Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 2nd European Orthodontic Teachers Forum 2nd European Orthodontic
Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
EOS initiative 2006 2nd European Orthodontic Teachers Forum to invite and bring together representatives from European universities with specialty programs p g in orthodontics,, based to a large g extent on the Erasmus Program 48 participants from 21 countries in Vienna Berlin, June 20, 2007 Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman S W O T ANALYSIS of orthodontic teaching in Europe STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES internal OPPORTUNITIES THREATS external Main conclusions from SWOT 2006 Erasmus still a good base, but needs updating Too much diversity in length, length contents and structure of existing programs within the EU and lack of quality control EOS, EFOSA and ADEE can possibly help Teachers Network is a necessity TASK FORCE 1 Main conclusions from SWOT 2006 Lack of academic teachers More collaboration between programs needed Common courses Use of modern communication possibilities through internet, like tele-teaching and Blackboard 2nd European Orthodontic Teachers Forum Program for today TASK FORCE 2 1 Program of the day – first part Program of the day – second part Introduction Minutes of the Vienna meeting 2006 Taskforce 1 progress Taskforce 2 progress Internet collaboration using Blackboard Breakout groups: Question 1 Question 2 Presentation of the results of the different groups Conclusions and future follow-up 10.40 – 11.00 Break 12.45 Lunch offered by EOS Questions to be discussed 2nd European Orthodontic Teachers Forum Breakout groups QUESTIONS Functioning of the Network How can somebody become a member? How can the criteria be implemented? What is the controlling body? Role of the Network Role of the Network towards postgraduate training in Europe 2
