* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Future urbanization in Asia and potential heat risk
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Future urbanization in Asia and potential urban heat risk: Preliminary study presented at the GCP Workshop, University of Tokyo, Japan 7-10 December 2015 Peter J. Marcotullio, Carsten Kessler, Carson Farmer, Gabriel Schuster, Jonah Garnick & Douglas Price Outline • • • • • Introduction Research design Preliminary findings Discussion Summary, caveats and future work Introduction • “There are no real independent urbanization projections to the UN Urbanization Prospects, as alternative scenarios invariably use the UN historical and current data as model inputs and also deploy a comparable methodological framework” (Grubler, 2013) • The UN currently projection urbanization to 2050, provides urban population numbers and growth rates (for nations) as well as a list of ~1700 cities of 300 thousand or greater (1950-2030) Introduction to population growth • What are the UN general trends and predictions for global urbanization? Millions Urban and rural population in the World, 1950 - 2050 12 000 10 000 8 000 6 000 4 000 2 000 0 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Rural Source: UN 2014 Urban Billlions World urban population by region 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 OCEANIA EUROPE LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN NORTHERN AMERICA ASIA AFRICA Introduction • What are the UN general trends and predictions for global population? Total population, 1950-2100 WORLD More developed regions Less developed regions AFRICA ASIA EUROPE LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN NORTHERN AMERICA OCEANIA 1950 2 525 779 812 943 1 712 836 228 827 1 395 749 549 043 167 869 171 615 12 675 Source: UN DESA, 2012, 2014, Medium Fertility Variant Total Population (000) 2000 2050 6 127 700 9 550 945 1 193 355 1 303 110 4 934 346 8 247 835 808 304 2 393 175 3 717 372 5 164 061 729 105 709 067 526 278 781 566 315 417 446 201 31 224 56 874 2100 10 853 849 1 284 035 9 569 814 4 184 577 4 711 514 638 816 736 228 513 065 69 648 Introduction • What is the country level distribution of general trends and prediction for global population? Total population change 1950 to 2000, by country Total population change 2000 to 2050, by country Total population change 2050 to 2100, by country Introduction • There are four urbanization scenario/projections to date: – Nicholls et al (2008): extend the UN projections to 2100 applying a constant fraction (to port cities) at the national level to determine future port-city populations exposed to climate change risk – Grubler et al (2007): extends the UN urbanization projections to 2100 and develops two additional scenario variants in which the asymptotic urbanization levels are varied to explore the implications of lower urbanization. The three urbanization rate scenarios are then combined with three alternative total population growth scenarios (low, medium and high) to determine the uncertainty range of future urban populations – Balk et al 2012: applies Grubler et al (2007) data on low elevation coastal zones (LECZ) to 2100 – GEA (2012): extends urbanization scenarios with emphasis on energy issues and normative pathways (where economic, energy and security issues are simultaneously achieved). Based upon UN data and Grubler et al (2007) Research design Research design Data • Databases – – – – – Temperature (current & 2050) Spatial population and land boundaries (2010) Urban areas (2000) National borders (2000) UN total and urban population data 2000-2050 Research design Data Variable Population Urban areas National population Urbanization Nations Temperature Database Year Coverage Resolution Source 30 arc-second grid Gridded Population of the cell (~ 1 km at http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/gpw-v4/ World 4 (GWP4) release 2 2010 Global equator), (2010) 0.008333333 DD 30 arc-second grid Global Rural Urban 1990, 1995, cell (~ 1 km at http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/collection/g Global Mapping Project (GRUMP) equator), 2000 rump-v1 (2005) 0.008333333 DD World Population Prospects 1950-2100 Global nations http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/DVD/ (2014) World Urbanization 1950-2050 Global nations http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/ Prospects (2014) 30 arc-second grid Global Rural Urban cell (~ 1 km at http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/collection/g Mapping Project (GRUMP) 2000 Global equator), rump-v1 (2005) 0.008333333 DD GCM downscaled GCM data portal, Research Program 2.5 minutes (~ 4.5 1950-2000 on Climate Change, Global km at