* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Electronic excitation gives informative fragmentation of polypeptide
Survey
Document related concepts
Electron configuration wikipedia , lookup
Electrochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Ultrafast laser spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Equilibrium chemistry wikipedia , lookup
Acid dissociation constant wikipedia , lookup
Acid–base reaction wikipedia , lookup
Membrane potential wikipedia , lookup
Physical organic chemistry wikipedia , lookup
Stability constants of complexes wikipedia , lookup
Nanofluidic circuitry wikipedia , lookup
Metastable inner-shell molecular state wikipedia , lookup
Ionic compound wikipedia , lookup
Franck–Condon principle wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
K.F. Haselmann et al., Eur. J. Mass Spectrom. 8, 117–121 (2002) 117 Fragmentation of Polypeptide Cations and Anions K.F. Haselmann et al., Eur. J. Mass Spectrom. 8, 117–121 (2002) Electronic excitation gives informative fragmentation of polypeptide cations and anions K.F. Haselmann, B.A. Budnik, F. Kjeldsen, M.L. Nielsen, J.V. Olsen and R.A. Zubarev* Department of Chemistry, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK 5230 Odense M, Denmark E-mail [email protected] A Fourier transform mass spectrometer is a versatile instrument with a range of available fragmentation techniques. Comparison of polypeptide fragmentation patterns revealed that the techniques involving electronic excitation, such as hot-electron-capture dissociation (HECD) and electron-detachment dissociation (EDD), are even more informative than vibrational excitation (VE) techniques such as collisional activation. For dications of the peptide KIMHASELMANN, 11 eV HECD cleaved all inter-residue links in at least two places, with up to five fragments characterizing each link. For dianions of the same molecule, VE produced only one backbone cleavage whereas EDD gave ten, including five internal cleavage fragments. This is consistent with the general postulate that homogeneous electronic excitation yields more types of cleavage than near-equilibrium processes such as VE. Keywords: polypetides, fragmentation, electronic excitation, ion–electron reactions, electron capture dissociation, collision-induced dissociation, electron-detachment dissociation Introduction V.L. Talroze belongs to the legendary generation of scientists who contributed to many important discoveries. His paper with A.K. Ljubimova, published in 1952 with the unpretentious title “Secondary processes in the Ion Source of a Mass Spectrometer”, opened the era of organic ion– molecule reactions,1 the probable mechanism by which the universe synthesizes most of its organic matter. The battles that V.L. Talroze had to withstand to defend this discovery are also legendary (the methonium ion CH5+ still poses some kind of a mystery for vibrational spectroscopy, with an infrared spectrum obtained only recently and not yet fully 2 explained). One of the lessons learned from that study was that a mass spectrometer is a versatile source of information on processes involving organic molecules. Today, the attention of the scientific community has shifted to larger biological polymers. Both natural and synthetic polypeptides and DNAs are increasingly not only being used in traditional life science disciplines, such as biochemistry, molecular biology, neurobiology, pharmacology and medicinal chemistry, but are also considered as potentially important building modules for nanotechnology.3 The world of naturally-occurring polypeptide sequences is much restricted compared to the vast realm of possible sequences. However, polypeptide sequences do not have to be natural to be biologically relevant. In our view, the term “biological” is equally applicable to any polymer containing building blocks found in living nature, just as the word “organic” is applicable to any carbon-containing molecule. Therefore, we consider any polypeptide to be biological, regardless of origin or presence among known sequences in a protein or DNA database. For polypeptides of arbitrary sequence, tandem mass spectrometry is of great importance for their characterization, since other techniques (for example Edman degradation) are not always efficient and/or exhaustive. Dissociation in the gas-phase requires application of one of the available activation methods. The range of the traditional techniques that involve vibrational excitation (VE) is broad, from collisional-activation dissociation (CAD) to infrared dissociation (IRMPD or BIRD) to surface-induced dissociation (SID). If we only consider multiply-charged ions produced by electrospray ionization (ESI) and analyzed by Fourier transform mass spectrometry (FT-MS), CAD techniques would include nozzle-skimmer dissociation, multipole-storage-assisted dissociation (MSAD),4 sustained 5 off-resonance irradiation (SORI) and electron-impact exci6 tation of ions from organics (EIEIO). In 1998, a new type of reaction, electron-capture dissociation (ECD), was intro7 duced. More recently, two more ion-electron reactions have been added: hot-electron-capture dissociation (HECD)8 for 9 polycations and