Download How to write a patient case report

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Medical ethics wikipedia , lookup

Adherence (medicine) wikipedia , lookup

Patient safety wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Electronic prescribing wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
02)-%2 0ATIENTCASEREPORT
02)-%2
)PXUPXSJUFBQBUJFOUDBTFSFQPSU
(%.29#/(%.
1
UBLISHED PATIENT CASE REPORTS
PROVIDE ESSENTIAL SOURCES OF
INFORMATION FOR THE OPTIMUM
CAREOFPATIENTSBECAUSECASEREPORTS
CANDESCRIBEIMPORTANTSCIENTIlCOB
SERVATIONSTHATAREMISSEDORAREUN
DETECTABLE IN CLINICAL TRIALS PROVIDE
INSIGHTFUL INFORMATION THAT EXPANDS
OUR KNOWLEDGE AND SPAWNS NEW RE
SEARCHANDPROVIDEINFORMATIONTHAT
STRAYSFROMTHECLASSICALTEXTBOOKCASE
ANDLEADSTOBETTERANDSAFERPATIENT
CARE)NDEEDACASEREPORTOF+APOSIS
SARCOMA IN A YOUNG HOMOSEXUAL
MAN IS THE SEMINAL OBSERVATION TO
THE DEVELOPMENT OF ACQUIRED IM
MUNEDElCIENCYSYNDROME3EMINAL
PATIENTCASEREPORTSLINKEDTHE&OOD
AND $RUG !DMINISTRATIONAPPROVED
INDICATION FOR THE ANOREXIC AGENTS
FENmURAMINE AND DEXFENmURAMINE
WITH PRIMARY PULMONARY HYPERTEN
SION AND SUBSEQUENTLY SPAWNED TRI
ALS THAT EVALUATED THE MECHANISM
INCIDENCE AND RISK FACTORS OF THIS
ADVERSE EFFECT CULMINATING IN THEIR
WITHDRAWALFROMTHEMARKET
-ANYBIOMEDICALJOURNALSPUBLISH
CASEREPORTSANDPROVIDEAUTHORSWITH
GUIDELINES THAT PROVIDE INSTRUCTION
FOR ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA CONTENT AND
FORMAT4HETYPESOFRELEVANTPATIENT
CASE REPORTS THAT MERIT PUBLICATION
ARELISTEDIN!PPENDIX!4HISARTICLE
1VSQPTF (VJEFMJOFT GPS XSJUJOH QBUJFOU
DBTF SFQPSUT XJUI B GPDVT PO NFEJDBUJPO
SFMBUFESFQPSUTBSFQSPWJEFE
4VNNBSZ 5IF GPSNBU PG B QBUJFOU DBTF
SFQPSU FODPNQBTTFT UIF GPMMPXJOH GJWF
TFDUJPOT BO BCTUSBDU BO JOUSPEVDUJPO BOE
PCKFDUJWFUIBUDPOUBJOBMJUFSBUVSFSFWJFXB
EFTDSJQUJPOPGUIFDBTFSFQPSUBEJTDVTTJPO
UIBUJODMVEFTBEFUBJMFEFYQMBOBUJPOPGUIF
MJUFSBUVSF SFWJFX B TVNNBSZ PG UIF DBTF
BOEBDPODMVTJPO5IFBCTUSBDUPGBQBUJFOU
DBTF SFQPSU TIPVME TVDDJODUMZ JODMVEF UIF
GPVSTFDUJPOTPGUIFNBJOUFYUPGUIFSFQPSU
5IF JOUSPEVDUJPO TFDUJPO TIPVME QSPWJEF
UIFTVCKFDUQVSQPTFBOENFSJUPGUIFDBTF
SFQPSU*UNVTUFYQMBJOXIZUIFDBTFSFQPSU
JT OPWFM PS NFSJUT SFWJFX BOE JU TIPVME
JODMVEF B DPNQSFIFOTJWF MJUFSBUVSF SFWJFX
UIBU DPSSPCPSBUFT UIF BVUIPST DMBJNT 5IF
DBTF QSFTFOUBUJPO TFDUJPO TIPVME EFTDSJCF
UIF DBTF JO DISPOPMPHJDBM PSEFS BOE JO
*OEFY UFSNT %SVHT BEWFSTF SFBDUJPOT
(VJEFMJOFT3FQPSUT8SJUJOH
"N + )FBMUI4ZTU 1IBSN WILL PROVIDE GUIDELINES FOR WRITING THECASEANDACONCLUSION3UPPLE
PATIENTCASEREPORTSWITHAFOCUSON MENTARYPARTSSUCHASTABLESlGURES
GRAPHS AND ILLUSTRATIONS PROVIDE ES
MEDICATIONRELATEDREPORTS
SENTIALDATAANDWILLENHANCETHEARTI
'PSNBUPGUIFQBUJFOUDBTFSFQPSU
CLESmOWANDCLARITY'ENERALLYMOST
#ASE REPORTS SHOULD ENCOMPASS OFTHEDATACONTAINEDINSUPPLEMEN
THE FOLLOWING lVE SECTIONS AN AB TARY PARTS SHOULD NOT BE DUPLICATED
