Download Concurrent Infections (parasitism and bacterial disease) in Nile Tilapia

8th International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture 2008
1365
CONCURRENT INFECTIONS (PARASITISM
Aquatic Animal Health Research Laboratory, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, 990
Wire Rd, Auburn, Alabama, USA 36832
Abstract
Most laboratory disease studies in tilapia to date have
focused on a single parasite or a single bacterial pathogen. In
intensive tilapia aquaculture, the reality of a single disease agent
resulting in death-loss may be small. More likely, multiple
disease agents are present (i.e., parasites, bacteria and/or a
combination) and responsible for disease losses. This paper will
focus on concurrent infections or the potential for concurrent
infections in tilapia aquaculture. We will highlight a recent study
completed at our laboratory on parasitism with a monogenetic
trematode and subsequent bacterial infection with Streptococcus
iniae in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).
Concurrent
experimental infection with Gyrodactylus niloticus and S. iniae
resulted in significantly higher mortality in tilapia (about 42%) as
compared to immersion infection with S. iniae alone (7%) and
parasitism with G. niloticus only (0%). Gyrodactylus niloticus
presumably provided a portal of entry for invasive bacteria due to
damage of the fish epithelium. Interestingly, G. niloticus was
also found to harbor viable S. iniae at 24 and 72 h post infection
suggesting that G. niloticus may vector S. iniae from fish to fish.
 Aquatic Animal Health Research Laboratory, United States
Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 990
Wire Rd, Auburn, Alabama, USA 36832
Tel.:
(334) 887-3741; Fax (334) 887-2983; E-mail:
[email protected]
INTRODUCTION
Tilapia aquaculture has expanded rapidly in the last ten years. The trend of
increased production is expected to continue due to the increased demand for tilapia
in the international market.
To meet the increased demand, intensification of
production will undoubtedly occur. Intensive fish production often results in increased
disease due to poor water quality and high stock densities used. Tilapias are
susceptible to a number of infectious agents including bacteria and parasites
(Shoemaker et al. 2006). Research is typically aimed at a single disease agent and
not at concurrent infections. In reality, most intensive tilapia production systems
probably have multiple disease agents resulting in death-loss.
Two important
pathogens of tilapia are Streptococcus iniae (Figure 1), a gram positive bacteria
responsible for significant losses in intensive culture (Perera et al. 1994; Stoffregen et
al. 1996; Shoemaker and Klesius 1997; Bowser et al. 1998; Klesius et al. 1999;
Shoemaker et al. 2000; 2001), and Gyrodactylus niloticus, a monogenetic trematode
that can cause problems in young fish stocked at high numbers in eutrophic (nutrient
rich) waters (Klesius and Rogers 1995; Shoemaker et al. 2006).
Cusack and Cone (1986) reviewed the limited information on the ability of
parasites to vector viral and bacterial diseases of fish. They concluded that parasite
1366
CONCURRENT INFECTIONS (PARASITISM AND BACTERIAL DIESEASE) in TILAPIA
vectors increase the transmission efficiency of pathogens by creating portals of entry
and/or by having the ability to transfer pathogens directly from fish to fish. Recent
studies have demonstrated that Cusack and Cone’s hypothesis was correct (Kanno et
al. 1990; Pylkkö et al. 2006; Bandilla et al. 2006; Evans et al. 2007).
Other studies
suggest different mechanisms that increase host susceptibility; for example, parasitism
has been shown to result in increased stress responses believed to be linked to
decreased disease resistance (Bowers et al. 2000; Tully and Nolan 2002).
This
manuscript will highlight a recent study where we evaluated concurrent G. niloticus
and S. iniae infections in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). We will further discuss
trends in examining concurrent parasitism and bacterial infection in fish.
Figure 1. A Streptococcus iniae infected tilapia showing spinal curvature and erratic
swimming and B) positive starch reaction of Streptococcus iniae. (arrow
shows the zone of hydrolysis).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fish and parasite
Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, reared in tanks using filtered recirculated
water at the Aquatic Animal Health Research Laboratory, Auburn, Alabama were used
as experimental animals.
Upon examination of the gills and fin under a light
CRAIG A. SHOEMAKER et al.
1367
microscope, this stock had a mean intensity of Gyrodactylus of less than 10 per fish.
The parasites were identified as G. niloticus (Cone et al. 1995) (Figure 2). Intense
infections were developed by holding 50 or more fish in 57-L aquaria for 1-2 weeks.