equator), http://www.ccafs-climate.org/data/ & 2050 Agriculture and Food 0.041667 DD Security, CGIAR and CCAFS Modeling Center (or Group) Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) and Bureau of Meteorology (BOM), Australia Beijing Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration Institute ID CSIRO-BOM Model Name ACCESS1.0 ACCESS1.3 BCC BCC-CSM1.1 BCC-CSM1.1(m) College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University GCESS BNU-ESM Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis CCCMA CanESM2 NCAR CCSM4 National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Earth System Model Contributors Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization in collaboration with Queensland Climate Change Centre of Excellence EC-EARTH consortium LASG, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and CESS,Tsinghua University The First Institute of Oceanography, SOA, China NSF-DOE-NCAR CESM1(BGC) CSIRO-QCCCE CSIRO-Mk3.6.0 EC-EARTH EC-EARTH LASG-CESS FGOALS-g2 FIO FIO-ESM GFDL-ESM2M NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory NOAA GFDL GFDL-CM3 GFDL-ESM2G NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies Met Office Hadley Centre (additional HadGEM2-ES realizations contributed by Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais) Institute for Numerical Mathematics NASA GISS GISS-E2-H GISS-E2-R MOHC HadGEM2-ES (additional realizations by INPE) HadGEM2-CC INM INM-CM4 IPSL-CM5A-LR Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace IPSL IPSL-CM5A-MR IPSL-CM5B-LR MIROC-ESM Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute (The University of Tokyo), and National Institute for Environmental Studies MIROC Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute (The University of Tokyo), National Institute for Environmental Studies, and Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology MIROC Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie (Max Planck Institute for Meteorology) MPI-M MIROC-ESM-CHEM MIROC5 MPI-ESM-MR MPI-ESM-LR Meteorological Research Institute MRI MRI-CGCM3 Norwegian Climate Centre NCC NorESM1-M Data downloaded from (http://www.ccafsclimate.org/data/) GCM downscaled GCM data portal, Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security, CGIAR and CCAFS RCP8.5, 2.5 arc minutes resolution for globe Data: Sample of urban extents and national boundaries Global Rural Urban Mapping Project (GRUMP) both raster (30 arc seconds) and vector files for year 2000 Research Design UN Population data United Nations Population Division Department of Economic and Social Affairs World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision File 3: Urban Population at Mid-Year by Major Area, Region and Country, 1950-2050 (thousands) POP/DB/WUP/Rev.2014/1/F03 July 2014 - Copyright © 2014 by United Nations. All rights reserved Suggested citation: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2014). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, CD-ROM Edition. • National scale data for population and urban population every 5 years from 1950 – 2050 • Urban areas are defined by national governments and may not conform to GRUMP urban extents • Projections are based on UN DESA methodologies, see: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/public ations/manual/projection/index.shtml Research design methods • Temperature 1. All annual files include 12 months of mean, max and min temperatures 2. For each model, we created 3-dimensional arrays and identified, for each cell, the highest three temperatures for three consecutive months and from this created a new raster 3. Among the 30 models for 2050 we created another 3-dimensional array and, for each cell, identified: a) the mean values and b) picked the highest mean Research design methods • Population 1. We started with GRUMP 2000 and GPW4 2010 spatial population data 2. We used the GRUMP rural-urban masks to identified urban and non-urban areas 3. We allocated urban and rural population, based upon UN figures, randomly by country, Research design methods • Analysis 1. We use a sample of urban areas (~3600) to sample both urban population and temperature (61% of urban population in 2010 and 75% of urban population in 2050) 2. We find mean temperatures for the “current” (2010), 2050 and 2050 highest mean periods 3. We compare changes in populations exposed to these different temperatures Preliminary results Projected temperature change (RCP 8.5 highest 3 month means) Population change over time Asian population change by latitude Urban population under different summer temperature conditions, 2010 and 2050 1,400 1,200 Population (millions) 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 < 28 C 28-32 C 32-34 C 34-36 36-38 C 3 month mean temperature conditions (degrees C) 2010 2050 2050 (highest mean) 38-40 C > 40 Preliminary results Percent of sample Asian urban population experiencing 3 month temperatures. 