STRACTANINTRODUCTIONANDOBJECTIVE INTHETEXT0ATIENTCASEREPORTSCAN
WITHALITERATUREREVIEWADESCRIPTION DESCRIBEASINGLECASEREPORTORASE
OF THE CASE REPORT A DISCUSSION THAT RIESOFCASEREPORTS#ASEREPORTSARE
INCLUDES A DETAILED EXPLANATION OF GENERALLYnWORDSINLENGTH
THE LITERATURE REVIEW A SUMMARY OF WITHnREFERENCES4HETITLEOFTHE
(%.29 #/(%. -3 0(!2-$ &##- "#00 #'0 IS !SSOCIATE
0ROFESSOROF0HARMACY0RACTICE!RNOLD-ARIE3CHWARTZ#OLLEGEOF
0HARMACY(EALTH3CIENCES,ONG)SLAND5NIVERSITY"ROOKLYN.9
AND$IRECTOROF0HARMACOTHERAPY%DUCATION2ESEARCHAND2ESIDEN
CY0ROGRAMS$EPARTMENTSOF0HARMACYAND-EDICINE+INGSBROOK
*EWISH-EDICAL#ENTER"ROOKLYN
!DDRESSCORRESPONDENCETO$R#OHENATTHE$EPARTMENTOF0HAR
FOPVHI EFUBJM GPS UIF SFBEFS UP FTUBCMJTI
IJTPSIFSPXODPODMVTJPOTBCPVUUIFDBTFT
WBMJEJUZ5IFEJTDVTTJPOTFDUJPOJTUIFNPTU
JNQPSUBOU TFDUJPO PG UIF DBTF SFQPSU *U
PVHIUUPFWBMVBUFUIFQBUJFOUDBTFGPSBDDV
SBDZWBMJEJUZBOEVOJRVFOFTTDPNQBSFBOE
DPOUSBTUUIFDBTFSFQPSUXJUIUIFQVCMJTIFE
MJUFSBUVSFEFSJWFOFXLOPXMFEHFTVNNB
SJ[FUIFFTTFOUJBMGFBUVSFTPGUIFSFQPSUBOE
ESBX SFDPNNFOEBUJPOT 5IF DPODMVTJPO
TFDUJPOTIPVMECFCSJFGBOEQSPWJEFBDPO
DMVTJPOXJUIFWJEFODFCBTFESFDPNNFOEB
UJPOTBOEBQQMJDBCJMJUZUPQSBDUJDF
$PODMVTJPO 1BUJFOU DBTF SFQPSUT BSF WBMV
BCMF SFTPVSDFT PG OFX BOE VOVTVBM JOGPS
NBUJPOUIBUNBZMFBEUPWJUBMSFTFBSDI
"N+)FBMUI4ZTU1IBSN‰7PM0DU
MACY+INGSBROOK*EWISH-EDICAL#ENTER3CHENECTADY!VENUE
"ROOKLYN.9HCOHENLIU AOLCOM
#OPYRIGHT Ú !MERICAN 3OCIETY OF (EALTH3YSTEM 0HARMA
CISTS)NC!LLRIGHTSRESERVED
$/)AJHP
02)-%2 0ATIENTCASEREPORT
CASEREPORTSHOULDBEDESCRIPTIVEAC
CURATEANDSUCCINCT
!BSTRACT#ASEREPORTSSHOULDIN
CLUDEANABSTRACTOFnWORDS
4HE AVAILABILITY OF AN ABSTRACT WILL
ALLOW FOR EASIER RETRIEVAL FROM ELEC
TRONIC DATABASES AND HELP RESEARCH
ERS DISCERN THEIR LEVELS OF INTEREST
IN THE CASE REPORT 4HE ABSTRACT
SHOULD INCLUDE THE SAME FOUR SEC
TIONS AS THE MAIN TEXT IN A SUCCINCT
FORMˆINTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE
CASE PRESENTATION DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONˆBUT THE FORMAT MAY
VARYDEPENDINGONAJOURNALSSTYLEIF
SUBMITTEDFORPUBLICATION
)NTRODUCTION 4HE INTRODUCTION
SECTIONSHOULDBECONCISEANDSALIENT
AND IMMEDIATELY ATTRACT THE ATTEN
TION AND INTEREST OF THE READER 4HE
INTRODUCTIONSHOULDPROVIDETHESUB
JECT PURPOSE AND MERIT OF THE CASE
REPORT)TSHOULDPRESENTBACKGROUND
INFORMATION THAT PROVIDES CLARITY TO
THESUBJECTOFDISCUSSION4HISSHOULD
BEFOLLOWEDBYANEXPLANATIONOFWHY
THE CASE REPORT IS NOVEL OR MERITS
REVIEW!FOCUSEDCOMPREHENSIVELIT
ERATURE REVIEW THAT CORROBORATES THE
AUTHORS CLAIMS SHOULD ACCOMPANY
THEINTRODUCTION)FFEWCITATIONSARE
FOUNDTHEYSHOULDALLBECITEDCHRON
OLOGICALLYHOWEVERIFMANYCITATIONS
ARE FOUND THE SEMINAL HISTORICAL
ANDMOSTPERTINENTREFERENCESSHOULD
BECITED4HESIGNIlCANTDETAILSFROM
THE LITERATURE REVIEW AND HOW THOSE
DETAILS COMPARE AND CONTRAST TO THE
