* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download File - Ossett History
Structural history of the Roman military wikipedia , lookup
Education in ancient Rome wikipedia , lookup
Military of ancient Rome wikipedia , lookup
Roman agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Food and dining in the Roman Empire wikipedia , lookup
Early Roman army wikipedia , lookup
East Roman army wikipedia , lookup
HOW MUCH DID RECRUITMENT AND TRAINING CHANGE BETWEEN THE ROMANS AND HENRY V’S ARMY IN 1415? Roman soldiers signed up for 20 years Henry V had 5,000 longbow archers. Between the time of the Romans and the army of Henry V in 1415 recruitment and training changed a lot, but some parts hardly changed at all. The Romans had a welltrained army which had specially selected recruits, but the Medieval armies were not well-trained and most soldiers had to be there, rather than being selected. The Romans had a permanent standing army so they had soldiers ready and trained for war even in peace time. Roman recruits were specially selected and had to meet certain requirements before being allowed to serve in the army. They had to be 5 feet 10 inches tall, be physically fit and strong, with good eyesight and intelligence. This ensured the soldiers were ‘the best of the best’, showing recruitment was very strict. Soldiers signed up for 20 years and were paid, ensuring loyalty and commitment to the army. In addition, the Roman soldiers participated in a strict training regime. They learned how to march with a full load, to fight in formation and as a unit, such as forming ‘wedges’ and ‘turtles ‘ for protection. They practiced throwing spears and improved their sword skills by fighting against gladiators in training camps. This meant the Roman army was a highly disciplined and professional fighting force. However, the armies that came after the Romans were not as well trained or recruited. In the C10th and C11th the Saxon army was made up of 2 different types of recruits, the Housecarls and the Fyrd. The Housecarls were professional soldiers, the bodyguards to the King and lords. These soldiers were recruited at a young age as they showed some fighting skills. They usually practiced often and had a high level of skill. This was similar to the Romans as they also trained regularly. However, the fyrd was mainly made up of peasants who were called up to fight because they worked on land owned by their local lord. The fyrd often brought their own equipment and weapons but they were significantly less well trained. As the fyrd only came together for wars, the Saxon army didn’t fight together as one unit. This was very different to the Roman army which trained together and fought together. When the Normans invaded in 1066, they brought a system of recruitment similar to the Saxons. This was called feudalism and meant that each man owed military service in exchange for land given to him from the person above him in society. This led to the creation of feudal armies. Peasants were forced to fight because they owed military service and this amounted to 45 days per year. Just like the fyrd, peasants turned up to fight when they were requested to do so. They had very little if any training and they weren’t very committed as they didn’t really want to be there. In this army the only real training was for the mounted knights who did learn how to fight on horseback and they trained to do this regularly. This shows a big difference to the Roman army as recruitment was compulsory and there was no selection of the better recruits. As a result, there was no training for the majority of the army and so it didn’t fight as a unit. This is also a big difference as only some parts of the army had training whereas all Roman recruits had training. By the later medieval period there were some more changes to recruitment and training of the army. Henry V’s army in 1415 had a large number of mercenaries as well as peasants. This is because the better-off peasants preferred to pay a tax called scutage instead of doing their military service. The King then used this money to buy professional soldiers to fight for him. Mercenaries were well-trained soldiers who earned their living by being professional soldiers and so they had to be good at fighting, if they wanted to stay alive. They practiced constantly. However, they were often disloyal and ill disciplined. They fought as individuals and not as a unit and so they were very different to the Roman soldiers. Mounted knights were also well trained as they practiced fighting, usually through jousting competitions. This was very similar to the Roman soldiers practicing against gladiators. But once again, they often fought as individuals not as a unit and so they were very different to the Romans. The majority of Henry V’s army at Agincourt in 1415 was made up of archers. These were men who had trained for 10 years to be able to use a longbow correctly. Since 1363 Englishmen had been ordered to practice archery every Sunday and holidays, making them very experienced and very like the training of the Romans. In addition, longbowmen went to special training camps where they practiced ‘cloth shooting’ which was aiming and shooting at a white sheet placed at various distances away. They also learned how to fire in volleys all at the same time so they could aim, fire, and reload on command. They could fire 15 arrows a minute at a distance of 400 metres making them a deadly weapon. The longbowmen had to practice very often and so this training was very similar to that of the Romans as it turned this part of the army into a professional unit. The rest of the infantry wasn’t so well trained and so were very different to the Romans. In conclusion, between the Romans and 1415, recruitment and training changed a lot as the Romans had very strict regulations for their recruits and they were well-trained. The Early Medieval Army wasn’t as well trained as it only came together in times of war and it was mainly made up of peasants who owed 45 days military service to their lord showing a big difference to the Romans who had a permanent standing army. The Late Medieval army was only slightly different to the Early Medieval army as it was still a feudal army with some mercenaries. In terms of training, the army of Henry V had some similarities with the Roman army as some parts were well trained eg the longbow archers, whilst other parts had hardly any training. Overall there were many changes between the Romans and Henry Vs army but there were also some things which stayed the same.