Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Chemotherapy in Anal cancer ?Lessons for vulva ANZGOG 2013 Michelle Vaughan Anal v vulval etiology Anal Age Path HPV 60s All grades 70-85% Precursor AIN Risks Sex/smoking Vulval Type1 35-65 More G3 >60% Type 2 55-85 More G1 <15% VIN Sex/smoking Lichen sclerosis - VULVAL & ANAL CANCER LOCAL CONTROL is dominant aim of treatment Indolent natural history Mets are rare (<10% as a 1st event) Chemo given to help RT with local control (Uncommon paradigm for chemotherapists!) RCTs in ANAL CANCER n UKCCCR/ACT 585 Add chemo? 1996/2010 EORTC QUESTION 110 1997 RTOG 291 Need MMC? 1996 RTOG 644 Cis v MMC? 2008/11 UKCCCR/ACT 940 (2009) ACCORD -03 307 Chemo induct? HD RT? 5yr LFR % 5yr PFS % 5 yr OS % √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ - - - - - - - - Does chemo add to RT? n Compared ACT I 585 EORTC 110 5yr Local failure % 5yr PFS % 5 yr OS % RT - 25 +15 60 35 35 50 ns RT + 5FU/MMC - 15 +20 50 35 40 60 ns Chemo improves local control & PFS 15-25% Chemo doesn’t affect survival Arnott Lancet 1996 & Northover BJC 2010, Barteleink JCO 1997 Strong effect on Loco-regional relapse Northover 2010 BJC 102:1123 Insignificant survival benefit HR 0.86 CI 0.7 – 1.04 Northover 2010 BJC 102:1123 Anal cancer: Is MMC necessary? RTOG n Compared 4yr Local failure 291 5FU MMC RT 5FU RT +20% -20% 35 15 4yr PFS OS ns 50 70 YES, unfortunately it is. Flam 1996 JCO 14:2527-39 Anal cancer: Is MMC necessary? RTOG n Compared 4yr Local failure 291 5FU MMC RT 5FU RT +20% -20% 35 15 4yr PFS OS ns 50 70 YES, unfortunately it is. Bother. Flam 1996 JCO 14:2527-39 MMC is toxic …So can we replace it? Cisplatin instead of MMC? n RTOG 98-11 ACT II UKCCCR 644 940 Compared 5FU MMC RT 5yr LFR 5yr PFS OS + 8% -10 -7 25 33 5868 7178 5% col 75 85 5FU Cis RT MMC + 5FU remains the standard Adjani JAMA 2008 & ASCO 2011, James ASCO 2012 G3-4 Toxicity: Cis v MMC Haem Infection Non haem Severe long RTOG 10mg x 2 CIS MMC 44 61 10 17 65 61 10 11 ACTII 12mg x 1 CIS MMC 13 25 3 3 74 74 - Can we reduce the MMC dose? Dose Haem tox G 3-4 RTOG 10mg/m2 D1 + 29 61% UKCCCR ACT II 12mg/m2 D1 25% TOXICITY: Better with D1 only mitomycin EFFICACY???: Who knows? So, What MMC dose? • We will never know • Either is reasonable • If you use the RTOG 10mg/m2 D1 & D29 remember to: – Do weekly FBC – Dose reduce if nadirs wcc < 2.4! SUMMARY Anal cancer is similar to Vulval cancer In anal cancer several large RCTS say: - Chemo adds PFS to RT - MMC adds PFS to 5FU chemo - MMC is better than cisplatin in 1 of 2 trials - More haem tox ?Argue for 5FU/MMC thank you Delayed deaths problematic • Marked excess OTHER deaths in the CRT group, peaking at 5 years (+9% p0.001): – Cancer 2yr – Cardiovasc – Pulmonary 3 v 1% 5 v 3% 1 v 0% (13yr =12 v 6% p= 0.03) Northover 2010 BJC 102:1123 Details of excess deaths: • Cardiovascular– Spread in time course, median time about 1 year • Second cancers - Mostly lung cancer (reflecting shared etiology), 8 v 2 in 1st 5 years, 26 v 16 after 5 years SO: Late (+ acute) chemo toxicity possibly cancelling out survival benefit from reduction in anal cancer death in this population ANAL CANCER RCTs (full) UKCCCR n Compared 585 5FU MMC RT RT ACT I 1996 Northover 2010 EORTC 22861 110 Bartelink 1997 RTOG 87-04 291 Flam 1996 RTOG 98-11 644 Ajani 2008/11 UKCCCR# Conroy 2009 5FU MMC RT 5FU RT 5FU MMC RT 5FU Cis RT 5 yr CFS % 5yr PFS % 5 yr OS % - 25 +10 +13 57 32 37 47 34 47 53 58 - 16 +32 +18 48 32 (4577) (42 60) -18 +12 +22 34 16* 59 71* 51 73* 54 58 67 76 -8 + 10# + 7# 33 25 58 68 7178 940 5FU MMC RT 5FU Cis RT ns ns 75 3yr ? 307 5FU Cis induct HD RT 28 83 70 78 ACT II 2009 ACCORD-03# 5FU MMC RT RT 5yr LFR % P<.001 P <0.01 P<0.05 *4yr #abs only (x)=from graph