CURRENT CASE SHOULD BE EXPLAINED IN
THE DISCUSSION NOT IN THE INTRODUC
TION ! BRIEF ONE OR TWOSENTENCE
DESCRIPTIONOFTHEPATIENTCASESHOULD
BEPROVIDEDANDISANEXCELLENTSEGUE
FORTHECASEPRESENTATIONSECTION4HE
INTRODUCTION SHOULD NOT BE MORE
THAN THREE PARAGRAPHS AND DOES NOT
NEED TO BE LABELED WITH A HEADING
IE)NTRODUCTION
! LITERATURE REVIEW SHOULD LIST
THESTRATEGYANDEXTENTOFTHESEARCH
AND SHOULD INCLUDE THE DATABASE
SEARCHED THE DATES THAT THE DATA
BASE WAS SEARCHED THE LANGUAGES
COVERED AND THE SEARCH TERMS USED
4HELITERATURESEARCHSHOULDPROVIDE
ENOUGHDETAILFORTHEREADERTOEASILY
REPRODUCETHESEARCH$ATABASESTHAT
ARE COMMONLY SEARCHED BECAUSE OF
THEIRCOMPREHENSIVENESSOFBIOMEDI
CAL CONTENT INCLUDE -%$,).% AND
%-"!3% (OWEVER IT IS IMPORTANT
THAT THE BREADTH OF THE SEARCH USES
DATABASES THAT CONTAIN INFORMATION
THATMAYNOTBEFOUNDIN-%$,).%
OR %-"!3% &OR EXAMPLE A CASE
REPORT OF AN ADVERSE DRUG EVENT OR
MEDICATIONERRORSHOULDINCLUDEARE
VIEWOFANADVERSEREACTIONDATABASE
SUCH AS #LIN!LERT OR DATABASES THAT
REVIEW PHARMACY PUBLICATIONS SUCH
AS )NTERNATIONAL 0HARMACEUTICAL!B
STRACTS AND )OWA $RUG )NFORMATION
3ERVICE!CASEREPORTDESCRIBINGTHE
COLLABORATION OF A PHARMACIST AND A
NURSE THAT IMPROVES A PATIENTS CARE
SHOULDINCLUDEASEARCHINTHENURS
INGDATABASESUCHASTHE#UMULATIVE
)NDEX TO .URSING AND !LLIED (EALTH
,ITERATURE&URTHERMORETOMAXIMIZE
THELITERATURESEARCHlNDINGSAUTHORS
SHOULDMETICULOUSLYSEARCHTHEREFER
ENCELISTSOFREVIEWARTICLESANDMETA
ANALYSES &INALLY CLINICIANS OUGHT TO
BE COGNIZANT THAT EARLY REPORTS MAY
NOTBEDETECTEDINALITERATURESEARCH
BECAUSE OF CHANGES IN CONCEPTS NO
MENCLATURE AND TERMINOLOGY SINCE
THEIRPUBLICATIONDATE
#ASE PRESENTATION 4HE DESCRIP
TIONOFTHEPATIENTCASEISONEOFTHE
MOST INTEGRAL SECTIONS OF THE CASE
REPORT)TSHOULDDESCRIBETHECASEIN
CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER AND IN ENOUGH
DETAIL FOR THE READER TO ESTABLISH HIS
OR HER OWN CONCLUSIONS ABOUT THE
CASES VALIDITY ! CASE REPORT THAT
CONTAINS DETAILED AND RELEVANT PA
TIENT INFORMATION ALLOWS THE READER
WITH A DIFFERENT CLINICAL EXPERTISE TO
UNCOVER IDIOSYNCRACIES THAT ARE NOT
DETECTED OR DESCRIBED BY THE AUTHOR
AND STIMULATES FURTHER INQUIRY AND
COMMENTARY 4HE CASE PRESENTATION
SHOULD ONLY INCLUDE INFORMATION
THATPERTAINSTOTHECASEANDREFRAIN
FROM PROVIDING CONFUSING AND SU
PERmUOUS DATA $AILY PATIENT PROG
RESS INCLUDING NORMAL VITAL SIGNS
ROUTINE LABORATORY RESULTS TYPICAL
CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DISCIPLINES
STEPDOWN TRANSFERS TO WARDS AND
OTHERIRRELEVANTPATIENTINFORMATION
MUSTBEAVOIDED4HEAUTHORSHOULD
ESTABLISH A CAUSAL AND TEMPORAL RE
LATIONSHIPANDINDICATETHEEFFECTOF
TREATMENTANYUNANTICIPATEDEFFECTS
THEPATIENTSlNALOUTCOMEANYFUR
THER PROPOSED TREATMENTS AND THE
PATIENTS PRESENT STATUS AT THE TIME
OFTHEREPORT
0ATIENTSDEMOGRAPHICSANDHISTORY
0ATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS SUCH AS AGE
