* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Even/Odd Mode Analysis of the Wilkinson Divider
Survey
Document related concepts
Integrated circuit wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
Air traffic control radar beacon system wikipedia , lookup
Valve RF amplifier wikipedia , lookup
Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup
Schmitt trigger wikipedia , lookup
Regenerative circuit wikipedia , lookup
Current source wikipedia , lookup
Power dividers and directional couplers wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Standing wave ratio wikipedia , lookup
Index of electronics articles wikipedia , lookup
RLC circuit wikipedia , lookup
Two-port network wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
4/14/2009 Wilkinson Divider Even and Odd Mode Analysis.doc 1/14 Even/Odd Mode Analysis of the Wilkinson Divider Consider a matched Wilkinson power divider, with a source at port 2: Port 2 Z0 λ + Vs - 4 2 Z0 Port 1 2 Z0 Z0 2 Z0 λ Port 3 Z0 4 Too simplify this schematic, we remove the ground plane, which includes the bottom conductor of the transmission lines: Port 2 λ Z0 4 2 Z0 Port 1 Z0 +Vs- 2 Z0 2 Z0 λ 4 Port 3 Z0 Jim Stiles The Univ. of Kansas Dept. of EECS 4/14/2009 Wilkinson Divider Even and Odd Mode Analysis.doc 2/14 Q: How do we analyze this circuit ? A: Use Even-Odd mode analysis! Remember, even-odd mode analysis uses two important principles: a) superposition b) circuit symmetry To see how we apply these principles, let’s first rewrite the circuit with four voltage sources: Vs Vs V2 λ Z0 2 Z0 2 Z0 λ 2 Z0 4 2 Z0 V1 2 − Vs 2 V3 4 Vs 2 Z0 Turning off one positive source at each port, we are left with Vs o 2 an odd mode circuit: V2 λ V1 o 2 Z0 Z0 Jim Stiles 2 Z0 2 Z0 λ Odd Mode Circuit Z0 4 4 − Vs 2 V3o Z0 The Univ. of Kansas Dept. of EECS 4/14/2009 Wilkinson Divider Even and Odd Mode Analysis.doc 3/14 Note the circuit has odd symmetry, and thus the plane of symmetry becomes a virtual short, and in this case, a virtual Vs ground! o 2 V2 λ o 2Z0 V1 Z0 4 Z0 2 Z0 V=0 2Z0 V1 o Z0 2 Z0 λ − Vs 2 V3o 4 Z0 Dividing the circuit into two half-circuits, we get: λ Z0 4 + 2Z 0 V1 o + 2 Z0 Z0 − 2 Z0 4 + V1 o Vs − λ 2Z 0 + - V2o + 2 Z0 − Z0 V3o + - − Vs 2 − Note we have again drawn the bottom conductor of the transmission line (a ground plane) to enhance clarity (I hope!). Jim Stiles The Univ. of Kansas Dept. of EECS 4/14/2009 Wilkinson Divider Even and Odd Mode Analysis.doc 4/14 Analyzing the top circuit, we find that the transmission line is terminated in a short circuit in parallel with a resistor of value 2Z0. Thus, the transmission line is terminated in a short circuit! λ Z0 4 + + V1 o = 0 Z0 2 Z0 V2o − + - Vs 2 − This of course makes determining V1 o trivial (hint: V1 o = 0 ). Now, since the transmission line is a quarter wavelength, this short circuit at the end of the transmission line transforms to an open circuit at the beginning! Z0 + Z0 V2o + - Vs 2 As a result, determining voltage V2o is nearly as trivial as determining voltage V1 o . Hint: − V2o = Vs Z0 V = s 2 Z0 + Z0 4 And from the odd symmetry of the circuit, we likewise know: V V3o = −V2o = − s 4 Now, let’s turn off the odd mode sources, and turn back on the even mode sources. Jim Stiles The Univ. of Kansas Dept. of EECS 4/14/2009 Wilkinson Divider Even and Odd Mode Analysis.doc 5/14 Vs V2e Even Mode Circuit λ V1 e Z0 4 2 Z0 Z0 2 Z0 2 Z0 λ 2 Vs V3e 4 2 Z0 Note the circuit