Dead fish killed by heavy parasite burden were removed and naïve individuals added
back to maintain the parasite population (Busch et al. 2003). During the trial, the
mean ± standard deviation of dissolved oxygen (DO) was 6.5 ± 0.7 mg L-1,
temperature was 26.4 ± 0.6 °C, pH was 7.4 ± 0.2, ammonia was 0.2 ± 0.1 mg L -1,
and hardness was 91.9 ± 12.3 mg L-1.
Nitrite concentrations were below the
threshold for detection.
Figure 2. Gyrodactylus niloticus shown associated and attached to gill filaments from a
parasitized tilapia.
Examination of Gyrodactylus infection of fish
Four wet mount samples were prepared from each fish to assess intensity, two
from the caudal fin and two from the gill.
Mucus was scraped with a glass cover slip
from entire caudal fin, each side of the fin representing one sample. Gill filaments (5
× 5 mm) were clipped from the left and right branchial arches, placed in a wet mount
and compressed by applying pressure using a cover slip.
These samples were
examined using a compound microscope (Olympus, Orangeburg, New York) at low
magnification. The entire wet mount was scanned from left to right and from top to
bottom to enumerate the parasites.
Bacterial isolation
An isolate of S. iniae (ARS-98-60), originally isolated from a hybrid striped bass
(Morone chrysops X M. saxatilis), was obtained from diseased tilapia in the laboratory
CONCURRENT INFECTIONS (PARASITISM AND BACTERIAL DIESEASE) in TILAPIA
1368
and identified biochemically (Shoemaker and Klesius 1997). The isolate was grown on
a sheep blood agar plate and then cultured in tryptic soy broth (Difco, Becton
Dickinson, Sparks, MD) for 24 h at 28°C and used to challenge the tilapia. Dead or
moribund tilapia were removed twice daily during the trial and bacterial samples
aseptically obtained from brain of tilapia were streaked onto 5% sheep blood agar
plates.
Bacterial colonies with beta-hemolysis, testing negative for catalase
production, positive by Gram-stain and having a coccoid morphology were considered
S. iniae positive. Forty fish (20 Gyrodatylus infected and 20 non-infected fish) were
cultured to verify the S. iniae free status prior to each trial.
Streptococcus iniae infection trial
Tilapia infected with G. niloticus was divided into 2 groups, one group treated
with formalin and potassium permanganate and the other received no treatment. The
treated group of fish was immersed in formalin at 100 mg L -1 for one hour on Day 1.
Potassium permanganate was added to tanks at 5 mg L -1 to treat fish for 1 h on Day 2
and Day 3, respectively. After treatment, flowing water was provided to each tank at
0.5 L min-1. The treated fish were allowed one week to recover from parasite infection
and chemical treatment. A total of 200 tilapia infected with G. niloticus and 200 fish
parasite free were used [fish ranged from 9.0 ± 0.6 (mean ± SD) cm in length and
11.7 ± 2.6 g in body weight (N=20)]. Ninety fish were used in each of four groups: 1)
G. niloticus infection and challenged with S. iniae (G-S), 2) no parasite infection and
challenged with S. iniae (N-S), 3) G. niloticus infected and no S. iniae (G-N) and 4) no
G. niloticus and no S. iniae (N-N), with 30 fish per tank and 3 tanks per group. The
remaining fish (20 infected with G. niloticus and 20 treated fish without parasite) were
examined for parasite load and S. iniae infection prior to the trial. Twelve buckets,
one for each aquarium, were filled with 2-L tank water and 30 fish per bucket with
aeration. For fish challenged with S. iniae, the bacterial suspension was added to the
bucket at the rate of 107 colony-forming units (CFU) mL-1. After immersion for 1 h,
the fish from each bucket were moved to a 57-L aquarium with flowing water at 0.40.5 L min-1 with aeration.
Mortality of fish was recorded, and dead or moribund fish
were examined for parasite load and S. iniae infection twice daily for 2 weeks.
Five
surviving fish from each tank were sampled for S. iniae at trial termination.
Collection of G. niloticus from S. iniae infected tilapia
Tilapia infected by G. niloticus at 40 (SD 8, N=10) parasites per wet mount
sample from caudal fin and 20 (SD 9) from gill were distributed into 3 buckets, 35 fish
per bucket. Fish in each bucket received one of following treatments: 1) S. iniae IP
injected, 2) S. iniae immersion exposed, and 3) no treatment (control). Each fish in
the injected group was IP injected with 0.1 ml of S. iniae, equal to 108 CFU fish-1.
