* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Real Business Cycles Basic idea
Nouriel Roubini wikipedia , lookup
Steady-state economy wikipedia , lookup
Ragnar Nurkse's balanced growth theory wikipedia , lookup
Non-monetary economy wikipedia , lookup
Fiscal multiplier wikipedia , lookup
Fei–Ranis model of economic growth wikipedia , lookup
Long Depression wikipedia , lookup
Economic growth wikipedia , lookup
Economic growth (III) 1 Schools of Macroeconomics longrun Classical or non-classical? (sticky wages and prices, rational expectations, etc. Short run or long run? (full adjustment of capital, expectations, etc. shortrun yes no yes Classical or non-classical? (sticky wages and prices, rational expectations, etc. no Neo-classical growth model Marxist theories? Behavior growth theories? Malthusian trap models? Real business cycle (RBC); supply-side economics; structural models; misperceptions models Keynesian model (sloping AS, expectationsaugmented PC, IS-LM, etc.) Agenda - A savings experiment - Theories of technological change - Real business cycles 3 Review from last week • Growth involves potential output (not business cycles) • Key assumptions: fixed s, labor growth at n, laboraugmenting tech change at h • Laws of motion: k = s f (k ) (n h ) k Test the long-run equilibrium of k 0 : s f ( k ) = (n h ) k • Long run growth of output per person, wages, productivity at rate • But technological change is exogenous and not satisfactorily explained. 4 Several “comparative dynamics” experiments • Change growth in labor force (immigration or retirement policy) • Change in rate of TC • Change in national savings and investment rate (tax changes, savings changes, demographic changes) Here we will investigate only a change in the national savings rate. 5 Consumption today … or … consumption tomorrow? Two faces of saving 6 The major non-cycle economic issue of today: The federal budget deficit and debt Important background: National Academy Sciences, Choosing the Nation’s Fiscal Future, 2010 National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, The Moment of Truth, 2010 The fiscal cliff at 00:00:01 am, January 1, 2013 These will be studied in coming weeks. 7 Bowles-Simpson Report 8 Why you can’t get anywhere without Econ 122: Examples from the Commission 9 Government debt and deficits and the economy: What is the effect of deficit reduction on the economy? 1. In long-run (in neoclassical growth model) • Higher savings leads to higher potential output • Mechanism: higher I → K → Y, w, etc. (through neoclassical growth model) 2. In short run (in weeks to come) • Higher savings is contractionary • Mechanism: lower S, lower AD, lower Y, inflation 10 Basics of the deficit and growth Assume a closed economy I = T– G + [Y – T – C(Y-T, r)] = Govt savings + private savings = Budget surplus + Sp At full employment and assuming that private C does not respond significantly to r, for deficits that reduce G: ΔI = ΔS = Δ (Budget surplus) So this is the motivation of deficit reduction for long-run growth. Question: what is the effect? 11 y** Impact of Higher National Saving y = f(k) y* i = s2f(k) i = s1f(k) (I/Y)* (n+δ)k k k* k** 12 Numerical Example of Deficit Reduction Assumptions: 1. Production is by Cobb-Douglas with CRTS 2. Labor plus labor-augmenting TC: 1. n = 1.5 % p.a.; h = 1.5 % p.a. 3. Full employment; constant labor force participation rate. 4. Savings assumption: a. Private savings rate = 22% of GDP b. Initial govt. savings rate = minus 6 % of GDP c. In 2012, govt. changes fiscal policy to a deficit of minus 2 % of GDP. d. All of higher govt. S goes into national S (i.e., constant private savings rate) and closed economy 5. “Calibrate” to U.S. economy 13 Impact of Lower Govt Deficit on Major Variables 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 35% Consumption per capita Percent change from baseline 30% GDP per capita Capital per capita 25% 20% NNP per capita - Note that takes 10 years to increase C -Political implications - Must C increase? - No if k>kgoldenrule 15% 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% 14 Conclusions on Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth • Fiscal policy affects economic growth through impact of government surplus through national savings rate • Increases potential output through: – higher capital stock for domestic investment – higher income on foreign assets for foreign investment • Consumption decreases at first then catches up after a decade or so 15 Classical themes in macroeconomics: Real Business Cycle Theory 16 Real Business Cycles Basic idea: cycles are caused by productivity shocks; these are propagated by changes in prices and then to labor supply. Model Details • Start with neoclassical growth model. • Remember decomposition of output growth from growth accounting: gY = α gK + (1-α) gL + θ, where θ = T.C. • Changes in output come from two sources: – Technological shocks: θ random. – Changes in labor force participation: assumes very high elasticity of labor supply with respect to wages. • This then generates random output fluctuations, which RBC school calls business cycles. RBC recession Price (P) AS’ AS P* AD Q* Real output (Q) RBC view of current recession 115 AS2012:Q2 114 Price level 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 12,600 12,800 13,000 13,200 Real GDP 13,400 AS2008:Q1 Policy implications of RBC models • Output shocks are exogenous phenomena (earthquakes, Internet revolution, terrorist strikes, wars, etc.). • No role for monetary or fiscal policies in cycle: – Economy and unemployment are efficient; no need for policies – Cycles are supply-driven, cannot use AD policies to stabilize output. – Money is “neutral” (M policy cannot affect real output), so cannot use M policy Problems in RBC models 1. Cyclical properties of classical models of the business cycle - Hard to explain deep recessions and depressions (1930s, 200709) as technological regress. What did we forget? 2. Money and output: is money neutral? - RBC predicts money neutral - Much evidence that M is non-neutral 3. Labor market features (such as quits and Beveridge curve) Verdict: Economists deeply divided. Personal view: Keynesian approach has not developed a complete microeconomic justification, but it is most promising approach to understanding sources and policies for business cycles. Promoting Technological Change Much more difficult conceptually and for policy: - TC depends upon invention and innovation - Market failure: big gap between social MP and private MP of inventive activity - No formula for discovery analogous to increased saving Major instruments: - Intellectual property rights (create monopoly to reduce MP gap): patents, copyrights - Government subsidy of research (direct to Yale; indirect through R&D tax credit) - Rivalry but not perfect competition in markets (between Windows and Farmer Jones) - For open economy, openness to foreign technologies and management 22