has even symmetry, and thus the plane of symmetry becomes a virtual open. Vs V2e λ 2Z0 V1 e 2 Z0 4 2 Z0 Z0 I=0 2Z0 V1 e 2 Z0 λ Z0 Vs V3e 4 2 Z0 Dividing the circuit into two half-circuits, we get: λ + 2Z 0 V1 e 2 Z0 − Jim Stiles Z0 4 Z0 + V2e + - Vs 2 − The Univ. of Kansas Dept. of EECS 4/14/2009 Wilkinson Divider Even and Odd Mode Analysis.doc λ Z0 4 + 2Z 0 V1 e 6/14 Z0 2 Z0 − + + - V3e Vs 2 − Note we have again drawn the bottom conductor of the transmission line (a ground plane). Analyzing the top circuit, we find that the transmission line is terminated in a open circuit in parallel with a resistor of value 2Z0. Thus, the transmission line is terminated in a resistor valued 2Z0. λ Z0 4 + + 2Z 0 V1 e V2e 2 Z0 + - Vs 2 − − Now, since the transmission line is a quarter wavelength, the 2Z0 resistor at the end of the transmission line transforms to this value at the beginning: Zin = Z0 + e Z0 V2 − + - Vs 2 2Z 0 ) 2 = Z0 Voltage V2 e can again be determined by voltage division: V2e = Jim Stiles ( 2Z 0 The Univ. of Kansas Vs Z0 V = s 2 Z0 + Z0 4 Dept. of EECS 4/14/2009 Wilkinson Divider Even and Odd Mode Analysis.doc 7/14 And then due to the even symmetry of the circuit, we know: V3e =V2e = Vs 4 Q: What about voltage V1 e ? What is its value? A: Well, there’s no direct or easy way to find this value. We must apply our transmission line theory (i.e., the solution to the telegrapher’s equations + boundary conditions) to find this value. This means applying the knowledge and skills acquired during our scholarly examination of Chapter 2! λ + + 2Z 0 V1 e Z0 4 2 Z0 V2e + - Vs 2 − − If we carefully and patiently analyze the above transmission line circuit, we find that (see if you can verify this!): V1 e = − jVs 2 2 And thus, completing our superposition analysis, the voltages and currents within the circuit is simply found from the sum of the solutions of each mode: Jim Stiles The Univ. of Kansas Dept. of EECS 4/14/2009 Wilkinson Divider Even and Odd Mode Analysis.doc V1 = V1 o +V1 o = 0 − V2 =V2o +V2o = jVs 2 2 Vs 4 + =− Vs 4 = 8/14 jVs 2 2 Vs 2 V V V3 =V3o +V3o = − s + s = 0 4 λ V1 = − jVs Z0 V2 = Vs 2 Z0 4 2 Z0 2 2 4 +Vs- 2 Z0 2 Z0 λ 4 V3 = 0 Z0 Note that the voltages we calculated are total voltages—the sum of the incident and exiting waves at each port: V1 V1 ( z1 = z1P ) =V1 + ( z1 = z1P ) +V1 − ( z1 = z1P ) V2 V2 ( z2 = z2P ) =V2+ ( z2 = z2P ) +V2− ( z2 = z2P ) V3 V3 ( z3 = z3P ) =V3+ ( z3 = z3P ) +V3− ( z3 = z3P ) Since ports 1 and 3 are terminated in matched loads, we know that the incident wave on those ports are zero. As a result, the total voltage is equal to the value of the exiting waves at those ports: Jim Stiles The Univ. of Kansas Dept. of EECS 4/14/2009 Wilkinson Divider Even and Odd Mode Analysis.doc 9/14 − jVs V1 + ( z1 = z1P ) = 0 V1 − ( z1 = z1P ) = V3+ ( z 3 = z 3P ) = 0 V3− ( z3 = z 3P ) = 0 2 2 The problem now is to determine the values of the incident and exiting waves at port 2 (i.e., V2 + ( z 2 = z 2P ) and V2 − ( z 2 = z 2P ) ). Recall however, the specific case where the source impedance is matched to transmission line characteristic impedance (i.e., Z s = Z 0 ). We found for this specific case, the incident wave “launched” by the source always has the value Vs 2 at the source: Z0 + Vs + - V + Z0 ( z = z s ) = Vs 2 − z z=zs Now, if the length of the transmission line connecting a source to a port (or load) is electrically very small (i.e., β A 1 ), then