Thirty-five tilapia were immersed in 2-L water with 7 × 107 CFU mL-1 S. iniae for one
CRAIG A. SHOEMAKER et al.
1369
hour. Fish in each bucket were then moved to a 57-L aquarium and ten fish in each
group were sampled 24 and 72 h post exposure to S. iniae.
Gyrodactylus was
collected only from live or moribund fish since the parasites leave the fish shortly after
death. At sampling, one tilapia at a time was placed in 50 ml cold MS-222 solution
(300 mg mL-1) in a 500 mL beaker.
solution using a Pasteur pipette.
Fish body surface was washed with MS-222
The solution containing the parasite was passed
through a screen with an aperture of 425 µm, transferred to a 50-mL centrifuge tube
and centrifuge at 90 g for 3 min. All parasites collected from an individual fish were
pooled and counted as one sample.
The parasites were treated with 300 IU of
-1
penicillin mL and 300 µg streptomycin mL-1 (Sigma) for 15 min, washed 3 times with
sterile water in 15 mL centrifuge tubes centrifuged at low speed (90 g). The washed
G. niloticus was transferred to a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube containing 0.5 mL sterile
water, vortexed at high speed for one min, inoculated onto Columbia CNA 5% sheep
blood agar and incubated at 28 °C for 24-48 h to identify S. iniae colonies (Shoemaker
& Klesius 1997).
Statistical analysis
Percentage of fish positive for S. iniae and mortality of fish from different
treatments were analyzed with Duncan multiple range tests (SAS Institute 1989).
Median days to death were calculated and compared by Lifetest procedure (SAS
Institute 1989) (Kaplan-Meier method). Probabilities less than 0.05 were considered
significant.
RESULTS
Streptococcus iniae infection trial
Mortality was 42.2% in the G-S group, which was significantly higher (P < 0.05)
than fish exposed to S. iniae but not G. niloticus (N-S group=6.7%, Table 1). No G-N
or N-N control fish died during the trial. S. iniae was isolated from all dead fish with
SBA except 3 out of 38 fish from the G-S group. The percentages of fish culture
positive for S. iniae were 92.1% and 100% for fish in the G-S and the N-S groups,
respectively. Bacteriologic examination revealed no S. iniae from fish prior to the trial
or from surviving fish.
Gyrodactylus niloticus was found on the gills and fins of all fish in groups G-S
and G-N throughout the trial (Table 2). Intensity of infection was higher at the start
of the experiments but lower on surviving fish. The parasite was rarely found on fish
that had been treated with formalin and K 2MnO4.
Table 1. Cumulative mortality of Gyrodactylus niloticus infected Nile tilapia 14 days
post-S. iniae immersion challenge. Within a given column, means (± SD)
followed by different superscript letters are statistically different ( P < 0.05)
(Xu et al. 2007).
CONCURRENT INFECTIONS (PARASITISM AND BACTERIAL DIESEASE) in TILAPIA
1370
Parasite Infection
Challenge
Mortality (%)
Mean days to death
(N=90)
Gyrodactylus
S. iniae (G-S)
42.2 ± 10.7
No infection
S. iniae (N-S)
6.7 ± 0
Gyrodactylus
None (G-N)
No infection
None (N-N)
a
b
7.8 ± 0.3
a
7.8 ± 0.1
a
0±0
b
NA *
0±0
b
NA
* Not available.
Isolation of S. iniae from infected tilapia and G. niloticus
In this trial, 36.7% and 40.0% of fish infected by G. niloticus died 72 h post-S.
iniae challenge by IP injection and immersion, respectively.
All dead fish from IP
injected and 40% fish from immersion exposure were positive for S. iniae 24 h post
challenge. Fish were 44.4% and 37.5% positive for S. iniae when challenged by IP
injection and immersion, respectively, 72 h post challenge. In tilapia co-infected with
S. iniae and G. niloticus, S. iniae was isolated from 60% and 11% of G. niloticus
collected 24 and 72 h, respectively, from fish IP injected with S. iniae (Table 3).
Forty and 25% of parasites cultured from immersion exposed fish were positive for S.
iniae when collected at 24 and 72 h.
Table 2. Number of Gyrodactylus niloticus in fin and gill samples of Nile tilapia (Xu et
al. 2007).
