Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
NIDDK Diabetes Research Judith Fradkin, M.D. Director, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, NIDDK AANHPI/NCAPIP August 27, 2016 Clinical Studies: Diabetes Normal Prediabetes Type 2 Diabetes Type 1 Diabetes Complications The DPP Study 3234 participants (45% minority) with IGT who were overweight or obese Compared 3 approaches to diabetes prevention for 3 years: Placebo Metformin Lifestyle DPP Study Population Caucasian 1768 African-American 645 Hispanic-American 508 Asian-American & Pacific Islander 142 American Indian 171 Asian/Pacific Islander 4% American Indian Hispanic 5% American 16% African American 20% Caucasian 55% ~67% women 20% older than age 60 Mean age 50, BMI-34 History of GDM 16% DPP Diabetes Rates Placebo Metformin Lifestyle Cases/100 person-yr 12 8 4 0 Caucasian (n=1768) African American (n=645) Hispanic (n=508) American Indian (n=171) Asian (n=142) Vitamin D for Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes 4000 units Vitamin D daily vs placebo 2500 Participants with prediabetes BMI >22.5 for Asian/PI participants Recruitment ongoing; Asian/PI currently constitute 5.5% of participants GRADE Goals • To provide an unbiased comparison of the most commonly used drugs to treat diabetes in metformin-treated patients with relatively recent-onset type 2 diabetes. • To determine patient characteristics and mechanisms associated with differential responses to medications to facilitate individualization of diabetes care. GRADE Goals • Practical and generalizable with potential for immediate translation • Capture characteristics important to patient and society • Capture majority of drugs in common use • Compare drugs over a clinically meaningful period of time (> 4 years) • Use meds based on labeling and usual use • Fair, balanced comparison Study Population • • • • • Type 2 diabetes Age >30 years (>20 for Am. Indians) Duration diagnosed diabetes < 10 years HbA1c 6.8-8.5% at end of run-in Must be able to tolerate at least 1000 mg metformin daily (Goal 1000 mg BID) Meant to represent relatively new-onset Type 2 diabetes. Screening Type 2 diabetes Treated with metformin alone HbA1c >6.8% at screening <10 years duration of diagnosed diabetes at Screening Metformin run-in Titrate metformin to 1000 (min) – 2000 (goal) mg/day HbA1c 6.8-8.5% at final run-in visit Randomization n=5000 eligible subjects Sulfonylurea (glimepiride) n=1250 DPP-4 inhibitor (sitagliptin) n=1250 GLP-1 analog (liraglutide) n=1250 Insulin (glargine) n=1250 Design Glimepiride + Metformin n=1250 Sitagliptin + Metformin n=1250 Liraglutide + Metformin n=1250 Glargine + Metformin n=1250 Primary outcome HbA1c >7%, confirmed, on maximally tolerated dose of assigned regimen Observe on assigned therapy Secondary metabolic outcome HbA1c >7.5%, confirmed, on maximally tolerated dose of assigned regimen Add basal insulin (per glargine protocol) Continue Metformin, continue second agent Tertiary metabolic outcome HbA1c >7.5%, confirmed, on glargine, assigned agent and metformin Intensify insulin (add rapid-acting insulin to basal glargine), continue metformin, and discontinue second agent State of the Union Address January 20, 2015 “Tonight, I’m launching a new Precision Medicine Initiative to bring us closer to curing diseases like cancer and diabetes — and to give all of us access to the personalized information we need to keep ourselves and our families healthier.” 12 Assembling the PMI Cohort One million or more U.S. volunteers — Broadly reflect the diversity of America (including family members of all ages, health statuses, areas) — Strong focus on underrepresented groups Longitudinal cohort, with continuing interactions, recontactable for secondary studies — Collect EHR data, provide biospecimen(s) and survey, and complete a baseline exam Two methods of enrollment — Direct volunteers: anyone can sign up — Healthcare provider organizations (incl. FQHCs): diverse participants, robust EHRs, participant follow-up Substantial participant engagement in development, implementation, governance 13 The Accelerating Medicines Partnership (AMP) Public-private partnership: government, industry, non-profit organizations, universities Goal: facilitate