Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Novel Oral Anticoagulants Fawaz Altuwaijri ACEM trainee Introduction Characteristics of novel anticoagulants Laboratory Testing Reversal in the bleeding patient Introduction Prevalence atrial fibrillation 3.03 million in 2005 7.56 million by 2050 VTE = 900K/yr in US 1-2% of adults take warfarin WARFARINWisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Coumarin 1920s – Outbreak hemorrhagic disease in cattle in northern US and Canada 1933 – Isolated by Karl Link 1948 – Rodenticde 1954 – Approved in humans Warfarin Disadvantages Bridging Drug and food interactions Long half-life Close monitoring required Why New Anticoagulants Rapid onset/shorter half-life Fewer drug and no food interactions No lab monitoring Equivalent to warfarin Prevention of stroke, VTE Bleeding rates Also known as Target specific Oral Anticoagulant – TSOAC. New Anticoagulant Disadvantages Limited experience treating bleeding No proven reversal agent No monitoring New Anticoagulants Direct Thrombin (Factor IIa) inhibitor Dabigatran (Pradaxa®) Selective, direct, factor Xa inhibitors Rivaroxaban (Xarelto®) Apixaban (Eliquis®) Dabigatran Indications: FDA approved • Stroke prevention in non-valvular afib Under FDA review • VTE prophylaxis in hip or knee replacement • Approved in Europe/Canada Dabigatran Mechanism: • Direct Thrombin (Factor IIa) inhibitor • Blocks conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin Dabigatran Pharmacology: Dabigatran etexilate = inactive pro-drug Rapidly absorbed Active form binds active site of thrombin Inhibits free and clot-bound thrombin Dabigatran Pharmacokinetics: Rapid onset Peak plasma level at 2 hours Half-life 14-17 hours No food interactions, few drug interactions No need for routine monitoring or dose adjustment Dabigatran Metabolism: 85% excreted via the kidneys Use caution with renal dysfunction Low protein binding (dialyzable) FACTOR Xa INHIBITORS Indications: Rivaroxaban/Apixaban Stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fib Rivaroxaban only VTE prophylaxis post-joint replacement DVT/PE prophylaxis and treatment FACTOR Xa INHIBITORS Mechanism: Selective, direct, factor Xa inhibitors FACTOR Xa INHIBITORS Pharmacology: Highly protein bound Not easily dialyzed Few drug interactions FACTOR Xa INHIBITORS Pharmacokinetics: Rapid onset Predictable Not affected by age, sex, body weight Fixed dose Peak at 2 – 3h Half life 7-14h Metabolism: Rivaroxaban Excretion 2/3rd renal 1/3rd liver Dose adjusted for reduced CrCl Apixaban Excretion 2/3rd liver, biliary 1/3rd renal Laboratory testing NOAC do not require monitoring when used for thromboprophylaxis or for therapeutic anticoagulation. The anticoagulant effect of NOAC should be measured in the following clinical situations: Bleeding Change in clinical scenario: urgent surgery, renal failure Laboratory testing Recommended Assays in the presence of bleeding: Since specific assays for quantitation of drug levels may not be available in many laboratories, routine coagulation assays may be utilized to provide qualitative information about the presence of some NOACs. Laboratory testing Dabigatran: The TT is the most sensitive routine coagulation assay for determining if any dabigatran is present. A normal aPTT suggests that it is unlikely that a high level of dabigatran is contributing to bleeding A normal TT excludes the presence of dabigatran Rivaroxaban: The PT (INR) is the most sensitive routine coagulation assay for detecting rivaroxaban. A normal PT/INR value suggests that the rivaroxaban level is not high, but does not exclude its presence. As with the low molecular weight heparins (LMWH), the APTT and PT cannot estimate the intensity of the anticoagulant effect. Rivaroxaban does not prolong the TT. Apixaban: There are limited data available for apixaban. A normal PT and APTT does not rule out significant anticoagulant effect The drug specific anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay is necessary to estimate accurately the anticoagulant effect of apixaban. NOACs Reversal Randomized trial data to support this practice are lacking. Based on clinical experience and data from case series There are no specific antidotes or reversal agents for NOACs Available strategies for reversing the anticoagulant effect of NOACs: Drug discontinuation. Drug removal from the circulation and/or gastrointestinal tract. Pro-hemostatic therapies such as antifibrinolytic agents. Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs), which may be prothrombotic. Abnormal coagulation testing is consistent with the presence of continued NOAC effect, but normal testing does not necessarily eliminate the possibility of clinically important concentrations of these agents. Therefore, the results of coagulation tests, or their trends over time, do not meaningfully inform reversal of NOACassociated bleeding. Management is based on the patient's presentation and change in their status over time rather than on the results of coagulation testing in most cases General principles in management of patients bleeding while receiving NOAC Drug discontinuation: Anticoagulant should be ceased at least temporarily in all patients presenting with significant bleeding. The timing of recommencement will be influenced by the severity of the bleeding event, the presence of ongoing risk factors for bleeding Baseline laboratory assessment: Haemoglobin- assess bleed severity Standard coagulation testing Creatinine level; allow prediction of the expected rate of anticoagulant drug clearance. General supportive care measures: Surgical and radiological procedures to identify the source of bleeding and to limit ongoing bleeding should be performed as appropriate, taking into account the risk of procedurerelated bleeding in an anticoagulated patient. Adequate hydration to enhance renal clearance RBC’s and platelets as indicated. Activated charcoal: within 2 h of the last oral dose of NOAC. Administration of haemostatic agents: Current evidence on the use of pro-haemostatic agents is limited and conflicting. aPCC (FEIBA) and four-factor PCC have been shown to reduce bleeding in animal models with variable effect on coagulation parameters in animals, healthy volunteers, with recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) demonstrating a less consistent effect. Due to the limited data supporting efficacy and potential for thrombotic complications, use of these prohaemostatic agents should be restricted to patients with life-threatening bleeding unable to be managed with supportive measures alone. PCC have been demonstrated to be able to reverse the laboratory anticoagulant effect of rivaroxaban, but in a small series appeared ineffective in patients with bleeding on dabigatran. In Australia and New Zealand, only three-factor PCC (Prothrombinex-VF) is available and its efficacy in the new anticoagulant drugs has not been evaluated. Did not recommend the use of rFVIIa, based on less consistent data on its ability to reverse anticoagulant effect, and its association with risk of thrombosis when used outside patients with haemophilia. Dialysis: patients receiving dabigatran with life-threatening bleeding,particularly if renal function is impaired or dabigatran is present in excess (APTT > 80 s or dabigatran level >500 ng/mL). 62% in 2 hours, 68% in 4hours. (6 healthy volunteers) There is no role for dialysis in factor X inhibitors related bleeding. Tran et al, New oral anticoagulants: a practical guide,IMJ 44 (2014) UpToDate Charcol: Dabigatran 2hr, Rivaroxaban 8 hr, Apixaban 6hr. Antifibrinolytic agents including tranexamic acid and aminocaproic acid can be used for severe bleeding. Recommended PCC’s for both dabigatran and rivaroxaban in “ imminent risk of death” bleeding. New oral anticoagulants: An emergency department overview, Emergency Medicine Australasia (2013) 25, 503–514 New oral anticoagulants: An emergency department overview, Emergency Medicine Australasia (2013) 25, 503–514 RAH Dabigatran Guidlines Thank you