HEIGHTWEIGHTSEXRACEANDOCCUPA
TIONMUSTBEINCLUDED!LTHOUGHTHE
RACEOROCCUPATIONOFTHEPATIENTMAY
APPEARASSUPERmUOUSTHISTYPEOFIN
FORMATIONMAYUNCOVERPHARMACOGE
NOMIC OR ENVIRONMENTAL INmUENCES
)N ORDER TO LIMIT THE POSSIBILITY OF
IDENTIFYING THE PATIENT THE PATIENTS
INITIALS DATE OF BIRTH AND OTHER
IDENTIlERSMUSTNOTBEUSED0RECISE
DATESINCLUDINGTHEMONTHDAYAND
YEAROFADMISSIONOROTHERIMPORTANT
EVENTSSHOULDBEAVOIDEDˆTHEYCAN
AIDINIDENTIFYINGTHEPATIENTANDDE
TRACTTHEREADERFROMTHECASEREPORT
BYCALCULATINGELAPSEDTIME)NABRIEF
SUMMARY AND IN A NARRATIVE FORM
THEPATIENTSCHIEFCOMPLAINTPRESENT
ILLNESS MEDICAL HISTORY FAMILY AND
SOCIALHISTORYANDUSEOFRECREATIONAL
DRUGS SHOULD BE LISTED (EADINGS
FOREACHPARTOFTHEPATIENTSHISTORY
SHOULDNOTBEUSED4HETYPEOFPHYS
ICAL EXAMINATION PERFORMED SHOULD
BE DESCRIBED AND ANY ABNORMALITIES
SHOULDBEREPORTED
0ATIENTSLABORATORYANDDIAGNOSTIC
DATA4HEPATIENTSLABORATORYVALUES
ANDDIAGNOSTICDATATHATSUPPORTTHE
CASEREPORTANDRULEOUTADIFFERENTIAL
DIAGNOSIS SHOULD BE REPORTED 0ERTI
NENT POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE LABORATORY
RESULTS MUST BE PROVIDED 7HEN THE
REFERENCERANGEOFALABORATORYVALUE
IS NOT WIDELY KNOWN OR ESTABLISHED
ITSHOULDBEPROVIDEDINPARENTHESES
$IAGNOSTIC PROCEDURES THE TIMELINE
INWHICHTHEYWEREADMINISTEREDAND
A BRIEF REPORT OF THE RESULTS SHOULD
BE INCLUDED! VERBATIM DESCRIPTION
"N+)FBMUI4ZTU1IBSN‰7PM0DU
02)-%2 0ATIENTCASEREPORT
OFAPATHOLOGISTSREPORTMUSTNOTBE
USED INSTEAD A SALIENT REPORT OF THE
RESULTS SHOULD BE INCLUDED 0ICTURES
OF HISTOPATHOLOGY ROENTGENOGRAMS
ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHS AND OTHER DI
AGNOSTIC TESTS SKIN MANIFESTATIONS
WOUNDSANDOTHERANATOMICALPARTS
MAYBEPROVIDEDANDADDTOTHEIN
TEREST OF THE REPORT !NY IDENTIFYING
FEATURES OF A PATIENTS PHOTOGRAPH
SHOULD BE BLOCKED OUT )NSTITUTIONAL
POLICIES AND PATIENT PERMISSION FOR
OBTAINING AND USING PHOTOGRAPHS
MUSTBEFOLLOWED
0ATIENTS MEDICATION HISTORY 4HE
PATIENTS MEDICATION HISTORY SHOULD
INCLUDE THE MEDICATIONS NAME
STRENGTH DOSAGE FORM ROUTE AND
DATES OF ADMINISTRATION 4HE BRAND
ORGENERICNAMEOFTHEDRUGANDTHE
NAME OF THE MANUFACTURER MAY BE
RELEVANT TO THE CASE AND SHOULD BE
LISTED"RANDANDGENERICDRUGSMAY
HAVE DIFFERENT BIOAVAILABILITY FAC
TORS OR MAY CONTAIN DIFFERENT lLLERS
PRESERVATIVES ADDITIVES OR DYESˆALL
OF WHICH MAY BE PERTINENT TO CASES
REGARDINGTHEDRUGSPHARMACOKINET
ICSEFlCACYANDADVERSEEFFECTS3INCE
AMEDICATIONHISTORYMAYOFTENOMIT
HERBALS VACCINES DEPOT INJECTIONS
AND NONPRESCRIPTION MEDICATIONS
THEAUTHORSHOULDSPECIFYTHEHISTORY
OF EACH OF THESE MEDICATION TYPES
4HE DATES A MEDICATION WAS DISCON
TINUED SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED SINCE
MEDICATIONSMAYHAVELASTINGEFFECTS
FOR MONTHS AFTER DISCONTINUATION
4HEAUTHORSHOULDVERIFYANDINFORM
THEREADEROFTHEPATIENTSHISTORYOF
