* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Notes
Birkhoff's representation theorem wikipedia , lookup
Évariste Galois wikipedia , lookup
Category theory wikipedia , lookup
Group (mathematics) wikipedia , lookup
Group action wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental theorem of algebra wikipedia , lookup
Étale cohomology wikipedia , lookup
Etale cohomology of fields by Johan M. Commelin, December 5, 2013 Etale cohomology The canonical topology on a Grothendieck topos Let E be a Grothendieck topos. The canonical topology T on E is given in terms of coverings by the collection of all families fXi ! X gi of universal eective epimorphisms, i.e., for every X 0 ! X , the family fXi0 ! X 0 gi = fXi zX X 0 ! X zX X 0 gi makes the diagram Y Y ! Hom(Xi0 zX Hom(X 0 ; Z) ! Hom(Xi0 ; Z) ! i;j i 0 Xj0 ; Z ) exact for all Z 2 E . Theorem. || The Yoneda embedding gives an equivalence of categories E æSh(E ; T ). Profinite groups; G-sets A pronite group is by denition a group that is the limit of a diagram of nite groups. Every pronite group is the limit of the diagram of its nite quotients. A pronite group is a topological group in a natural way: the nite index normal subgroups form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of the identity. In particular, open subgroups are of nite index. Let G be a pronite group. Let S be a set with a G-action. The following are equivalent: The G-action is continuous for the discrete topology on S. For every point s 2 S, the stabiliser of s is an open subgroup of G. The set S equals H SH , where H runs over the open normal subgroups of G, and SH denotes the H -invariants of S. S The category of G-sets satisfying the above equivalent condition is a Grothendieck topos, denoted G-set. 1 Sh(Spec(k) The topos et ) . Write G for the absolute Let k be a eld. Fix a separable closure k=k Galois group, which is by denition the pronite group liml=k Gal(l=k), where l=k runs over the nite Galois extensions contained in k. Let X =k be an e tale k-scheme. Observe that G acts on X (k). For every open normal subgroup H G, we have X (k)H = X (kH ). Consequently S X (k) = H X (k)H , and therefore the G-action is continuous. Theorem. || The functor Spec(k) et ! G-set X 7! X (k) is an equivalence of categories, and the e tale topology on the left corresponds to the canonical topology on the right. Proof. We construct a quasi-inverse. Let S be a continuous G-set. Let s 2 S be a point. Write H for the stabiliser of s. It is a open subgroup. By elementary group theory, we have an isomorphism of G-sets G=H ! Gs. This shows that S is the disjoint union of nite orbits. We map Gs to Spec(kH ), and since Spec(k) has arbitrary disjoint unions, this dene a functor G-set ! Spec(k) . It is left as an exercise to show that these functors are actually quasi-inverse. Since we are working with the small e tale site Spec(k) , every morphism in Spec(k) is e tale. It is then immediate that the e tale topology coincides with the canonical topology. qed Corollaries. || et et et et 1. Every sheaf on Spec(k) is representable. et 2. Global sections on Spec(k) correspond with G-invariants on G-set. et 3. Abelian e tale sheafs on Spec(k) correspond to e tale commutative k-group schemes, and correspond to abelian G-modules. et F1f 2 Group cohomology Injective objects Let G be a discrete group. The category G-mod consists of commutative group objects in G-set. For an object A we denote with AG the G-invariant elements of A. Observe that G-mod is equivalent to Z[G]-mod. Let H ! G be a group homomorphism. Then there is an adjunction HomG (A; IndGH (B)) HomH (A; B) where IndGH (B) is the G-module Map(G; B)H . In the category of abelian groups, the injective objects are the divisible groups (abelian groups such that multiplication by n is surjective for all n 2 Z> ). It follows from the adjunction that, if A is a divisible group, then IndG (A) is an injective object in G-mod. In particular, this gives a method to construct injective resolutions in G-mod from injective resolutions in Ab. 0 1 Computation with cochains For r 2 Z , let Pr be the free abelian group generated by Gr . Naturally Pr comes with a G-action, by coordinatewise multiplication. Dene boundary operators dr : Pr ! Pr x , by +1 0 1 dr (g0 ; : : : ; gr ) = Xr i (x1) (g0 ; : : : ; g^i ; : : : ; gr ); i=0 where ^ denotes the usual `ommision'. One may check that P is a complex. If we denote with " : P ! Z the map that sends every basis element to 1, we can prove: 0 Lemma. || The complex P ! Z ! 