Download Cats and collars: reducing predation rates 49

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

History of wildlife tracking technology wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
49
Cats and collars:
reducing predation rates
There are an estimated 9 million
David Kjaer (rspb-images.com)
domestic cats in the UK. Whilst not
all cats hunt, there is little doubt
that cats kill a very large number of
birds. Whether this represents
additional mortality over and above
that due to other causes is unclear,
and it is impossible to say whether
cat predation has affected
population levels of any species.
Estimates of bird kill rates are
sufficiently high, however, to
suggest that we should adopt the
precautionary principle and look for
ways to reduce predation.
In summer 2003, the RSPB ran an
experiment among its members to test
whether collar-mounted warning
devices reduced predation rates.
Volunteer owners of cats known to
hunt were given three quick-release
collars; one plain, one fitted with a bell,
and one fitted with an electronic
device which emitted an audible bleep
every seven seconds (‘CatAlertTM’).
Owners were asked to fit their cat
with each collar in a
pre-determined random order for a
one-month period. Over the three
months of the trial, they recorded the
prey returned by the cat.
Collar-mounted devices were
successful at reducing predation rates.
Bells reduced total prey returned by
31%, mammals by 34% and birds by
42%. Cat Alert reduced total prey
returned by 42%, mammals by 38%
and birds by 51%. Although there
was no significant difference in the
efficacy of a bell or the sonic device,
further research and development
could usefully be undertaken to see
50
Mean (+/- 1 se) prey return rates per cat for a one-month period by
device type for all prey (top), birds (mid) and mammals (bottom).
No prey cat per month
5
4
3
2
1
0
Plain
Bell
Sonic
Sonic device (CatAlert™) on a
quick-release collar.
No birds per cat per month
2
whether the effectiveness of sonic
1.5
devices could be improved.
It would appear that attaching a
1
warning device to the collar of cats
prone to kill offers a partial
management solution to reduce
0.5
predation rates on birds. It is essential
that any collar be designed with a
0
No mammals per cat per month
Plain
Bell
Sonic
2
quick-release catch to allow the cat to
escape in the event of it snagging.
Contact:
[email protected]
1.5
The study was overseen by a
steering group, including the RSPCA
and the Feline Advisory Bureau to
1
ensure cat welfare was not affected.
The study was supported by a grant
0.5
from The Wildlife Trusts.
Nelson SH, Evans AD and Bradbury
0
Plain
Bell
Sonic
RB (2005) The efficacy of collarmounted devices in reducing the rate
of predation of wildlife by domestic
cats. Applied Animal Behaviour
Science 94: 273–285.