Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The role of genetics in diagnosis and treatment of mood disorders Alessandro Serretti, MD, PhD Institute of Psychiatry University of Bologna Italy Genetics of mood disorders Is genetics important for MD? Is genetics useful for MD diagnosys? Is genetics important for MD treatment? Is genetics useful for MD treatment? Genetics of mood disorders Is genetics important for MD? Is genetics useful for MD diagnosys? Is genetics important for MD treatment? Is genetics useful for MD treatment? Morbid Risk in Bipolar Disorder % 70 62 60 50 40 30 20 8 10 8 2 1 0 MZ DZ First degree Second degree General Population Morbid Risk in Major Depressive Disorder % 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 40 11 9 5 MZ DZ First degree General Population Genetics of mood disorders Is genetics important for MD? Yes Is genetics useful for MD diagnosys? Is genetics important for MD treatment? Is genetics useful for MD treatment? Genetics of mood disorders Is genetics important for MD? Yes Is genetics useful for MD diagnosys? Is genetics important for MD treatment? Is genetics useful for MD treatment? % 70 62 60 50 40 30 20 8 10 8 2 1 0 MZ DZ First degree Second degree ? General Population ? Genetics of mood disorders Is genetics important for MD? Yes Is genetics useful for MD diagnosys? Not as we may think! Plasticity Is genetics important for MD treatment? Is genetics useful for MD treatment? Genetics of mood disorders Is genetics important for MD? Yes Is genetics useful for MD diagnosys? Not as we may think! Plasticity Is genetics important for MD treatment? Is genetics useful for MD treatment? TODAY…. trials and errors diagnosis effective treatment TODAY…. trials and errors diagnosis TOMORROW…. tailor made effective treatment Genetic Variation Unrelated individuals are (only) 99% genetically similar. There is about a 7 million bp difference between any two non-related individuals. Plus CNVs, epigenetics, expression controls… This explains interindividual variability Hair color, weight and …. disease liability, drug response. Pharmacogenetic studies (Medline 1992-2008) 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 19 92 19 94 19 96 19 98 20 00 20 02 20 04 20 06 0 Number of studies VARIATIONS IN DRUG RESPONSE GENE DRUG EFFECT ß2-ADREN. ALBUTEROL Asthma response CETP PRAVASTATIN Atherosclerosis resp. D2, D3, 5HT2 ANTIPSYCHOTICS Response-Side eff. APOE4 TACRINE Alzheimer resp. RYANODINE HALOTHANE Malignant hyperthermia PROTHROMBIN CONTRACEPTIVES Thrombosis NET ATOMOXETINE Response (Ramoz 2009) Her2/neu TRASTUZUMAB Efficacy/Tolerance GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS Pharmacokinetic •Transporters •Plasma protein binding •Metabolism Pharmacodynamic •Receptors •Ion channels •Enzymes •Immune molecules Genes investigated in the short term HTTLPR SERT-STin2 5HT1A C-1019G 5-HT1B 5HT2A T102C 5HT2A G1438A 5HT2C 5HT6 C267T TPH A218C TPH2 NET T-182C NET G1287A COMT MAOA DRD2 S311C DRD4 VNTR ACE I/D polymorphism G-protein beta3 C825T ADRB1 G1165C CRHR1 NOS C276T IL-1beta C511T DTNBP1 FKBP5 CLOCK MDNF DTNBP1 nNOS IL-1beta APOE MDR1P-gp A-161T REGULATORY VARIANT OF 5-HT TRANSPORTER A functional polymorphism in the transcriptional control region upstream of the 5-HTT coding sequence (5-HTTLPR) has been reported (Heils et al., 1996). H A M DD E C R E A S ED U R IN GFLU V O X A M IN ETR E A TM E N T 5-H TTLP Rvariantsinpsychoticandnonpsychoticsubjects 35 30 25 P <0.001 HAMDSCORE 20 15 10 5 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 H TT s/s H TT l/s H TT l/l TIM E 5-HTTLPR variants explained 7% of the variance of antidepressant efficacy HTTLPR - Conclusions • HTTLPR l variant associated with better outcome and side effects in caucasians, conflicting in asians (“flip-flop” Lin, 2007) • Possibly through a complex and indirect effect • Multiple effects both in normals and patients (Serretti, 2006) • Further variants control its effects HTTLPR - Conclusions • HTTLPR l variant associated with better outcome in caucasians • Possibly through a complex and indirect effect • Multiple effects both in normals and patients (Serretti, 2006) • Further variants control its effects HTTLPR - Conclusions 5-HTTLPR variations…… Broad influence of a single gene on a range of aspects Poor serotonin pathway plasticity Stress reactivity Anatomical change Temperament Response to antidepressants Mood disorders Harro J (2009): The brain prepared to become anxious: predisposing neurobiology in animals and humans. Eur. Neuropsychopharm. 