Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Virginia's Use of Bacteria Source Tracking to Develop “Cheaper, Better, Faster” Bacteria TMDLs 1. What is Bacteria Source Tracking (BST)? The term “Bacteria Source Tracking” (BST) in connection with water quality management describes the use of various technologies to determine the source of bacteria in a given body of water. Nationally, several procedures for BST in two major categories (biochemical methods, molecular or DNA fingerprinting methods) are currently in use or under development. In Virginia, the methods used most frequently are antibiotic resistance analysis (biochemical) as well as ribotyping and pulse field gel electrophoresis (molecular). The underlying assumption in these methods is that bacteria carried by different hosts will exhibit distinctive patterns either in their response to antibiotics or in their genetic code. DNA - based methods offer very precise source identification (i.e. identification of individual animal types), but their utility is limited due to the expense and the timeconsuming nature of the procedures. Biochemical methods are simpler, faster, and less costly, but they have typically been used for less precise analyses (i.e. identification of major source group such as human, livestock, wildlife). 2. How has BST been used in Virginia’s bacteria TMDLs? BST has been used in several watershed studies to determine the dominant sources of fecal contamination in Virginia’s streams and estuarine waters. The most assertive use of BST occurred in three bacteria TMDLs, where loading inputs to the watershed model were adjusted until the average annual loading by source as represented by the model was equal to the average annual percentage of the source in the water samples as determined by BST. In other TMDLs, BST helped to support model output showing that wildlife was a significant contributor to the fecal coliform contamination in the waterbody. BST has also been very helpful in stakeholder meetings by demonstrating the sources that were contributing bacteria to the stream through data. Due to the BST analysis, the stakeholders were much more receptive of the load allocations developed during the TMDL process. 3. What are the potential future applications of BST in bacteria TMDLs? Virginia is currently pursuing the use of BST as the primary tool for source identification and allocation development, striving for “cheaper, better, and faster” bacteria TMDLs. BST will allow us to use measured data rather than relying on assumptions of source distributions within the watershed and on highly complex, data – intensive watershed models such as HSPF, which give the illusion of detail and accuracy that may be inappropriate for bacteria TMDLs. 1) Application in Shellfish Waters Together with the EPA Region III, Virginia is developing a BST – based approach for TMDLs in fecal coliform impaired shellfish waters. The shellfish method involves calculating an “allowable loading” for the TMDL study area using the volume of water and the numeric value of the applicable bacteria standard. The actual fecal coliform bacteria loading of the TMDL study area will be determined by using the volume of water in the TMDL study area and the fecal coliform bacteria data collected by the Division of Shellfish Sanitation. Sources of the bacteria will be determined from the BST analysis. Using the loading and BST source information, the TMDL allocation or reductions needed to attain water quality will be calculated by comparison of the “allowable loading” with the actual loading. 2) Virginia’s Proposed “Cheaper Better Faster” Application in Freshwater Streams In addition to the shellfish TMDLs, Virginia is investigating the potential use of a cheaper, better, faster method to develop TMDLs for fecal coliform bacteria impaired freshwater streams. This method is similar to the flow duration method recently developed by Kansas, but the pollutant source identification is made through a BST analysis. Using the flow duration data from the stream flow frequency analysis and the applicable value of the bacteria water quality standard, the “allowable loading” of the TMDL watershed is developed. The actual bacteria loads for the stream are calculated using daily stream flow values and the ambient bacteria data. The TMDL allocation or bacteria reductions needed for the attainment of the water quality is calculated by comparison of the “allowable loading” with the "actual stream loading". Source reductions (human, cattle, canine, poultry, wildlife, etc,) are determined by using the BST analysis.