electron-detachment dissociation (EDD) for polyanions. All these techniques can be implemented in a © IM Publications 2002, ISSN 1356-1049 118 Fragmentation of Polypeptide Cations and Anions single FT instrument. Which technique is the most informative in sequence characterization of polypeptides? Here we address this question by applying MSAD, SORI CAD, ECD, HECD and EDD to the same molecule. More than a dozen peptides were involved in the study: however, we illustrate the general findings using one model peptide with the sequence KIMHASELMANN. The length of the peptide (12 residues) and its amino acid composition is characteristic of the synthetic peptide studies that our laboratory is involved in.10 Experimental Synthesis The peptide was obtained using automated solid-phase synthesis and the Fmoc (9-fluoronylmethoxycarbonyl) protection strategy on a research-scale ResPep peptide synthesizer (Intavis AG, Gladbach, Germany). After completion of the synthesis, the resin was washed three times with dichloromethane (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and dried in a dry nitrogen flow for 15 min. Simultaneous cleavage of the peptide from the resin and side-chain deprotection was performed at 21°C in a mixture (95 : 2.5 : 2.5, v/v) of trifluoroacetic acid (Fluka, Steinheim, Germany), triisopropylsilane (used as a scavenger) and MilliQ-water (Millipore, CA, USA). After two hours of deprotection, the peptide was precipitated with cold (0°C) t-butyl methyl ether (Fluka). The peptide precipitate was redissolved in 1% aqueous acetic acid and lyophilized. Mass spectrometry Nano-electrospray mass spectrometry, using a hexapole-based interface (Analytica of Branford, MA, USA), modified with a heated metal capillary, was performed on a 4.7 T Ultima FT mass spectrometer from IonSpec (Irvine, CA, USA). The peptide was dissolved in a standard electrospray mixture of water, methanol and acetic acid (49 : 49 : 2, v/v) all of the highest purity available. A 3–5 L aliquot was loaded into a metallized pulled-glass capillary (MDS Proteomics, Odense, Denmark). Ions produced by electrospray were externally accumulated in the hexapole for 0.5 s and transmitted to the FT cell by RF-only quadrupole ion guides. Capture of ions in the open-ended cylindrical cell with extra trapping plates was achieved by gated trapping. For performing dissociation experiments, ions of interest were isolated by application to the excitation electrodes of a pre-programmed waveform. For SORI CAD, a 500 ms RF-burst with an amplitude of 6 V was applied at a frequency approximately 2 kHz higher than that for the m/z value of the molecular ions, together with a pulse of collision gas (4 ms, N2 at 20 Torr). For electron-ion fragmentation reactions (ECD, HECD and EDD), an indirectly-heated dis11 penser cathode operated at 5 V and 0.34 A was employed. In the ECD experiments, the electron-emitting surface was Figure 1. SORI CAD of dications of KIMHASELMANN (10 scans). biased to –1 V for 200 ms and in HECD to –11 V for 250 ms. In EDD of dianions, irradiation at 21 eV for 1200 ms was used. MSAD in the hexapole of the electrospray interface was carried out by increasing the external accumulation time to three seconds. Results and discussion SORI CAD of dications The SORI CAD spectrum of the 2+ ion is shown in Figure 1. The precursor ion was totally fragmented and the base peak corresponds to the loss of water from the dication. Peptide bond fragmentation (b, y fragments) gave full sequence coverage, with eight complementary pairs. Only one 2+ dicationic backbone fragment was observed, b11 . Among singly-charged fragments, the most abundant N-terminal + + fragment was b9 , while its complementary ion y3 was the most abundant C-terminal product. MSAD of positive ions Compared with SORI CAD, fragment peaks in the MSAD spectrum of dications were more abundant, with the average m/z shifted to higher values (Figure 2), so that the Figure 2. Multipole-storage-assisted dissociation of dications of KIMHASELMANN (10 scans). K.F. Haselmann et al., Eur. J. Mass Spectrom. 8, 117–121 (2002) Figure 3. Electron-capture dissociation of dications of KIMHASELMANN. Asterisks denote the second and third harmonics from the ICR-signal (100 scans). cleavages of three out of four N-terminal backbone bonds were not observed. No complementary pairs were obtained, either. The relative peak intensities in the m/z range from 800 + to 1200, however, remained the same, with the b9 product being again the most abundant. The absence of low-mass y ions in the MSAD spectrum could be due to the massdiscrimination effect of the gated trapping, but it could also be an inherent feature of MSAD. For other molecules, the tendency of MSAD to promote formation of ions with high m/z was also noticed. MSAD does not employ precursor-ion selection and it does not inhibit secondary fragmentations, therefore, the resultant ion population is often dominated by the most stable fragments (usually y ions). The ion stability depends upon the intramolecular charge density,12,13 which is higher for species with smaller m/z. Proton transfer to neutral 14 species occurs if accumulation time is long (which can account