Download Medico-legal cases in Strabismus

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Medico-legal aspects of
Strabismus
Lionel Kowal
Ocular Motility, RVEEH
1
We ALL live and
work in a
glasshouse
Melbourne’s a small town
You will see my unhappy pts
I will see your unhappy pts
L.Kowal 2004
2
My experience :
+
30
cases
Defendant
Advisor / opinions to legal firms Plaintiff and Defendant
Expert witness
L.Kowal 2004
3
Is it Lawyers & Doctors
or
Lawyers vs. Doctors ?
 WE’RE VERY DIFFERENT
Doctors : truth, honesty, one- on- one caring
Lawyers : VICTORY for the client
L.Kowal 2004
4
It is the lawyers DUTY to…
 manipulate the truth to help victory
 encourage an expert to accept distortion
1% risk becomes 50% risk
choose an expert whose Calvinist or
Generous personality supports client’s case
The patient responded to my hand signal from
across the waiting room ….
L.Kowal 2004
5
It is the lawyers DUTY to…
 manipulate the truth to help victory
 encourage an expert to accept distortion
1% risk becomes 50% risk
 choose an expert whose expertise / lack of expertise supports client’s
case [‘Brawn beats brain’]
‘Expert’ in ref surg case with ZERO experience in ref surg
Passion of intellectual or PERSONAL opposition more important than
expertise
 choose an expert whose Calvinist or Generous personality supports
client’s case
The patient responded to my hand signal from across the waiting room ….
L.Kowal 2004
6
NSW c.f. Vic
NSW more ‘aggressive’ culture than Vic
More ‘fishing’
More record subpoenas
More aggressive questioning in court
‘Experts’ more likely to partisan
L.Kowal 2004
7
Bar is VERY high for the Dr
Court [on behalf of the community] determines
standard of care
Peer standards of care NOT a defence
Medical board even higher bar
eg Medownick: CANNOT RELY ON HISTORY AS GIVEN BY
PATIENT - must obtain WRITTEN history from previous Drs
L.Kowal 2004
8
Chapel & Hart paraphrased
If the case is unusual &
If you the treating doctor know that there is someone
else who has particular expertise in this sort of
case then
Part of the informed consent process must involve
you telling the patient about this other doctor &
letting the patient choose between you & the other
doctor
L.Kowal 2004
9
Diplopia after adult squint
surgery #1
Adult XT. No diplopia by history or during exam.
Uneventful LR recess: lat incomitance →
persisting lat gaze diplopia.
MESSAGE
1: Diplopia always possible
2: Iatrogenic incomitance doesn’t always get
better
L.Kowal 2004
10
Diplopia after adult squint
surgery
#2
30 yo WCM
i/mitt ET esp when tired
UCV 6/6. +2 : 6/6. Cyclo +6! [+4 latent hyperopia]
Demands ET surgery : Accomm spasm for suture
adjustment  poor result [→ multiple surgeries
inc hyperopic Lasik!]
MESSAGE
Proper Cyclo Refraction in all adult hyperopia /
esotropia [mydriacyl not enough!!]
L.Kowal 2004
11
? Patch the wrong eye @ age 10
months for 11 days
Several subsequent ophthals / surgeries →
6/9,6/36; spectacle dependent; ET; poor self
image; poor school results → litigation
15 years later : files from visit not available: case
difficult to defend!
Other Drs not joined
MESSAGE: NEVER discard child’s file
L.Kowal 2004
12
Inferior rectus fibrosis after
blocks for cataract surgery
 ? 1% occurrence
 << 1% troublesome
 Alternatives exist
MESSAGE
Must mention diplopia with blocks
L.Kowal 2004
13
Bilateral Brown’s
Parents seek Rx for AHP - tip up [photo 30 °]
Post Sx: diplopia complaints++
NO MEC / clumsiness / objective signs of diplopia
Now: “Why did you operate ? He wasn’t that bad”.
MESSAGE:
Good pre-op documentation of indications for
unusual surgery. Can show parents the pre-op
photos they had brought and transcript of phrases
they had used
L.Kowal 2004
14
Cerebellar atrophy
DBN  oscillopsia / blur
fixed with tip-up AHP
also skew deviation with diplopia
IR Rc : temp better. re-Rc : diplopia
Diplopia due to progressive skew
MESSAGE
Document pre-op diplopia. Photos for difficult cases.
Weird :  2nd opinions
L.Kowal 2004
15
WHO IS AN EXPERT?
Weird repetitive eye mvmts after minor head
injury.
Several neurologists can’t explain it. Psychiatrist
‘confirms’ is malingering.
David Zee / Peter Savino confirm is organic
Improved by neurontin
L.Kowal 2004
16
WHO IS AN EXPERT?
DECLINE to comment if you are not a genuine
expert [eg psychiatrist]
Incorrect advice HARMFUL & EXPENSIVE –
many cases ‘run’ on 2nd rate reports then
abandoned [eg several days in court]
US: Some litigation against pseudo- experts
L.Kowal 2004
17
PUBLIC / PRIVATE
Pt with total 6th told ‘not fixable’ in public clinic. Pt
sees Dr X [head of same public clinic] privately
and is fixed!
Pt explores action for costs against public clinic and
joins Dr X as head of clinic!
Recent MMC gyne case: Private gyne refers pt to
public clinic with which he has no association and
is joined in action when result is bad
L.Kowal 2004
18
Acquired XT after refractive
lensectomy
Female , 50. Wears +5. Cyclo refraction +7 =
surgical target → 6/6 OU.
2 DS latent hyperopia → loss of accomm conv used
to control unrecognised exo → troublesome XT
Kushner / Kowal Archives ’03 : 28 pts ref surg/strab
20%!! monovision pts have abnormal binoc vision
MESSAGE: Stratify ref Sx pts into high/ med / low
risk groups & evaluate appropriately
19
Role of the Orthoptist
 Historically : Ophthal delegates intellectual
understanding of strabismus to the orthoptist
Case: Alphabet / oblique dysfunction waiting in
OR for orthoptist’s surgical recipe!
Postop diplopia >2 further Sx e/where
MESSAGE: Don’t do strab if you can’t
L.Kowal 2004
20
WE ALL LIVE AND WORK
IN A GLASSHOUSE
Thank you
L.Kowal 2004
21
WRITING REPORTS
Emphasise relevance in CV
Disability :American MA 4th & 5th Editions (NOT
RANZCO!)
Report should be understandable to your secretary
Add Glossary
Criticize colleagues in supplementary report
L.Kowal 2004
22