Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Produce decontamination : Considerations and future issues Linda Everis Campden BRI, Chipping Campden, Glos, UK. [email protected] Outline of presentation • Where are the microorganisms? • How do they get there? • How do we get remove them: decontamination • Chlorine washing • Alternatives to chlorine: acid, alkali, ozone, chlorine dioxide Microorganisms associated with fresh produce • Diverse microflora associated with fresh fruits and vegetables • Gram-negative spoilage bacteria (Pseudomonas, Enterobacteriaceae) • Yeasts and moulds • Pathogenic bacteria – Salmonella., E. coli 0157:H7, Shigella, Listeria, Bacillus, Clostridium., Vibrio, Yersinia, Aeromonas • Viruses – Hepatitis A, Norovirus • Parasites – Giardia, Cyclospora, Cryptosporidium, Where are these microorganisms? • on natural surfaces • on cut surfaces • inside the plant tissues How do the organisms get there? • Seed - contaminated with Salmonella,E.coli • Major issue with sprouted seeds – need to ensure seeds are decontaminated prior to use and much research being done in this area • Primary production- Fertilisers, irrigation water, animals contaminated with pathogens • Harvesting- contamination by pickers • Processing-inadequate washing procedures fail to remove or even add contamination • Storage-inadequate hygiene, times and temperatures of storage Typical levels of microorganisms on fresh produce before processing Vegetable TVC Log10count/g Broccoli 4.0 Cabbage 3.6-6.3 Lettuce 4.3 Carrotts 5.6 Corn 5.0-7.0 Spinach 6.3-7.4 Key bacterial pathogens • Salmonella • Listeria • E.coli O157 Viruses • Viruses that can cause foodborne illness – Human Norovirus – Hepatitis A – Hepatitis E Outbreaks Year Country Food Cases Virus 2009 Australia Semi dried tomatoes 144 HAV 2010 Denmark Lettuce 264 HuNV 2010 Finland Frozen raspberries 46 HuNV 2010 France & Netherlands Semi dried tomatoes 72 HAV 2012 Germany Frozen strawberries 11000 HuNV 2013 10 European countries Frozen 1444 blackberries and redcurrants HAV 2013 USA Pomegranate seed HAV 165 Key surrogates used to date Virus Source/comments Murine norovirus (MNV) Controlled by patent laws – owner Washington University patent No 7,041,444 B2 Feline calicivirus (FCV) ATCC MS2 ATCC How can microorganisms be removed: Produce Washing • Removal of debris and spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms • Potable water containing biocides, disinfectants and processing aids – chlorine, chlorine dioxide, organic acids, • Washing in potable water can give up to a 1 log reduction but wash water becomes contaminated • Washing in water containing sanitiser can give a 1-2 log reduction (Beuchat 1998) • Attached microorganisms can be difficult to remove as there can be crevices, stomata, cut surfaces for attachment • Internalised organisms can’t be removed Choice of Disinfectant • Efficient against microorganisms on the produce surface • Removal of organisms from wash water • On line monitoring of its efficiency • No alteration of fresh produce quality • No residues and harmful by-products Chlorine • • • • Widely used in the UK Relatively cheap and easy to use Na and Ca hypochlorites most commonly used Must ensure system is optimised Chlorine chemistry 1. Sodium hypochlorite + water sodium hydroxide NaOCl +H20 NaOH +HOCl 2. Chlorine + water Cl2 + H20 hypochlorous acid + hypochlorous acid HOCl + HCl 3. Hypocholorous acid dissociates to hypochlorite ion HOCl H+ + OCl- Chlorine • The hypochlorite ion (OCl-) is less biocidal and has 1/80th germicidal activity of HOCl • Mode of action is not clearly elucidatedreactions with cell membrane proteins, cell metabolism, inhibition of enzymes • Important to maximize presence of HOCl • pH control is important pH control pH 5 6 7 8 9 10 % HOCl 100 97 78 23 4 0 % OCL0 3 22 77 96 100 Chlorine washing • <pH 4 chlorine in solution is chlorine gas • Sodium hypochlorite + water produces NaOH and therefore an alkaline pH • pH adjustment is therefore necessary to lower pH • pH usually adjusted to 7.0 - 7.5 (commonly by citric acid) • Lower pH’s will give more HOCl but may effect product quality and can be corrosive to equipment Chlorine washing • In wash water there will be free chlorine and combined chlorine • Free chlorine compounds are: hypochlorous acid (HOCl), hypochorite ion (OCl-),chlorine (gas) (Cl2) • Combined chlorine is formed when free chlorine reacts with organic