Download Transactions and Locks PowerPoint

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Application Interface Specification wikipedia , lookup

Relational model wikipedia , lookup

Commitment ordering wikipedia , lookup

SQL wikipedia , lookup

Object-relational impedance mismatch wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
BIT 275
Transactions and Locks
A Quick Reference and Summary
Transaction
• A transaction is a series of steps that perform a logical
unit of work.
• Transactions must adhere to ACID properties, that is:
– Atomicity: Either all of the steps must succeed or
none of them may succeed.
– Consistency: The data must be left in a predictable
and usable state.
– Isolation: Changes made must not be influenced by
other concurrent transactions.
– Durability: The changes made must be permanent in
the database and survive even system failures.
Transactions
• SQL Server records all changes made in the
transaction log to allow any changes to be undone
(rolled back) or redone (rolled forward) in case of a
system failure.
• When updating or inserting a record into a
database, the record is first allocated in buffer
memory, and the buffer manager guarantees that
the transaction log is written before the changes to
the database file are written.
• It does this by keeping track of a log position using
a log sequence number (LSN).
Checkpoints
• At certain intervals, SQL Server issues a
checkpoint in the transaction log that issues
a write from the transaction log to the data
file.
• Depending on the setting of the transaction
log defined in the database recovery model,
the transaction log will keep the committed
and written records in the transaction log or
truncate the log.
Autorecovery
• This process of working with the transaction
log and recording actions in the transaction
log before applying them to the actual data
files allows SQL Server to recover from
failures in case of an unexpected shutdown.
Autorecovery
• The autorecovery process will check the database
to see what the last-issued checkpoint and written
LSN were and will then write all committed records
from the transaction log that were not recorded yet
in the data file to the data file.
• This process is a rollforward.
• Different from other database systems such as
Oracle, SQL Server automatically issues a
transaction (autocommitted) on every statement,
so you don’t need to explicitly commit these
transactions.
Transaction Logs
• SQL Server uses a buffer cache, which is an
in-memory structure, into which it retrieves
data pages from disk for use by applications
and users.
• Each modification to a data page is made to
the copy of the page in the buffer cache.
• A modified buffer page in the cache that has
not yet been written to disk is called a dirty
page.
Transaction Logs
• The modification is recorded in the transaction log
before it is written to disk.
• For this reason, the SQL Server transaction log is
called a write-ahead transaction log.
• SQL Server has internal logic to ensure that a
modification is recorded in the transaction log
before the associated dirty page is written to disk.
• When SQL Server writes the dirty page in the cache
to the disk, it is called flushing the page.
Checkpoint
• The checkpoint process is designed to minimize
the recovery time if the server fails by minimizing
the number of pages in the buffer cache that have
not been written to disk.
• Checkpoints occur whenever:
– A CHECKPOINT statement is issued.
– The ALTER DATABASE statement is used.
– An instance of SQL Server is stopped normally.
– An automatic checkpoint is issued.
Checkpoint
• Automatic checkpoints are generated periodically
based on the number of records in the active
portion of the transaction log, not on the amount of
time that has elapsed since the last checkpoint.
Log File Organization with Available Space at
the End
Log File with No Available Space at the End
Executing Implicit and Explicit Transactions
• By default, SQL Server automatically
commits a transaction to the database, and
every transaction is handled as a single
process.
• Because this process occurs without any
explicit request from you to confirm the
action, this is called an autocommit.
Executing Implicit and Explicit Transactions
• explicit transaction: A group of SQL
statements enclosed within transaction
delimiters that define both the start and end
of the transaction.
• implicit transaction: A connection option in
which each SQL Statement executed by the
connection is considered a separate
transaction.
Transaction Rollback
• When you want to confirm a transaction, you
issue a COMMIT TRANSACTION statement.
• This will close the open statements and
confirm the grouped DML statements.
• If you don’t want a transaction to occur, that
is, you want to cause a transaction rollback,
you issue a ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
statement.
Distributed Transaction