Fish group
Day 0
Day 1-13
Day 14
No.
Fin
Gill
No.
Fin
Gill
No.
Fin
Gill
G – S*
40
19 ± 4
29 ± 7
32
45 ± 10
20 ± 5
30
3±1
4±1
N–S
40
0±0
0±0
4
0±0
0±0
30
0±0
0±0
G–N
40
19 ± 4
29 ± 7
NA
NA
NA
30
4±2
1±0
40
0±0
0±0
NA
NA
NA
30
0±0
0±0
N–N

G-S: Gyrodactylus niloticus infected and challenged with S. iniae, N-S: no parasite infection and
challenged with S. iniae, G-N: Gyrodactylus niloticus infection and no S. iniae, and N-N: no G. niloticus
and no S. iniae infection.
Table 3. Number (n) of Gyrodactylus niloticus samples positive for Streptococcus iniae
at 24 or 72 h post challenge with S. iniae.
All Gyrodactylus niloticus
collected from an individual fish were pooled and counted as one sample
(Xu et al. 2007).
Gyrodactylus niloticus
Streptococcal Challenge
IP injection
24 h S. iniae positive
Immersion
Not exposed
n/ samples
%
n/ samples
%
N/samples
%
6/10
60
4/10
40
0/10
0
CRAIG A. SHOEMAKER et al.
72 h S. iniae positive
1/9
11
2/8
1371
25
0/10
0
DISCUSSION
Anecdotal data have suggested the possible role of parasites in enhancing
infections of fish with bacterial pathogens. For example, Plumb (1997) reported that
in a recirculation tilapia production facility, presence of Trichodina spp. presumably
caused epidermal injuries that lead to streptococcal and edwarsiellosis infections that
could not be controlled by antibiotics. Control of the parasite with formalin resulted in
a decrease in overall death loss. Cusack and Cone (1985) demonstrated the presence
of bacteria in close association with monogenetic trematodes using scanning electron
microscopy and suggested a vectoring role for ectoparasites. Others (Roberts and
Summerville 1982; Kabata 1985; Buchmann and Bresciani 1997) also suggest the
enhancement of secondary bacterial infections due to presence of ectoparasites.
However, until recently, few studies documented these interactions.
The present
study demonstrated that captive tilapia with a single infection of G. niloticus or of S.
iniae had less than 7% total mortality.
increased significantly.
However, during co-infection, mortality
The present experimental challenge study helps to confirm
earlier impressions that under farm conditions these two diseases can occur together
with devastating results.
Gyrodactylus spp. may serve as a vector for S. iniae as well as damage fish
epithelium and create portals of entry for bacterial invasion. G. niloticus attaches to
fish gills, fins and skin by a posterior attachment haptor with one large anchor and 16
marginal hooklets (Hoffman 1985). The invasion and movement of parasites from one
location to another on fish cause mechanical injuries to the epithelium (Cone and
Odense 1984). These injuries may serve as portals of entry for bacterial invasion
making fish with G. niloticus infection more susceptible to S. iniae. In the present
study, S. iniae was isolated from Gyrodactylus collected not only from fish exposed to
S. iniae by immersion but also from fish infected by IP injection.
The material
ingested while Gyrodactylus feeds on fish epithelia (blood or tissues) passes to the
parasite gut (Buchmann and Lindenstrøm 2002). The results suggest that S. iniae was
ingested by G. niloticus and survived in the parasite for approximately 72 hours. Busch
et al. (2003) studied concomitant infection of G. derjavini and Flavobacterium
psychrophilum in trout.
Results of their study suggested that invasion by F.
psychrophilum was only slightly enhanced by presence of G. derjavini and mortality
was correlated to gyrodactylid infection (Table 4).
Interestingly, the highest mortality
occurred in the group with highest number of parasites concurrently infected with F.
CONCURRENT INFECTIONS (PARASITISM AND BACTERIAL DIESEASE) in TILAPIA
1372
psychrophilum.
These authors (Busch et al. 2003) did not try and isolate F.
psychrophilum from G. derjavini.
Table 4. Recent literature documenting concurrent infections between parasites and
bacterial diseases in fish.
Study
Parasite/Bacteria
Result
Trichodina spp.