identification of new targets for diagnosis and therapy in selected disease areas Approach: forge a new model for drug development by working together to identify and validate promising biological targets Initial disease areas: • type 2 diabetes (T2D) • Alzheimer disease • autoimmune disorders lupus & rheumatoid arthritis 14 Novel genetic variants associated with type 2 diabetes can be discovered by studying different ancestry groups Most risk variants are shared across ancestry groups Allele frequency varies substantially across ancestry groups Studying genome wide associations in multiple ethnic/racial groups does yield variants strongly associated with diabetes only in certain populations Highlights need to aggregate available genetic studies from diabetes cohorts NIDDK and pharmaceutical partners have developed a new resource to enable study of genetics of diabetes and related traits Type 2 Diabetes Knowledge Portal New tool to explore relationship between genetic risk variants and diabetes associated traits across major ancestry groups User friendly tools to query large datasets from multiple cohorts www.type2diabetesgenetics.org Populations in Genetics Studies Lek M et al- Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humansExome Aggregation Consortium, Nature. 2016. Proportion of Type 1 and Type 2 DM by Race/Ethnicity in Youth aged 10-19 Years NHW NHB Hispanic ASPI AIAN 4.4% 29.0% 27.2% 71.0% 31.8% 26.3% 72.8% 73.7% 68.2% 95.6% Type 1 Type 2 NHW: non-Hispanic white; NHB: non-Hispanic black; API: Asian or Pacific Islander; AIAN: American Indian or Alaska Native Hamman et al. ADA 2012 SEARCH Glycemic Control Data for Type 2 Diabetes by Race/Ethnicity 80 % HbA1c Distribution 70 60 50 Good 40 Intermediate 30 Poor 20 10 0 NHW AA H A/PI AI “Good”: age specific HbA1c, < 6 yr, <8.5%; 6-12 yr, <8.0%; 13-18 yr, <7.5%; 19+ yr, <7.0% “Intermediate”: HbA1c between “good” and “poor” “Poor”: HbA1c ≥ 9.5% J Peds 155: 668, 2009 Prevalence of Diabetes in Youth By Age, Race/Ethnicity, and Clinical Type, 2001 3.0 3.0 NHW Prevalence (per 1,000) 2.5 AA 2.5 H A/PI 2.0 2.0 AI 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 T1 T2 Ages 0-9 years T1 T2 Ages 10-19 years Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet P2P Pathway to Prevention Eligibility Requirements • Anyone between age 1 and 45 with a sibling, child or parent with type 1 • Anyone between age 1 and 20 with a sibling, child, parent, cousin, uncle, aunt, niece, nephew, grandparent or half-sibling with T1D • Those under 18 who do not have autoantibodies can be retested every year www.diabetestrialnet.org Tracy Rodriguez TrialNet Coordinator, UCSF 21 Translational Research T1 Translation Basic science discoveries used to develop new treatments Basic Research T2 Translation Testing use of proven therapies in clinical practice & community settings Clinical Research Efficacy Trials Basic Research Discovery -Mechanisms -Associations Public Health Effectiveness Trials Dissemination & Implementation Research Translational Research Projects Examples in Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders Role of stress and interaction of stress with behavior/lifestyle factors in diabetes risk in Chinese immigrants Use of smart phones and social media to improve outcomes for Filipino Americans with diabetes Ascertainment of diabetes prevalence and risk factors in 10 Asian/PI subpopulations in Hawaii using EHRs Major T2D Clinical Research Needs Management of diabetes in the elderly Management of glycemia in hospitalized patients CVD prevention Foot ulcer prevention and therapy Treatment of GDM Improving diabetes care in primary care setting/reducing disparities Defining heterogeneity for individualized care NHANES Survey: Diabetes Prevalence in U.S. Adults 2011-2012 Undiagnosed diabetes as percent of total 24.6 diabetes cases: 32.8 39.7 36.8 35.2 40.2 26.9 15.5 25.0 Total diabetes prevalence 20.0 Percent Diagnosed 15.0 Undiagnosed 10.0 5.0 0.0 Race-ethnicity (age-adjusted) Age (unadjusted) Menke A, Casagrande S, Geiss L, and Cowie CC. Prevalence of and Trends in Diabetes Among Adults in the United States, 1988-2012. JAMA 314: 1021-1029, 2015.; Table 2 NDEP Diabetes Prevention and Control Messages Available to download at www.ndep.nih.gov