Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
PLANKTON AND NEKTON COMMUNITIES AND POLYCHAETA GROUP OF THE URUGUAYAN CONTINENTAL SHELF SOUTH WEST ATLANTIC MARINE SHELF PLANKTON Danilo Calliari, Mónica Gómez Erache, Laura Rodríguez-Graña, Cecilia Alonso, Mariano Martínez, Lucía Nogueira, Noé Espinosa ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABILITY Saraceno, et al. 2004 INFORMATION ANALYSIS PHYTOPLANKTONIC BIOMASS • 854 records • TIME SCALES: • ANNUAL: Discharge of the RDLP in shelf RdlP shelf off Uruguay and southern Brazil. •Semiannual: Predominantly deepwater> 200 m and is correlated with the latitudinal oscillations of the CBM. •Interannual: ENSO modulation RdlP discharge. •REGIONAL SCALES: North shelf: the RdlP discharge water column. It stabilizes reaching high biomass values in Spring. • South shelf: depends on the stational termocline of water column. BIODIVERSITY • In the ASO are represented ca. 20% (1056 species). • It was recorded 457 species that represents the 43% of all records in the ASO. Conocimiento Nº de especies Grupo del grupo en el Océanos ASO Proyecto ASO Radiolaria Polycystina 350 78 53 Pobre Tintinnida 300 148 59 Regular Hydromedusae 650 136 60 Regular Ctenophora 80 11 4 Pobre Polychaeta 120 58 25 Pobre Pteropoda 160 57 23 Bueno Cladocera 8 8 5 Bueno Ostracoda 169 59 43 Regular Copepoda 2000 275 54 Pobre Mysidacea 700 20 7 Muy pobre Amphipoda 400 52 38 Muy pobre Euphausiacea 86 50 25 Buena Chaetognatha 80 25 24 Buena Appendicularia 64 43 20 Buena Doliolida 17 7 5 Regular Salpida 45 29 12 Muy buena • Many species are not restricted to a single water mass but occur in the area of influence of both Brazil and Malvinas currents • The percentage of shared species is higher in ZT (62%) being the north entrance of subantarctic organisms seems to be stronger than the expatriation of south subtropical organisms. 25 POLYCHAETA PTEROPODA N° spp 20 15 10 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 REGION •The general pattern indicates the existence of maximum taxonomic diversity in the outer shelf and slope, especially at depths greater than 200 meters. 8 9 ICTIOPLANCTON • 2125 records • Hake (Merluccius hubsii, 21%). •Anchovy (Engraulis anchoita, 22%). • These records were highest in Brazil current, but the maximum egg density values were found in coastal and shelf Uruguayan (regions 1 and 2) and Argentinian (regions 7 and 8) waters. • This result indicates the existence of reproductive areas. • The anchovy occurs mostly in Uruguayan and Argentinian coastal and shelf zone. • The hake are more abundant in the waters of outer shelf and slope, especially in front of Uruguay. RECOMENDATIONS • There is a remarkable unbalance between the amount of information about taxonomic aspects and occurrence and distribution of various groups, compared to the availability respect to the assessment and quantifications of ecosystem functions. • It is necesary to develop rapid and sensitive indicators to determine perturbations by environmental contamination or deterioration. • We need to know the mechanisms of recruitment of key fish species and understand the processes (physical, biological) involved. •It requires an adequate characterization of fundamental ecosystem functions integrated into a quantitative model to explore the effects of environmental changes on ecosystem functioning at different levels. • It needs to be implemented a monitoring system in accordance with the uses in the area. Literature Review Sub-area benthic fauna Polychaeta Marcel Rodríguez, Andrea Lanfranconi y Pablo Muniz Why Polychaeta? • • • • Megadiverse group More than 11000 especies known and much more unknown Inhabit all the aquatic environments, with a high trophic diversity Good environmental biondicators 155 references found, only 98 exclusivelly for Uruguay -Thesis, technical reports, cruize reports and papers 126 sampling/time points for the study area, ranging between years 1880 and 2012 Reference distribution by exploration areas Higher density in coastal areas (areas 10 y 11): 12 references at each one By contrast, missing data in the exploration areas corresponding to deep sea (9 and 13 to 17), aprox. 