Concurrent
Streptococcus iniae
susceptible to streptococcal disease
(Fish species)
Evans et al. 2007
(channel
catfish,
Ictalurus
infection
made
catfish
punctatus)
S. agalactiae
Bandilla et al. 2006
Argulus coregoni
Parasitic
(rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus
Flavobacterium columnare
susceptibility of trout to columnaris
mykiss)
infection
increased
the
disease
Pylkkö et al. 2006
Diplostomum spathaeceum
Presence of D. spathaeceum invasion
(grayling,
Aeromonas salmonicida
in fish increased the proportion of fish
Thymallus thymallus)
carrying A. salmonicida
Busch et al. 2003
Gyrodactylus derjavini
Correlated
(rainbow trout)
F. psychrophilum
gyrodactylid infection level
host
mortality
to
Studies in other fish species have recently linked parasitic disease and bacterial
infection (Table 4). Evans et al. (2007) showed that parasitism of channel catfish
(Ictalurus punctatus) fry with Tricodina sp. resulted in increased susceptibility of
catfish to streptococcal disease caused by either S. iniae or S. agalactiae.
These
authors further suggested that parasite-induced mechanical injury increased fish
susceptibility. Mechanical injury due to invasion and/or feeding of parasites has also
been shown in coldwater fish species. Bandilla et al. (2006) demonstrated an increase
in disease due to Flavobacterium columnare, if fish were co-infected with Argulus
coregoni. They suggested that the parasite feeding on the skin was responsible for
damage and possibly aided bacterial attachment.
Another study suggested that
infection with a digenetic trematode ( Diplostomum spathaceum) resulted in more
Aeromonas salmonicida cells in heart tissue than in fish without trematode infection
(Pylkkö et al.
2006). However, increased mortality due to the presence of both
infectious agents was not observed. While many of the studies have demonstrated an
association between concurrent infectious agents and disease in fish, some have
produced unequivocal results. This area of research is relatively little studied in tilapia.
Due to the intensification of culture conditions, studies examining multiple pathogens
will be invaluable to solve tilapia producers’ current and future problems.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
CRAIG A. SHOEMAKER et al.
1373
We thank Drs. Tom Welker and David Pasnik (USDA-ARS) for critical review of the
manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. Bandilla M., E. T. Valtonen, L-R Suomalainen, P. J. Aphalo and T. Hakalahti. 2006.
A link between ectoparasite infection and susceptibility to bacterial disease in
rainbow trout. Int. J. Parasitol. 36, 987-991.
2. Bowers J. M., A. Mustafa, D. J. Speare, G. A. Conboy, M. Brimacombe, D. E. Sims
and J. F. Burka. 2000. The physiological response of Atalntic salmon, Salmo salar
L., to a single experimental challenge with sea lice, Lepeophtheirus salmonis. J.
Fish Dis. 23, 165-172.
3. Bowser P. R., G. A. Wooster, R. G. Getchell and M. B. Timmons. 1998.
Streptococcus iniae infection of tilapia Oreochromis niloticus in a recirculation
production facility. J. World Aquac. Soc. 29, 335–339.
4. Buchmann K. and J. Brescian. 1997. Parasitic infection in pond-reared rainbow
trout Oncorhynchus mykiss in Denmark. Dis. Aquat. Org. 28, 125-138.
5. Buchmann K. and T. Lindenstrøm. 2002.
Interactions between monogenean
parasites and their fish hosts. Int. J. Parasitol. 32, 309-319.
6. Busch S., I. Dalsgaard and K. Buchmann.
2003.
Concomitant exposure of
rainbow trout fry to Gyrodactylus derjavini and Flavobacterium psychrophilum:
effects on infection and mortality of host. Vet. Parasitol. 117, 117-122.
7. Cone D. K., J. R. Arthur and M. G. Bondad-Reantaso. 1995. Description of two
new species of Gyrodactylus von Nordmann, 1832 (Monogenea) from cultured Nile
tilapia, Tilapia nilotica (Cichlidae), in the Philippines. Proc. Helminthol. Soc. Wash.
62, 6-9.
8. Cone D. K. and P. H. Odense 1984. Pathology of five species of Gyrodactylus
Nordmann, 1832 (Monogenea). Can. J. Zool. 62, 1084-1088.
9. Cusack R. and D. K .Cone. 1985.
A report of bacterial microcolonies on the
surface of Gyrodactylus (Monogenea). J. Fish Dis. 8, 125-127.
10. Cusack R. and D. K. Cone. 1986. A review of parasites as vectors of viral and
bacterial diseases of fish. J. Fish Dis. 9, 169-171.
