Download Adverb_11b_From_Marketings_Perspective

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Marketing channel wikipedia , lookup

Marketing strategy wikipedia , lookup

Product planning wikipedia , lookup

Street marketing wikipedia , lookup

Marketing plan wikipedia , lookup

Marketplace Fairness Act wikipedia , lookup

Multi-level marketing wikipedia , lookup

Global marketing wikipedia , lookup

Sensory branding wikipedia , lookup

Direct marketing wikipedia , lookup

Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup

Segmenting-targeting-positioning wikipedia , lookup

Marketing mix modeling wikipedia , lookup

Marketing communications wikipedia , lookup

Integrated marketing communications wikipedia , lookup

Sales process engineering wikipedia , lookup

Internal communications wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Adverb 11b
From a marketing department’s perspective, every
relationship looks like a sales opportunity!
By Justin Roff-Marsh
At best, most marketing communications are irrelevant to
most of their recipients, most of the time.
At worst, these communications run the risk of damaging the
very relationships they are supposed to be cultivating.
The problem is, from a marketing department’s perspective;
every relationship looks like a sales opportunity.
Accordingly, marketing (and sales) people tend to design
communications based upon the assumption that every
recipient is in the process of making a purchasing decision.
Few potential clients are sales opportunities
Unfortunately, as the diagram below illustrates, nothing could be further
from the truth.
This diagram portrays a marketplace consisting of six potential customers.
Each makes a buying decision every 25 days. The duration of each decisionmaking process is two days.
If a marketing person (‘you’ in the diagram) were to view this marketplace
for a total of eight days, only two sales opportunities would come into view.
Copyright © Ballistix, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Page 1
Of course, if the marketer were to notice these two sales opportunities and
assume that they were representative of the market as a whole, he would be
sorely mistaken.
In the real world, the odds of a marketing communication striking a potential
customer within her decision-making process are nowhere near as generous
as those illustrated in this diagram.
If you’re selling a service or a ‘major’ product, your customers’ buying cycle
(time between sales opportunities) is likely to be three or more years. The
duration of a sales opportunity may be one or two months. And the
persistence of your marketing communication (how long it stays top-of-mind)
may be less than a week. (In this more realistic scenario, only one out of
every 144 recipients of your communication would be in the process of
making a purchasing decision.)
The real cost of irrelevant communication
In other words, the odds of your communication striking any given customer
at just the right time is comparable to the odds of your being able to spear a
particular fish in a pond, while wearing a blindfold!
Marketers traditionally compensate for these lousy odds by broadcasting
their sales communications to large numbers of potential customers
simultaneously.
Now, this approach is like electrifying the pond. You’ll get your fish, but the
pond will sustain a lot of collateral damage in the process!
Obviously, repeated exposure to irrelevant communications (perhaps for a
period of many years) is likely to damage your relationships with potential
clients. If these communications are delivered by e-mail, many recipients will
eventually unsubscribe themselves from your list — cutting-off your future
access to them.
You could argue that this collateral damage is likely to be minor, because
those individuals for whom your communications are irrelevant are more
likely to simply treat them with indifference.
This is a valid argument. However it ignores the opportunity cost of this
promotional approach.
What if, instead of deliberately creating and distributing communications that
will be treated with indifference by the greater majority of your marketplace,
you were to create communications that were relevant to recipients, at any
stage of their buying cycles?
Copyright © Ballistix, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Page 2
If this were possible, each communication would make a positive contribution
to a developing relationship with your potential customers.
Well it is possible.
Invest in relationships, not sales opportunities
All you have to do, is identify a basis for communication that transcends your
quest for sales opportunities. Our article entitled The importance of getting
religion explains that this basis for communication should consist of the
intersection between your market’s interests and your expertise (and
credibility).
These relationship-building communications may be less effective at inciting
action from that small percentage of recipients who are in the midst of their
decision-making processes — but that’s okay.
The effectiveness of your communication should not be measured on an
individual-to-individual basis; it should be measured across the marketplace
as a whole.
Remember, when you broadcast a communication to your marketplace, those
potential customers who are ready to buy today are a tiny minority. You’ll
enjoy a significantly greater return on investment if you design your
communications to be relevant to those individuals who are not currently
sales opportunities!
[Agree? Disagree? Please drop me a line and let me know.]
Justin Roff-Marsh is the Managing Director of Ballistix, a management
consultancy specialising in Sales Process Engineering. Visit Ballistix and
subscribe to his periodical, AdVerb at: http://www.ballistix.com.au
Copyright © Ballistix, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Page 3