Download Kathleen Brandfass, MS PT

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Chemo Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
 Kathleen Brandfass, MS PT
 Director of Neuro,Vestibular and Geriatric
Outpatient Services
 UPMC/Centers for Rehab Services
Objectives
 1. Review Case presentation of Chemo Induced
Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)
 2. Introduce Chemotherapeutics/targets
 3. Types of CIPN
 4.Chemo toxicity side effects
 5. Future Research Targets

Case Study
 JH: 64 y.o. Women
 Stage III ovarian cancer
 2005- bilateral salpino-oophorectomy
 Chemo s/p surg: 8 cycles


Taxol
Carboplatin
 Chemo completed 12-2005
Case Study (cont)
 6-2006
 Evaluated by PCP- c/o numbness/tingling bilateral
hands and feet, imbalance h/o falls- worse with eyes
closed or walking in the dark.

Case Study (cont)
7-2006- Referred to neurologist:
Motor- wasting bilateral extensor digitorium brevis
Strength: bilateral thumb/fingers 4-/5 rest UE 4/5
bilateral dorsiflexion 3-/5
bilateral Plantar flexion 3+/5 rest LE 4/5
Sensory:
Pin Prick/Vibration: Bilateral UE significant impairment
fingers to elbows ; elbows to shoulders normal
 Bilateral LE: absent toes to ankles ; significant
impairment to knees, normal knees to hips.








Case Study ( cont)
 Proprioception:
 5/10 errors bilateral index fingers
 2/10 errors bilateral great toes
 Description: bilateral feet- high arched feet, hammer
toes, inverted wine bottle appearance distal legs.

Case Study (cont)
 EMG:
 Evidence of severe , large fiber length-dependent
sensory-motor axonal polyneuropathy. Suggests
chronic process of ongoing acute denervation in
presence of high arched feet, hammer toes and
family h/o similar feet, possible the process is
secondary to an inherited neuropathy and acute
conduction denervation due to chemotherapeutic
agents.
Case Study (cont)
 Referral to PT :8-2006
 Going complaint of bilateral numbness and tingling




hands and feet.
Imbalance: difficult to stand, trips when walking on even
floors at home, worse on uneven surfaces in dark or with
eyes closed , bending over in sink to wask face increasing
difficulty “holding” unto objects.
H/O fall
Ambualtion : WW bilateral AFOs
Severe ataxic pattern
Case Study: PT Eval












Fatigue: Global Fatigue Scale: 80-90/100
Pain: 0/10
Dizziness: 5/10 with position changes.
Sensation/Strength: as reported
Balance: Romberg-EO- 30 sec/ EC-12 sec increased sway. Romberg
:foam EO- 14 sec/ EC 3 sec both conditions demonstrated increased
sway.
5XSTS:28sec
BBS:40/56
TUG: 27 sec- ww bilateral AFOs
DGI: 8/24
Gait Speed: 0.67 m/sec
Activities Specific Balance Confidence Scale: 34%
Cancer Survivorship
 After 5 years 60% of individuals diagnosed with all
types of cancer are still alive.
 Chemotherapy:
 Cytotoxic drugs are given for cancer treatments.
 Chemo agents interrupts the cell cycle: disrupts cell
 mitosis
Chemotherapeutics
 Chemo Drugs
 Taxane:

Paclitaxel

Docetaxel

Abraxane
 Vinca Alkaloid

Vincristine

Vinorelbine





Platinum
Cisplatin
Carboplatinum
Oxaliplatinum
Used to Treat
breast
lung
0varian
leukemia/lymphoma
sarcoma
lung
ovarian
sarcoma
Chemotherapeutics: Toxity




Peripheral Nerve Toxicity:
Paclitaxel
Docetaxel
Thalidomides








DRG Toxity:
Platinum Analogues
Doxrubicin
Suramin Sodium
Bortezomibs
Taxanes
Vinca Alkaloids
Chemo Toxicity
 Peripheral Nerve:
Axon Damage
Interrupts transport along axons by
interrupting ion exchange across cell membrane
 When chemo stopped ~ 80% of improvement occurs
within 6 months.


Chemo Toxicity
 DRG:
 Acquired Sensory Neuron Disease





60-70% of sensory
axons are unmyelinated C Fibers
Degeneration of short/long sensory axons and central
sensory processing projection in the posterior columns
“costing” effect- symptoms initiate and often persist
after discontinuation of chemo treatments
Symptoms: can includepain, burning, numbness/tingling,decreased fine
motor, changes in thermal sensitivity, CN:3,4,6,and 8
Chemotherapeutics: Sites
 Neuropathy can effect:
 Motor System
 Sensory System
 Autonomic System
Chemo Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)
 CIPN factors:
 Which chemo agents used
 Dose and temporal pattern of delivery
 Health of the individual- functional reserve
 Risk Factors:
 Comorbid Peripheral Neuropathies
 balance impairments prior to treatment
 Visual Impairments
 Decreased peripheral vestibular function
Peripheral Neuropathy (PN)
 PN is not CIPN
 PN Comorbity could include:
 Diabetes
 GBS
 Axonal Neuropathies
 LS plexopathies
 CMT
 Miller Fischer Syndrome
 Chronic Inflammatory Polyradiculoneuropathiy
Chemotherapeutics: Side Effects











Cancer Related Fatigue (CRF): Present 85-95%
Anemia/Leucopenia
Thrombocytopenia
CIPN
Sarcopenia
“Chemo Brain”
Osteoporosis
Dysregulation of sleep cycle
Mood changes
Incontinence
Premature menopause
Case Study
 Intervention:






Education- CIPN- recognize symptoms
Ambulation- BWSTT /overground
Therapeutics Aquatics
Balance- static/transitional/dynamics challenges.
Epigentics and Cancer
 Epigentics : Study of hertiable changes to DNA
structure that does not alter the underlying
sequence.
 International Cancer Genome Consortium- initial
identification of patterns of recurrent somatic
mutations in protein-coding genes specific to a
variety of cancers
 Cancer epigentics is the area of emerging research
that is identifying the molecular pathogensis of
specific cancer types, assessing novel treatment
targets for an individual diagnosed with cancer.
Case Study
 Discharge Evaluation: (8-2008)
Strength- Bilateral dorsiflexors 4-/5, rest bilateral
LE 4+/5. Bilateral thumbs and fingers- 4/5, rest
bilateral UE 4+/5

Sensory: pin prick/light touch /vibration:UE- min
decrease fingers to elbows, normal to shoulders. Min
decrease toes to midcalf, midcalf to hips normal.

Proprioception: 0/10 errors bilateral index
fingers; 0/10 errors bilateral great toes.

Case Study
 Discharge Evaluation (cont):









Balance: romberg: even surface and foam-EO/EC: 30
sec . SLS right 24 sec, left 22 sec.
5XSTS: 8 sec
BBS: 50/56
TUG: 10 sec
DGI: 20/24
Ambulation: no assistive device, AFOs for long distances
Gait Speed: 1.01 m/sec
Activites Specific Balance Confidence Scale: 90%