Download Contact Lens Discomfort What is it, why does it occur, and how can it

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
A4 tfos_FORMATO AMERICANO 2013:Layout 1 31/10/13 16:42 Pagina 1
Contact Lens Discomfort
What is it, why does it occur, and how can it be treated?
Jason J. Nichols (Houston, TX, USA), Lyndon Jones (Waterloo, Ontario, Canada), J. Daniel Nelson
(Minneapolis, MN, USA), Fiona Stapleton (Sydney, NSW, Australia), David A. Sullivan (Boston, MA,
USA), Mark D.P. Willcox (Sydney, NSW, Australia), on behalf of the participants of the TFOS
International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort
Introduction
Contact lens discomfort (CLD) is a problem
experienced by as many as one-half of all
contact lens wearers. However, there is no
global consensus concerning the definition,
classification, epidemiology, pathophysiology,
diagnosis, management and the proper
design of clinical studies for CLD.
To achieve such a consensus, the Tear Film
& Ocular Surface Society (TFOS;
www.tearfilm.org) sponsored an
international workshop “The TFOS
International Workshop on Contact Lens
Discomfort.” The workshop involved 79
individuals from around the world, who
participated on one of nine subcommittees
addressing multiple aspects of CLD.
Contact Lens Discomfort
Contact Lens
Material
e.g.
Lubricity
Water
Content
Design
e.g.
Edge
Base Curve
Environment
Fit & Wear
e.g.
Lens
Interaction
Modality
Lens Care
e.g.
Solution
Chemistry
Care
Regimen
The critical attributes of comfortable
contact lens wear include the ability to
wear contact lenses without sensation and
without problems for as long as desired.
Contact lens discomfort is often recognized
clinically based on patient symptoms of
discomfort and dryness (especially at the
end of the day).
“Strugglers”
Physical Awareness
Visual Disturbance
Reduced
Comfortable
Wearing Time
www.tearfilm.org
Age/Gender
Ocular/Systemic
Disease
Medication
Compliance
Reduced Total
Wearing Time
Ocular
Environment
e.g.
External
Environment
e.g.
Lipid/Tear
Stability
Blink
Humidity
Air Quality
Temporary
Discontinuation of
Lens Wear
Permanent
Discontinuation of
Lens Wear
(Drop Out)
Figure 1. Classification of CLD
There are many terms that have been used
to describe cessation of lens wear (e.g.,
discontinuation, dropout, intolerance, lapse).
The term “discontinuation” should be used
when describing the process of stopping
lens wear, while the term “dropout” should
be used to describe an individual who has
discontinued (or stopped) wearing contact
lenses for a sustained period of time. The
Workshop determined that the two major
classifications used to classify CLD are
contact lens related and environmental
factors (Figure 1).
The Workshop defined CLD as follows:
Contact lens discomfort (CLD) is a condition
characterized by episodic or persistent
adverse ocular sensations related to lens
wear either with or without visual
disturbance, resulting from reduced
compatibility between the contact lens and
the ocular environment, which can lead to
decreased wearing time and
discontinuation of contact lens wear.
Modifiable
Patient
Factors
e.g.
Progression of CLD
The purpose of this report is to describe
the major findings of this workshop and
help translate these findings to the clinical
practice and care of the contact lens
wearing patient.
What is CLD?
Inherent
Patient
Factors
e.g.
How frequent is CLD?
Contact lens discomfort is a frequent
problem. Estimates from both populationand clinic-based studies suggest that the
frequency of CLD ranges between 31% and
79% of contact lens wearers—as such, it is
often stated that about one-half of
contact lens wearers have CLD.
Why does CLD occur?
Numerous patient-related non-modifiable
and modifiable factors were considered.
The evidence did not confirm a patientrelated non-modifiable risk factor profile
for CLD, although sex (female) and age
showed moderate evidence of being
related to CLD. Likewise, there was little
evidence to suggest a clear patient-related
modifiable risk factor profile for CLD.
Other etiological considerations of CLD
were also considered, such as the
neurobiology of symptoms, the effects of
contact lens wear on the ocular surface,
adnexa and tear film, and the impact of
contact lens materials, designs and lens
care. Although the neurobiology associated
with the ocular surface is likely critically
important in CLD, at present little is known
about the role of the nervous system and
its response related to CLD. Many of the
other ocular surface structures appear to
www.ARVO.org
A4 tfos_FORMATO AMERICANO 2013:Layout 1 31/10/13 16:42 Pagina 2
Bothersome
Symptoms or
Comfortable Wearing
Time Less Than
Desired?
No
No Further Action
Required
Yes
Change care solution or
Care System
Self-Reduction
of Wearing
Time
No
Initiate
Management
Eliminate Care-System/
Change to Daily Disposable
Adjust Replacement
Frequency
Asses Patient
Status
Is Weartime
Adequate for
Pt Needs?
Yes
Yes
Change Lens Design
and/or Material
Eliminate
Co-Existing
Factors
No
Discontinuation/
Dropout
Tear Supplementation
1) Lubricating Drops
2) Wetting Drops
3) Lacrimal Inserts
4) Punctal Occlusion
Fix Suboptimal
Contact Lens
Factors
Dietary
Supplementation
(Evening Primrose Oil)
Change
Method of
Correction
Bothersome
Symptoms or
Comfortable Wearing
Time Less Than
Desired?
No
Topical Medication
(Azithromycin)
Yes
Improve Environment
Treatment of
Patient With
Clinically Acceptable
Lens
No
Yes
All Strategies
Investigated?
Yes
Bothersome
Symptoms or
Comfortable Wearing
Time Less Than
Desired?
No
Figure 2. Management of CLD
be unchanged in CLD, with the possible
exception of loss of or change to the
meibomian glands. Meibomian gland
loss and/or contact lens wear leads to
reduced pre-lens tear film stability and
increased evaporation, both of which
may be factors involved in CLD.
Many contact lens material, design
factors were shown to have little role
in CLD. Factors that appear to have
some influence on CLD include
increased contact lens material water
content, low surface friction, poor
contact lens fit, contact lens edge
profile (thin/sharp better than round),
and wearing modality (daily disposable
better than reusable). Further, the
literature does not give a clear
indication of specific care solution
formulations or components that are
associated with CLD. It remains to be
definitively shown whether regular
contact lens care, including rubbing,
rinsing and adequate soaking
(disinfection and cleaning), are
important in the prevention of CLD.
How may CLD be treated?
The first consideration in managing CLD
is to obtain a detailed history from the
patient, followed by the elimination of
confounding issues (e.g., identifying and
treating non-contact lens related/coexisting systemic and ocular disease)
and any obvious contact lens-related
problem (e.g., damaged contact lens).
Following this, treatments may include
changing the contact lens material,
changing the modality of wear, changing
the care solution/regimen, eliminating
the care solution, increasing the
replacement frequency, changing the
lens design, adding tear
supplementation, modifying diet,
improving the environment (increased
humidity), or the use of topical
medications (Figure 2).
Conclusions
Contact lens discomfort is a common problem. Significant progress has been made in identifying important factors characteristic of
the condition, as well as those that should be ignored. While the treatment of CLD is multifaceted, it is important that clinicians
consider a step-wise approach in diagnosing, managing, and treating CLD in order to maximize the potential for continued successful
contact lens wear.
Acknowledgments: We thank Sabrina Zappia (www.citynetonline.it) and Amy Gallant Sullivan for their professional assistance. A listing of Workshop participants may
be found at www.tearfilm.org.
www.tearfilm.org
www.ARVO.org