Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Grand Challenges for EarthScope in Geodesy Jim Davis Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics VE RI TAS 3 mm/yr GreatBREAK Workshop Bennett et al. [2003] GPS Horizontal Velocity Errors seven-year timespan 0 Velocity Standard Deviation (mm/yr) 10 -1 10 Ion-free LC Receiver Noise Only L1 Receiver Noise Only -2 10 -3 10 Assume Linear = True Random walk error model Whole-Error “Effective” LCMethod Phase Noisefor time series (1–3 mm/√yr) (Accounts (Ignores formal for multipath errors; and Other model Looks at velocity errors) fit to model; Combines model & data errors) -4 10 -5 10 -6 10 L1 Obs. Noise LC Obs. Noise "Effective" LC Noise GreatBREAK Workshop Whole-Error Random Walk 8 Linear + white noise error + correlated error 6 CEDA North (mm) 4 2 0 -2 -4 120-d boxcar smoothing -6 -8 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Epoch GreatBREAK Workshop 2001 2002 2003 2004 Time-Correlated Site Motions • Our tectonic framework 0 10 -1 10 2 Power Spectral Density (mm per cpd) predicts (generally) timelinear site motions • Exceptions: coseismic, postseismic, magmatic events • Nonlinear site motions (even if real) “geodetic error” • Power spectra of nonlinearities are used to derive error models -2 10 -3 10 seasonal -4 10 -5 10 0.1 GreatBREAK Workshop 1 10 Frequency (cycles per year) 100 • Deformation interpreted as periodic slow earthquakes in Cascadia subduction zone [Miller et al., 2002] • More recently, deformation associated with tremor activity GreatBREAK Workshop • Deformation associated with deep swarm of M < 2.2 earthquakes beneath Lake Tahoe • GPS measurements at BARGEN site SLID compared to cumulative moment • From Smith et al., submitted GreatBREAK Workshop • Temporally nonlinear motions of BARGEN sites modeled with acceleration terms • See Davis and Wernicke poster GreatBREAK Workshop Great Salt Lake Loading Elósegui et al. [2003]. GreatBREAK Workshop 8 6 CEDA North (mm) 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Epoch GreatBREAK Workshop 2001 2002 2003 2004 8 6 CEDA North (mm) 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Epoch GreatBREAK Workshop 2001 2002 2003 2004 QuickTime™ and a Video decompressor are needed to see this picture. GreatBREAK Workshop Grand Geodetic Questions for EarthScope • Under what conditions, and on what time and space resolution and scales, is crustal deformation continuous and secular? • Is the time-linearity “default” simply a convenient approximation for the Earth’s behavior in the era of “>1 mm/yr” level (campaign) geodesy? • What can this nonsecular behavior tell us about forces in the Earth’s crust and interior and the response of the crust to those forces? GreatBREAK Workshop Challenges for Geodesy • Quantify (accurately) GPS error and its temporal • • • • and spatial behavior Must be independent (as possible) of assumptions concerning Earth’s behavior Will rely heavily on multiple techniques and data types Must be applicable to EarthScope’s spatial and temporal scales (inner and outer) Develop analysis strategies that allow for nonsecular behavior GreatBREAK Workshop