Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
NORMATIVE THEORIES OF IR AIM EXAMINE THE NORMATIVE THEORIES GOVERNING THE CONDUCT OF IR DEFINE RULES AND NORMS Extrapolate the role of norms and institutions in IR Distinguish between communitarian and cosmopolitan approaches to norms and morals governing the conduct of IR Genesis of Normative theories in IR • Chief proponent Mervyn Frost(1994)—that IR as an academic discipline is normative itself • That Normative theories gained prominence in the post-cold war era becoz it was being overshadowed by the dominance of Realism and Idealism as key paradigms • Also that the fragmented nature of the international system as a result of the cold war made it difficult to come up with universal rules and norms governing IR • Normative theorists attempts to clarify basic moral issues and dilemmas of IR • Frost (1994) used the secular Hegelian Ethical theory and came up with a constitutive theory of individuality • In this theory, he coined what are called settled norms of the modern day IR theory and these are used to generate solutions to the hard cases of IR What are norms? • • • • • • • Does and don'ts in a given society or context They stem from Ethics which philosophically concerns issues of morality/moral judgments and the kind of justification which is attached to them We are talking about the right conduct in a particular circumstance In that case, Normative ethics concerns the rightness or wrongness or good or bad that expounds the system of moral values (Brown 1992). Normative theory is primarily about understanding fundamental values of international life, the moral dimensions of IR and the place of ethics in statecraft The idea is to address the moral dimensions of IR and the wider questions and debates generated by the discourse (Brown 1992) It focuses on the state-centric global practices in a wide context of liberty, distributive justice, sovereignty, violence, just war, human rights, humanitarian intervention, responsibility to protect etc Normative Issues confronting IR Today • • • • • Do human Rights override state autonomy? To what extent is state sovereignty more important than human rights? What is our responsibility for preserving human rights and justice? To what extent is environmental issues a global concern? Do gays and lesbians have rights? • Normative theory posits that actors in the praxis of IR do have alternatives and real choices and can always change their conduct • That international order can be changed in any specified way and that people ‘s normative ideas (norms, morals and principles) can shape the order in which they live (Frost 1996) • Normative debates in IR fall under the cosmopolitan and communitarian approaches and these attempt to delineate the ethical limitations of a state vis-à-vis issues of human rights, distributive justice, ethics of intervention, environmental issues etc • Acc to the communitarian approach, the autonomy of states is derived from their membership of a particular community • That the state as the only legal representative of a community has an absolute right to autonomy • • • • • • • In that case, individuals must submit and accept to live according to the limitations set by the highest authority, ie, the state. This is however rejected and challenged by the Cosmopolitan mindset which brings in a universal notion to normative matters in IR cosmopolitan approach; posits that all individuals are part of the humankind and are born with certain natural rights, which are applied equitably to everyone. Against this, they argue that the universal rights possessed by the individuals override the state autonomy of rights. Meaning that state autonomy can be limited to universal human rights Normatively, this addresses the question of human security vs state security Unlike the communitarians who claim that individuals do not exist autonomous to the community in which they are members, cosmopolitans advance the universal argument that human rights are possessed by individuals as autonomous moral agents, rather than as members of the community • • • • • • Cosmopolitans reiterate that rights are inviolable individual values and independent from any particular system of community Regarding intervention: communitarians adopt the settled norm of nonintervention as underpinning the international order. Belief is that a community has the right to develop its own social, political and economic systems and individuals can not dictate on such a system. As for Cosmopolitans: intervention is permissible or justified under certain conditions like protection of human rights and social justice On the distribution of justice: cosmopolitans argue for distributive justice and equality for all through social institutions Communitarians however; argue that justice can not be universalized (universal justice)---that justice claims are only limited to communities which construct social institutions not individuals