• When executing a distributed transaction, SQL
Server doesn’t really differ a lot from executing an
explicit transaction.
• The transaction, however, will be considered to
execute over a remote connection and will be
managed and coordinated by the Microsoft
Distributed Transaction Coordinator (DTC).
• In a distributed environment, you work over the
network segment, so the execution of the
transaction will take place using a two-phase
commit.
Locks
• Locks prevent users from reading or modifying
data that other users are in the process of
changing.
• Two main types of lock come into play:
– Read locks: Read locks ensure other users don’t
change the data you are retrieving but allow
other users to read the data at the same time.
– Write locks: Write locks ensure no other users
can examine or change the data you are
updating.
Deadlock
• A deadlock is a situation when two (or more)
users, each having a lock on one piece of
data, attempt to acquire a lock on the
other’s piece.
• Unless one of the user processes is
terminated, each user would wait indefinitely
for the other to release the lock.
• SQL Server detects deadlocks and
terminates one user’s process.
Locks and Serialization
• Locks permit the serialization of
transactions, meaning only one person can
change a data element at a time.
• During a transaction, SQL Server controls
and sets the appropriate level of locking.
• You can control how some locks are used by
including locking hints in your query.
Concurrency
• Specific types of locks allow users to access and
update data at the same time.
• A SELECT may be allowed at the same time as an
UPDATE, but the UPDATE blocks a second UPDATE.
• This concept, known as concurrency, can increase
response time from the user’s perspective.
• Concurrency control means changes made by one
person do not adversely affect modifications other
users make.
Concurrency
• There are two types of concurrency control:
– Pessimistic: Pessimistic concurrency control
locks data when data are read in preparation
for an update.
– Optimistic: Optimistic concurrency control
does not lock data when data are initially
read.
Locks and Transaction Integrity
• When users access data concurrently, a risk
exists that one user’s actions might affect
the records another user is accessing.
• Locks can prevent the following situations
that compromise transaction integrity:
– Lost updates
– Uncommitted dependencies (dirty read)
– Inconsistent analysis (nonrepeatable read)
– Phantom reads
Locks and Concurrent Transactions
• SQL Server uses different locking modes to control
how resources can be accessed by concurrent
transactions.
• These types of locks are:
– Shared
– Exclusive
– Intent
– Update
– Schema
– Bulk update
Data Manipulation Language Queries
• The data Manipulation Language keywords SELECT,
INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE and MERGE examine and
change data in your tables.
• To retrieve data from one or more tables, use these
keywords in this order:
– SELECT
– FROM
– WHERE
– GROUP BY
– HAVING
– ORDER BY
Presenting Data in a Different Order
• The ORDER BY clause provides the primary
means of organizing data, and it has two
major keywords:
– ASCending
– DESCending
Error Handling
• SQL Server has greatly improved errorhandling capabilities when compared to
other database platforms.
– RAISERROR
– @@ERROR
Error Messages
• ERROR_LINE
• ERROR_MESSAGE
• ERROR_NUMBER
• ERROR_PROCEDURE
• ERROR_SEVERITY
• ERROR_STATE
TRY…CATCH Blocks
• TRY…CATCH blocks are a great way to implement
error handling in SQL Server.
• These blocks work the same as (or very similar to)
any programming language that uses a
TRY…CATCH construct and they will catch every
error that has a severity level greater than 10 but
not cause any termination in the database
connection.
• TRY…CATCH blocks can also be used in stored
procedures and triggers.
Using INSERT and DELETE Operations
• During an INSERT operation the inserted
table is dynamically created and during a
DELETE operation the deleted table is
likewise created in memory for the life of the
transaction. Now, instead of a trigger, you
may use the OUTPUT clause to manipulate
these data.
Summary
• Working with transactions allows you to roll
back or cancel a transaction to execute in
case of a certain event or condition, or even
roll back multiple grouped statements in a
distributed environment
Summary
• SQL Server supports various recovery
models. The most common—but also the one
with the biggest transaction log size—is the
Full recovery model.
• However, if you perform large amounts of
batch and bulk inserts, it might be useful not
to set the recovery model to Full and instead
use the Bulk-Logged recovery model.
Summary
• The error-handling in SQL Server is one of
the best error-handling capabilities so far in
the SQL language because it implements a
TRY…CATCH block, just as do programming
languages such as Visual Basic and C#.