the source is effectively connected directly to the source (i.e, βz s = βz P ): Z0 And thus the total voltage is: + Vs + - V − z=zs=zP Jim Stiles Zin V = V + ( z = z P ) +V − ( z = z P ) =V = Vs + (z = zS ) +V − (z = z P ) 2 +V The Univ. of Kansas − (z = zP ) Dept. of EECS 4/14/2009 Wilkinson Divider Even and Odd Mode Analysis.doc 10/14 For the case where a matched source (i.e. Z s = Z 0 ) is connected directly to a port, we can thus conclude: V + ( z = z P ) = Vs 2 V − ( z = z P ) = V −Vs 2 Thus, for port 2 we find: V2+ ( z 2 = z2P ) =Vs 2 V2− ( z2 = z2P ) =V2 −Vs 2 = Vs 2 −Vs 2 = 0 Now, we can finally determine the scattering parameters S12 , S22 , S32 : V1 − ( z1 = z1P ) ⎛ − jVs ⎞ 2 − j S12 = + = = V2 ( z2 = z2P ) ⎜⎝ 2 2 ⎟⎠Vs 2 V2− ( z2 = z2P ) 2 S22 = + = (0) = 0 V2 ( z2 = z2P ) Vs V3− ( z 3 = z3P ) 2 S32 = + = (0) = 0 V2 ( z2 = z2P ) Vs Q: Wow! That seemed like a lot of hard work, and we’re only 1 3 of the way done. Do we have to move the source to port 1 and then port 3 and perform similar analyses? Jim Stiles The Univ. of Kansas Dept. of EECS 4/14/2009 Wilkinson Divider Even and Odd Mode Analysis.doc 11/14 A: Nope! Using the bilateral symmetry of the circuit ( 1 → 1, 2 → 3, 3 → 2 ), we can conclude: S13 = S12 = −j 2 S33 = S22 = 0 S23 = S32 = 0 and from reciprocity: S21 = S12 = −j S31 = S13 = 2 −j 2 We thus have determined 8 of the 9 scattering parameters needed to characterize this 3-port device. The remaining holdout is the scattering parameter S11. To find this value, we must move the source to port 1 and analyze. Port 2 λ -Vs+ Z0 4 2 Z0 Port 1 Z0 2 Z0 2 Z0 λ 4 Port 3 Z0 Note this source does not alter the bilateral symmetry of the circuit. We can thus use this symmetry to help analyze the circuit, without having to specifically define odd and even mode sources. Jim Stiles The Univ. of Kansas Dept. of EECS 4/14/2009 Wilkinson Divider Even and Odd Mode Analysis.doc 12/14 Since the circuit has (even) bilateral symmetry, we know that the symmetry plane forms a virtual open. V2 λ −Vs + V1 Z0 4 Z0 2 Z0 2Z0 I=0 2Z0 Z0 2 Z0 V1 −Vs + λ V3 4 Z0 Note the value of the voltage sources. They have a value of Vs (as opposed to, say, 2Vs or Vs/2) because two equal voltage sources in parallel is equivalent to one voltage source of the same value. E.G.: + + 5V + - + - 5V 5V − + - 5V − Now splitting the circuit into two half-circuits, we find the top half-circuit to be: λ Vs 4 2Z 0 + + - V1 2 Z0 Z0 Z0 − Jim Stiles The Univ. of Kansas Dept. of EECS 4/14/2009 Wilkinson Divider Even and Odd Mode Analysis.doc 13/14 Which simplifies to: λ 4 2Z 0 + Vs Z0 2 Z0 V1 + - − And transforming the load resistor at the end of the line back to its beginning: Vs 2Z 0 + - + 2Z 0 V1 λ 4 wave Finally, we use voltage division to determine that: − ⎞ Vs 2Z 0 ⎟= Z + Z 2 2 2 0 ⎠ ⎝ 0 ⎛ V1 = Vs ⎜ Port 2 Thus, λ -Vs+ V1 = V s Z0 4 2 Z0 2 Z0 2 Z0 2 Z0 λ 4 Port 3 And since the source is matched: Z0 V1 + ( z1 = z1P ) =Vs 2 V1 − ( z1 = z1P ) =V1 −Vs 2 =Vs 2 −Vs 2 = 0 Jim Stiles The Univ. of Kansas Dept. of EECS 4/14/2009 Wilkinson Divider Even and Odd Mode Analysis.doc 14/14 So our final scattering element is revealed! V1 − ( z1 = z1P ) 2 S11 = + = (0) = 0 V1 ( z1 = z1P ) Vs So the scattering matrix of a Wilkinson power divider has been confirmed: ⎡ 0 ⎢ S = ⎢− j 2 ⎢⎣ − j 2 −j 0 0 2 −j ⎤ ⎥ 0 ⎥ 0 ⎥⎦ 2 His worst handout ever! Oh no, I’ve seen much worse. So, what’d ya think? Jim Stiles The Univ. of Kansas Dept. of EECS