for the presence of singly-charged ions in the MSAD spectrum), with higher proton-transfer rates for smaller ionic species. ECD of dications At low electron energies (<1 eV), direct electron capture by dications was promoted, with the resulting mass spectrum given in Figure 3. Here, ECD cleaved all interresidue bonds. As is typical for ECD spectra, mostly N–Cα • bonds were broken to yield c and z ions. Since the intermediate species were singly-charged radical cations, no complementary fragments from N–Cα cleavage were observed. On • the other hand, the fact that no c-ions smaller than c4 or z ions smaller than z9 were observed identified His4 as one of the protonation sites. This was expected due to the high gasphase basicity of that residue. The position of the other protonation site is less clear [ECD of n-cations usually reveals the location of (n–1) charges]. Among c fragments, the most abundant was c11; the peaks, due to the loss of the Cterminal amino acid, are usually intense in ECD spectra. No • losses of neutral groups were observed from c or z ions. Additionally, two y species were observed at lower intensities, which together with c ions gave two complemen- 119 Figure 4. Hot-electron-capture dissociation of dications of KIMHASELMANN (200 scans). + tary pairs. Whereas y9 could be due to the minor fragmentation channel in ECD that gives y+ + a• + CO,15 the presence 2+ of the doubly-charged y10 ion can only be explained by the excitation in inelastic collisions during electron irradiation (EIEIO). Here, ECD was not more informative than CAD. This is a typical situation for <1.5 kDa species, with ECD becoming relatively more important for larger species. HECD of dications When the electron energy was increased to 11 eV, the spectrum character changed dramatically (Figure 4). Many more fragments were observed, especially in the low m/z region. Full sequence coverage was obtained with full (within the detected m/z region >200 Th) b, c and y series; every inter-residue link produced between two and five different fragments. All five z ions and six a ions were evenelectron species 1 Da below the expected mass for homolytic cleavage, suggesting either heterolytic cleavage or hydrogen atom loss upon homolytic backbone fragmentation. Secondary fragmentation is a common phenomenon in hot-electron-capture dissociation (details of this regime are 8 given elsewhere). The EIEIO effect was rather significant: the most abundant fragment ions were b ions in the higher m/z region, whereas the most abundant fragments in the lower m/z Figure 5. SORI CAD of dianions of KIMHASELMANN (10 scans). 120 region were y ions. Of the eleven b ions, ten lost water. But, even if only single-bond cleavages were taken into account, HECD was easily the most informative fragmentation technique for positive ions. SORI CAD of dianions In the negative-ion mode, abundant molecular dianions of the peptide were observed. However, SORI CAD produced mostly losses of small neutral groups (Figure 5) with only one backbone fragment, b11. MSAD did not give additional cleavages. This result illustrates the difficulty of obtaining structural information from peptide anions by VE techniques. Only a few studies that report on tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) of deprotonated peptides larger than 16 five residues have been published so far, despite the fact that most modern mass spectrometers with MS/MS capabilities can easily handle ions of both polarities. At the same time, many peptides are acidic and ionize far better in the negative-ion mode. In addition, some labile modifications, notably sulfation and phosphorylation, promote anion formation. EDD of dianions 21 eV electron irradiation of dianions produced an oxi–• dized radical ion [M–2H] which fragmented to give nearly complete sequence coverage except for one backbone bond between Ala5 and Ser6 (Figure 6). Despite the fact that Metoxidized species were not perfectly removed from the ICR cell during isolation of the precursor dianions, their fragments were of low abundance and did not interfere with the rest of the spectrum. The most abundant fragment peak was due to carbon dioxide loss from the oxidized radical species. This is readily explained by the ionization of negativelycharged carboxylic groups (for example, Glu7 or the C-ter• minus). This gives an RCO(O ) group, the radical site of 17 which initiates α-cleavage with carbon dioxide loss. Upon backbone ionization, backbone fragmentation occurred due 9 to electron-hole recombination. Interestingly, five internal Fragmentation of Polypeptide Cations and Anions fragments were observed, a sign of high energy deposition by the electrons. Vibrational vs electronic excitation The much greater variety of fragmentation channels in HECD of dications and EDD of dianions, compared with CAD of the same species, requires explanation. Of course, the fragmenting species in both techniques are different: they are radical ions in the first case and even-electron species in the latter case. However, stable polypeptide radical cations tend to produce less backbone fragmentation than do the corresponding even-electron ions.18,19 Therefore, another