2000 m to offshore Data type • Qualitative data: 45 ref. • Density/abundance: 18 ref. • • • • • • Temperature: 13 ref. Salinity: 18 ref. Deep: 28 ref. Bottom type: 32 ref. TOM: 4 ref. Others (HM, N, P): 6 ref. Ecological data was found ONLY for areas 1, 2 and YPF (3). Species number -61 % of sampling points with only 1 species. -87 % between 1 and 5 -9 % between 6 and 11 -3 % between 12 and 17 Sampling effort concentrated at northeast (areas 10 and 11) and at area 6 • A total of 145 taxa reported, belonging to 36 families. Lumbrineridae Spionidae Paraonidae Terebellidae Onuphidae Eunicidae Families more extended: Eunicidae, Onuphidae and Lumbrineridae present in 9 areas Low frequency: Syllidae Trichobranchidae • Trophic groups Predominance of carnivores and depositivores (12 families), and low prevalence of suspensivores Conclusions The uruguayan continental shelf can be considered as a particular biogeographic area, presenting high oceanographic diversity associated with the interaction between Rio de la Plata and cold and warm water masses (Malvinas and Brasil). The knowledge of benthic polychaetes fauna is poor and fragmented. There is a better knowledge of the coastal areas and there is no existence of information from 2000 m deep offshore (areas 9 and 13 to 17). The focus is needed in all the study area, priority areas could be considered BR (4), YPF (3), 7, 8 and 9, those of them yet assigned and/or with high qualification status, coinciding with those with low/inexistent knowledge. Reccomendations Minimize impact in those areas near coral reef structures (areas 6 and 12): high diversity systems Cold seep environments are recognized as hot spots for the benthic fauna, most of them presenting endemic and peculiar fauna Are necessary quantitative studies in all the study area. Quantitative data is important in order to relate the present qualitative knowledge with the environment and to better understand the biological processes driven these environments. Only with a good ecosystem knowledge is guaranted a rentable exploration. NEKTON COMMUNITIES OF THE URUGUAYAN CONTINENTAL SHELF Alicia Acuña, Diego Caballero-Sadi, Ruben Canavese, Rodrigo Gurdek, Cecilia Passadore & Diana Szteren Introduction • In marine ecosystems, nekton structure marine food webs occupying higher trophic levels. • Coastal vulnerability becomes coastal marine biodiversity knowledge essential. • A rich nekton diversity threatened in conservation develop much of its life cycle in the area of oil exploration (Exclusive Economic Zone-EEZ Uruguay). Objetive: Evaluate nekton specific composition (reptiles, mammals, birds, fishes and cephalopods) in EEZ, conservation status and biological relevance of the area. BIRDS Procellariidae (petreles) with 19 species 49 species Diomedeidae (albatros) with 10 species Area 12, over continental slope, registered higher species number. Número de especies de aves marinas que ocurren en las áreas de la ZEE. (Arballo & Cravino 1999; Shealer 2001; Nicholls et al. 2005; Phillips et al. 2006; Boletín Atlántico Sur 2007; Domingo et al. 2007; Jiménez et al. 2008, 2009; Jiménez & Domingo 2009; Abreu et al. 2010). BIRDS All of the families with some threatened degree according to IUCN. 20 species with conservation problems SNAP consider 18 species in the EEZ priority for conservation in Uruguay Estado de conservación de las especies de aves marinas de la ZEE según la UICN. LC: preocupación menor; NT: casi amenazada; VU: vulnerable; EN: en peligro; y CR: en peligro crítico. REPTILES Reptiles represented only by marine