Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
January 11, 2013 31 January 2016 China, Challenges and Volatility Q&A on Emerging Markets SUMMARY • Emerging market underperformance stemmed from two main causes – the Fed rate hike and concerns on China. • Nonetheless, we remain optimistic about emerging markets, emerging markets have, in general, experienced strong historical growth trends and we consider many of the factors driving recent volatility to be temporary. • As we look forward, it is important to note that times of stress in financial markets can offer the largest upside potential in the medium term. Why did emerging markets underperform in 2015? In our view, there have been two main factors contributing to emerging markets’ performance over the past year: the anticipation of and lead up to the US Federal Reserve’s (Fed) interest rate hike and concern about slowing economic growth in China. Weakness in commodity prices and emerging market currencies also further pressured stock market performances in emerging markets. Historically, we have seen similar sharp market gyrations Mark Mobius, Ph.D. Executive Chairman Templeton Emerging Markets Group In terms of the impact of slowing growth in China, again we feel there has been unwarranted investor panic. While China’s equity market volatility and the government’s ineffectual attempt to intervene directly to support prices have dominated headlines this past summer, we remain confident that the government’s efforts to effect a broad economic rebalancing will succeed. While news of China’s market ups and downs makes for splashy headlines, we expect the impact of recent declines in mainland share indices to have limited impact on the broader economy due to the low level of household wealth allocated to (typically downward) in both emerging market currencies and equities in China (less than 20%, according to our research). As equities in advance of Fed tightening. However, during the household exposure to local equities is very low, we believe actual implementation of previous US rate-rising cycles, equities there would not be a profound wealth effect even if we saw a have been able to improve—illustrating our belief that markets market crash in China. tend to price in a worst-case scenario prior to the event. Looking at the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, the average one-year performance (in US dollars) following a Fed interest rate increase was 12.4%. The government is also systematically addressing the structural weaknesses in the economy—most notably concerning debt— with the mandated transfer of banks’ bad loans to asset management companies, higher non-performing loan While a series of continued and aggressive rate hikes would be provisioning at banks, and the development of local government bearish for emerging markets, given the first round of increases debt markets. Furthermore, while aggregate levels of debt are in December 2015, that scenario does not seem likely to us. US relatively high, given China’s level of economic development, multinational companies (and thus the broader US economy) the country also has a uniquely vast level of state assets, depend vastly more upon emerging market countries (most including foreign exchange reserves and state-owned notably Asia) for growth than they did during previous rate rise enterprises that provide balance. Continued rapid rises in cycles. Hence, a greater feedback mechanism exists now, wages and dramatic increases in the number of service jobs whereby declines in emerging market growth and currencies (typically in the private sector) in our view also help counter the have a far larger direct impact upon US economic growth and, housing slowdown and manufacturing job losses. The increased in turn, influence the freedom of the Fed to raise rates. We also flexibility in the renminbi represents another welcome move must not forget that other central banks outside the United towards financial market liberalisation. States have been adding liquidity via Quantitative Easing (QE) or interest rate cuts, including Europe, Japan and China. The value of investments may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the full amount invested How optimistic are you that these problems can be overcome in the foreseeable future – and that investors will return to emerging markets? We acknowledge that 2015 – and the beginning of 2016 – has been a challenging time for investors in emerging markets. Nonetheless, we remain optimistic about emerging markets, as we consider many of the factors driving recent volatility to be temporary. We believe it is important to remember that emerging markets have, in general, consistently experienced stronger growth trends than developed markets. Even with major economies such as Russia and Brazil in recession, emerging markets’ growth in 2016 is expected to be 4.3%, more than twice the rate of the 2.1% growth projected for developed markets. Though investors have been concerned with China’s growth rate slowing down (from approximately 10% in 2010 to a projected 6% in 2016), China remains one of the fastest-growing countries in the world. Investors should also keep in mind that the size of China’s economy has grown tremendously in US dollar terms from that of a few years ago, when growth rates were stronger with a smaller base. Furthermore, the fundamentals of emerging markets have significantly improved over the last decade. For example, foreign currency reserves in emerging markets have steadily risen, and emerging markets have, in general, much lower levels of public debt in relation to Gross Domestic Product (GDP). In spite of recent weakness, emerging markets still make up over half of global GDP. It is also important to note that in times of stress, financial markets can offer the largest upside potential in the medium term. As investors in emerging markets, our primary focus is on the underlying business models and fundamentals of the individual companies we invest in, more so than broader macro views. Are you concerned about the Chinese economy? We don’t believe that the Chinese economy has in any way deteriorated meaningfully in recent months. The recent turmoil in equity markets, as we see it, is more the result of a reaction to US Federal Reserve’s interest rate increase and uncertainties regarding the People’s Bank of China’s (PBOC’s) foreign exchange policy. The market has lost confidence in the Chinese yuan, with some speculating that it may depreciate significantly within a short period of time. We are of the opinion that the yuan may depreciate moderately against the US dollar, adjusting the over valuation of the yuan against other currencies. One of the key reasons supporting this thesis is China’s healthy current account balance and