* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Low Impact Development and Stormwater
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Low Impact Development and Stormwater Management in Pennsylvania Catherine Chomat, P.E. F. X. Browne, Inc Brian Oram, PG Wilkes University Dr. Robert Traver, P.E. Villanova University Impacts of Stormwater Runoff on Aquatic Ecosystems Impacts of Stormwater Runoff on Aquatic Systems • Historical Perspective • EPA 2000 Water Quality Report • Water Quality-Ecosystem Impacts Wastewater Treatment • • Since 1970… STP Construction $239 Billion STP Operations $234 Billion EPA Needs Survey $84 Billion Needed for new STPs for year 2008 Wastewater Treatment • • Populations Served by STPs 1972 85 million people 1988 150 million people From 1972 to 1988… 4000 new sewer systems 2000 new STPs Wastewater Treatment • 1988:Less than 1% of U.S. Population discharges untreated wastewater • Meeting Effluent Criteria Industrial 93% Municipal 87% Summary of Quality of Assessed Rivers, Lakes, and Estuaries Leading Causes and Sources* of Impairment in Assessed Rivers, Lakes and Estuaries Development Activities Site Clearing and Grading Tree Removal Loss of Natural Depressions (Storage) Loss of Topsoil/Humus Loss of Pervious Area/Percolation Increase in Impervious Area Increase in Runoff Development Impacts on Water Quality 1. Watershed Hydrology 2. Stream Geometry 3. Degradation of Aquatic Ecosystems 4. Pollutant Export During Construction 5. Pollutant Export After Site Development Impervious Cover as an Indicator of Stream Health (Schueler 1995) Characteristic Sensitive Degrading Non-Supporting Percent Impervious Cover 0% to 10% 11% to 25% 26% to 100% Channel Stability Stable Unstable Highly Unstable Water Quality Good to Excellent Fair to Good Fair to Poor Stream Biodiversity Good to Excellent Fair to Good Poor Pollutants of Concern Sediment and temperature only Also nutrients and metals Also bacteria 1. Watershed Hydrology 1. Reduced Infiltration 2. Increased Peak Discharges 2-5x Predevelopment 3. Increased Volume of Runoff Moderately Developed – 50% more runoff 4. Decreased Time of Concentration “Time Runoff Reaches Stream” as much as 50% lower 5. Increased Flooding Frequency & Severity Bankfull conditions: Natural…Once every 2 years Developed…3-4 times per year 6. Reduced Base Streamflow Due to Loss of Groundwater 7. Higher Runoff Velocity Changes in Hydrology Due to Development Hydrology Changes Due to Development Parking Lot vs. Meadow Parameter Runoff Coefficient Time of Concentration (minutes) Peak Discharge (cfs) 2-Year 100-Year Storm Runoff Volume (cu. ft.) Runoff Velocity 2-Year Storm (fps) Parking Lot 0.95 4.8 Meadow 0.06 14.4 4.3 12.6 3,450 0.4 3.1 218 8 1.8 COMPARISON OF RUNOFF VOLUME BETWEEN UNDEVELOPED AND DEVELOPED CONDITIONS STORM 24-HOUR ESTIMATED RUNOFF (inches) Undevel. Devel. RUNOFF AS PERCENT OF RAINFALL Undevel. Devel. FREQUENCY RAINFALL (years) (inches) 2 2.8 0.14 0.60 5% 21% 10 4.0 0.53 1.33 13% 33% 100 5.8 1.40 2.64 24% 46% 2. STREAM GEOMETRY 1. Channel Widening Developed Area Streams: 2 to 4 times original size Streambank Erosion Increased Pollutant Loads 2. Increase in Floodplain 3. Undercut Streambanks 4. Siltation of Stream Stream Bedload Substrate Changes (Biota Changes) Physical Impacts of Impervious Cover 3. DEGRADATION OF AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS 1. Cumulative Effects Scouring Sedimentation Velocity Streamflow Organic Matter - Biochemical Oxygen Demand Dissolved Oxygen Nutrients Toxics Chlorides 3. DEGRADATION OF AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS 2. Temperature Increase in % Impervious Increases Temp. Adverse Impact on - Algae - Macroinvertebrates - Fish Temperature % Impervious Area 3. DEGRADATION OF AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS 3. Fish and Macroinvertebrates – Decrease in …Diversity …Populations …Clean Water Species Increase in Pollution Tolerant Species 3. Degradation of Aquatic Ecosystems URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTANTS • Sediments • Nutrients • Bacteria • Organic Matter • Hydrocarbons • Metals • Toxic Chemicals • Chlorides SEDIMENTS Produced by: Construction Erosion Developed Area Erosion Washoff Streambank Erosion Problems: Turbidity Reduced Light Penetration Clogging of Gills/Filters (Fish & macroinvertebrates) Reduced Spawning Habitat Destruction Nutrients Metals Toxics Metals and Phosphorus Attach to Sediments NUTRIENTS Nitrogen (TN, NH3, NO3, Organic-N) Phosphorus (TP, PO4, SRP) Eutrophication of Lakes, Impoundments & Large Rivers PROBLEMS: Excessive Algae and Aquatic Weeds Dissolved Oxygen Depletion Taste & Odor Problems Fish Kills Loss of Recreation Toxins Increased Water Treatment Costs Wet vs. Dry Weather Stream Hydrograph Total Phosphorus Concentrations Stream Hydrograph Total Suspended Solids Concentrations BACTERIA Always Found in Urban Runoff Often Exceed Health Standards More Developed – More Bacteria Older Developed – More Bacteria Special Problem Areas: Combined Sewer Areas Sewer Overflow Areas ORGANIC MATTER Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) of Stormwater Runoff is High Causing: Decreased Dissolved Oxygen Stressed Aquatic Life Fish Kills Older, highly impervious areas – Highest BOD Dissolved Oxygen in Stream 0.4 Inches of Rain HYDROCARBONS Oil & Grease – Hydrocarbons Sources: Parking Lots Roads Gas Stations METALS Toxic Affect on Aquatic Life Impact on Drinking Water Common Metals Lead Copper Zinc Caveats: 1. Only soluble form is toxic and available for biological uptake 2. Some are attached to sediment TOXIC CHEMICALS NURP Studies: Scan of 120 Pollutants Small concentrations – no real problem Great Lakes – Contaminated Sediments Limited Data Base, Need More Data for Suburban, and Urban Ateas CHLORIDES Snowmelt: 2,000-3,000 mg/L Chlorides Soluble Streams High Levels: Toxic to organisms 4. POLLUTANT EXPORT DURING CONSTRUCTION Soil Erosion 35-45 Tons/Acre/Year – Uncontrolled 10 Times Agriculture and Developed Land 5. POLLUTANT EXPORT AFTER DEVELOPMENT A. Impervious Area Washoff Dryfall & Wetfall Up to 90% Washoff Constituents Sediments Metals Nutrients Sources Buildings, Roofs, Pipes Pet Droppings Vegetative Matter Litter Debris “THE LAND TAKES A SHOWER” 5. POLLUTANT EXPORT AFTER DEVELOPMENT B. Older Community – More Impervious Household Add-Ons C. Causes On-Site and Streambank Erosion Unit Area Loads Total Phosphorus Load Use lb/ac/yr Forest 0.1 – 0.35 Developed 0.4 – 3.5 Commercial 0.5 – 1.6 Agriculture 0.36 – 1.52 Ultimate Concern • Runoff Volume • Velocity in Stream • Streambank Erosion Our Ultimate Goal