MEDICATIONADHERENCE
)NORDERTOEVALUATETHEAPPROPRI
ATENESSOFAMEDICATIONSDOSAGEREGI
MENLABORATORYVALUESTHATDESCRIBE
RENAL AND HEPATIC ORGAN FUNCTIONS
SHOULD BE PROVIDED 2ENAL FUNCTION
VALUES SHOULD INCLUDE SERUM CRE
ATININEBLOODUREANITROGENANDTHE
TOTAL mUID VOLUME INTAKE AND EXCRE
TION WHEN A URINARY CATHETER IS IN
PLACE #ALCULATION METHODS USED TO
ESTIMATE THE PATIENTS RENAL FUNCTION
SHOULD BE IDENTIlED ,IVER FUNCTION
TESTS SUCH AS THE )NTERNATIONAL .OR
MALIZED 2ATIO SERUM ALBUMIN AND
ALBUMINGLOBULIN RATIO AND HEPATIC
ENZYME TESTS SUCH AS ASPARTATE AND
ALANINEAMINOTRANSFERASESSHOULDBE
PROVIDED
!COMPREHENSIVEMEDICATIONHIS
TORYSHOULDALSOINCLUDETHEPATIENTS
ALLERGY STATUS 4HE ALLERGY HISTORY
SHOULD INCLUDE THE DATE OF THE REAC
TION THE NAME OF THE DRUG AND THE
TYPE OF ALLERGIC MANIFESTATION 4HE
NAMEOFTHEDRUGSHOULDBELISTEDAS
EITHERTHEGENERICORBRANDNAMEAND
COMBINATIONPRODUCTSSHOULDBELIST
EDASSUCH!LLERGIESTOCOMBINATION
PRODUCTSSUCHAS5NASYNAND:OSYN
CAN BE MISLABELED AS A PENICILLIN AL
LERGY RATHER THAN A SULFONE ALLERGY
ORVICEVERSA3IMILARLYANALLERGYTO
3EPTRAOR"ACTRIMCANBEMISLABELED
AS AN ALLERGY TO SULFONAMIDE RATHER
THAN TO TRIMETHOPRIM OR VICE VERSA
3OME NONALLERGIC ADVERSE DRUG REAC
TIONS SUCH AS DRUGINDUCED SEIZURES
MAYNOTBEINCLUDEDINTHEALLERGYHIS
TORY NEVERTHELESS THE AUTHOR SHOULD
INVESTIGATEANDREPORTSUCHDATA
7HENAVAILABLEDRUGSERUMLEVELS
OUGHTTOBELISTEDALONGWITHTHETIME
THEY WERE DRAWN AND THEIR RELATION
SHIPTOTHEDOSAGEOFTHEMEDICATION
ADMINISTERED EG TROUGH PEAK
$RUG SERUM LEVELS SHOULD DELINEATE
BETWEEN TOTAL AND FREE LEVELS EG
PHENYTOIN VALPROIC ACID 3INCE
THERE MAY BE INTRALABORATORY VARIA
TIONSINDRUGSERUMREFERENCERANGES
THE REFERENCE RANGE SHOULD ALWAYS
BE PROVIDED IN PARENTHESES 7HEN
PERTINENTTOTHECASETHEMETHODOF
DRUGSERUMLEVELASSAYSHOULDALSOBE
INCLUDED
0ATIENTS DIET 4HE PATIENTS DIET
HISTORY OUGHT TO BE INCLUDED IN THE
CASE REPORT &OOD CAN INTERACT WITH
MEDICATIONSYIELDINGLOWERORHIGHER
SERUM DRUG LEVELS OR INCREASING OR
DECREASINGTHEDRUGSPHARMACOLOGIC
EFFECT 4HE PATIENTS DIET CAN HAVE
CONSEQUENTIAL EFFECTS ON A DISEASE
STATE $IETARY CAUSES OF ADVERSE
EVENTS SUCH AS ALLERGIC REACTIONS
SHOULD BE RULED OUT BEFORE SUSPECT
INGADRUGALLERGY
"N+)FBMUI4ZTU1IBSN‰7PM0DU
$ISCUSSION 4HE DISCUSSION SEC
TION IS THE MOST IMPORTANT SECTION
OF THE CASE REPORT 4HE DISCUSSION
SHOULD EVALUATE THE PATIENT CASE FOR
ACCURACY VALIDITY AND UNIQUENESS
COMPARE AND CONTRAST THE CASE RE
PORT WITH THE PUBLISHED LITERATURE
AND DERIVE NEW KNOWLEDGE AND AP
PLICABILITY TO PRACTICE 4HE AUTHOR
MUSTCONlRMTHATTHECASEREPORTIS
VALIDBYENSURINGTHEACCURACYOFTHE
DATA PRESENTED AND BY ESTABLISHING
A TEMPORAL AND CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP
&OR DRUGINDUCED ADVERSE EFFECTS A
VALIDATEDNOMOGRAMTOESTABLISHTHE
PROBABILITY OF CAUSALITY SUCH AS THE
.ARANJO NOMOGRAM MUST BE USED