trade surplus, which is also being supported by low commodity prices. Corporate and household liabilities in foreign currencies are low, thus there should be minimum knock-on effects should the yuan continue to which depreciate. Moreover, foreign holdings of domestic assets are not high. It is natural to see some outflows as the Chinese government allow “free-er” capital flow and the domestic economy weakens, structurally, leading to some depletion in China’s foreign reserves. However, we do not expect this situation to be sustained over the longer term. Moreover, even with the recent reduction, China’s reserves remain in excess of US$3 trillion and are the largest globally. China’s economy remains in a structural transition. Our recent trip to some second- and third-tier cities gave us the impression that the service sector (e.g. tourist and culture-related industries) were growing robustly. Although we noted that infrastructure and property investment had slowed down due to more stringent approval process and the still high property inventory, we believe that this could improve gradually in 2016 as financing available to local governments has improved after the recent government debt swap and that the construction and sale of new properties may pick up once the government is able to destock, as planned. Recent market corrections have provided long term investors with an attractive investment opportunity as markets, especially overseas Chinese stocks listed in Hong Kong, are traded at historically low price to earnings multiples. While the yuan depreciation may adversely impact earnings growth in US dollar terms, it will benefit the Chinese economy by supporting China’s exports and the overall economy. Furthermore, the lower liquidity may also allow the PBOC to further cut interest rates and/or reduce reserve requirement ratios for commercial banks. In terms of sectors, we are still cautious about selective financial stocks such as brokers and second-tier banks, which have more direct exposure to the domestic “A” share markets. We continue to see consumption as a good investment theme. We are also searching for opportunities in sectors where consolidation is leading to healthier industry dynamics. How concerned are you about the risk of contagion effect from China, and the impact volatility may have on other Asian markets? We are not concerned about the risk of contagion from China on other Asian markets because that volatility is already discounted by the market to a great extent. The fact that China’s economic growth rate is decelerating is already well-known. The fact that there has been very high volatility in China’s stock market is also well-known. These factors have already had an impact on markets worldwide including that of Asia and the US. However, there are many other factors impacting markets worldwide, including the interest rate picture in the US. Of course, actions by the regulatory authorities in China to restrict selling have created even more uncertainty which is probably the most important factor we should consider. Emerging Markets Monthly Commentary 2 What do you think will be the biggest potential challenge for markets in 2016? The biggest potential challenge has to do with confidence. With the volatility experienced in recent years, particularly in emerging markets, investors are fearful and thus are reluctant to invest, seeking solace and presumed safety in US dollar cash. Often emerging markets bear the brunt of this “flight to safety” on these occasions. While heightened market volatility can be unsettling, we aim to look beyond the short term to find and invest in well-managed growth leaders at what we believe are attractive valuations. As we look forward, it is important to note that times of stress in financial markets can offer the largest upside potential in the medium term. At the end of January, emerging markets appeared undervalued versus developed markets, based on price-to-earnings and price-to- Investments entail risks. The value of investments and any income received from them can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Past performance is not an indicator, nor a guarantee of future performance. Currency fluctuations may affect the value of overseas investments. When investing in a fund denominated in a foreign currency, performance may also be affected by currency fluctuations. In emerging markets, the risks can be greater than in developed markets. Any research and analysis contained in this document has been procured by Franklin Templeton Investments for its own purposes and is provided to you only incidentally. Franklin Templeton Investments shall not be liable to any user of this document or to any other person or entity for the inaccuracy of information or any errors or omissions in its contents, regardless of the cause of such inaccuracy, error or omission. book ratios. Important Legal Information This document is intended to be of general interest only and does not constitute legal or tax advice nor is it an offer for shares or invitation to apply for shares of any of Franklin Templeton Investments’ fund ranges. Nothing in this document should be construed as investment advice. Franklin Templeton Investments has exercised professional care and diligence in the collection of information in this document. However, data from third party sources may have been used in its preparation and Franklin Templeton Investments has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. Opinions expressed are the author’s at the publication date and they are subject to change without prior notice. Given the rapidly changing market environment, Franklin Templeton Investments disclaim responsibility for updating this material. All MSCI data is provided “as is.” The portfolio described herein is not sponsored or endorsed by MSCI. In no event shall MSCI, its affiliates or any MSCI data provider have any liability of any kind in connection with the MSCI data or the portfolio described herein. Copying or redistributing the MSCI data is strictly prohibited. For more information about any Franklin Templeton Investments’ fund, UK investors should contact: Franklin Templeton Investments, Telephone: 0800 305 306, Email: [email protected] or write to us at the address below. Alternatively, the information can be downloaded from our website www.franklintempleton.co.uk. Issued by Franklin Templeton Investment Management Limited (FTIML) Registered office: Cannon Place, 78 Cannon Street, London EC4N 6HL. FTIML is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Franklin Templeton Investment Management Limited Cannon Place 78 Cannon Street London EC4N 6HL 0800 305 306 [email protected] franklintempleton.co.uk 02/16 Copyright © 2016 Franklin Templeton Investments. All rights reserved.