explanation is needed, and we offer one in the form of a simple model. According to this model, near-equilibrium excitation in CAD leaves the ions primarily in the ground electronic state, with N0 parallel channels open for dissociation at a given level of the excess energy. Electronic excitation by electron impact is rather homogeneous (no strongly “chromophoric” sites as in UV photoexcitation). Therefore, the ion can be excited to multiple (n) electronic states, where n is at least of the order of L/λ, where L is the peptide length in Å and λ is the electron localization length in polypeptides. The value of λ can be estimated as ≤6–10 Å.20,21 The lifetime of first excited electronic states in polypeptides is of the order of nanoseconds, with much longer lifetimes for high Rydberg states.22 This is enough for single-bond cleavage. Each of these states has Ni parallel channels for dissociation (i = 1,..n). In general, Ni ≈ N0. Although some or even many of these channels are the same as in the ground electronic state, the sum ΣNi, i = 0..n, is always larger than N0: it cannot be smaller since N0 is also included in it. Therefore, homogeneous electronic excitation should lead to a more diverse (informative) fragmentation than vibrational excitation at the same energy excess. Among the new channels opened by electronic excitation, the model predicts the dominance of single-bond cleavages, since losses of neutral molecules are too slow (require rearrangement) to compete with intramolecular energy conversion that removes electronic excitation. This, however, does not preclude slow secondary fragmentation occurring after the product separation. Conclusions Figure 6. Electron-detachment dissociation of dianions of KIMHASELMANN (200 scans). We have demonstrated with one typical example that the most informative fragmentation techniques in FTMS are those involving electron-ion reactions with electron energies sufficient to produce electronic excitation. Experiments with other tested molecules were in agreement with this observation. A simple model is proposed that explains the effect through the existence of multiple electronic excitation states, each of them with a set of parallel fragmentation channels. K.F. Haselmann et al., Eur. J. Mass Spectrom. 8, 117–121 (2002) 121 Acknowledgement Heinrich Gausepohl is gratefully acknowledged for help in setting up the peptide synthesis facility. The work was funded by the Danish research councils (SNF, grant number 51-00-0358; STVF, grant number 0001242). The FTMS instrument was funded by the Instrument Center Program (grant number 9700471). 12. References 15. 1. This paper has been reprinted in English in J. Mass Spectrom. 33, 502 (1998). 2. E.T. White, J. Tang and T. Oka, Science 284, 135 (1999). 3. N.C. Seeman, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37, 3220 (1998). 4. K. Sannes-Lowery, R.H. Griffey, G.H. Kruppa, J.P. Speir and S.A. Hofstadler, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 12, 1957 (1998). 5. J.W. Gauthier, T.R. Trautman and D.B. Jacobson, Anal. Chim. Acta 246, 211 (1991). 6. R.B. Cody and B.S. Freiser, Anal. Chem. 51, 547 (1979). 7. R.A. Zubarev, N.L. Kelleher and F.W. McLafferty, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 3265 (1998). 8. F. Kjeldsen, K.F. Haselmann, B.A. Budnik, F. Jensen and R.A. Zubarev, submitted to Chem. Phys. Lett. 9. B.A. Budnik, K.F. Haselmann and R.A. Zubarev, Chem. Phys. Lett. 342, 299 (2001). 10. B.A. Budnik, M.L. Nielsen, J.V. Olsen, K.F. Haselmann, P. Hörth, W. Haehnel and R.A. Zubarev, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., in press. 11. Y.O. Tsybin, P. Håkansson, B.A. Budnik, K.F. Haselmann, F. Kjeldsen, M.V. Gorshkov and R.A. 13. 14. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Zubarev, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 15, 1849 (2001). M. Barber, D.J. Bell, M. Morris, L.W. Tetler, M.D. Woods, J.J. Monaghan and W.E. Morden, Org. Mass Spectrom. 24, 504, (1989). S.G. Summerfield and S.J. Gaskell, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes, 165/166, 509 (1997). M.W. Senko, C.L. Hendrickson, M.R. Emmet, S.D.-H. Shi and A.G. Marshall, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 8, 970 (1997). R.A. Zubarev, N.A. Kruger, E.K. Fridriksson, M.A. Lewis, D.M. Horn, B.K. Carpenter and F.W. McLafferty, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 2857 (1999). C.S. Brinkworth, S. Dua, A.M. McAnoy and J.H. Bowie, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 15, 1965 (2001). R.A. Zubarev, B.A. Budnik and M.L. Nielsen, Eur. J. Mass Spectrom. 6, 235 (2000). I.K. Chu, C.F. Rodriquez, T.-C. Lau, A.C. Hopkinson and K.W.M. Siu, J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 3393 (2000). R.A. Zubarev, unpublished results. C.S. Burns, L. Rochelle and M.D.E. Forbes, Org. Letters 3, 2197 (2001). R. Weinkauf, P. Schanen, A. Metsala, E.W. Schlag, M. Bürgle and H. Kessler, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 18567 (1996). J.R. Cable, M.J. Tubergen and D.H. Levy, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 7349 (1988). Received: 9 November 2001 Revised: 7 January 2002 Accepted: 19 February 2002 Web Publication: 8 April 2002