Download Coupling Capacitors (Updated 5-15

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Spectrum analyzer wikipedia , lookup

Time-to-digital converter wikipedia , lookup

Test probe wikipedia , lookup

405-line television system wikipedia , lookup

Mechanical filter wikipedia , lookup

Power dividers and directional couplers wikipedia , lookup

Analog-to-digital converter wikipedia , lookup

Cellular repeater wikipedia , lookup

Amateur radio repeater wikipedia , lookup

Regenerative circuit wikipedia , lookup

Mathematics of radio engineering wikipedia , lookup

Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Analog television wikipedia , lookup

Zobel network wikipedia , lookup

Battle of the Beams wikipedia , lookup

Over-the-horizon radar wikipedia , lookup

Audio crossover wikipedia , lookup

RLC circuit wikipedia , lookup

Oscilloscope history wikipedia , lookup

Distributed element filter wikipedia , lookup

Phase-locked loop wikipedia , lookup

FM broadcasting wikipedia , lookup

Equalization (audio) wikipedia , lookup

Valve RF amplifier wikipedia , lookup

Superheterodyne receiver wikipedia , lookup

HD-MAC wikipedia , lookup

Radio transmitter design wikipedia , lookup

Index of electronics articles wikipedia , lookup

Heterodyne wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Coupling Capacitors
5/15/2001
Coupling Capacitors
1 AC Coupling
1
AC Coupled signals pass through a classic RC high-pass filter as shown in Figure 1. Some
amount of signal degradation also occurs, as shown. The time constant of the RC filter determines
the amount of ‘decay’ in the signal. A design target may be that the maximum signal decay be
10% for a given frequency of operation. The value of R is usually constrained by the construction
of the printed circuit board which has a characteristic impedance. The value of R is picked to
match this impedance, and it will usually be somewhere near 50 ohms, which is assumed here.
This leaves us with the value of C which can be chosen to minimize signal degradation for an
expected operational frequency f.
Input
C
Input
Output
Time = 1/f
R
Output
90%
10% decay
time
Figure 1: High pass filter defined by AC coupling capacitor and termination resistor.
2 Scalability: Capacitor Size Versus Frequency
The chart shown in Figure 2 shows signal decay versus time normalized into time constants.
(Note the semi-log scale.) After one time constant, only about 37% of the original signal remains.
To achieve the goal of 10% maximum degradation, we need a time constant of 0.1 from the chart.
From Figure 1 again, we see we need to assure this degradation occurs within a half-cycle of
frequency f, so we have RC * 0.1 = 1/(2*f) which can be solved: C = 5 / (f *R). Thus for a given
frequency f (and R = 50) we can calculate the required minimum capacitance needed to assure at
most a 10% degradation of signal. This relation is shown in the chart in Figure 3 which is plotted
with logarithmic scales on both axes.
The frequency range for f runs three decades from 10 MHz to 10 GHz. Capacitance varies
over four decades from 10 to 10,000 picofarads. The 10 MHz value is in the range of clock
frequencies used by Boundary-Scan ATE equipment. When Boundary-Scan is executing, we
1
We are considering test waveforms transmitted on a high frequency path, that are square waves with frequency f. Data
waveforms may contain a limited number of contiguous 0s or 1s that are rectangular. Data may be transmitted at GHz
rates while testing may be conducted more slowly. The widest part of a data rectangle may have a period similar to a
test waveform. While f may be lower than the data rate, degradation considerations could be similar.
Ken Parker
1 of 2
Coupling Capacitors
5/15/2001
could expect to see TCK-based square waves in the 10 MHz range for capable ATE. This would
require 10,000 pF coupling capacitors. As we scale mission frequencies higher, we can use
smaller capacitors, which could be integrated into IC packages or even onto silicon. However,
test frequencies will need to scale to support this. For example, a 500 pF capacitance would
support a 200 MHz test frequency.
Signal Decay vs Time Constant
Decay
1
0.1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1 .6
1.8
2
Tim e C o n s t a n t
Figure 2: Decay of capacitor charged by a step function, versus time measured in time constants.
Capacitance to m a intain 0.1 Tim e C o n s t a n t
vs Frequency
Capacitance (pF)
10000
1000
100
10
10
100
1000
Freq (MHz)
Figure 3: Minimum capacitance needed to assure =10% decay versus frequency.
Ken Parker
2 of 2
10000