* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Ms S was convicted of two counts of Arson being reckless
Outpatient commitment wikipedia , lookup
Pyotr Gannushkin wikipedia , lookup
Mental disorder wikipedia , lookup
Moral treatment wikipedia , lookup
History of psychiatric institutions wikipedia , lookup
Abnormal psychology wikipedia , lookup
Lifetrack Therapy wikipedia , lookup
Clinical mental health counseling wikipedia , lookup
Psychopathy Checklist wikipedia , lookup
Involuntary commitment internationally wikipedia , lookup
Causes of mental disorders wikipedia , lookup
Deinstitutionalisation wikipedia , lookup
Mental health professional wikipedia , lookup
Psychiatric survivors movement wikipedia , lookup
Community mental health service wikipedia , lookup
History of mental disorders wikipedia , lookup
Residential treatment center wikipedia , lookup
Psychiatric rehabilitation wikipedia , lookup
List of addiction and substance abuse organizations wikipedia , lookup
Surrey Cat 2, level 2 Ms G was approaching release from a 4.5 year sentence for arson and assessed as posing a very high risk of serious harm to the public. Her history of violent and aggressive offending was linked to substance misuse and mental health problems, having been diagnosed with borderline personality disorder and chronic post-traumatic stress. Given the nature of her current offending, it was apparent that Ms G would experience significant difficulties securing stable accommodation upon release, which would increase her risk of reoffending, relapsing into substance misuse and harming the public. A MAPPA level 2 meeting was held to discuss Ms G’s release. It was agreed that a local alcohol and drug treatment provider would continue to work with her to secure funding for residential rehabilitation upon release. Surrey & Sussex Probation Trust’s (SSPT’s) housing worker referred Ms G to probation approved premises in the event that funding for residential rehabilitation was not secured. The community forensic mental health team agreed to work with Ms G before and after release to ensure her emotional treatment needs were being met. Children’s Services agreed to make contact with Ms S’s ex-partner to ensure that he was aware of the potential risk posed to him and their children. As a result of her MAPPA management, Ms G was released to a residential rehabilitation unit. Funding was initially secured for a three month placement but this was later extended to six months. A robust risk management plan is in place and can be activated if Ms G absconds or breaches the conditions of her licence. The Community Forensic Mental Health Team remain in contact with Ms G and she is currently emotionally stable. She has not lapsed into substance misuse since her release. There have been no reported incidents of self harm and she has complied with the terms of her licence.