nitrogen containing compounds (NHCl2, NH2Cl) • Combined chlorine is less effective as a disinfectant • Free and Combined Chlorine = Total Chlorine • Chlorine demand = chlorine lost to reaction with organic matter Log reduction (cfu/g) Log reduction with 100ppm chlorine Wash : 5 minutes, pH 7.0 1.3 Salmonella 1.2 Listeria 1.1 E.coli 1 Salmonella Listeria E.coli Other considerations • Agitation can enhance log reduction by increasing removal of bacteria • Temperature can be important if the produce is warm and the water cold uptake of the water can occur and therefore internalisation • If water is warmer than produce influx is reduced • Produce type can influence efficacy – melon can neutralise chlorine – some produce types are smoother (cabbage, tomatoes) Why we need alternatives to chlorine • Need a system which has less potential harmful bi-products but achieves a similar effect • New approaches which will increase the total level of decontamination • Novel techniques for specific targets e.g. pathogens • Chlorine not permitted for use with organic produce • Chlorine not permitted for use in some EU countries (Germany, Denmark) • Chlorate limits maybe introduced Chlorine Alternatives • Popular chlorine alternatives: – chlorine dioxide – Electrolysed water – Peracetic acid – Ozone – Organic acid based washes – Ultrasound – Combination treatments/sequential treatments review of decontamination methods Beuchat (1999: Surface decontamination of fruits and vegetables eaten raw: a review. WHO/FSF/FOS/98.2). Chlorine Dioxide • Not affected by pH and organic matter to the same extent as chlorine – pH range: 3.0-9.0 – can be unstable and require on-site generation however, stabilised (liquid) forms of chlorine dioxide are now commercially available • Oxidising power 2.5 times greater than chlorine • Similar efficacy to chlorine Mean Log reduction of bacteria from Iceberg and spinach after 3 washing for 1 min in 2 - 3 ppm Chlorine dioxide and 1 min in 20ppm free chlorine 2.5 2 Salmonella 2 1.5 Salmonella 3 1 Pseudomonas 1 0.5 Pseudomonas 3 0 -0.5 Lettuce Spinach Ozone • Lethal to micro-organisms at low concentrations • Strong oxidising agent – reactive, unstable, on-site generation – no residues in water, decomposes to oxygen – short half-life, less than 20 min. in water at 20oC – aqueous or gaseous – Need to consider employee exposure • Can be used to decontaminate wash water Mean Log reduction of bacteria from Spinach after washing 3.0 for 2 mins in 2ppm ozonated water log reduction log cfu 2.5 2.0 Salmonella 2 1.5 Salmonella 3 1.0 Pseudomonas 1 0.5 Pseudomonas 3 0.0 -0.5 Control Alginate lyase Organic Acids • Occur naturally in many fruits and vegetables – Acetic acid, citric acid, lactic acid • Do not generally kill micro-organisms • 6-log reduction of Yersinia on parsley with 2% acetic acid (Karapinar & Gonul, 1992) • Organic acid based products Citrox, Drywite and Anti-bac, Aqua-a- live permitted for use on organic produce Washing in organic acid for 2 mins Wash type 100ppm chlorine (50ppm after washing) Acetic acid Lactic acid Log reduction of S. Typhimurium (log cfu) 0.95 0.53 Log reduction of L. monocytogenes (log cfu) 0.71 0.89 1.55 1.59 1.33 1.27 1.34 1.19 0.87 0.99 UV light • • • • UV light has been studied Useful for decontaminating water Need to ensure the whole surface is exposed Campden BRI has UV tunnel which can be used in trials to decontaminate produce in particular soft fruits Electrolysed water • Salt and water are passed through and electrode and hypochlorous acid is produced • Literature suggests this could be a viable alternative to chlorine Other novel techniques • Other techniques include: – Cold plasma – In pack ozone treatments – Irradiation- studies in US have found this to be effective – Natural compounds (carrot extract, essential oils) – Hot water – Biocontrol – Combination treatments (e.g. hydrogen peroxide and heat, acid/alkali) Conclusions • Fresh produce is not sterile • Risks from pathogens need to be controlled during primary production, harvesting and processing • Decontamination procedures are the final control point in the chain as fresh produce is consumed without cooking • Current systems in general use have limitations and at best achieve a 2-log reduction in total microbial levels • New systems are needed which will increase the level of microbial reduction or specifically target pathogens to give some assurance of produce safety