
Sources of Biodiversity
•! “The complex bathymetry of deep-sea trenches results in
sedimentation rates differing from place to place, and
different substrates ranging from fine muds to hard
outcrops, which create a variety of ecological niches for
benthos.”
•! “While high pressure restricts diversity of inhabitants of
the ultra-abyssal zone, suitable conditions are available
in many deep-sea trenches for abundant quantitative
development for animals which have adapted to
extremely high pressure”
-Belyaev, 1967
•! In 1966, number of benthic invertebrates
known from abyssal zone is 58
•! Number of hadal species at 254
•! Since there is an estimated 67X more abyss
than hadal, Belyaev calculated that ….
•! #species/area is 15X greater in hadal
environment than abyssal environment!
•! He attributes this phenomenon to the “more
favorable environmental conditions” found in
the hadal zone, including varied substrate.
* Note: this is prior to Sanders & Hessler
“high diversity in deep-sea” paper
-Belyaev, 1966
The Origin of Hadal fauna
INFLUENCES:
•! Trenches are relatively new and during the last
ice age (which was very rapid) the deep oceans
cooled 10ºC to stay under 4ºC
•! Trenches can be colder (1-2ºC) than abyssal
oceans though the water heats slightly towards
the bottom due to pressure
•! Physiological studies stress that pressure is the
limiting factor for hadal access…but the role of
temperature should not be discounted
History of the Relevant Ideas
1955 – Zenkevich and Birshtein suggest that hadal fauna is
ancient
1960- Wolff suggests that the hadal fauna might have two
origins.
(1) preglacial hadal fauna that survived the massive
temperature decrease
(2) continual invasion of post-glacial abyssal species
adapted to cold water
1966- Belyaev suggests that fauna are relatively new
1990s- Temperature may be more of a factor…many
authors note apparent connection of hadal fauna with
Arctic or Antarctic fauna
Antarctic Bottom Water Flow
Future questions in hadal biology
•! Why is biodiversity low? What is the role of sedimentation
versus high pressure vs isolation?
•! What are the key features structuring hadal community
abundance, composition and diversity?
•! Are trench populations connected through gene flow?
•! Geographically limited trenches are analogous to inverted
deep-sea islands: what can we learn about gene flow in the
deep sea?
•! Why are some species so successful under hadal conditions?
•! How do calcareous species persist below the CCD?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=0mKotQs93Dc&feature=playe
r_embedded#