19:S113. HTTLPR - Conclusions • HTTLPR l variant associated with better outcome in caucasians • Possibly through a complex and indirect effect • Multiple effects both in normals and patients (Serretti et al., Curr Drug Targ, 2006) • Further variants control its effects Types of 16th repeat (*l) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 16-A 16-D tgcacccccagcatcccccc tgcacccccggcatcccccc 16-F tgcactcccagcatcccccc Nakamura, 2000; Goldman, 2004 Studies with at least two independent replications FKBP5 (Binder et al., 2004) (Tsai et al., 2007) (van Rossum et al., 2006) (Papiol et al., 2007) (Lekman et al., 2008) (Kirchheiner et al., 2008) FKBP5 FKBP5 NR3Cl ER22/23EK FKBP5 rs1360780 FKBP5 rs4713916 FKBP5 rs3800373 Assoc. with resp. in 2 indep. samples No association Associated with response trend with response (p=0.09) Assoc with remission and rs1360780 associated with response (venlafaxine and drug combination) BDNF Studies with at least two independent replications Dysbindin Studies with at least two independent replications Dysbindin associated with SSRI antidepressant efficacy Dysbindin associated with SSRI antidepressant efficacy DTNBP1 haplotype analysis for rs2005976, rs760761 and rs2619522, on final MADRS covariated for baseline scores (haplotypes frequency>1%) P=0.0073. DYSBINDIN GENE (DTNBP1) IN mood disorders: ASSOCIATION WITH CLINICAL RESPONSE TO SSRIs Arias, B; Serretti, A; Mandelli, L; Gastó, C; Catalán, R; Di Ronchi, D; Fañanás, L. Pharmacogenet Genomics, In Press Two-way repeated measures ANOVA for rs760761 30 HDRS scores 25 CC CT TT 20 15 10 5 0 0 4 8 Weeks 12 Studies with at least two independent replications P-glycoprotein - MDR1 MDR1 GRIK4 (Paddock, 2007) GRIK4 rs1954787 assoc. with remiss. p=.001 (Gau, 2007) p75 NTR S250L assoc. with response p=.039 Genes investigated in the short term of SSRI HTTLPR Different target COMT SERT-STin2 MAOA Different Plasticity 5HT1A C-1019G DRD2 S311C 5-HT1B DRD4 VNTR 5HT2A T102C Different SSRI availability inpolymorphism the brain 5HT2A G1438A ACE I/D 5HT2C G-protein beta3 C825T Glutamate modulation 5HT6 C267T ADRB1 G1165C TPH1 A218C TPH2 CRHR1 NOS C276T NET T-182C IL-1beta C511T NET G1287A FKBP5 CLOCK MDNF DTNBP1 nNOS IL-1beta APOE MDR1P-gp GRIK4 Some gene variants influence antidepressant effects But… Is antidepressant a unitary effect? And… Do genes influence only one behavioral feature? CLOCK 3111T/C Broad influence of a single gene on a range of aspects Insomnia Diurnal Preference Response to antidepressants Temperament Mood fluctuations Genetics of mood disorders Is genetics important for MD? Yes Is genetics useful for MD diagnosys? Not as we may think! Plasticity Is genetics important for MD treatment? Yes Is genetics useful for MD treatment? Genetics of mood disorders Is genetics important for MD? Yes Is genetics useful for MD diagnosys? Not as we may think! Plasticity Is genetics important for MD treatment? Yes Is genetics useful for MD treatment? Yes, but in a complex way Some gene variants influence antidepressant effects and other features Can we use them in everyday clinical practice? NO NOT YET Pharmacogenetics: problematic issues…and possible solutions • • • Low variance explained by polymorphisms (HTTLPR=2.8%, TPH=2.7%, Gß3=1.2%) Other variables influence drug response: Life events, social support, temperament, hormons…and should be included in the model! Neural Network? Epigenetic factors, CNV, Splicing, Regional expression, gene interactions…should be controlled with multivariate or neural network models. Drug response may differ across episodes…longer follow up Would be the puzzle the actual image of reality? Principal Collaborating Centers Kansai Medical University, Japan Athens University, Greece Prof. Toshihiko Kinoshita Masaki Kato MD Prof. Yoannis Liappas Antonis Politis MD Petros Malitas MD The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, South Korea Prof. Chi-Un Pae University of Toronto, Canada Prof. Jim Kennedy Daniel Muller MD Universitat de Barcelona, Spain Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany Prof. Lourdes Fananas Barbara Arias PhD Univerza V Ljubljani - University Of Ljubljana, Slovenia Prof. Vita Dolzan Prof. Dan Rujescu Ina Giegling PsyD Psychiatric Genetic Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Bologna, Italy Alberto Chiesa MD Diana De Ronchi MD PhD Alessandro Serretti MD PhD Laura Mandelli PsyD Martina Forlani Antonio Drago MD Raffaella Calati PsyD, PhD Sara Gibiino