0 is exact. Proof. Dene r : Pr ! Pr by " +1 r (g0 ; : : : ; gr ) = (e; g0 ; : : : ; gr ): By construction dr r + r x dr = 0. If dr (x) = 0, this implies x = dr (r (x)). qed Corollary. || For every G-module A, we have +1 1 +1 Hn (G; A)æHn (HomG (P ; A)): 3 Observe that HomG (Pr ; A) consists of maps : Gr +1 !A satisfying (gg0 ; gg1 ; : : : ; ggr ) = g(g0 ; g1 ; : : : ; gr ): Consequently, to know the value of (g ; g ; : : : ; gr ), it is enough to know the value of (g g ; g x g ; : : : ; g x gr ). Therefore, it is enough to know the value of on tuples of the form (1; g 0 ; g 0 g 0 ; : : : ; g 0 g 0 y ygr0 ). In this way, we obtain a map 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 2 Gr +1 ! Gr 0 0 0 (g0 ; g1 ; : : : ; gr ) 7! (g1 ; g2 ; : : : ; gr ) gi0 = gixx11 gi ; and this map induces an identication of HomG (Pr ; A) with Map(Gr ; A). If we write Cr (G; A) for Map(Gr ; A), we nd that the induced boundary maps are given by dr : C r (G; A) ! C r +1 (G; A) 7! dr ; where dr (g1 ; g2 ; : : : ; gr +1 ) = g1 (g2 ; : : : ; gr +1 ) + Xr i (x1) (g1 ; : : : ; gi gi+1 ; : : : ; gr ) i=1 + (x1) r +1 (g1 ; : : : ; gr ): Writing Zr (G; A) for ker(dr ), and Br (G; A) for im(dr x , we nd 1 Hr (G; A)æZr (G; A)=Br (G; A): This allows for pretty explicit descriptions of Hn (G; A) for small n. We give the descriptions for n = 1. The elements of Z (G; A) are called crossed homomorphisms. They are maps : G ! A satisfying 1 g(h) x (gh) + (g ) = 0: On the other hand, elements of B (G; A) are called principal homomorphisms. They are the maps a for each a 2 A, with 1 a (g ) = ga x a: We will now put this description to use. 4 Hilbert's theorem 90 If l=k is a nite Galois extension, and G its Galois group, then l{ is a G-module. The following theorem by Hilbert goes by the name Hilbert's theorem 90. || We have H (G; l{ ) = 0. Proof. For this proof, we need the following fact, known as Dedekind's theorem on the independence of characters : Let l be a eld, and G a group. Every nite set of homomorphisms i : G ! L{ is linearly independent P over l. In other words, if i ci i (g ) = 0 for all g 2 G, then ci = 0 for all i. With this fact we can proceed with the proof of Hilbert's theorem 90. Let : G ! l{ be a crossed homomorphism: 1 (gh) = g(h) y (g ); for all g; h 2 G: For all a 2 l{ , write ba = X g 2G (g ) y ga: Apply the above fact to the nite set of homomorphisms (g y) : l{ ! l{ . P Since (g ) 6= 0 for all g 2 G, the fact shows that g 2G (g )g is not the zero-map. We conclude that there is an a such that ba is non-zero. Fix such an a, and write b = ba . For all h 2 G we have hb = X g 2G h(g ) y hga = But this means that principal. X g 2G (hg )(h)x1 hga = (h)x1 b: (h) = b=hb = hbx1 =bx1 , which is to say that is qed Galois cohomology For pronite groups, all the above remains true, except that we need to ask most of the maps to be continuous. In particular, we replace C r (G; A), Z r (G; A), and Br (G; A) by their subsets of continuous maps; denoted respectively Cr (G; A), Zr (G; A), and Br (G; A). In particular cts H cts r cts cts r (G; A) Zcts æ Br (G; A) cts (G; A) : Observe that there is a natural map colimH Cr (G=H; AH ) ! Cr cts (G; A); given by the compositions with G ! G=H , and AH ! A. (The colimit runs over the open normal subgroups of G.) We claim this map is an 5 isomorphism. Injectivity is clear. For surjectivity, take a continuous map : Gr ! A. Then (Gr ) is discrete, and compact because Gr is compact. Hence (Gr ) is nite, and thus contained in M H0 for some normal open subgroup H G. On the other hand, for every a 2 (Gr ), the inverse image x (a) is open, and thus containsTa translate of Har , for some normal open subgroup Ha G. Now H = a2 G Ha is an normal open subgroup of G, and by construction factors via (G=H )r . Finally, write H = H H , so that lifts to a map (G=H )r ! AH . This proves surjectivity. Because the system of normal open subgroups of G is ltered, the colimits indexed by this system commute with kernels and cokernels, and therefore with cohomology. We thus obtain: 0 1 1 ( r 1 0 1 Hr cts æcolimH Hr (G=H; AH ): (G; A) Corollary || We also have a statement of Hilbert's theorem 90 for the absolute Galois group: If k is a eld, with absolute Galois group G, then H (G; k{ ) = 0. 1 6