Download Formation of Galaxies

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Seyfert galaxy wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Formation of the Galaxies:
Current Issues

Joe Silk
University of Oxford
Gainesville, October 2006
Some remarks about star formation…
mass, light, chemistry control galaxy evolution

Low mass stars control M

Solar mass stars control light in a spheroidal
galaxy
The most massive stars dominate the light in a
disk galaxy


Intermediate mass stars control chemical
evolution
THE INITIAL STELLAR MASS FUNCTION

What determines the characteristic mass of a
star?
Is the IMF universal?
Kroupa 2004
Stars

Fundamental theory applied to a diffuse interstellar cloud
that is collapsing under self-gravity
3 / 2
Minimum fragment mass ~  g mp ~ 0.01 M
a robust but wrong result!
Resolution: continuing accretion of cold gas, eventually
halted by feedback that taps stellar energy via MHD
turbulence3
vs
Ý
M gas ~ 
G
first stars were massive

In addition IMF most likely also involves fragmentation




3 PROCESSES PLAY A ROLE:
FRAGMENTATION,
ACCRETION,
FEEDBACK
Klessen 2006
NGC1333: Quillen et al. 2006
Shu 2006
Shu 2006
Pudritz et al. 2006
Disk galaxy star formation is inefficient, due to SN
feedback
Accretion and minor mergers renew gas supply
Ellipticals are old because infall is quenched….by AGN
outflows
Efficient early star formation occurred in massive spheroids and
ellipticals
There are likely to be two modes of star
formation:
disks/pseudobulges AND elliptical/spheroid formation
Accretion, mergers and AGN outflows are key ingredients
 (L )
theory (CDM-motivated)
L ~ 3 1010 L
Galaxies
observations
luminosity
too many Dwarfs
but they are fragile
t 


m
p
3
12 
cool
M cooledbaryons ~  2

T


  
g
me t dyn 
 ~ 0.5
too many Giants:
a problem!

nkT
tcool ~
Gas cooling time-scale
(T )n 2

t dyn ~
1
Gmp n

Dynamical time-scale

A necessary condition for star formation is cooling:

So the BIG ISSUE is astrophysical feedback
Ultraluminous infrared galaxies and
the galaxy luminosity function
Sanders 1999
The red sequence evolves
Bell et al. 2004
Blanton 2006
Star formation was efficient in the
most massive galaxies
Papovich et al. 2006
More evidence for a shorter timescale
Maraston 2006
AN EFFICIENT MODE OF STAR FORMATION IS
NEEDED FOR
SPHEROID FORMATION: THE CASE FOR POSITIVE
FEEDBACK
D. Thomas
D. Thomas 2006

THERE ARE PLAUSIBLY TWO MODES OF STAR
FORMATION: REGULATED BY GAS SUPPLY,
DYNAMICAL
TIMESCALE
DISK
MODE:
motivated by ….
gravitational instability of cold disks
star surface density
gas surface density
Star formation efficiency
SFE =
 gas vcool m*,SN
ESN initial

0.02
SPHEROID MODE: motivated by gas-rich mergers
A GLOBAL STAR FORMATION LAW
FOR DISKS
Sajina et al. 2006
SFR=0.02 (GAS SURFACE DENSITY)/tdyn
fits quiescent and
starburst galaxies
Need cold gas accretion via infall and/or minor mergers
to maintain global disk instability
Need low efficiency: due to SN feedback
NGC 891
LOCAL COLD GAS
FEEDING BY INFALL
NGC 6946
HI contours
Oosterloo et al. 2005
Boomsma et al 2005
The Rate of Star Formation
 number of

 SN bubbles
porosity ~ 
generated

 per unit time


  maximum 4 - Volume
 
   of a bubble limited by
  ambient ISM pressure









1

~ star formation rate  
1.36 
 (pressure)

Three-phase ISM
Perhaps porosity self-regulates!
SFR with SN feedback in a multiphase
ISM
Slyz et al. (2005)
HISTORY OF STAR FORMATION
Rocha-Pinto 2000: solar vicinity
Allard et al. 2006: M100
Star Formation Rate Simulation
The Mice (NGC 4676 a,b)
old stars + gas
density-dependent SFR
shock-induced SFR
Barnes (2004)
GALAXY LUMINOSITY FUNCTION
space density
of galaxies
AGN
Feedback
Bower et al. 2006
luminosity
Massive spheroids form first
K. Bundy et al. 2006
Cimatti et al. 2006
Build-up of luminosity
and star formation rate
Bouwens, Illingworth et al 2006
AGN ARE ANTI-HIERARCHICAL
Hasinger et al. 2006
LEdd/c=GMMgas/r2
SMBH formation/feedback
in galaxy spheroid formation
LEddMSMBH

4
 

9
M  3 10 Msun 
km 
300


s 

black hole
Fits observed normalisation and slope mass

King (2003), Silk & Rees (1998)
Supernovae provide feedback in
potential wells of low mass galaxies
 SMBH outflows provide positive
feedback
in massive protospheroids
 Blowout occurs/star formation
terminates


spheroid
velocity
dispersion
Triggered global star formation?
OUTFLOWS
FROM SMBH
OVERPRESSUR
E ISM CLOUDS
Saxton et al. 2005
star formation
timescale
tjet<<tgal yields
high efficiency
Labiano et al. 2005
z=0.27 radio galaxy
star formation rate compared to
renormalised black hole feeding rate
Silverman et al. 2006
gravity-induced
star formation
jet-enhanced star
formation in spheroids
x 10-3
comoving star
formation rate
comoving SMBH
accretion rate
suppression
by ouflows
feedback
redshift
at z~2, SMBH fall below the relation
Star formation suppressed
Star formation triggered
Borys et al 2006
AGN-induced outflows & star formation
AGN
AGN
3
Ý
M gasoutflow ~ L /cv w  
SN
2.7
Ý
Ý
M gasoutflow  M sfr
SN
AGN
Ý
Ý
Msfr
 M sfr (t dyn / t jet )
 M gas(v jet / ) / t dyn  v w
Boost by ~10!
3
Observed scaling!
C. Martin 2005:
KI and NaI line profiles
OUTFLOWS FROM ULIRGS
Morganti et al. 2005: HI absorption
Swinbank
et al. 2006
a SCUBA galaxy at z=2.385
multiplicative factor of AGNtriggered SN
Everett & Murray 2006:
extended injection
of energy needed
for NGC 4151
outflow
X-ray absorbed
QSOs in ULIRGs
Ultraluminous starbursts
associated with AGN
absorption
by ionised wind
M. Page et al. 2006
A UNIFIED THEORY
NEGATIVE
POSITIVE
H THEORETICAL INGREDIENTS ARE NEE