11. Evans J. J., P. H. Klesius., D. J. Pasnik and C. A. Shoemaker. 2007. Influence of
natural Trichodina sp. parasitism on experimental Streptococcus iniae or
Streptococcus agalactiae infection and survival of young channel catfish Ictalurus
punctatus (Rafinesque). Aquaculture Res. 38, 664-667.
1374
CONCURRENT INFECTIONS (PARASITISM AND BACTERIAL DIESEASE) in TILAPIA
12. Kanno T., T. Nakai and K. Muroga. 1990. Scanning electron microscopy on the
skin surface of ayu Plecoglossus altivelis infected with Vibrio anguillarum. Dis.
Aquat. Org. 8, 73-75.
13. Kabata Z. 1985. Parasites and diseases of fish cultured in the tropics. Taylor and
Francis, Philadelphia. 318p.
14. Klesius P. and W. Rogers. 1995. Parasitisms of catfish and other farm raised food
fish. J. Amer. Vet. Med. Assoc. 207, 1473-1478.
15. Klesius P. H., C. A. Shoemaker and J. J. Evans.
1999.
Efficacy of a killed
Streptococcus iniae vaccine in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).
Bull. Eur. Assoc.
Fish Pathol. 19(1), 39-41.
16. Perera R. P., S. K. Johnson, M. D. Collins and D. H. Lewis. 1994. Streptococcus
iniae associated mortality of Tilapia nilotica × T. aurea hybrids. J. Aquat. Anim.
Health 6, 335–340.
17. Plumb J. A. 1997. Infectious diseases of tilapia. In: Tilapia aquaculture in the
Americas (ed by B.A. Costa-Pierce & J. E. Rakocy), pp 212-228, World Aquaculture
Society, Bataon Rouge, Louisiana.
18. Pylkkö P., L-R Suomalainen, M. Tiirola and E. Tellervo Valtonen. 2006. Evidence
of enhanced bacterial invasion during Diplostomum spathaceum infection in
European grayling, Thymallus thymallus (L.). J. Fish Dis. 29: 79-68.
19. Roberts R. J. and C. Sommerville. 1982. Diseases of tilapias. In R.S.V. Pullin and
R. H. Lowe-McConnel (Eds.), The biology and culture of tilapias (pp 247-263).
Manila, Philippines: ICLARM Conference Proceedings 7.
20. SAS Institute. 1989. SAS/Stat user΄s guide, Ver. 6, 4th edn. SAS Institute, Cary,
NC, USA.
21. Shoemaker C.A. and Klesius P.H. 1997.
Streptococcal disease problems and
control: a review. In: Tilapia Aquaculture (ed. by K. Fitzsimmons), pp 671-680.
Northeast Regional Aquacultural Engineering Service, Ithaca, New York.
22. Shoemaker C.A., J. J. Evans and P. H. Klesius. 2000. Density and dose: factors
affecting mortality of Streptococcus iniae infected tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).
Aquaculture 188: 229-235.
23. Shoemaker C. A., P. H. Klesius and J. J. Evans. 2001. Prevalence of Streptococcus
iniae in tilapia, hybrid striped bass and channel catfish from fish farms in the
United States. Amer. J. Vet. Res. 62: 174-177.
CRAIG A. SHOEMAKER et al.
1375
24. Shoemaker C. A., Xu De-Hai, J. J. Evans and P. H. Klesius. 2006. Parasites and
Diseases. In C. Lim and C.D. Webster (eds) Tilapia: Biology, Culture and Nutrition
(pp. 561-582). The Haworth Press, Inc., Binghamton, NY.
25. Stoffregen D. A., S. C. Backman, R. E. Perham, P. R. Bowser and J. G. Babish.
1996.
Initial disease report of Streptococcus iniae infection in hybrid striped
(sunshine) bass and successful therapeutic intervention with fluoroquinolone
antibacterial enerofloxacin. J. World Aquac. Soc. 27: 420–436.
26. Tully O. and D. T. Nolan. 2002. A review of the population biology and hostparasite interactions of the sea louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Copepoda:
Caligidae). Parasitology 124: 165-182.
27. Xu De-Hai, C. A. Shoemaker and P. H. Klesius. 2007.
Evaluation of the link
between gyrodactylosis and streptococcosis of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus
(L.). J. Fish Dis. 30: 233-238.