Download VIEW PDF - Parexel

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute wikipedia , lookup

Antihypertensive drug wikipedia , lookup

Myocardial infarction wikipedia , lookup

Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup

Saturated fat and cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup

Cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
3 IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS OF
CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES TRIALS
The FDA 2008 guidance1 mandates all type 2 diabetes products perform a cardiovascular
outcomes trial (CVOT). However, regulators and payers are increasingly demanding such
trials for other disease and indications such as chronic kidney disease, dyslipidemia,
thrombosis and anemia. According to the Cardiovascular Safety Outcome Trials Think
Tank, there are three important considerations before performing such trials.
1
PLAUSIBILITY
How likely it is that a possible
signal indicating risk is real,
based on strength of evidence,
and/or whether a plausible
mechanism of action for
potential cardiovascular (CV)
harm has been identified
2
RELEVANCE
What relative and absolute
CV risk would need to be
excluded to determine that
the drug had an acceptable
benefit-to-risk balance
for its use in the intended
patient population
3
INFLUENCE
How plausibility and
relevance influence the
timing and approach to
further safety assessment
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
PRIOR TO A CVOT
Alternative approaches for
collecting CV data e.g.,
observational studies,
registries and electronic
health records (EHRs)
Determine whether a pre- or
post-approval CVOT is needed
Insight into other clinical
studies that have addressed
individual therapeutic agents
Rationale for a regulatory
requirement of CVOT
and generalizability of
data to other agents in
the same class
WHEN DO YOU NEED A CVOT?
CV OUTCOME STUDIES SHOULD BE BASED ON EVIDENCE
OF PLAUSIBLE RISK, AS INDICATED BY DATA IN:
The same
pharmacologic class
Statistical evidence from the
development program itself
(e.g., adverse events
and biomarkers)
Clinical judgment is
tempered by false/positive
attributions of risk and the
risk/benefit assessment
ABOUT PAREXEL
Mechanistic considerations
and clinical judgment
regarding the disease
being observed
The use of post-marketing
risk monitoring rather than
pre- or post-marketing
controlled trials should
be considered
IN THE NUMBERS (PAST 5 YEARS)
Cardiovascular outcomes trials can be
expensive, time-consuming and technically
complex studies. At PAREXEL, we bring
together best minds from scientific, clinical,
regulatory and commercial disciplines
to help you navigate the challenges in
conducting these trials. We provide
innovative solutions that can help you
more efficiently generate the evidence
needed to unlock the value of your products.
1 FDA. Guidance for Industry. Diabetes mellitus—evaluating cardiovascular risk in new antidiabetic
therapies to treat type 2 diabetes. Effective December 2008. Available at, http://www.fda.gov/
*This infographic was based on data taken from A meeting report from the Cardiac Safety
Research Consortium http://www.cardiac-safety.org/2015/02/cardiovascular-safety-outcometrials-a-meeting-report-from-the-cardiac-safety-research-consortium/
600 Late Phase studies,
including many large
complex studies
Our medical operations
professionals have managed
>41,700 events for CEC
adjudication
Optum Partnership with
access to Claims Data 150M+
lives & EHR Data 75M+ lives
For more information:
Visit our website
Email us
©2016 PAREXEL International Corporation. All rights reserved.