turtles. Chelonia mydas (tortuga verde) Caretta caretta (tortuga cabezona) Dermochelys coriacea (tortuga siete quillas) Lista de tortugas marinas de Uruguay. Se indica su estado de conservación según la UICN (VU: vulnerable; EN: en peligro; y CR: en peligro crítico), si es una especie prioritaria para la conservación según el SNAP, y si se encuentra en algún Apéndice CITES. MARINE MAMMALS Represented by 39 species in Uruguay Otaria flavescens Arctocephalus australis Tursiops truncatus Número de especies totales de mamíferos marinos que ocurren en las áreas de la ZEE. (Passadore et al. 2007, 2008; Passadore 2010). Eubalaena australis Higher species number in areas 3, 6 and 12, over the continental slope. MARINE MAMMALS For UICN: Most of the marine mammals of Uruguay considered as least concern species (LC). 1 species considered vulnerable (VU) 3 species of wales clasificated as endangered (EN) For CITES 25 species integrate their lists Estado de conservación de las especies de los mamíferos marinos de la ZEE según la UICN. DD: datos insuficientes; LC: preocupación menor; NT: casi amenazada; VU: vulnerable; EN: en peligro; y CR: en peligro crítico For SNAP 33 species are priority FISHES Número absoluto de especies de peces cartilaginosos y óseos por área. Bony fishes: Order Perciformes (higher species number, N= 138) Área de estudio mostrando la Zona Económica Exclusiva Uruguaya y las áreas delimitadas por ANCAP. and chondrichthyes Order Rajiformes (N = 40) FISHES Bony fishes not clasificated and some species with threatened conservation. Cartilaginous fishes are in vulnerable and extinct in the wild according to UICN. Important distribution, feeding, reproduction and nursery area between 20 and 100 m (areas 1, 5, Área de estudio mostrando la Zona Económica Exclusiva Uruguaya y las áreas delimitadas por ANCAP. 10 y 11). CEFALOPHODS 4 nektonic s pecies Illex argentinus Loligo sanpaulensis Omastrephes bartrami Onychoteuthis banksii Distribución de asociaciones de diferentes especies de cefalópodos en las áreas de la ZEE, se muestra en colores los nombres de las especies por región. (Aguiar & Haimovici 1997; Alvarez et al. 2009; Brunetti & Perez 1989; Brunetti et al. 1998; Brunetti et al. 1999; Chen et al. 2007; Leta 1981; Leta 1989; Leta & Chiesa 1992; Pineda et al. 1996; Pineda et al. 2002; Scarabino 2003). Áreas de reproducción y cría de Illex argentinus. (Brunetti et al. 1998). Final Considerations and Perspectives -Nekton community in the area represented by 568 species, most of them fish species (82,2%). -Higher fish species number and biological importance over the continental shelf. - Higher bird an mammal species number between 200 and 1500 m and deep zones until 3000 m. .s Area 11 present 19 bird species with conservation problems: albatros de Tristán critically endangered: Riqueza de especies nectónicas (aves, reptiles, mamíferos, peces y cefalópodos) con presencia confirmada en las áreas de la ZEE. Endangered species: ballena Sei, ballena azul y ballena Fin (Mammals), tortuga laúd (reptiles) and gatuso, angelito, guitarra y pez sierra (fishes). EEZ as a very relevant area for the subsistence and growing of nektonic species and the presence of threatened species point out about the vulnerability of the zone. Consideraciones finales y perspectivas Se destaca que: •la información fue extraída de las pesquerías y existe ausencia de información actualizada enla ZEE. •hay escasas investigaciones realizadas de manera sistemática y cuantitativa y nulas en profundidades superiores a 2000 m. •Uruguay está suscrito a tratados internacionales que protegen la comunidad nectónica. •Es importante generar y seguir protocolos que minimicen el impacto negativo de las prospecciones sobre la fauna marina de la ZEE, particularmente sobre las especies nectónicas que se encuentran actualmente con problemas de conservación. MUCHAS GRACIAS