* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Julia West
Survey
Document related concepts
Food and drink prohibitions wikipedia , lookup
Hunger in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Food safety wikipedia , lookup
Human nutrition wikipedia , lookup
Overeaters Anonymous wikipedia , lookup
Raw feeding wikipedia , lookup
Obesity and the environment wikipedia , lookup
Food studies wikipedia , lookup
Food coloring wikipedia , lookup
Food politics wikipedia , lookup
Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
1 Julia West Response essay English 1010 Food for Thought to America “You are what you eat.” This saying depicts a widely accepted and accurate correlation between what people consume and the overall health of their body. In the article “Escape from the Western Diet,” written by Michael Pollan, emphasis is placed on the importance of consuming whole foods in the place of the modern industrialized alternative of vitamin enriched processed foods, which the food industry as well as the drug companies have capitalized on today. By switching Americans’ diets to primarily whole foods Pollan suggests his theory will begin to decrease the rising health crisis that is currently plaguing the modern American society. With obesity in America linking to an increasing amount of health issues and higher death rates, it is safe to say all Americans should implement some sort of change in their diets and Pollan’s suggestions are a good first step. Although Pollan’s theory of “Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants” is seemingly contradictory upon first glance, the core principles and concepts within it would greatly benefit the overall health of those who chose to follow it. The proposition of his particular dietary plan having the cure to the health crises parallels the scientifically “proven” diet propaganda and food industrialized diet gimmicks fed to Americans everyday. This seems interesting considering that he actually criticizes the diet gimmicks for capitalizing on ultimately the same proposition he makes. Some may say that by Pollan arguing that the science and food industry are inaccurate in their practices of 2 “fixing” the health crisis and introducing his own theories in such a way that it is the only true option he falls prey to hypocrisy, a move that ultimately discredits his theory altogether. Although he seems to show signs of hypocrisy it cannot be ignored that his findings are absolutely right in his implication that the scientific community is too focused on finding a “miracle cure” to obesity, and not focused enough on the significance of which types of foods Americans are ingesting. The science industry views that by isolating the specific micronutrients and adding supplements to our food it will fix our problem but instead of taking unhealthy processed foods and adding things, like omega 3 fatty acids and antioxidants to it, we should be focusing on eating whole foods which already contain these essential vitamins without the excess garbage that is embedded into industrialized processed food. But what is a “whole” food really? Most people when asked to define a whole food will simply say whole foods are things such as fruits and vegetables and meat such as beef or chicken and that is correct to an extent, but America has industrialized our food to such a level that even our meat that is mass produced is processed to certain consent. Pollan writes The steer has itself been raised on a Western diet, and that diet has rendered its meat substantially different- in the type and amount of fat in it as well as its vitamin content- from the beef our ancestors ate. The steer’s industrial upbringing has also rendered its meat so cheap that were likely to eat more of it more often than our ancestors ever would have. This suggests yet another sense in which this beef has become an industrial food: it is designed to be eaten industrially too- as fast food. 3 From the soil Americans use to raise crops to the corn filler used to feed American cows, processing food starts at the beginning origins of the food itself. Furthermore, studies have shown that the consumption of processed meats is linked with a higher prevalence of coronary heart disease and diabetes. Naturally, with the rise of diabetes being over 20 percent in the last decade it is hard to ignore that there is something causing Americans’ medical health downturn. Some may argue that processed foods are not the cause of Americans’ health atrocity and that the decline of America’s healthy population is simply poor genetics prevailing through the aid of modern medicine. Admittedly they are partially correct in that health anomalies and poor genetics are passed genetically from generation to generation, but it does not explain why people with seemingly perfect inherited genetics are being diagnosed with conditions such as: diabetes, irritable bowl syndrome or small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. These conditions are directly linked to an unfavorable diet. As the saying goes, “an apple a day keeps the doctor at bay.” Ignoring the potential of allergic affiliations, when was the last time a whole food such as an apple caused negative side effects such as IBS to an individual? In the case of processed foods it is not genetics that is flawed, but rather it is Americans’ approach to their diet that needs improvement. Pollan insists that the attitude of the American society towards their eating habits is flawed, stating that “Americans spend less than 10 percent of their income on food; they also spend less than half an hour a day preparing meals and little more than an hour enjoying them.” With how fast paced society is today there is a McDonalds at every corner and a Wendys on the adjacent side of the street. It is hard to not fall prey to 4 processed foods in the on-the-go culture, this cannot be denied, but it does not constitute a good excuse to allowing one’s personal health to diminish. Pollan’s theory of “Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants,” although as radical as it may be, is more effective and ultimately a better alternative to injecting processed food with vitamins and expecting a change in Americans’ health.