4HE AUTHOR SHOULD COMPREHENSIVELY
LIST THE LIMITATIONS OF THE CASE AND
SHOULD DESCRIBE THE SIGNIlCANCE OF
EACHLIMITATION
4HEAUTHORSHOULDBRIEmYSUMMA
RIZE THE PUBLISHED LITERATURE DERIVED
FROM THE LITERATURE REVIEW AND MAY
PROVIDEADETAILEDSUMMARYOFAFEW
CITATIONS!TABLELISTINGTHEPERTINENT
FACTS OF THE CASES DETECTED FROM THE
LITERATUREREVIEWISASIMPLEMETHOD
FORPROVIDINGEXTENSIVEDETAILEDDATA
INANINTERPRETABLEFORM4HEAUTHOR
SHOULD COMPARE AND CONTRAST THE
NUANCES OF THE CASE REPORT WITH THE
PUBLISHED LITERATURE AND SHOULD EX
PLAIN AND JUSTIFY THE DIFFERENCES AND
SIMILARITIES 4HE DISCUSSION SECTION
OFACASEREPORTISINNOWAYDESIGNED
TO PROVIDE COMPREHENSIVE DETAILS OF
EACH CITATION OF AN ALLINCLUSIVE AND
EXTENSIVE LITERATURE REVIEWˆTHIS
SHOULD BE SAVED FOR REVIEW ARTICLES
!LL THE REFERENCES CITED SHOULD BE
CRITICALLY EVALUATED 4RANSFERRING AN
UNREAD REFERENCE CITED IN ANOTHER
ARTICLEISUNETHICALANDWILLPLACETHE
AUTHOROFTHECASEREPORTATRISKOFER
RORANDEMBARRASSMENT
4HE AUTHOR SHOULD NEXT SUMMA
RIZETHEESSENTIALFEATURESOFTHECASE
REPORTJUSTIFYWHYTHISCASEISUNIQUE
AND DRAW RECOMMENDATIONS AND
CONCLUSIONS
#ONCLUSION "ASED ON THE EVI
DENCEREVIEWEDINTHEDISCUSSIONSEC
TIONTHEAUTHORMUSTPROVIDEAJUSTI
02)-%2 0ATIENTCASEREPORT
lEDCONCLUSION4HEAUTHORMUSTBE
CAREFUL NOT TO MAKE lRM JUDGMENTS
AND SWEEPING RECOMMENDATIONS
BASED ON SPECULATION ON LIMITED
AND TENUOUS INFORMATION OR ON A
FEWCASEREPORTS(OWEVERJUSTIlABLE
EVIDENCEBASED RECOMMENDATIONS
SHOULD BE STATED 4HE AUTHOR MAY
SUGGEST THAT CLINICIANS BE COGNIZANT
OF THE INSIGHT LEARNED FROM THE CASE
OR SUGGEST HEIGHTENED VIGILANCE
PRUDENT MANAGEMENT AVOIDANCE
FURTHERSTUDYBEFORETAKINGACTIONOR
NEWIDEASFORINVESTIGATION(OWTHE
INFORMATIONDISCOVEREDFROMTHECASE
REPORTWILLAPPLYTOTHEAUTHORSPRAC
TICESHOULDBEDESCRIBED4HISSECTION
SHOULD BE CONCISE AND NOT EXCEED
ONE PARAGRAPH 'UIDELINES FOR WRIT
INGPATIENTCASEREPORTSINACHECKLIST
FORMAT !PPENDIX " CAN FACILITATE
ANDENHANCETHEMANUSCRIPTWRITING
PROCESS
$PODMVTJPO
0ATIENTCASEREPORTSAREVALUABLERE
SOURCESOFNEWANDUNUSUALINFORMA
TIONTHATMAYLEADTOVITALRESEARCH
3FGFSFODFT
'OTTLEIB'*2OGOZ!6OGEL*6ETAL!PRE
LIMINARY COMMUNICATION ON EXTENSIVELY
DISSEMINATED+APOSISSARCOMAINAYOUNG
HOMOSEXUAL MAN !M * $ERMATOPATHOL
$OUGLAS * -UNRO * +ITCHIN! ET AL 0UL
MONARY HYPERTENSION AND FENmURAMINE
"R-ED*
!TANASSON 0 7EISS " 3CHMID % ET AL
0ULMONARYHYPERTENSIONANDDEXFENmURA
MINE,ANCET,ETTER
7EIR %+ 2EEVE (, (UANG *- ET AL
!NOREXIC AGENTS AMINOREX FENmURAMINE
AND DEXFENmURAMINE INHIBIT POTASSIUM
CURRENTINRATPULMONARYVASCULARSMOOTH
MUSCLE AND CAUSE PULMONARY VASOCON
STRICTION#IRCULATION
!BENHAIM , -ORIDE 9 "RENOT & ET AL
!PPETITESUPPRESSANTDRUGSANDTHERISKOF
PRIMARYPULMONARYHYPERTENSION.%NGL
*-ED
$E"AKEY,$E"AKEY34HECASEREPORT)
'UIDELINES FOR PREPARATION )NT * #ARDIOL
-C#ARTHY ,( 2EILLY +% (OW TO WRITE A
CASEREPORT&AM-ED
.ARANJO#!"USTO53ELLERS%-ETAL!