2010 and 2050 Year 2010 2050 2050 (highest mean) < 28 28-32 32-34 34-36 36-38 38-40 >40 62.76 21.95 12.18 27.48 50.00 45.76 8.85 8.52 17.74 0.91 11.91 8.35 0.00 6.21 8.78 0.00 1.38 4.10 0.00 0.03 3.08 Between 252.5 and 528.8 million urban residents Discussion Discussion • Urbanization includes much more than population expansion Source: Romero-Lankao et al 2014 Projected future urban land use in Asia 2000 to 2030 Source: Seto et al. 2012. PNAS Discussion • Across the world’s continents, Asia suffers from a disproportional distribution of “natural hazard” impacts Millions Total population affected by ”natural disasters” by continent: 5-year moving averages, 1950-2014 300 250 Populatoin affected 200 Africa 150 Americas Asia Europe Oceania 100 50 2014 2012 2010 2008 2006 2004 2002 2000 1998 1996 1994 1992 1990 1988 1986 1984 1982 1980 1978 1976 1974 1972 1970 1968 1966 1964 1962 1960 1958 1956 1954 1952 1950 0 Year Source: D. Guha-Sapir, R. Below, Ph. Hoyois - EM-DAT: The CRED/OFDA International Disaster Database – www.emdat.be – Université Catholique de Louvain – Brussels – Belgium. Discussion • Risk from extreme heat currently has one of the lowest impacts among hazards in the region Distribution of selective cumulative natural disaster impacts in Asia and share of World, 1950-2014 Occurances Percent Natural Disaster Number Total Asia Drought 152 4.3 Floods 1,805 51.3 Storms 1,500 42.6 Heat waves 61 1.7 Total Asia 3,518 World Drought Floods Storms Heat waves Total World 632 4,374 3,607 167 8,780 24.1 41.3 41.6 36.5 40.1 Affected Number Percent (millions) Total Deaths Number Percent (thousands) Total Damage Cost Percent (US$ billions) Total 1,725 3,406 908 0.1 6,039 28.6 56.4 15.0 0.0 1,513 2,283 889 12.1 4,697 32.2 48.6 18.9 0.3 38 410 224 0.4 673 5.6 61.0 33.3 0.1 2,221 3,584 994 5 6,804 77.6 95.0 91.4 2.6 88.8 2,211 2,377 970 155 5,714 68.4 96.0 91.6 7.8 82.2 136 673 1,022 22 1,853 28.0 60.9 22.0 1.9 36.3 Source: D. Guha-Sapir, R. Below, Ph. Hoyois - EM-DAT: The CRED/OFDA International Disaster Database – www.emdat.be – Université Catholique de Louvain – Brussels – Belgium. Discussion • With expanding population and urban areas will come increasing energy use, infrastructure development and other activities that create and increase Urban Heat Island effects • While those Asian affected by extreme heat are low in number compared to other risk, this hazard will grow in importance, not only because of the higher number of those exposed but also because of increased sensitivity (larger numbers of older people in cities) 3000 2500 Deaths from heat waves 2000 1500 Heat wave Linear (Heat wave) 1000 500 Adj. R-sq. = 0.071 Sign. F = 0.018 0 Source: D. Guha-Sapir, R. Below, Ph. Hoyois - EM-DAT: The CRED/OFDA International Disaster Database – www.emdat.be – Université Catholique de Louvain – Brussels – Belgium. Discussion • “Despite all of the heat-related risks that cities face in the future, few have put heat-management plans in place” (Hoag, 2015, pp. 404) • My guess is that solutions may come from new technologies, urban design and energy efficiencies AND from traditional sources including traditional housing and building technologies Conclusions Conclusions • We have developed a simple baseline model for the creation of urbanization scenarios using a random distribution of urban and non-urban population across national space • The output of this model is associated with temperature outputs from 30 models for RCP 8.5 pathways to 2050 • Results suggest increasing and large urban populations may experience very warm consecutive months in the mid-term (2050) future Conclusions • Selected caveats – These are preliminary findings of a baseline for the development of scenarios. This baseline needs further validation and checking; – The model method while “plausible” has not yet been compared to historical development patterns; – We do not include UHI in our results; – We do not include urban physical expansion in the model; Conclusions • Some thoughts on further work for Asia • Phase 1 – Calculate temperatures for RCP 8.5 for 2020, 2030, 2060 and 2080 – Project urbanization to 2100 – Continue baseline analysis to 2100 – Compare model outputs to historical results Conclusions • Phase II – Develop different models of urbanization for a range of outputs • Allocation models for urban growth based upon, inter alia, transportation corridors, physical barriers, and densities • Varying urbanization and population levels – Compare the results from these analyses against each other and the baseline “random” approach End