Download latchup

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Fault tolerance wikipedia , lookup

Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup

Ohm's law wikipedia , lookup

Electrical ballast wikipedia , lookup

Tube sound wikipedia , lookup

Flexible electronics wikipedia , lookup

Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup

Power engineering wikipedia , lookup

Islanding wikipedia , lookup

Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup

Ground (electricity) wikipedia , lookup

Current source wikipedia , lookup

History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup

Power inverter wikipedia , lookup

Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup

Buck converter wikipedia , lookup

Rectifier wikipedia , lookup

Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup

Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Two-port network wikipedia , lookup

Metadyne wikipedia , lookup

Surge protector wikipedia , lookup

Thermal runaway wikipedia , lookup

Alternating current wikipedia , lookup

Semiconductor device wikipedia , lookup

Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup

Regenerative circuit wikipedia , lookup

History of the transistor wikipedia , lookup

Rectiverter wikipedia , lookup

Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup

Earthing system wikipedia , lookup

Current mirror wikipedia , lookup

Transistor wikipedia , lookup

CMOS wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Digital cell (inverter) as used on the MDT-ASD with 3m "Well-to-Active" spacing according to
MOSIS SCMOS scalable design rules for the HP AMOS14TB process (SCN3MLC_SUBM, lambda = 0.3)
and cross section with parasitic bipolar transistors forming the latchup circuit.
Well-to-Active spacing
3m
p-substrate
Rwell
Rsub
A byproduct of the Bulk CMOS structure is a pair of parasitic bipolar transistors. The collector of each BJT
is connected to the base of the other transistor in a positive feedback structure. Latchup can occur when both
BJT's conduct, creating a low resistance path between Vdd and GND and the product of the gains of the two
transistors in the feedback loop, 1  2, is greater than 1. The result of latchup is at the minimum a circuit
malfunction, and in the worst case, the destruction of the device.
Latchup may begin when Vout drops below GND due to a noise spike or an improper circuit hookup (Vout
is the base of the lateral NPN Q2). If sufficient current flows through Rsub to turn on Q2 (I  Rsub > 0.7 V ),
this will draw current through Rwell. If the voltage drop across Rwell is high enough, Q1 will also turn on,
and a self-sustaining low resistance path between the power rails is formed. If the gains are such that 1  2
> 1, latchup may occur. Once latchup has begun, the only way to stop it is to reduce the current below a
critical level, usually by removing power from the circuit. The most likely place for latchup to occur is in
pad drivers, where large voltage transients and large currents are present.
Preventing latchup
Fab/Design Approaches
1.
Reduce the gain product 1  2
 move n-well and n+ source/drain farther apart increases width of the base of Q2 and reduces gain 2,
also reduces circuit density
 buried n+ layer in well reduces gain of Q1
2.
Reduce the well and substrate resistances, producing lower voltage drops
 higher substrate doping level reduces Rsub
 reduce Rwell by making low resistance contact to GND
 guard rings around p- and/or n-well, with frequent contacts to the rings, reduces the parasitic
resistances.
Systems Approaches
1.
2.
3.
4.
Make sure power supplies are off before plugging a board. A "hot plug in" of an unpowered circuit
board or module may cause signal pins to see surge voltages greater than 0.7 V higher than Vdd, which
rises more slowly to is peak value. When the chip comes up to full power, sections of it could be
latched.
Carefully protect electrostatic protection devices associated with I/O pads with guard rings. Electrostatic
discharge can trigger latchup. ESD enters the circuit through an I/O pad, where it is clamped to one of
the rails by the ESD protection circuit. Devices in the protection circuit can inject minority carriers in
the substrate or well, potentially triggering latchup.
Radiation, including x-rays, cosmic, or alpha rays, can generate electron-hole pairs as they penetrate the
chip. These carriers can contribute to well or substrate currents.
Sudden transients on the power or ground bus, which may occur if large numbers of transistors switch
simultaneously, can drive the circuit into latchup. Whether this is possible should be checked through
simulation.
A number of design techniques are used to reduce the probability of latch up.

Generous use of substrate and n-well bias contacts. Placement of bias contacts between PMOS
transistors and NMOS transistors decreases the values of parasitic resistances.

Reduce substrate resistance, Rsub, by contacting the buried layer with a deep N diffusion.

Improve supply busing. Proper reverse biasing of the substrate and the n-well requires that they be
connected to the most positive supply and the most negative supply, respectively. Supply under passing
and serpentine routing should be avoided. Supply lines should be wider than minimum to reduce voltage
drops.

Isolate MOS transistors connected to bond pads. Latchup requires NMOS and PMOS transistors to be in
close proximity. If transistor drains are connected to pads and the pads are driven beyond the supply
rails, parasitic transistors may be turned on, triggering latchup. Separating PMOS and NMOS transistors
increases the base width of the parasitic lateral pnp. This decreases its beta and reduces the loop gain of
the SCR structure below the value necessary to sustain latchup.

Use guard rings between NMOS and PMOS devices. These rings are made of N+ source/drain
diffusions and are connected to the positive supply rail. They reduce R sub, the substrate resistance, and
reduce the beta of the lateral parasitic pnp.

Regroup transistors according to type with a greater distance between PMOS and NMOS transistors.
Avoid a "checkerboard" layout with PMOS and NMOS devices mixed together.