METHOD FOR ESTIMATING THE PROBABILITY OF
ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS #LIN 0HARMACOL
4HER
4VNNBSZ
0ATIENT CASE REPORTS ARE VALUABLE
RESOURCESOFNEWANDUNUSUALINFOR
MATIONTHATMAYLEADTOVITALRESEARCH
ANDADVANCESINCLINICALPRACTICETHAT
IMPROVE PATIENT OUTCOMES #ASE RE
PORTSSHOULDCONTAINANABSTRACTAND "QQFOEJY"‰$SJUFSJBGPSQVCMJTIBCMF
DBTFSFQPSUT
FOURSECTIONSˆANINTRODUCTIONCASE
0UBLISHABLE PATIENT CASE REPORTS INCLUDE
PRESENTATIONDISCUSSIONANDCONCLU CASESTHAT
SION 4HE INTRODUCTION PROVIDES THE
SUBJECT PURPOSE AND MERIT OF THE s !DVANCEMEDICALSCIENCEANDSPAWNRESEARCH
CASEREPORTANDTHESTRATEGYUSEDFOR s $ESCRIBERAREPERPLEXINGORNOVELDIAGNOSTIC
FEATURESOFADISEASESTATE
THELITERATUREREVIEW4HEPATIENTCASE s 2EPORT THERAPEUTIC CHALLENGES CONTROVERSIES
PRESENTATION SHOULD BE DESCRIPTIVE
ORDILEMMAS
ORGANIZED CHRONOLOGICALLY ACCURATE s $ESCRIBEANEWSURGICALPROCEDURE
SALIENT AND PRESENTED IN A NARRATIVE s 2EPORT HOW A DRUG CAN ENHANCE A SURGICAL
PROCEDURE
FORM 4HE DISCUSSION SHOULD COM s 4EACH HUMANISTIC LESSONS TO THE HEALTH CARE
PARE AND CONTRAST THE CASE REPORTS
PROFESSIONAL
lNDINGS WITH THE LITERATURE REVIEW s 2EVIEW A UNIQUE JOB DESCRIPTION OF A HEALTH
CAREPROFESSIONALTHATIMPROVESPATIENTCARE
ESTABLISHACAUSALANDTEMPORALRELA s 2EPORT
NEW MEDICAL ERRORS OR MEDICATION
TIONSHIP AND VALIDATE THE CASE WITH
ERRORS
APROBABILITYSCALE4HELITERATURERE s $ISCOVERADEVICEMALFUNCTIONTHATRESULTSIN
PATIENTHARM
VIEWSHOULDBEEXTENSIVEANDSHOULD
ADVERSE EFFECTS AND PATIENT TOXICITY
SUPPORT THE JUSTIlCATION OF THE CASE s $ESCRIBE
OFARADIOPAQUEAGENT
REPORT4HEDISCUSSIONSECTIONSHOULD s $ESCRIBELIFETHREATENINGADVERSEEVENTS
ENDWITHABRIEFSUMMARYOFTHECASE s $ESCRIBE DANGEROUS AND PREDICTABLE ADVERSE
EFFECTSTHATAREPOORLYAPPRECIATEDANDRARELY
WITH RATIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS AND
RECOGNIZED
CONCLUSIONS 4HE CONCLUSION SECTION s $ESCRIBERAREORNOVELADVERSEDRUGREACTIONS
MUSTPROVIDEABRIEFCONCLUSIONWITH s $ESCRIBE A THERAPEUTIC FAILURE OR A LACK OF
THERAPEUTICEFlCACY
EVIDENCEBASEDRECOMMENDATIONS
s $ESCRIBERAREORNOVELDRUGnDRUGDRUGnFOOD
ORDRUGnNUTRIENTINTERACTIONS
s 2EPORT UNLABELED OR UNAPPROVED USES OF A
MEDICATION
s %XPLORE THE USE OF PHARMACOGENOMICS TO
MANAGEDISEASES
s 5SE LIFESAVING TECHNIQUES NOT PREVIOUSLY
DOCUMENTED
s 5SE PHARMACOECONOMIC PRINCIPLES THAT IM
PROVEPATIENTCARE
s 5NCOVERBARRIERSTOPATIENTADHERENCE
s $ISCOVERANINTERACTIONBETWEENADRUGANDA
LABORATORY TEST THAT YIELDS A FALSEPOSITIVE OR
FALSENEGATIVERESULT
s $ESCRIBETHEEFFECTOFDRUGSINPREGNANCYAND
LACTATION
s $ETECTNOVELPHARMACOKINETICORPHARMACO
DYNAMICPRINCIPLESAND
s 5SETECHNOLOGYTOIMPROVEPATIENTOUTCOMES
"QQFOEJY#‰(VJEFMJOFTGPSXSJUJOH
QBUJFOUDBTFSFQPSUNBOVTDSJQUT
4HE FOLLOWING CHECKLIST IS COMPREHENSIVE
SOME ITEMS MAY NOT APPLY TO ALL TYPES OF CASE
REPORTS
)!BSTRACT
† )NTRODUCTIONANDOBJECTIVE
† #ASEREPORT
† $ISCUSSION
† #ONCLUSION
)))NTRODUCTION
† $ESCRIBETHESUBJECTMATTER
† 3TATETHEPURPOSEOFTHECASEREPORT
† 0ROVIDEBACKGROUNDINFORMATION
