Download Investigating Differences in Solubility between Crystalline

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Environmental persistent pharmaceutical pollutant wikipedia , lookup

Discovery and development of cephalosporins wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacognosy wikipedia , lookup

Discovery and development of non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors wikipedia , lookup

DNA-encoded chemical library wikipedia , lookup

Environmental impact of pharmaceuticals and personal care products wikipedia , lookup

Drug discovery wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Investigating Differences in Solubility
Between Crystalline and Amorphous
Forms of Pharmaceuticals
Rhea Brent
Pharmaceutical Analytical Research and Development
AstraZeneca
Alderley Park
Aim
• To determine the differences in solubility
between amorphous and crystalline forms of
pharmaceuticals.
• To determine whether there are any trends
between these differences.
Introduction: Why is the Solidstate Form Important?
Thermodynamically Stable
Crystalline Form
Amorphous Form
Molecules packed in a
regularly ordered, repeating
pattern
Molecules in a random
arrangement.
• More stable
• Less stable
• Lower solubility
• Prone to crystallisation and
degradation
• Lower risk
• Higher solubility
• Higher Risk
Identifying the solid-state by
XRPD
• X-ray powder diffraction is a powerful tool to determine
whether a drug sample is amorphous or crystalline.
Crystalline Diffraction
Pattern
Amorphous Pattern: No
diffraction.
Dispersive scatter of x-rays
Why is Solubility Important?
•Poor solubility, poor absorption of drugs into the
body, poor bioavailability.
• Solubility is pH dependent, so is determined at
physiologically relevant pH.
• Increasingly more drugs with poor solubility being
made.
• Solubility determined early in the drug discovery
process, to assess risks involved in progressing
molecules.
Drug Discovery
ƒ Early batches material used to assess solubility:
Limited quantity (only a few mgs)
Variable purity (often low)
Often amorphous/ semi-crystalline (not enough bulk to
assess this)
ƒ Later batches produced should be the crystalline,
stable form to ensure no form changes during the
development period or on storage.
Early solubility investigations are often performed
on non-ideal material
Investigation Drivers
ƒ Study investigates effects of a change in form (from amorphous
to crystalline) will have on the solubility.
How much of an over-estimate are early
solubility measurements?
ƒ Literature describes the solubility increase from crystalline to
amorphous material has been reported to be between 10 and
1600 fold.
ƒ Selected 40 structurally diverse compounds with variable
solubilities.
ƒ Can this comparison help us to understand how crystallisation
affects solubility?
Pharm.Res Vol 17, No.4, 2000
Experimental: Outline of work
2) In pH 7.4 buffer, 24 hour
stirring, 25°C
1) By XRPD
Quantification by LC-MS
Check Crystallinity of Compounds
Measure Solubility of Crystalline Form
Prepare Amorphous Forms of test set
Measure Solubility of Amorphous Form
Perform Slurry experiments to identify form changes during experiment
3) Making amorphous
Compounds- The easy bit??
Aim: Prepare amorphous forms of all 40
compounds
Solvent Approach
ƒ
Crash cooling, rapid addition of anti-solvent, evaporation at high
temperatures.
ƒ Compounds tended to recrystallise rather than stay
amorphous
Success = 1 compound!
Grinding / milling
ƒ Mechanically disordered by grinding using a pestle and mortar
and compacting.
ƒ Only small amounts of amorphous in predominantly
crystalline bulk.
Success = 0 compounds!!
3) Making amorphous
Compounds- The easy bit??
Freeze Drying
ƒ
Freeze a dissolved sample (acetic acid) and dry under vacuum.
Hinders crystal growth.
ƒ Amorphous materials prepared, found to crystallise over
time.
ƒ Some compounds not soluble enough to dissolve.
Success = 2 compounds!
Melting and rapid cooling with liquid nitrogen
ƒ
Melt compound in pan and rapidly cool in liquid nitrogen.
ƒ Most sucessful technique, used as standard method of
preparing amorphous.
ƒ However, many compounds found to decompose using this
method.
Success = 20 compounds
4) Measuring Solubility of
Amorphous
ƒ
Solubility of amorphous measured over 24h in phosphate
buffer at pH 7.4.
ƒ Solubility measured at 10 mins, 1 and 24 hrs in excess
solid.
ƒ Excess solid analysed by XRPD to determine form.
Amophous Solubility Plot
Solubility (ug/ml)
Amorphous solubility
taken as the maximum
solubility measured during
experiment
60
40
20
0
0.16
1
Time (hours)
Chlorpromazine
24
Results: Amorphous vs.
Crystalline
Comparing 24 hour amorphous and crystalline
solubility
Solubility Changes of Amorphous from
Crystalline
Number observed
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
decrease
m oderate increase
significant increase
ƒ When amorphous solubility, taken as maximum
solubility measured, amorphous solubilities found to
differ from crystalline between 0.3 and 6000 fold
Results- The Crystallisation
Problem
ƒ Amorphous solid in contact
with solvent can crystallise
rapidly.
ƒ Solubility measured may
actually be that of semicrystalline or crystalline
material?
ƒ Crystallisation after 24
hours.
ƒ How rapidly does
crystallisation occur in
solution?
ƒ Is it a feature of the ‘forced’
amorphous material?
Terfenadine
Polarised Light Intensity
Crystalline
Amorphous
Polarised Light Experiment
Light Intensity
Polarised Light Intensity of Amorphous and
Crystalline Forms of Tamoxifen
Amorphous
Crystalline
0
500
1000
Time (mins)
1500
Looking for Trends
In theory............
ƒ Compounds with strong crystal lattices (high
melting points) will readily crystallise in solvent
hence the solubility benefit will be low.
ƒ Compounds with weak crystal lattices (low melting
points) are less prone to crystallise and therefore
amount in solution will remain high. Greater
solubility benefit.
Amorphous/Crystalline Solubility
vs. Time
Ratio of amorphous/crystalline
10000.0
mp = 99°C
1000.0
Cinnarizine
100.0
mp = 146°C
Chlorpromazine
10.0
1.0
mp = 196°C
Bifonazole
0.1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Time (Hours)
ƒ Appears to be a correlation of high melting point compounds
with a low enhancement of solubility and vice versa.
Conclusions
ƒ Difficult to make amorphous compounds from
crystalline.
ƒ The tendency to degrade and/or recrystallise is very
common.
ƒ In the majority of cases, the amorphous form of
pharmaceuticals are more soluble than the crystalline
form.
ƒ For half of the compounds the solubility increase
remained for at least 24 hours.
ƒ Physical properties e.g. melting point may indicate
the enhancement of the amorphous solubility over
that of the crystalline.
Acknowledgements
Rebecca Booth,
George Kirk,
Nicola Colclough,
Rod Kittlety,
James McCabe,
Richard Storey,
Mark Timms,
Andrew Dobson,
Jamie Scott
and Trevor Johnson
Questions?