Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Scientific Method Formulation of an H ypothesis P lanning an experiment to objectively test the hypothesis Careful observation and collection of D ata from the experiment I nterpretation of the experimental results Steps in Experimentation H Definition of the problem Statement of objectives P Selection of treatments Selection of experimental material Selection of experimental design Selection of the unit for observation and the number of replications Control of the effects of the adjacent units on each other Consideration of data to be collected Outlining statistical analysis and summarization of results D Conducting the experiment I Analyzing data and interpreting results Preparation of a complete, readable, and correct report The Well-Planned Experiment Simplicity – don’t attempt to do too much – write out the objectives, listed in order of priority Degree of precision – appropriate design – sufficient replication Absence of systematic error Range of validity of conclusions – well-defined reference population – repeat the experiment in time and space – a factorial set of treatments also increases the range Calculation of degree of uncertainty Types of variables Continuous – can take on any value within a range (height, yield, etc.) – measurements are approximate – often normally distributed Discrete – only certain values are possible (e.g., counts, scores) – not normally distributed, but means may be Categorical – – – – qualitative; no natural order often called classification variables generally interested in frequencies of individuals in each class binomial and multinomial distributions are common Terminology experiment planned inquiry treatment procedure whose effect will be measured factor class of related treatments levels states of a factor variable measurable characteristic of a plot experimental unit (plot) unit to which a treatment is applied replications experimental units that receive the same treatment sampling unit part of experimental unit that is measured block group of homogeneous experimental units experimental error variation among experimental units that are treated alike Barley Yield Trial Experiment Hypothesis Treatment Factor Levels Variable Experimental Unit Replication Block Sampling Unit Error Hypothesis Testing H0: = ɵ HA: ɵ or H0: 1= 2 HA: 1 2 If the observed (i.e., calculated) test statistic is greater than the critical value, reject H0 If the observed test statistic is less than the critical value, fail to reject H0 The concept of a rejection region (e.g. = 0.05) is not favored by some statisticians It may be more informative to: – Report the p-value for the observed test statistic – Report confidence intervals for treatment means Hypothesis testing It is necessary to define a rejection region to determine the power of a test Decision Accept H0 Reject H0 Reality H0 is true 1 = 2 Correct HA is true 1 2 1- Type II error Power Type I error Power of the test Power is greater when – differences among treaments are large – alpha is large – standard errors are small Review - Corrected Sum of Squares Definition formula n SS Y Yi Y i1 2 Computational formula – common in older textbooks uncorrected sum of squares correction factor Yi n i1 2 SSY Yi n i1 n 2 Review of t tests To test the hypothesis that the mean of a single population is equal to some value: Y 0 t sY Compare to critical t for n-1 df for a given (0.05 in this graph) 2 s where s Y n df = df = n-1 df = 6 df = 3 Review of t tests To compare the mean of two populations with equal variances and equal sample sizes: Y1 Y 2 t s Y1 Y2 where sY1 Y2 2s2 n df = 2(n-1) The pooled s2 should be a weighted average of the two samples Review of t tests To compare the mean of two populations with equal variances and unequal sample sizes: Y1 Y 2 t sY1 Y2 where sY1 Y2 1 1 s df = (n1-1) + (n2-1) n1 n2 2 The pooled s2 should be a weighted average of the two samples Review of t tests When observations are paired, it may be beneficial to use a paired t test – for example, feeding rations given to animals from the same litter t2 = F in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) when there are only two treatment levels Paired t2 = F in a RBD (Randomized Complete Block Design) with two treatment levels Measures of Variation s (standard deviation) Y s2 n CV (coefficient of variation) s2 * 100 Y t ,df se (standard error of a mean) L (Confidence Interval for a mean) 2 s n sY1Y2 2 (standard error of a difference between means) 2s2 n t ,df Y t ,df t ,df 2 s2 n 2 LSD (Least Significant Difference between means) L(Confidence Interval for a difference between means) t ,df 2s2 n Y Y t 1 2 ,df 2s2 n