† 0ROVIDEPERTINENTDElNITIONS
† $ESCRIBETHESTRATEGYOFTHELITERATUREREVIEW
ANDPROVIDESEARCHTERMS
† *USTIFYTHEMERITOFTHECASEREPORTBYUSING
THELITERATUREREVIEW
† )NTRODUCETHEPATIENTCASETOTHEREADER
† -AKE THE INTRODUCTION BRIEF AND LESS THAN
THREEPARAGRAPHS
)))0ATIENTCASEPRESENTATION
† $ESCRIBETHECASEINANARRATIVEFORM
† 0ROVIDE PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS AGE SEX
HEIGHTWEIGHTRACEOCCUPATION
† !VOID PATIENT IDENTIlERS DATE OF BIRTH INI
TIALS
† $ESCRIBETHEPATIENTSCOMPLAINT
† ,ISTTHEPATIENTSPRESENTILLNESS
† ,ISTTHEPATIENTSMEDICALHISTORY
† ,ISTTHEPATIENTSFAMILYHISTORY
† ,ISTTHEPATIENTSSOCIALHISTORY
† ,IST THE PATIENTS MEDICATION HISTORY BEFORE
ADMISSIONANDTHROUGHOUTTHECASEREPORT
† %NSURETHATTHEMEDICATIONHISTORYINCLUDES
HERBALSVACCINESDEPOTINJECTIONSANDNON
PRESCRIPTION MEDICATIONS AND STATE THAT THE
PATIENTWASASKEDFORTHISHISTORY
† ,ISTEACHDRUGSNAMESTRENGTHDOSAGEFORM
ROUTEANDDATESOFADMINISTRATION
† 6ERIFYTHEPATIENTSMEDICATIONADHERENCE
† 0ROVIDE RENAL AND HEPATIC ORGAN FUNCTION
DATAINORDERTODETERMINETHEAPPROPRIATE
NESSOFMEDICATIONDOSINGREGIMENS
"N+)FBMUI4ZTU1IBSN‰7PM0DU
02)-%2 0ATIENTCASEREPORT
† ,ISTTHEPATIENTSDRUGALLERGYSTATUSINCLUDINGTHENAMEOFTHEDRUG
BRANDORGENERICANDTHEDATEANDTYPEOFREACTION
† ,IST THE PATIENTS ADVERSE DRUG REACTION HISTORY AND THE DATES OF THE
REACTION
† 0ROVIDEPERTINENTSERUMDRUGLEVELSANDINCLUDETHETIMEOFEACHLEVEL
TAKENANDITSRELATIONSHIPTOADOSE
† 0ROVIDETHEPATIENTSDIETARYHISTORY
† 0ROVIDEPERTINENTlNDINGSONPHYSICALEXAMINATION
† 0ROVIDEPERTINENTLABORATORYVALUESTHATSUPPORTTHECASE
† 0ROVIDE THE REFERENCE RANGE FOR LABORATORY VALUES THAT ARE NOT
WIDELYKNOWNORESTABLISHED
† ,ISTTHECOMPLETEDDIAGNOSTICPROCEDURESTHATAREPERTINENTANDSUP
PORTTHECASE
† 0ARAPHRASETHESALIENTRESULTSOFTHEDIAGNOSTICPROCEDURES
† 0ROVIDEPHOTOGRAPHSOFHISTOPATHOLOGYROENTGENOGRAMSELECTROCAR
DIOGRAMSSKINMANIFESTATIONSORANATOMYASTHEYRELATETOTHECASE
† /BTAINPERMISSIONFROMTHEPATIENTTOUSETHEPATIENTSPHOTOGRAPHS
ORFOLLOWINSTITUTIONALGUIDELINES
† 0ROVIDETHEPATIENTSEVENTSINCHRONOLOGICALORDER
† %NSUREATEMPORALRELATIONSHIP
† %NSUREACAUSALRELATIONSHIP
† %NSURETHATTHEPATIENTCASEPRESENTATIONPROVIDESENOUGHDETAILFOR
THEREADERTOESTABLISHTHECASESVALIDITY
)6$ISCUSSION
† #OMPAREANDCONTRASTTHENUANCESOFTHECASEREPORTWITHTHELITERA
TUREREVIEW
† %XPLAINORJUSTIFYTHESIMILARITIESANDDIFFERENCESBETWEENTHECASE
REPORTANDTHELITERATURE
† ,ISTTHELIMITATIONSOFTHECASEREPORTANDDESCRIBETHEIRRELEVANCE
† #ONlRMTHEACCURACYOFTHEDESCRIPTIVEPATIENTCASEREPORT
† %STABLISHATEMPORALRELATIONSHIP
† %STABLISHACAUSALRELATIONSHIP
† 2EPORTTHEVALIDITYOFTHECASEREPORTBYAPPLYINGAPROBABILITYSCALE
SUCHASTHE.ARANJONOMOGRAM
† 3UMMARIZETHESALIENTFEATURESOFTHECASEREPORT
† *USTIFYTHEUNIQUENESSOFTHECASE
† $RAWRECOMMENDATIONSANDCONCLUSIONS
6#ONCLUSION
† 0ROVIDEAJUSTIlEDCONCLUSION
† 0ROVIDEEVIDENCEBASEDRECOMMENDATIONS
† $ESCRIBEHOWTHEINFORMATIONLEARNEDAPPLIESTOONESOWNPRACTICE
† ,ISTOPPORTUNITIESFORRESEARCH
† %NSURETHATTHISSECTIONISBRIEFANDDOESNOTEXCEEDONEPARAGRAPH
"N+)FBMUI4ZTU1IBSN‰7PM0DU